|
|---|
Category:Legal-Exhibit
MONTHYEARIR 05000413/20083012009-02-0505 February 2009
Official Exhibit - CCS-118-00-BD01 - Catawba Nuclear Station NRC Operator License Examination Report 05000413-08-301 and 05000414-08-301
ML0513600792005-02-17017 February 2005
Security Exhibit List for Hearing Held from January 11 to January 14, 2005
ML0506702592005-01-13013 January 2005
Catawba Hearing - Staff Exhibit (SEC-28), Attachment 1. Resumes of Sherri L. Cross, Albert G. Garrett, Michael R. Burrell, R. John Vanden Berghe, John Brian Mckirgan, and William Troskoski
ML0506702552005-01-13013 January 2005
Catawba Hearing - Intervenor Exhibit 8 (SEC-13), IAEA Safeguards Glossary 2001 Edition. International Nuclear Verification Series No.3
ML0506702152005-01-13013 January 2005
Catawba Hearing - Staff Exhibit 8 (SEC-24), the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities
ML0506701562005-01-13013 January 2005
Catawba Hearing - Staff Exhibit 7 (SEC-23), Technical Reports Series No.415, Status and Advances in MOX Fuel Technology
ML0506701442005-01-13013 January 2005
Catawba Hearing - Intervener Exhibit 14 (SEC-19), Doe'S Involvement in Negotiations on the Question of Whether to Revise the Convention on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material
ML0506701062005-01-13013 January 2005
Catawba Hearing - Intervenor Exhibit 5 (SEC-10), NUREG/CR-1378, Rev 1, Hardening Existing Strategic Special Nuclear Material Storage Facilities
ML0506701042005-01-13013 January 2005
Catawba Hearing - Intervenor Exhibit 1 (SEC-9), Curriculum Vitae of Edwin Stuart Lyman
ML0506700932005-01-11011 January 2005
Catawba Hearing - Applicant Exhibit 4 (SEC-4), Resume of Howard B. Williams
ML0506700862005-01-11011 January 2005
Catawba Hearing - Applicant Exhibit 1 (SEC-1), Steven P. Nesbit Statement of Professional Qualifications - Rec'D 01/11/05
ML0506700892005-01-11011 January 2005
Catawba Hearing - Applicant Exhibit 2 (SEC-2), Resume of Glenn A. (Skip) Copp, III
ML0506700902005-01-11011 January 2005
Catawba Hearing - Applicant Exhibit 3 (SEC-3), Resume of William Thomas Byers, III
ML0506700982005-01-11011 January 2005
Catawba Hearing - Applicant Exhibit 5 (SEC-5), Resume of Rita A. Edwards
ML0506701012005-01-11011 January 2005
Catawba Hearing - Applicant Exhibit 14 (SEC-7), Diagram of FS-65 Transportation Package, Cross-Section
ML0506701132005-01-11011 January 2005
Catawba Hearing - Applicant Exhibit 15 (SEC-8), Duke Energy Corp. Administrative Change to Facility Operating Licenses in Conjunction with the Commission Order EA-03-088 Re Revised Design Basis Threat and Revisions to Safeguards.
ML0506702622005-01-0909 January 2005
Catawba Hearing - Intervenor Exhibit 22 (SEC-A), the Big Gun, Broadcast on CBS Tv Show 60 Minutes
ML0503801632004-12-31031 December 2004
R. Nevin Staff Exhibit 6, Nirs/Pc EC-7: Duke Power, About Us Nuclear Power Plants, 2004, Available at Http://Www,Dukepower.Com/Aboutus/Plants/Nuclear
ML0422603132004-07-16016 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/15/04 - Intervenor Exhibit 52, Y. Yan, Et Al., LOCA Results for Advanced-Alloy and High-Burnup Zircaloy Cladding - Rec'D 07/15/04
ML0422603652004-07-15015 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/15/04 - Applicant Exhibit D, E. H. Karb, Et Al., Results of the FR2 In-Pile Tests on LWR Fuel Rod Behavior - Identified 07/15/04
ML0422603062004-07-15015 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/15/04 - Intervenor Exhibit 51, J. Papin, Et Al., Synthesis of CABRI-RIA Tests Interpretation - Rec'D 07/15/04
ML0422600822004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 19 - Figure 14, Figure M5 Rupture Strain Versus Rupture Temperature Slow Ramp Rate - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422602282004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Staff Exhibit 3 (Official Exhibit #40), Excerpt from Y. Yan, Et Al. Slide Presentation of LOCA Test Results for High-Burnup BWR Fuel and Cladding - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422602212004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Staff Exhibit (Official Exhibit #37), Professional Qualifications Statements of Undine Shoop, Ralph R. Landry, and Ralph O. Meyer - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600432004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 10 - Figure 5, Thermal Conductivity Comparison for MOX and Leu Fuel (Fuel Porosity of 0.0479) (Figure Q21-1) - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422602122004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Intervenor Exhibit H (Official Exhibit #32), NUREG/CR-6744, Phenomenon Identification and Ranking Tables (Pirts) for Loss-of-Coolant Accidents in Pressurized and Boiling Water Reactors... - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600742004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 16 - Figure 11, FR2 Test E4 for High Exposure Fuel (Relocation) - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600182004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 08 - Figure 3, Mox/Leu Decay Heat Ratio - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422601132004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Intervenor Exhibit a (Official Exhibit #25), Edwin Stuart Lyman Curriculum Vitae - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422601082004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 18 - Figure 13, Figure M5 Rupture Temperature Correlation - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422601052004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 24 - Figure 19, Accumulated Cycle Irradiation in Effective Full Power Days - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600952004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 23 - Figure 18, Fuel Exposure, Gwd/T - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600912004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 22 - Figure 17, Micrograph of Irradiated MOX Pellet (Rg) - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600862004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 21 - Figure 16, Micrograph of Irradiated Leu Fuel Pellet with Transverse Crack - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600852004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 20 - Figure 15, Micrograph of Irradiated Leu Pellet with Typical Cracking - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600312004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 14 - Figure 9, Previously Irradiated Rod 12, 74% Total Circumferential Elongation, 1066 K Estimated Burst Temperature - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600762004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 17 - Figure 12, MOX Fuel and Cladding Temperature During LOCA Compared to Severe Accident Fuel Melt Temperatures - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600172004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 07 - Figure 2 - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422602952004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 47, Professional Qualifications Statement of Steven P. Nesbit - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422602982004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 48, Professional Qualifications Statement of Robert C. Harvey - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600302004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 13 - Figure 8 - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600732004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 15 - Figure 10, FR2 Test B3.1 for Low Exposure Fuel (No Relocation) - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600262004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 12 - Figure 7, Pin Power Peaking Factor, Fq, Cycle Exposure, EFPD - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422602992004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 49, Professional Qualifications Statement of Bert M. Dunn - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422603052004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 50, Professional Qualifications Statement of J. Kevin Mccoy - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600222004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 11 - Figure 6, Pellet Radial Power Profiles 0.5 Gwd/T (Figure Q7-1) - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600202004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 09 - Figure 4, MOX and Leu Fuel Pin Temperature Profile Comparison at Loss of Coolant Accident Initiation - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422600142004-07-14014 July 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Applicant Exhibit 06 - Figure 1, Catawba MOX LOCA Temperatures - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422602742004-06-14014 June 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/14/04 - Staff Exhibit a (Official Exhibit #43), E-mail from Wolfgang Wiesenack to Miroslav Hrehor Re Statement in One of Segfsm Reports - Rec'D 07/14/04
ML0422603172004-06-0707 June 2004
Catawba Hearing 07/15/04 - Intervenor Exhibit 53, E-mail from Robert C. Harvey to Steven P. Nesbit Re Oecd/Nea/Csni Special Experts Topical Meeting on LOCA Fuel Safety Criteria, Cadarache France, March 22-23, 2001 - Rec'D 07/15/04
2009-02-05
[Table view] |
Text
-R5$F3/7 DOCKETED USNRC A August 9, 2004 (11 :45AMf FRAMATOME ANP OFFICE OF SECRETARY An AREVA and Siemens Company RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF NucLEAR REGULTORY COMMISSION FRAMATOMrE ANP. Inc. Docket No. ' _ Official Exh. No. 5H in the matter of -_M C pa thz 0>A December 15, 2003 Staf-f IDENTIFIED NRC:03:085 Applicant. . . RECEIVED-1°5 _
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Intervenor X/ REJECTED AllN: Ralph 0. Meyer, Senior Technical Advisor Contrg Off R U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Contracto _o DATF _
Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Oftr-Extended Scope of MOU on testing M5 CladdingRdin,,l Ref.: 1. Letter, James F. Mallay (Framatome ANP) to Ashok C. Thadani (NRC), -ANL High Bumup Test Program' NRC:03:068, October 17, 2003.
Ref.: 2. Letter, James F. Mallay (Framatome ANP) to Farouk Eltawila (NRC), Confirmation of Existing Cladding Embrittlement Criteria", NRC:03:069, October 17,2003.
Dear Ralph:
In early September you had requested that Framatome ANP consider extending our MOU to Include high bumup fuel using MS cladding. We have held a number of Intemral discussions on how to proceed, Including deliberations with our colleagues In France and Germany. We would like to proceed with your suggestion by establishing a meeting with you and your management In early 2004 to outline the actions needed to proceed with this Idea.
You should appreciate Framatome's reluctance to proceed with serious discussions, however, about providing Irradiated fuel. As you know, we have always been willing to cooperate In this program, but we expect this spirit of cooperation to be extended In both directions. We want you to understand that we have several reservations about continuing this cooperation to Include Irradiated fuel.
First, we were dismayed when It was discovered that our MS cladding was altered (etched) to perform some comparative tests with another type of cladding. This discovery was very disappointing because we were not asked about the test or whether we would want to participate. Moreover, the MOU specifically calls for our agreement with any new test; an agreement that was not sought in this case. We had also asked (and understood that we had agreement) that specific comparisons with other cladding material not be conducted. This agreement was especially important to us Inthis case because MS had been repeatedly compared to this other cladding In highly adverse and Inaccurate ways. We are not willing to suffer this embarrassment again.
Second, Framatome has been unable to gain recognition of MS in the regulation (50.46) associated with ECCS acceptance. Our competitor cladding Is Included In the regulations by name, and the NRC had prepared to Issue a direct final rule to Include MS more than18 months ago. We were informed that this rulemaking did not proceed because of questions raised conceming the adequacy of the oxidation limits Inthe regulation; Research recommended that the Inclusion of M5 cladding be delayed until the oxidation tests at Argonne were completed.
Such a delay could extend for many years for no apparent value added. Not only did this FRAMATOME ANP. Inc.
3315 Old Forest Road. P.O. Box 10935 - Lynchburg. VA 24508-0935 Tel.: 434-832-3000 Fax: 434-832-0622 www.us.framatome-anp.corn
-el;%la/e=- s-ac6-e' - CA- 61--
Ralph. 0. Meyer NRC:03:085 December 15, 2003 Page 2
-question constitute an Inappropriate criticism about the Integrity of M5 cladding, but it also
-.-.-. constituted'artW ti-competitive action on the part of the NRC. We had been led to believe (for example,.irtrmnuerous NRC statements made during the Argonne meeting InJuly 2002) that MS was looked on favorably by the NRC, based Inpart on Its outstanding performance, which Is documented Inthe approved topical report on the application of MS cladding.
Third, we continue to bd-e concerned about .e ongoing tests at Argonne that we expressed In earlier correspohdence-(References -iand2). Repeated statements have been made by the NRC that these tests are intended to be 1confirmatory* in nature. However, it appears other objectives are being pirsued that are not confirmatory In nature, Including attempts to support major alterations to the ECCS regulations. Inview of two very lengthy evaluations of ECCS criteria In 1972-73 and in the mid-1980s, Insupport of best-estimate analyses, we see no benefit to another evaluation at this time when nearly all evaluation models have reached satisfactory maturity.
Framatome ANP Is anxious that these matters concerning the demonstrated Integrity of MS cladding and the conduct and Intent of the ongoing testing program at Argonne be resolved before agreement Is reached on extending the scope of our MOU.
I plan to contact you in January to establish a framework for continued discussions on the testing of our MS cladding.
Very truly yours, Regulatory , Dirs Regulatory Affairs cc: Jack Rosenthal
