ML033450382

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Slides of Meeting with Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Company, to Discuss Licensees Modifications to High Pressure Injection Pumps
ML033450382
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 06/16/2003
From:
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Hopkins J
Shared Package
ML033450382 List:
References
Download: ML033450382 (57)


Text

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 1

Modification of High Pressure Injection Pumps Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 2

Opening Remarks........... Gary Leidich

  • HPI Pump Design.. Jim Powers
  • HPI Pump ModificationsBob Coward, MPR Closing Comments.... Gary Leidich Agenda

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 3

Opening Remarks Gary Leidich Executive Vice President - FENOC

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 4

  • Background

-Implemented Building Block approach in the summer/fall of 2002 that included assuring the health of plant systems

-System Health Assurance identified the High Pressure Injection Pumps as an original design issue since fine particles from the Containment Emergency Sump could potentially damage the pumps during the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) recirculation mode

-Assessed the alternatives to address the issue

  • Today

-Present resolution plan Overview

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 5

Reactor Head Reactor Head Resolution Plan Resolution Plan Program Compliance Program Compliance Plan Plan Containment Health Containment Health Assurance Plan Assurance Plan Restart Test Plan Restart Test Plan Management and Management and Human Performance Human Performance Excellence Plan Excellence Plan System Health System Health Assurance Plan Assurance Plan Restart Action Plan Restart Action Plan Restart Overview Panel Restart Overview Panel Return to Service Plan Return to Service Plan

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 6

  • An understanding by the NRC of the proposed High Pressure Injection Pumps modification and testing, and assurance that the pumps will perform their required safety functions Desired Outcome

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 7

High Pressure Injection (HPI) Pump Design Jim Powers Director - Davis-Besse Engineering

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 8

High Pressure Injection System Design Functions

-Two redundant trains provide emergency core cooling for small break LOCA

-Operates in conjunction with Low Pressure Injection System and Core Flood Tanks to limit core damage in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix K for a range of small break LOCAs

-Provides borated water to decrease Reactor Coolant System (RCS) reactivity

-Provides makeup for reactor coolant contraction due to cooling of RCS

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 9

High Pressure Injection System Safety Functions

-Borated Water Storage Tank (BWST) injection mode operation

-LBLOCA safety analyses do not credit HPI

-BWST injection mode and Containment Emergency Sump recirculation mode operation

-Flow requirements from safety analyses

  • Boron precipitation control

-Containment Emergency Sump recirculation mode operation

-250 gpm required through Auxiliary Pressurizer Spray line Boron precipitation control

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 10 High Pressure Injection Pumps

  • Manufacturer

- Babcock and Wilcox

  • Type

- Horizontal, eleven stage centrifugal pumps

- 600 HP electric motors

- Hydrostatic bearing

  • Design Pressure/Temperature

- 2000 psig/ 3000F

  • Design/Manufacture Code

- ASME Pump & Valve Code, Class II, November 1968

  • Surveillance Test/Inservice Testing

- ASME Section XI

  • Believed to be unique to Davis-Besse in domestic nuclear industry

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 11 HPI Pump Design Issues

  • Post-LOCA Operation Issues

-In post-LOCA recirculation mode operation, HPI pump suction is from Containment Emergency Sump

-Sump is likely to contain debris from LOCA blowdown and containment spray actuation

-HPI Pumps must be capable of operating with debris in the pump flow

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 12 HPI Pump Design Issues

  • System Health Assurance identified three design issues

-Hydrostatic bearing plugging

-Bearing orifices are smaller than emergency sump strainer and could become plugged

-Bearing pad clearances are smaller than sump strainer

-Fine clearance wear

-Preliminary rotordynamics analyses suggested increases in clearances due to wear by debris could lead to operation at critical speeds

-Increased clearances will degrade pump hydraulic performance

-Supply path to cyclone separator (seal water) could be smaller than sump strainer and may become plugged

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 13 HPI Pump Modification Objective

  • Implement a resolution plan to resolve HPI pump debris issue that

-Modifies only the HPI pump

-Makes no substantive change to existing licensing basis, procedures, USAR, or design basis documents

-Makes no changes to Technical Specifications

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 14 Bob Coward MPR High Pressure Injection (HPI) Pumps Design Issue Resolution

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 15 Project Overview

  • Issue

-Debris in containment emergency sump post-LOCA may degrade HPI pump performance

- Plugging of hydrostatic bearing orifice

- Plugging of hydrostatic bearing pads

- Wear of fine clearances

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 16 HPI Pump Internal Assembly Assembly Process Eleven stage internal assembly

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 17 4th Stage Volute 4th Stage Volute with Impeller Back Side of Volute with Impeller 4th Stage Volute

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 18 Hydrostatic Bearing Orifice Plugging

  • Design issue

-Orifices in supply to hydrostatic bearing pads are 0.111 inch diameter

-New containment emergency sump strainer has 0.188 inch diameter openings

-Orifices may plug with debris that passed through sump strainer, degrading bearing performance

  • Resolution

-Add a self-flushing strainer plate at entrance to bearing supply tube

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 19 Hydrostatic Bearing Pad Debris

  • Design issue

-Bearing design includes tight clearances (0.012 inch to 0.015 inch diametral) at edges of hydrostatic bearing pads

-Debris in water flowing to bearing pads may be larger and accumulate in the bearing pad, impacting bearing performance

-Degradation of bearing performance may impact pump operation

  • Resolution

-Demonstrate existing clearances are acceptable based on test of actual bearing with conservative debris loading

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 20 Hydrostatic Bearing Configuration

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 21 Hydrostatic Bearing Design

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 22 Fine Clearances Wear

  • Design issue

-Pump design includes tight clearances

-Central volute bushing (0.011 inch to 0.014 inch diametral)

-Hydrostatic bearing (0.012 inch to 0.015 inch diametral)

-Wear rings (0.019 inch to 0.021 inch diametral)

-Debris in water may increase rate of wear of the fine clearances

-Increased clearances could result in operation at critical speeds

-Increased clearances could decrease hydraulic performance capability

  • Resolution

-Use analysis, mock-up, and in-plant testing to demonstrate reliable pump operation with expected increased clearances

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 23 Cyclone Separator Supply Line Plugging

  • Postulated design issue

-New containment sump strainer has 0.188 inch diameter openings

-Supply line to the cyclone separator was considered to be as small as ~ 0.125 inch diameter

-Supply line may plug with debris that passed through sump strainer, starving flow to the cyclone separator and seal

  • Resolution

-Updated information shows supply line is ~ 0.35 inch diameter, but cyclone separator inlet port is 0.180 inch diameter

-Potential need for cyclone separator modification or replacement under consideration (pump modifications not necessary)

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 24 Resolution Approach

  • Modifications

-Install self-flushing strainer on volute to prevent plugging of hydrostatic bearing supply line orifice

-Move supply line take-off on volute

  • Analysis

-Rotordynamic analysis to demonstrate satisfactory pump operation with increased fine clearances

-Hydraulic analysis to demonstrate satisfactory pump performance with increased fine clearances

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 25 Resolution Approach (Continued)

  • Perform mock-up testing of

-Strainer installation to confirm self-flushing nature and debris dispersal effect

-Hydrostatic bearing under debris loading to confirm satisfactory operation

-Fine clearances to determine wear rates

  • Perform in-plant testing to

-Validate rotordynamics model

-Validate hydraulic performance model

-Demonstrate satisfactory pump operation with increased clearances

  • Perform post-modification testing to confirm pump operation

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 26

  • Modification

-Install strainers over the hydrostatic bearing supply ports in volute

-Relocate hydrostatic bearing supply ports to increase flow velocity over strainer and reduce debris entering hydrostatic bearing

-Perform all design and modification activities as safety related

  • Design analyses

-Perform stress analysis of modified volute and strainer

-Perform hydraulic analysis of hydrostatic bearing flow path

-Perform Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analyses to support moving take-off port Pump Modification

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 27 Original Strainer Concept

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 28 Final Strainer Design

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 29 Volute Finite Element Model

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 30 Finite Element Analysis Results

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 31 Hydrostatic Bearing Flow

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 32

  • French PWRs use similar class pump for makeup/HPI

-Normal service instead of standby

-12 stages instead of 11 stages

-4500 rpm instead of 3600 rpm

-Central hydrostatic bearing instead of bushing

  • Nuclear Safety Authority requested validation pumps would operate satisfactorily in emergency conditions

-Testing performed in 1980-1981

  • Pump operated satisfactorily after hydrostatic bearing supply port was moved to side of volute near impeller Pump Guinard Testing

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 33

  • Rotordynamics Analysis

-Model tuned using vibration data from 1X in-plant test

-Preliminary model predictions show vibration levels for increased fine clearances (up to 2X) are acceptable and not significantly greater than 1X levels

  • Hydraulic Analysis

-Model considers leakage between stages across wear rings

-Calculations performed for 2X fine clearance condition

-Predicted performance for 2X meets surveillance test requirements Analyses

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 34 Rotordynamics Analysis

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 35 Hydraulic Performance Analysis

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 36 Mock-Up Testing

  • Test objectives

-Confirm strainer self-flushing behavior

-Confirm hydrostatic bearing operation

-Measure wear ring clearance increases

-Measure central volute bushing clearance increases

-Measure hydrostatic bearing clearance increases

-Measure debris separating effect by pump impellers

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 37 Mock-Up Testing

  • All tests

-Fixture design matches critical characteristics of HPI pump

-Performed in accordance with QA Program requirements

-Debris characterization based on Davis-Besse containment design

-Full scale components

-Capability to adjust clearances

-Capability to pause/re-start test for interim results

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 38 Debris Characterization

  • HPI pump debris loading based on

-LBLOCA scenario

-Sump strainer size

-Mass and density of particles

-Flow velocities in containment

  • Debris solution includes

-Fibrous insulation

-Rust particles

-Qualified and unqualified coatings

-Dirt and dust

-Concrete particles

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 39 Debris Characterization (Continued)

  • Approach

-Analyses based on debris generation and debris transport analyses for Davis-Besse containment sump, as well as NRC-sponsored research

-Critical parameters, and their acceptance ranges, are defined for each debris type

-Commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) materials selected to match critical characteristics

-Commercial dedication performed to qualify COTS materials

-Debris handling procedure addresses initial loading, sampling, and re-loading

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 40 Debris Acceptance/Inspection

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 41 Debris Acceptance/Inspection (Continued)

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 42 Debris Characterization (Continued)

  • Conservatisms

-75% of generated debris transports to HPI pump

-No credit for filtering of small debris on sump strainer surfaces

-Particle/fiber sizes biased toward increasing potential for pump degradation

-All hard concrete debris is considered transportable and in size range with potential to wear critical pump surfaces

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 43 Mock-Up Testing

  • Five test loops

-Loop 1 - Suction Wear Ring

-Loop 2 - Discharge Wear Ring

-Loop 3 - Hydrostatic Bearing

-Loop 4 - Central Volute Bushing

-Loop 5 - Hydrostatic Bearing Supply Strainer

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 44 Suction Wear Ring Fixture

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 45 Suction Wear Ring Fixture (Continued)

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 46 Suction Wear Ring Fixture (Continued)

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 47 Suction Wear Ring Fixture (Continued)

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 48 Discharge Wear Ring Fixture

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 49 Mock-Up Testing

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 50 Mock-Up Testing (Continued)

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 51

  • Baseline pump test (1X)

-Conducted during surveillance test

-Increased data acquisition capability

-Results used to validate rotordynamics model

- Increased response at 942 gpm

- Low vibratory response throughout flow range In-Plant Testing

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 52

  • Worn pump test (2X)

-Spare pump assembled with 2X fine clearances

-Increased data acquisition capability

-Results used to validate rotordynamics model, validate hydraulic model, and demonstrate pump operation is acceptable

- Preliminary results show low vibratory response over full range of operating conditions

- Preliminary results show hydraulic performance acceptable

- Most importantly - pump ran well with clearances opened to twice normal

  • Post-modification testing will be performed to demonstrate satisfactory operation of modified pumps In-Plant Testing (Continued)

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 53 Failure Mode and Effects Analysis

  • Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in progress as design activity
  • Expected result is no increase in probability of failure

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 54 Status

  • Modification design

-Design complete and in review

-10CFR 50.59 evaluation in progress

-Long lead parts/material on order

  • Mock-up testing

-Debris characterization complete

-Fixture design and fabrication complete

-All test loops operating earlier this week

-Complete confirmatory tests this week

-Complete wear tests in July

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 55 Status (Continued)

  • Rotordynamic analysis

-Preliminary model completed

-Benchmarking in progress using results of in-plant tests

  • Hydraulic analysis

-Preliminary model/calculation completed

-Final calculation in preparation based on in-plant test results

  • In-plant activities

-Baseline and worn pump tests completed

-Both pumps removed and at fabricator for modification

-Pump re-installation planned for mid-July

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 56 Summary

  • Modifications and associated analysis and testing are expected to fully resolve debris issue
  • Current schedule shows completion to support normal operating pressure test in July

Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station June 19, 2003 57 Closing Comments Gary Leidich Executive Vice President - FENOC