Text

Attachment 4 to Supplement Dated May 10, 2002 to License Amendment Request Dated December 11, 2002 Conversion to Improved Technical Specifications (ITS)
	ML021400043
Person / Time
Site:	Prairie Island
Issue date:	05/10/2002
From:	; Nuclear Management Co
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	Download: ML021400043 (186)
	v • d • e

Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Attachment 4 to Supplement dated May 10, 2002 to License Amendment Request dated December 11, 2000 Conversion to Improved Technical Specifications (ITS)

SER Tables

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Chapter 1.0 - Use and Application (Not listed sequentially) toaaonai cnanges were made in retormatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do "-1.

1 1.U not revise or delete any technical requirements.

'.1AA.1 I I .U-U I Rewords CTS definitions of ACTIONS, CHANNEL CHECK, CORE ALTERATION, COLR, DOSE 1.1 1.0 EQUIVALENT 1-131, E-AVERAGE DISINTEGRATION ENERGY, OPERATIONAL MODE ACTIONS, MODE, OPERABLE - OPERABILITY, PTLR, QPTR, RTP, SDM, and STAGGERED TEST CHANNEL BASIS. These changes do not revise the meaning or intent of the current PI definitions.

CHECK, CORE ALTERATION, COLR, DOSE EQUIVALENT I 131, E-AVERAGE DISINTEGRATION ENERGY, OPERATIONAL MODE - MODE, OPERABLE OPERABILITY, PTLR, QPTR, RTP, SDM, and STAGGERED TF=-qT PA(ZI A1.0-04 Rewords CTS definition of CHANE CALIBRATION to specifically reference testing of 1.1 1.0 resistance temperature detectors or thermocouple sensors, allowing in place qualitative CHANNEL assessment of sensor behavior, and normal calibration of the remaining devices in the channel. CALIBRATION These changes do not substantively change the Prairie Island methodology for calibration of plant instrumentation.

A1.0-05 Updates CTS reference for COLR in accordance with NRC approved LAR. 1.1 1.0 COLR 1

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Controls ITS Chapter 1.0 - Use and Application (Not listed sequentially)

Rewords CTS wording and re-titles definition of CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST to conform to 1.0 CHANNEL OPERATIONAL TEST (COT). These changes do not substantively change the PI CHANNEL methodology for testing of these instruments. FUNCTIONAL TEST A1.0-08 Did not include CTS definition of LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS. This is an NA 1.0 Administrative change since the justification for not including LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM LSSS SETTINGS is in the discussion of CTS.

A1.0-09 Rewords CTS definition of OPERABLE - OPERABILITY. Additional clarification was provided 1.1 1.0 specifically allowing credit for both "normal or emergency power" instead of only stating normal OPERABLE power. These changes do not substantively change the definition of OPERABLE OPERABILITY.

A1.0-11 Rewords CTS definition of PHYSICS TESTS. The allowed power level for PHYSICS TESTS is 1.1 1.0 now related to the definition of power level at which the MODE changes from MODE 2 to MODE PHYSICS TESTS 1.

A1.0-12 Did not include CTS definition for PROTECTION INSTRUMENTATION AND LOGIC since it is NA 11.0 not used in the ITS. PROTECTION INSTR & LOGIC A1.0-18 Did not include CTS definition for SOURCE CHECK since it is addressed within the definition of NA 1.0 CHANNEL CALIBRATION and CHANNEL OPERATIONAL TEST (COT). SOURCE CHECK A1.0-19 Rewords CTS STAGGERED TEST BASIS by deleting the second paragraph which is consistent 1.1 1.0 with rules and use of ISTS STAGGERED TEST BASIS. Any differences in use of this term STAGGERED between CTS and ITS are accounted for by changing instrument test Frequencies in Section 3.3. TEST BASIS 2

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Controls ITS Chapter 1.0 - Use and Application (Not listed sequentially)

Did not include CTS definition for STARTUP OPERATION since the CTS and ITS are consistent NA and all phases of plant operation are included within the definition of MODES listed in Table 1.1 1.u STARTUP 1.

A1.0-24 Clarifies use of Logical Connectors to aid in the understanding and use of the new format, 1.2 NA presentation style, and establish positions not previously formalized. These changes do not involve any substantive changes in plant operations or testing.

A1.0-28 Adds a section explaining the use of the Frequencies specified within the SRs to aid in the 1.4 NA understanding and use of the ITS format, presentation style, and establish positions not previously formalized. This explanation does not involve any substantive change in plant operations or testing.

Al .0-29 Rewords CTS clarifying that SRs can be suspended when the plant is not in the Mode of 1.4 4.1.D Applicability associated with the SR. The intent of the CTS and NUREG/ITS requirements are the same and no plant operating or testing requirement changes have been introduced.

3 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Chapter 1.0 - Use and Application (Not listed sequentially)

DCN ., ummary~

S<~k ITS Seto CT Sect n L1.0-22 Revises definition of operating MODES including MODE title changes. Table 1.1-1 Table 1-1 1, 2 Redefines reactivity conditions to change MODES at 0.99 Keff rather than "Critical".

Revises RATED THERMAL POWER (RTP) at which the MODE changes from MODE 2 to MODE 1

from 2% to 5%. This change also allows PHYSICS TESTS to be performed at power levels up to 5% RTP.

Average reactor coolant temperature requirements remain functionally the same except that CTS MODE 5 was less than 200 'F and ITS is less than or equal to 200 'F. MODE 4 changed accordingly to interface with the new limit for MODE 5.

Deletes Column entitled, "REACTOR VESSEL HEAD CLOSURE BOLTS FULLY TENSIONED",

since this facet of the MODE definition is included in footnotes.

CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Chapter 1.0 - Use and Application (Not listed sequentially)

LMI .U-U,5 Nelocates elements ot the definition for AUXILI 5.5.12, Bases 1.0 SPECIAL VENTILATION ZONE INTEGRITY. Control Program ABSVZ z INTEGRITY LR1.0-07 Relocates elements of the definition for CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY.

5.5.12, Bases Bases 11.0 Control Program CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY LR1.0-14 0elocatFes. dfiniion for REPORTABLE EVENT, wich is in

ýcontained I1OCFR5O.72 and I1OCFR50.73. IOCFR50.59 'ITRM' 3,4 REPORTABLE EVENT LR1.0-16 elementsof the definition for SHIELD BUILDING INTEGRITY. 5.5.12, Bases Bases 1.02 Control Program SHIELD BLDG INTEGRITY CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 5/8/2002 1

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Chapter 1.0 - Use and Application (Not listed sequentially)

Adds new definitions for ACTUATION LOGIC TEST, AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE (AFD), LEAKAGE, MASTER RELAYS,REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM (RTS) RESPONSE TIME, SLAVE RELAYS, 1.U and TRIP ACTUATION ACTUATING DEVICE OPERATIONAL TEST (TADOT).

LOGIC TEST, AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE (AFD),

LEAKAGE, MASTER RELAY TEST, REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM (RTS)

RESPONSE

TIME, SLAVE RELAY TEST, and TRIP ACTUATING DEVICE IOPERATIONAL M1.0-13 Replaces CTS definition of CHANNEL RESPONSE TEST with REACTOR TRIP I ___ 1I~(IAUOT)

TEST SYSTEM (RTS) 1.1 1.0 CHANNEL RESPONSE TIME, which includes more details on testing.

RESPONSE

TEST and REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM (RTS)

RESPONSE

M1,0-17 Revises CTS definition for SHUTDOWNý MAR IN to include new requirements in Technical

_______TIME 1.1 i0.....................

1..................

Specifications.

SDM 1

5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Chapter 1.0 - Use and Application (Wnf liczfcti nei nloh Adds new requirements to Technical Specifications in Section 1.3, Completion Times to aid understanding and use of the new format and presentation style, and to establish in the 1.3 I rules of usage not previously formalized.

R .A'In'V7 1 lvI - V Replaces CTS 48 hour5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months allowance to perform a SR if it cannot be performed until the plant enters the Mode of Applicability, with a more limiting specific allowable time or condition(s) for testing.

2 5/8/2002

Table R - Relocated Specifications and Removed Details ITS Chapter 1.0 - Use and Application (Not listed sequentially)

INONE INONE INnNIP IN NE ]NOnrF IfN lIK(riU P CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References

5. Relocated Specification not meeting 10 CFR 50.36 (c)(2)(ii) criteria

6. Relocated Specification/Surveillance Requirement/ Administrative Control Requirement

7. Performance Required for Indication 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Chapter 2.0 - Safety Limits (Not listed sequentially)

I/- .U-UU Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not revise LCO 2.0 LCO 2.0 or delete any technical requirements.

A2.0-01 Minor format and wording changes have been made to CTS Section 2.1, 2.2.A, and 2.2.B. Which do not LCO 2.1.1, LCO 2.1, change the meaning, limits or otherwise change plant operation or testing. 2.2.1, and 2.1 .B, 2.2, 2.2.2 2.2.A, and 2.2.B 1

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Chapter 2.0 - Safety Limits (Not listed sequentially)

CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Chapter 2.0 - Safety Limits (Not listed sequentially)

DOC No >~ ~Q~~~umaryProcess

2'~~SumaryControl Change'

Location CSSect Change Type~

LR2.O-02 Relocates discussion clarifying that the thermal power is measured in AT on the curve. 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 2.1.A 2 Control Program LR2.0-03 Relocates detailed information for notifying the NRC of a Safety Limit violation in 10CFR50.72, TRM LCO 3 accordance withI oCFR50.72, a written report in accordance with 1CFR50.73 1 0CFR50.73, and 2.2.C, and cessation of operation until NRC authorization. 10CFR50.59 2.2.E and j ____________2.21F LR2.0-04 Relocates and the chairman detailedofinformation the Safety requiring notification Audit Committee of corporate within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months . management 10CFR50.59 TRM ILCO 2.2. 3 CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Chapter 2.0 - Safety Limits (Not listed sequentially)

DOC No. Summary. ITS Section CTS Section NONE NONE NONE NONE 5/8/2002

Table R - Relocated Specifications and Removed Details ITS Chapter 2.0 - Safety Limits (Not listed sequentially)

JNUNE INUNE NONF N( )NI-INONE

.. IN NE..-...-.. ICN

- IN

. NEN" tN CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References

5. Relocated Specification not meeting 10 CFR 50.36 ©(2)(ii) criteria

6. Relocated Specification/Surveillance Requirement/ Administrative Control Requirement

7. Performance Required for Indication 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.0 - LCO Applicability/SR Applicability (Not listed sequentially)

.IA4.U-UU Lditorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not change or delete any technical requirements.

4.0 A3.0-01 Rewords and restates CTS phraseology for LOOs 3.0.A, 3.0.13. and 3.0.C. These changes include 1) - _LCO using standard MODES 3.0.1, LCO 3.0.A, of Operation such as MODE 1 and etc. instead of POWER OPERATIONS, 2) 3.0.2, and 3.0.B, 3.0.C, dividing LCO 3.0.A into two separated LCOs; and 3) listing those specific LCOs providing exemptions to 3.0.3 3.0.C.1, and the applicable LCO. The CTS requirements are basically the same in ITS 3.0 Specifications.

3.0.C.2 A3.0-02 Clarifies CTS requirements for Completion Times to state the total time from when the Condition was LCO 3.0.3 LCO 3.0.C.1 first entered and use the MODE number. CTS and ITS Completion Times are the same. Any and 3.0.C.2 differences are addressed in a separate Discussion of Change.

A3.0-04 Clarifies that ITS 3.0.3 only applies in MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4 which is consistent with the intent of CTS.

LCO 3.0.3 3.0.C A3.0-09 Clarifies CTS relationship between Technical Specification and non-Technical Specification systems iLCO3.0.8 iNA which support ITS.

A3.0-12 Clarifies CTS intent for the application of test exception LCOs for the purpose of performing PHYSICS iLCO 3.0.7 .NA TESTING. This change does alter any plant operations or technical requirements.

A3.0-13 Clarifies and formalizes the use of ihe PI ITS for two units.

LCO 3.0.9 NA I

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes Section 3.0 - LCO Applicability/SR Applicability (Not listed sequentially)

Retains CTS requirements for managing performance at I-i oasea on a "nTlxea scneouie'" surveillance LLWJ 4.U.A.1 program. and 4.0.A.2 The ITS retains CTS requirements for the refueling cycle, limiting the refueling cycle to two years.

A3.0-17 Clarifies CTS requirements and limitations that the SRs shall be meet during the MODES or Other LCO 3.0.1 LCO 4.0.B Specified Conditions in the Applicability for which the requirements of the LCO apply. This change does not impose any new requirements and is consistent with current practice at the PI plant.

A3.0-18 Rewords CTS requirements deferring entry into Required Actions. ITS wording allows delaying LCO 3.0.3 LCO 4.0.B declaration that the LCO is not met rather than delaying only the ACTIONS. These changes are off setting considerations and the intent remains the same.

2 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.0 - LCO Applicability/SR Applicability (Not listed sequentially)

Ld.U-ZU Relaxes CTS requirements allowing up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months for a missed SR. ITS allows 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months up LCO 3.0.3 LCO 4.0.B 3, 10 to the stated interval with appropriate risk assessment justification.

I CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.0 - LCO Applicability/SR Applicability (Not listed sequentially)

INUNL INUNE NONE IN NE IN(JNI INF NF- IN)N F CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.0 - LCO Applicability/SR Applicability (Not listed sequentially)

Adds new, more restrictive LCU requiring the plant to be in MUDE 4 within 13 hours1.50463e-4 days 0.00361 hours 2.149471e-5 weeks 4.9465e-6 months tollowing entry into LCO 3.0.3.

M3.0-06 Adds new LCO restrictions, which preclude entry into a MODE or Other Specified Condition in the LCO 3.0.4 NA Applicability (MOSCA) when a LCO is not met. The new LOC 3.0.4 may impose restrictions on the changes in MOSCA which do not exist in the CTS.

M3.0-07 Adds new LCO, which restricts current plant practices allowing equipment to be removed from service or LCO 3.0.5 NA declared inoperable to comply with ACTIONS.

M3.0-11 Adds new LCO, which restricts current plant practices clarifying actions necessary to be taken when a LCO 3.0.6 NA system or support system that has its own LCO is inoperable. The supported system(s) are not required to be declared inoperable if they are inoperable due to support system inoperability. The supported systems' Conditions and Required Actions are not entered unless directed to do so by the support system's Required Actions.

M3.0-16 Adds new SR supporting the ITS format changes and makes the ITS complete by not allowing plant LCO 3.0.2 LCO 4.0.A.1 operation or testing that will cause an unsafe condition.

M3.0-19 Adds new SR establishing the requirement that all applicable SRs shall be met before entry into a MODE LCO 3.0.4 NA or Other Specified Condition in the Applicability.

1 5/8/2002

Table R - Relocated Specifications and Removed Details ITS Section 3.0 - LCO Applicability/SR Applicability (Not listed sequentially)

INONE INONE INONE IN( )NI-

]NONE INONE INONE IN(NI-CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References

5. Relocated Specification not meeting 10 CFR 50.36 (c)(2)(ii) criteria

6. Relocated Specification/Surveillance Requirement/ Administrative Control Requirement

7. Performance Required for Indication 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.1 - Reactivity Control Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewor LUU 0~. I~r or delete any technical requirements. 3.10, SR 4.9, Table 4.1-2A and Table 4. 1 I r" A3.1-01 Replaces CTS prose descriptions of Modes with equivalent ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY. The plant LC 3.13, LCO3.1.F.,1F1 MODES to which this specification apply have not changed. Conditions 3.1.F.3.a, A and B, 3.10.A.1, and LCO 3.1.1, 13.10. D.1 A3.1-02 Did not include meaningless CTS statement resulting from the new ITS format. No new limits are added to NA LCO 3.1.F.1 the ITS and the CTS limits are stated in the ITS.

and 3.1.F,3.a A3.1-06 Did not include meaningless CTS statements which are not contained in the ITS. This change does not NA LCO 3.1.F.3.a iaffect any operating limits or conditions.

A3.1-08 Did not include duplicative CTS NRC reporting requirements which are also outlined and submitted in NA LCO 3.1 .F.3.c accordance with 10CFR50.72 and 10CFR50.73.

A3.1-12 Did not include general CTS Applicability and Objective statements. ITS administratively incorporates NA LCO 3.10 and these statements within each specification, the plant design features, or systems to which it applies. SR 4.9 These statements have been administratively incorporated, into the ITS, describing plant design features or systems since they do not establish any regulatory or operational requirements.

A3.1-34 Restates CTS requirements for declaring a misaligned rod inoperable, however, both require verifying NA LCO 3.10.E.2 SDM, taking remedial action, and allowing the plant to continue to operate. This paragraph does not have any net change on plant operations under ITS requirements.

1 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.1 - Reactivity Control Systems

('Nnf liqftrd zont iontipflliA Clarifies CTS operating practices allowing for Separate Condition Entry for each inoperable rod position indicator and demand position indicator.

A3.1-48 Restates CTS requirements declaring a misaligned rod being inoperable with the ITS requirement of LCO 3.1.4, LCO 3.10.G.5 declaring the rod of being misaligned. In either case, the plant would continue to operate, thus not making Condition A a difference in plant operations or impact.

A3.1-52 Rewords CTS requirements for when a rod is trippable but not movable, verifying that the rod position is LCO 3.1.4, LCO 3.1O.G.6 within insertion limits to the ITS wording of verification that the rod alignment is within limits. This wording Condition A change does not change the impact on plant operations.

A3.1-54 Rewords CTS Action Statement from one or more inoperable rods to one or more misaligned rods. This LCO 3.1.4, LCO 3.10.G.5 change does not affect plant operations or any technical requirements. Condition D A3.1-57 Rewords CTS terminology "loss of stationary gripper coil voltage" with "beginning of decay of stationary SR 3.1.4.3 LCO 3.10.H gripper coil voltage". This terminology does not change the SR performance and clarifies CTS intent.

2 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive ITS Section 3.1 - Reactivity Control Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Eliminates CTS requirement to enter LCO 3.0.C which requires entering MODE 3 in 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months LCO 3.0.C, and MODE 5 in 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months . The ITS only requires the plant to go to MODE 3 in 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and not 3.0.C, and continue to MODE 5 for the same Condition. 3.10.D.1 L3.1-23 Eliminates CTS requirements to comply with the control bank insertion limits when "approaching LCO 3.1.6 LCO 3.10.D.2 2 criticality". The ITS only requires meeting control bank insertion limits when in MODES 1 and 2 with Keff > 1.0.

L3.1-26 Eliminates CTS requirements to enter LCO 3.0.C which requires entering MODE 3 in 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months L00 3.1.6 ILCO 3.0.C 4,9 and MODE 5 in 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months . The ITS only requires the plant to go to MODE 3 in 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and not and 3.10.D continue to MODE 5 for the same Condition.

L3.1-28 Eliminates CTS requirements for ITC, Rod Group Alignment, and RCS Minimum Temperature LCO 3.1.8, LCO 3.10.D.3 2, 4 for Criticality requirements from being met during PHYSICS TESTS. LCO 3.1.5 Note, and LCO 3.1.6 Note L3.1-63 Eliminates CTS OPERABILITY requirements for the Analog Rod Position Indication System in NA Table 4.1-iC 1,2 MODES 3, 4, and 5 when the reactor trip system breakers are closed and the control rod drive Function 2 system is capable of rod withdrawal. Note 31 CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.1 - Reactivity Control Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Relaxes CTS requirements to functionally test the rod position indication "prior to each startup I able 4.1-1U following shutdown in excess of two days if not done in the previous 30 days". The ITS requires Note 30 this test to be performed "prior to criticality after each removal of the reactor head".

1-3.1-67 Increases CTS Completion Time for determining core power distribution from 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months to 8 LCO 3.1.4 LCO 3.10.E.1 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months .I_ _I__I _

CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 2

5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.1 - Reactivity Control Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Relocates the term, "with all rods withdrawn" to the COLR, which defines the LCO conditions to which the specific rod withdrawal limits apply. 3.1 .F.1 and 3.1 .F.2 LR3.1-07 Relocates detailed methods of assuring that the controi rods are maintained 15.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 2,3 within the administrative withdrawal limits until a subsequent calculation verifies Control Program 3.1 .F.3.b they have been restored to within limits.

LR3.1-37 Relocates bank demand step detailed information which defines the capabilities 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 1,2 of the control position indication system. Control Program 3.17.F.1 LR3.1-43 Relocates the CTS definition of an inoperable rod for the associated Action 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 2 Statements. Control Program 3.10.G.1 LR3.1-51 Relocates CTS detailed information that the potential ejected rod worth and 5.5.12, Bases Bases LtO 2,3 associated transient power distribution peaking factors, including allowance for Control Program 3.10.G.5 non-uniform fuel depletion in the neighborhood of the inoperable rod, shall be determined by analysis.

CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.1 - Reactivity Control Systems (Not listed sequentially)

~b~b~N~ . Control Change, LUflc Change, ProcessType~

LR3.1-59 Relocates CTS detailed information for instrument surveillances on the rod bank 10 CFR 50.59 TRM LCO 1,2 insertion limit monitor, rod position deviation monitor, and additional logging of the 3.10.1.1 rod positions when these monitors are inoperable. and Table 4.1-1C Functions 1,2, and 4, and Note 32 LR3.1-65 Relocates CTS detailed information to measure rod drop times after each 10OCFR50.59 TRM Table 4.1- 2, 3 refueling, following maintenance or modification to the control rod drive system. 2A Item 1 CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 2

5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.1 - Reactivity Control Systems (Not listed sequentially) eaas new L*U requirements mat the lower ITC limits shall be met in MODES 1, 2, and 3. LkU .1.0 LUU . 1.I-.1I M3.1-09 Adds new Required Action to address the EOC lower limit. LCO 3.1.3, NA Conditions C and D M3.-1-1 Adds new SRs to verify that the ITC is within the upper limit and to verify that the ITC will be within-limits SR3.1.3. 1, NA when RTP reaches 70%. 3.1.3.2, and 3.1.3.3 M3.1-17 Adds a new SR to verify SDM is within limits every 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months . SR 3.1.1.1 LCO 3.10.A.2 M3.1-18 Adds specific Required Actions and shutdown requirements when the core reactivity differs from the LCO 3.1.1 LCO 3.10.A.3 predicted value. and 3.1.2, and SR 4.9 Conditions A and B M3.1-19 Adds new SR to verify measured core reactivity is within limits prior to entering MODE 1 after each SR 3.1.2.1 LCO 3.10.A refueling outage.

M3.1-22 Adds a new SR to verify every 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months that shutdown banks are within their insertion limits as specified SR 3.1.5.1 LCO 3.10.D in the COLR.

M3.1-24 Adds new Condition and Required Actions to ensure that the control bank sequence and overlap limits LCO 3.1.6 LCO 3.10.D.2 shall be met or the unit must be placed in MODE 2 with Keff > 1.0.

1 5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes Section 3.1 - Reactivity Control Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Adds new SRS to verify estimated critical control bank position is within limits in the COLR, verify control s6-H 3.1.6.1, banks are within their insertion limits and verify sequence and overlap limits are met. 3.1.6.2, and 3.1.6.3 M3.1-29 Adds new SRs to perform a COT on power and intermediate range NIS channels, verify RCS lowest SR 3.1.8.1, LCO 3.10.D.3 loop average temperature, verify Thermal Power and verify SDM is within limits. 3.1.8.2, 3.1.8.3, and 3.1.4.4 M3.1-31 Reduces CTS flexibility to perform the rod worth measurement in the N-1 condition. {NA LC__3.1__D_ 3 M3.1-32 .Adds new Required Actions rverifing ihat the SDM requirements are met or initiate boration if a cluster LCO 3.1.4, LCO CE. 3.1. 1 control assembly is misaligned from its bank by more than 24 steps. Condition B M3.1-38 Expands the MODE of Applicability from MODE 1 to include both MODES 1 and 2. CTS requires each LCO 3.1.7 LCO 3.10.F.1, channel of the RPI to be OPERABLE in MODE 1. The ITS extends the MODE of Applicability to MODE 3.10..F.2,

. 2. 3.10..F.3, and 3.10.F.4 M3.1-42 Adds a new Action Statement for demand position indications. LCO 3.1.7, ILCO 3.10.F Condition A M3.1-44 Reduces operational flexibility by imposing a restriction that with one or more rods inoperable, restore LCO 3.1.4, LCO 3.10.G.2 the inoperable rod to OPERABLE within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months or be in MODE 3, whereas the CTS would allow Condition A continued operation with one rod inoperable.

M3.1-47 Adds requirements that whenever a rod is inoperable, the SDM requirements shall be met within one LCO 3.1.4, LCO 3.10.G.3 hour3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months or initiate boration. Condition A and 3.10.G.4 2

5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes Section 3.1 - Reactivity Control Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Adds a new Condition and Required Actions that with one rod inoperable, the unit is to be in MODE 3 LGO 3.1.4, within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months . The CTS would require the rod to be declared inoperable and operation can continue.

Condition C M3.1-62 Reduces flexibility in that the ITS requires a normalization of the computed boron concentration as a SR 3.1.2.2 SR 4.9 function of burnup within 60 days whereas the CTS requires the same test to be performed without any time constraints.

M3.1-66 Changes the distance the control rods are required to be moved to 10 or more steps every quarter to S 3.1.4.2 Table 4.1-2A demonstrate OPERABILITY whereas the CTS does not have specific distance for rod movement. jItem 2 3

5/8/2002

Table R - Relocated Specifications and Removed Details ITS Section 3.1 - Reactivity Control Systems (Not listed sequentially)

INONE INONE INONE IN{)NP

]NONE ]NNON E ON N( JtJI CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References

5. Relocated Specification not meeting 10 CFR 50.36 (c)(2)(ii) criteria

6. Relocated Specification/Surveillance Requirement/ Administrative Control Requirement

7. Performance Required for Indication 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.2 - Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially)

A.i.Z-UU Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not LCO 3.2 LCO 3.10 and change or delete any technical requirements. Table 3.5.2.A A3.2-01 Did not include general CTS Applicability and Objective statements at the beginning of each CTS LCO 3.2 LCO 3.10 section. These statements only provided general information and do not impose any operational or technical requirements.

A3.2-03 Replaces CTS symbols for hot channel factors with symbols consistent with ISTS. LCO 3.2.1 and LCO 3.10.B.1, 3.2.2 3.10.B.2, 3.10.B.3(a),

3.10.1.3(b),

3.10.1B.3(d)1, and 3.10.B.3(d)2 A3.2-05 Did not include CTS Unit 1, Cycle 19 specific requirements which are no longer applicable. NA LCO 3.10.B.1, 3.10.B.3(d),

and 3.11 A3.2-06 Did not include CTS SR phrase "whichever occurs first" since all SRs are required to be performed SR 3.2.1.2, LCO 3.10.13.2 regardless of which condition occurs first. 3.2.1.1, 3.2.2.1, and 3.2.2.2 A3.2-22 Clarifies CTS by adding a Note to reverify that Fwq is within limits which is consistent with the intent of SR 3.2.1.2 LCO the CTS. 3.10.B.3.d A3.2-23 Restates CTS descriptions of when the specification is applicable with a more precise applicability LCO 3.2.3 LCO 3.10.8.4 defined as MODE 1 with power > 15% RTP which consistent with the intent of CTS.

I 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.2 - Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially)

Restates CTS requirement that the AFD is outside the target band when two or more operable excore LGU 3.10.13.4, channels indicate it is outside the target band for all power levels.

3.10.B.5, and 3.10.B.6 A3.2-27 Rewords CTS Action Statement to more accuraiely define the ranges of applicability when there is a LCO 3.2.3 LCO 3.10.B.5 deviation between the AFD and Target Band. This change does not make any substantive changes in and 3.10.B.6 plant operation.

A3.2-33 Clarifies CTS Note allowing for extending the time the indicated AFD may deviate from the Target LCO 3.2.3 LCO Band without penalty deviation time during the incore/excore calibration. 3.10.B.6(a)

A3.2-37 Clarifies CTS by using a more precise Applicability Statement which requires QPTR limits to be met in LCO 3.2.4 LCO 3.10.C.1 MODE 1 with the power > 50%.

A3.2-38 Did not incorporate CTS requirements to "correct" the QUADRANT POWER TILT RATIO (QPTR) if not NA ILCO within limits because restoring a limit is always an option.

3.10.C.1 a A3.2-58 Clarifies CTS by adding a note stating that other means of determining QPTR can be one or more SR 3.2.4.2 LCO 3.10.C.4 excore nuclear channel inputs inoperable.

2 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.2 - Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially)

DOCNo Sum~mary< ITS Section CTS Sect Tp L3.2-09 Deletes CTS requirements to determine the target flux difference and FAH following power SR 3.2.11 LCO 3 changes of 10% or more. 3.10.B.2.b L3.2-17 Reduces CTS operating restrictions for placing the unit in MODE 3 when the hot channel factors LCO 3.2.2, LCO 2,4 are not met. The ITS requires placing the unit in MODE 2 in the same Condition. Condition B 3.10.B.1 L3.2-18 Deletes CTS requirements for placing the plant in hot shutdown within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months if the hot channel LCO 3.2.2, LCO 2, 4 limits are not met. The ITS requires a specific reduction in power level and not a shutdown. Condition A 3.10.B.3.c L3.2-24 Deletes band for CTS AFD.requirement that "atthat The ITS requires least thethree AFD operable excore channels" shall be within the target LCO 3.2.3 shall be considered outside the target band when LCO 3.10.B.4, 1 two or more OPERABLE excore channels indicate AFD to be outside the target band. 3.10.B.6.c, and 3.10.B.7 L3.2-28 Increases CTS Completion Time by an additional 15 minutes to allow for correcting the AFD when LCO 3.2.3, TLCO 6 operating above 90% RTP. Condition C 3.10.B.5 CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.2 -Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially)

-timinaies k; I j requirements to reduce the high neutron flux setpoint when the AFD deviates LLA,J ,*Z, LU from the Target Band for more than 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months when violated for two OPERABLE excore channels. 3.10.B.6.b L3.2-44 Eliminates CTS Action Statements addressing remedial actions, including reduction in RTP and NA LCO potential reactor shutdown, when QPTR limits are not met. The ITS only requires RTP reduction 3.10.C.2 and and not a reactor shutdown. 3.10.C.3 L3.2-50 Relaxes CTS requirements for maintaining the hot channel factor within limits at all times, except LCO3.2.1 LCO 2 for low power Physics Testing. The ITS only requires the hot channel factor limits to be met in 3.10.B.1 MODE 1.

CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 2

5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.2 - Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially)

Heiocates specific equations for determining that the hot channel factor is within limits. These equations are NRC approved equations used for LLO determining COLR limits. 3.10.B.1, 3.10.B.2, 3.10.B.3(a),

3.10.B.3(b),

3.10.B.3(b)2, and 3.10.B.3(d)1 LR3.2-34 Relocates logging details related to inoperable AFD monitor alarms. 10CFR50.59 TRM LCO 3 3.10.B.9 LR3.2-47 Relocates the number of moveable detectors and core thermocouples to be 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 3 used per quadrant for determining core QTPR when one excore nuclear channel is inoperable.

Control Program 3 .1 0.C.4 LR3.2-48 Relocates detailed information related to rod position deviation monitors and 10CFR50.59 TRM LCO 3.10.1.2 1, 2 quadrant power tilt monitors OPERABILITY.

and 3.10.1.3 CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.2 - Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially)

Adds specific time requirements to determine Fq(Z) within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months of reaching equilibrium conditions. LUU 3.10.B.2.b M3.2-11 Adds new SRs to determine Fcq and FnAH are within limits. SIR 3.2.1.1 3.10.B.2.c and 3.2.2.1 M3.2-12 Adds a specific time of 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months to reset the high neutron flux trip set point and requires a power LCO 3.2.1, LCO reduction within 15 minutes if the hot channel factor cannot be restored to within limits. Condition A 3.10.B.3.a and 3.10.B.3(b)2 M3.2-13 Adds stricter power reduction requirements to the CTS if the hot channel factor exceeds the limits in LCO 3.2.1, LCO COLR. Power is required to be reduced by a percentage specified in the COLR whereas, the ITS Condition A 3.10.B.3(a) requires the power level to be reduced to < 50% and the neutron high flux trip set point to

55% for the same condition.

M3.2-14 I Deletes the option of placing the reactor in an equilibrium configuration when the hot channel factor is notiLCO 3.2.1, LCO within limits. Condition B 3.10.B.3.b.1 M3.2-15 Reduces the time allow to place the reactor in MODE 3 from 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months to MODE 2 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months when LCO 3.2.1, LCO the hot channel factors exceed specific limits in the COLR. Condition C 3.10.B.3.a and LCO 3.2.2 Condition B M3.2-16 Adds new Action Statements requiring performance of specific SRs and associated Frequencies to LCO 3.2.1 LCO determine the hot channel factors. and 3.2.2 3.10.B.3.a and 3.10.B.3.b M3.2-19 Adds requirements to re-verify Fq(z) is within limits after Fq(z) has been multiplied by the appropriate SR 3.2.1.2 LCO factors in the COLR. 3.10.B.3.d 1

5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.2 -Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially)

Aaas a uompietion I ime ot 30 minutes to correct the AFD power levels at or above 50% RTP to 90% LUU J.Z.J, LUU RTP. In addition a Note is added to require completion of this Required Action once it is entered. Condition C 3.10.B.6(b)

M3.2-36 1Adds new SR to verify the AFD is within limits on a 7 day Frequency. SR 3.2.3.1 2NA M3.2-39 Adds restrictions on plant operations requiring the power level to be reduced by 3% for every 1% that the LCO 3.2.4, LCO 3.10.C.1 QPTR exceeds 1.0 whereas the CTS only requires that core power level be reduced by 2% for every 1% Condition A that the QPTR exceeds 1.0.

M3.2-41 Revises or adds remedial actions for QPTR outside limits. A new Required Action requires the LCO 3.2.4, LCO 3.10.C.1 determination of the QPTR once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months ; replaces requirements to maintain QPTR below 1.07 and Condition A perform monitoring and logging with performing additional SRs to verify specific hot channel factors, perform additional SR to ensure that the reactor is maintained in a safe configuration, re-evaluate safety analyses and confirm validity for operation prior to increasing power, requires the excore detectors are normalized to restore QPTR to within limits prior to increasing power above the limit, and finally provides an Action for power reduction below 50% RTP within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months if the new Required Actions cannot be met.

M3.2-43 Adds a new SR requiring performance of a calculation every 7 days verifying that QPTR is within limit. SR 3.2.4.1 NA M3.2-46 Increases the SR Frequency from daily to each shift or.3.10..0.4 after each 10% power change. The presentation SR.3.2.4.2 L.

of this test requirement has also been revised to state "Note, not required to be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after core is operating above 85% power with one or more excore nuclear channel inoperable".

M3.2-51 Adds new requirement to determine Fwq 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after achieving equilibrium thereby, allowing the core SR 3.2.1.2 LCO 3.10.B.2 parameters to stabilize.

M3.2-52 Adds new SR Note requiring verification of heat flux channel factors at the beginning of each cycle when SRs 3.2.1 LCO 3.10.B.2 an equilibrium power level has been achieved.

2 5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.2 -Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially)

Aaas new requirements to perform a SR on the nuclear enthalpy rise hot channel factor within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months LCO 3.2.1 LCO when the measured hot channel factor is not within the COLR limits.

and SR 3.1 0.B.3.a M3.2-54 Adds Note requiring verification of the nuclear enthalpy hot channel factor when it is not within limits. LCO 3.2.2, LCO Condition A 3.10.B.3.a and M3.2-55 Adds new SR requirements to verify nuclear enthalpy hot channel factor prior to exceeding 75% RTP LCO 3.2.2, LCO and 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months after reaching greater than or equal to 95% RTP. Condition A 3.10.B.3.c M3.2-56 Adds new requirements reducing power below 15% RTP within 9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months if the AFD is not within the LCO 3.2.3, LCO acceptable region or the cumulative penalty deviation time is exceeded and the Thermal power was not Condition D 3.10.B.6.b reduced to > 50% RTP within 30 minutes M3.2-57 Adds a note allowing a target flux difference to be provided after each refueling outage based on design SR 3.2.3.2 LCO 3.10.B.2 predictions.

3 5/8/2002

Table R - Relocated Specifications and Removed Details ITS Section 3.2 - Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially)

R3.2-49 Relocates CTS Specification for Core Surveillance Instrumentation. This :TRM LUU 5. 1 1 JA .5, 0, U specification has been relocated because it does not meet the NRC Policy Statement TS Selection Criteria for inclusion in the TS.

I I CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References

5. Relocated Specification not meeting 10 CFR 50.36 (c)(2)(ii) criteria

6. Relocated Specification/Surveillance Requirement/ Administrative Control Requirement

7. Performance Required for Indication 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (Not listed sequentially)

-altorlal cnanges were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording in accordance with the LCO 2.3, 3.5, guidance of NUREG-1431.

3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.10, 3.15, 4.1, Table 3.5-1, Table 3.5-2A, Table 3.5-2B, Table 3.15-1, Table 4.1-1A, Table 4.1-1B and Table 4.1-A3.3-01 Did not include general CTS Applicability and Objective statements. ITS administratively incorporates LCO 3.3 2.3, 3.5, and these statements within each specification, the plant design features, or systems to which it applies.

4.1 These statements have been administratively incorporated, in the ITS, describing plant design features or systems since they do not establish any regulatory or operational requirements.

A3.3 Did not include a CTS reference to another section. JNA LCO 2.3.A.3.d A3.3-04 Reformats CTS Tables consistent with ISTS. NA LCO 3.5.A, 3.5.B, 3.15.B, SR 4.1.A, 4.1.B and 4.1.C A3.3-05 Revises CTS column heading to "Required Channels" to be consistent with the ISTS. Table 3.3.1-1 Table 3.5-2A and 3.3.2-1 and 3.5-2B 1

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially)

A3.3-07 "tpiacesspeciTic t-; i j references wita II S reterences. I able L*.*. 1-1, I abies 3.5 FU 1 thru 19, 2A, Table 3.5 and 3.3.2-1, 2B, and Table FU 1 thru 9 3.15-1 A3.3-08 Deletes CTS general collective titles of the applicable modes. The applicable Modes are specifically Table 3.3.1-1, Table 3.5-2A defined in the Table and do not need to be described in the function title. FU 5 Function 6 and Table 4.1-lA Function 6 A3.3-09 Clarifies CTS requirements for the time delay and time range for the degraded voltage DG start time SR 3.3.4.3 Table 3.5-1 delay.

Function 10 A3.3-14 Reformatted CTS including the RTBs have been included in a Table Function named Reactor Trip Table 3.3.1-1, Table 3.5-2A Breakers instead of their own separate Function. FU 17, and Functions 19 Note h and 20 Note (d) and Table 4.1-1A Functions 19 and 20, Notes 15 and 16 A3.3-18 Reformatted CTS Action Statements to be consistent with ISTS.

LCO 3.3.1, Tabl 3.-A Cond B, C, Actions 1, 4, D,E, F, H, J, 5,6,7,8,11, K,L,M,N,O, and 33 and and Note 1, Table 3.5-2B LCO 3.3.2, Actions A, 20, Cond B, C, D, 21, 23, 24, 25, E, F, G, H, I, 26, 27, 28, 29, J, and K 30,31,32, LCO 3.3.4, and 33 2

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially)

Uond A, B, and C A3.3-19 Revises CTS title for reactor trip system consistent with ISTS by deleting "and Interlock". Table 3.3.1-1, Table 3.5-2A FU 19 Function 18 and Table 4.1 1A Function 118 A3.3-21 Replaces CTS Action Statements Mýod Tiiies witih equivalent Mode numbers. In addition, the LCO 3.3.1, Table 3.5-2A, Completion Times have been reformatted to require actions in total hours instead of specific Cond B, M, 0, Action 1, 7, 9, increments. The overall times have not changed. and P and and 10, and LCO 3.3.2, Table 3.5-2B, Cond B, C, F, Action 20, 23, and G 25, 27, and 28 A3.3-23 Did not include CTS statement that the IRNIs channel be restored to OPERABLE prior to increasing LCO 3.0.4 and Table 3.5-2A power above P-6. This requirement is included in ITS LCO 3.0.4 which provides the same restriction. LCO 3.3.1 Action 3 Cond F A3.3-28 Replaces specific CTS terminology "unblocked" with "blocked" when describing the reactor trip Table 3.3.1_-1, LCO 2.3.13.1, "interlocks. FU 16, 16.b.2, 2.3.B.2, 16.d, and 2.3.B.4, and 16.e. 2.3.B.5 A3.3-29 Reformats CTS presentation of shutdown tracks consistent with ISTS format. LCO 3.3.1 Table 3.5-2A Cond B, M, N, Actions 1, 7, O, and P, 8, 9, and 10 LCO 3.3.2, and Table 3.5 Cond B, C, F, 2B Actions 20, and G 23, 25, and 28 3

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially)

IeTormattea L; I b requirements tor inoperable SR 3.3.1.4 Table 3.5-2A consistent with ISTS. Note 1 Action 10 A3.3-35 Revises CTS title, "Automatic Actuation Relay Logic" to more accurately reflect PI design. Table 3.3.2-1, Table 3.5-2B FU 2, 2b, 3b, Functions le, 4b, and 5b 2c, 3.e, 4.f, Table 3.3.5-1 5e, 6d, and 7f Table 4.1-1 B FU le, 2c, 3c, 4f, 5e, 6d, and 7f.

A3.3-38 Reformats CTS Note to be consistent with ISTS meaning that the function is not required below 2000 Table 3.3.2-1, Table 3.5-2B psig in the RCS. Note a note a and Table 4.1-1B Note 21 A3.3-39 Reformats CTS Note consistent with ISTS requiring the function of CVI OPERABLE during Table 3.3.5-1, Table 3.5-2B containment integrity and movement of irradiated fuel. Notes a, b, Note b and and Table 4.1-1B Applicability Note 26 A3.3-43 Reformats CTS Note restating the Applicability for when both MSIVs are closed. Table 3.3.2-1 Table 3.5-2B Note c note c and Table 4.1-1 B Note 23 A3.3-47 Revises CTS Function Title deleting "4.16 kV" since it is redundant information. Table 3.3.2-1, Table 3.5-2B FU 6 Function 7 A3.3-48 Clarifies CTS with wording consistent with ISTS. Table 3.3.2-1, Table 3.5-2B Note G Footnote and Table 4.1-1 B 4

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially)

Keviseda I 6 consistent with LAR entitled, ýmoval of Boric Acid Storage Tanks from the Safety I aDle j.o-zt Injection System." Function 9 Action 34, 35, and 36 A3.3-51 Reformats CTS requirements from being subdivided into the turbine driven AFW and the motor driven Table 3.3.2-1, Table 3.5-2B1 AFW. FU 6e and Table 4.1-1B Function 7d A3.3-54 Restates CTS required actions for systems normally blind flanged and not operating. LCO 3.3.5, Table 3.5-2B, Cond B and C Action 22 A3.3-55 Did not include CTS statement allowing one channel to be bypassed for up to 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months for surveillance LCO 3.3.1, Table 3.5-2B, testing since this is included with the AFW logic testing. Condition I Action 30 A3.3-62 Did not include CTS specific Objective statements which did not provide any technical requirements. LCO 3.3.3 LCO 3.15 A3.3-63 Restates CTS requirements allowing the plant to start up with inoperable EM equipment. LCO 3.3.3, LCO 3.15.C Actions A3.3-65 Restates CTS using ISTS descriptive terminology "Penetration Flow Path." Table 3.3.3-1, Table 3.15-1 FU9 Function 9 A3.3-66 Did not include unnecessary CTS descriptive verbiage. Table 3.3.1-1, Table 3.15.1 FU 15 and Action 5, 15, Table 3.3.3, and 16 Note c Note c A3.3-68 Clarifies CTS adding a Note in the EM Table that each core exit thermocouple is a channel. Table 3.3.1-1 NA Note c 5

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially) ilarnies u i s Dy providing a direction tor operators to LCO 3.3.3, Completion Times. Cond H A3.3-72 Did not include CTS column title of Functional Test since this test has been replaced by other tests i.e., Table 3.3.1-1, Table 4.1-1A, TADOT, COT, or ALT. FU 1 thru 19 FU 1 thru 20 and 4.1 -1 B, and 4.1 -1 C A3.3-75 Restate CTS requirements for SRs for the calibration of the Power Range Neutron Flux High Setpoint. Table 3.3.1-1, Table 4.1-1A FU 6, 7, and Functions 2a, 20 7, and 8.

A3.3-81 Clarifies CTS requirements that setpoint verification is not required for the quarterly SR of the 4 kV Table 3.3.1-1, Table 4.1-1A RCP Bus undervoltage and underfrequency. FU 11 and 12 Functions 15 and 16b Iand A3.3-84 Clarifies CTS requirements for response time testing of the automatic trip logic and reactor trip Table 3.3.1-1, Table 4.1-1A breakers. FU 17 and 19 Functions 18

_ 19 A3.3-85 Did not include CTS format for Frequency notations not included in the ISTS. LCO 3.3 Table 4.1-1A, Table 4.1-1B and Table 4.1 1C A3.3-94 Did not include unnecessary CTS descriptive wording. SR 3.3.1.11, Table 4.1-1A No te No t e 7 A3.3-95 Restates CTS requirements for STAGGERED TEST BASIS consistent with ISTS. SR 3.3.1.4, Table 4.1-1A 3.3.1.5, and Note 9 and 3.3.2.2 Table 4.1-1B Note 22 6

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially) 3.- u' uia not inciude U Ib Note reterencing a spe, Specification since it is no longer applicable. NA Iabie 4.1-1 b Note 25 1A3.3-109 Clarifies CTS by adding a Note requirin veiiation of the setpoint is not required by this SR. SR3.3.2.4, ~NA Note A3.3-114 Incorporated LAR, "Removal of Boric Acid" into the CTS. NA Table 4.1-1C Functions 5, 7, 9 and 12 and Note 33 A3.3-123 Did not include CTS Notes due to ISTS format. NA Table 4.1-1C Notes and 37 35, 36, A3.3-126 ~Restates CTS references for TS 3.11 to ITS 3.2.4.2. {LCO 3.3.1, 1 LCO 3.1 O.C.4 D

ICond A3.3-1?2* Clarifies CTS requirements that two automatic trip logic and reactor trip breakers are to be OPERABLE Table 3.3.1-1, Table 3.5-2A ith the input to the RTS from each train considered to be a channel.. FU 15, 17, Function 17, and 19 18 and 19 A3.3-130 Revises the CTS definition of the nomenclature and the values for f(AI) consistent with ISTS. Table 3.3.1-1, LCO 2.3.A.2.d FU 6, Note 1 and 2.3.A.2.e A3.3-133 Restates CTS requirements that undervoltage is a percentage of normal voltage to undervoltage is a Table 3.3.1-1, LCO 2.3.A.2.g percentage of rated bus voltage. FU 11a and 11b A3.3-134 Clarifies CTS instrumentation ranges for measuring high pressurizer water level and low low steam Table 3.3.1-1, LCO 2.3.A.3.a generator water level which are specified as a percentage of narrow range. FU 9 and 13 and 2.3.A.3.b 7

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially)

Kesiates u i z5 tnat a UU I be pertormed on intermediate range and source range neutron I able 4.1-1 A instrumentation prior to reactor startup following each shutdown in excess of 2 days. The ITS requires Notation 4 the same SR Frequency only specified as 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months instead of a 2 days.

A3.3-142 Clarifies CTS applicability by specifically stating that once the plant is in Mode 3, the MSIVs can be LCO 3.3.2, Table 3.5-2B shut thus exiting the Mode of Applicability which is consistent with ISTS. Condition G Action 25 A3.3-143 Clarifies CTS requirements that the neutron detectors are excluded from CHANNEL CALIBRATION. SR 3.3.3.1, Table 4.1-1C This is consistent with current PI practices and ISTS requirements. 3.3.3.2, and Footnote 41 LCO 3.3.5 and FU 23 A3.3-144 Restates CTS requirements for submitting a report to the NRC. 5.6.8, LCO Table 3.15 3.3.3, Cond C Action (a)l and J and 3 A3.3-146 Clarifies CTS requirements ensuring that with one or more trains of radiation monitoring inoperable, LCO 3.3.5, Table 3.5-2B, operation may continue provided that the containment inservice purge supply and exhaust valves are Cond A and B Action 22 closed.

A3.3-147 Reformats CTS requirements for CVI instrumentation. LCO 3.3.5 LCO 3.6.D.2.c A3.3-148 Restates CTS actions requiring that with one or more inservice purge Functions inoperable, enter LCO 3.3.5, LCO 3.6.D.2.d applicable Conditions and Required Actions of LCO 3.6.3 for containment inservice purge valves made Condition B inoperable by isolation instrumentation.

A3.3-149 Reformatted CTS consistent with ISTS wording. LCO 3.3.5 and LCO 3.8.A.1 .j Applicability A3.3-150 Clarifies CTS requirements by adding a Note stating that separate condition entry is allowed for each LCO 3.3.4, Table 3.5-2B, Function. This is consistent with PI current intent. Condition A Function 8.

8 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Power Distribution Limits (Not listed sequentially) iarities L; I b intent that it the automatic load sequencers are inoperable, spec I aoie 3.b-zt, to be taken. Function 8 A3.3-155 Clarifies CTS requirements that the neutron detectors are excluded from response time testing. Table FU 2a,3.3.1-1, 2b, 3a, Table 4.1-1A Functions 2a, 3b, 5, 6, and 7 2b, 3a, 5, 6, SR3.3.1.16, and 7

................................. No te 9

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (Not listed sequentially)

D IT eto~CSSc> Change No.

Summr .,C L3.3-13 Revises CTS MODES of Applicability to be consistent with NUREG-1431, Rev. 1. ITS Seto CTS Sect T~ype~

Table 3.3.1 - Table 3.5- 1 1, FU 8a, 2A, Action 1, 8b, 9, 10, 6, and Table 11, 12,13, 4.1-1A 14, notes e, Functions 9, f, and g 11,12,13, LCO Cond 15, and 16 B, D, I, K, M, and N L3.3-22 Eliminates CTS requirement to enter LCO 3.0 C rather, the ITS provides specific Required Actions LCO 3.3.1, Table 3.5-2A 2,-9 to be performed instead of a reactor shutdown upon entry into the subject Condition. Cond D and Action 2 and E 6, Table 3.5 LCO 3.3.2, 2B Actions Cond D, E, 21,24, and and H 29 And LCO 3.0.C CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (Not listed sequentially) jSumrmary , .~ ITS Section CTS Sect Xcag No. Type L3.3-24 Relaxes CTS requirements for restoring an inoperable intermediate range nuclear instrument LCO 3.3.1 Table 3.5-2A 4 channel to operable prior to increasing power above P-10 when the plant power level is between Cond D Paragraph P-6 and P-10. The ITS requires that one intermediate range neutron flux channel is inoperable, (b) the plant reduce power below the P-6 setpoint or requires the plant to increase power above P-10.

L3.3-25 Eliminates CTS requirement to enter LCO 3.0 C for a single inoperable channel of neutron flux LCO 3.3.1 Table 395-2A"4,9 instruments. The ITS provides specific Required Actions to be performed instead of a reactor Cond G Action 3 and shutdown upon entry into the subject Condition.

LCO 3.0.C L3.3-30 Relaxes CTS requirements on stopping all operations involving positive reactivity changes when .LCO 3.3.1 Table 3.5-2A 4 one source range neutron flux channel is inoperable. The ITS allows cooldown or boron dilution Cond H Action 4 activities to continue as long as the reactivity is accounted for in the SDM.

L3.3-31 Replaces CTS instrument setpoint values to be consistent with established allowable values Table 3.3.1- LCO consistent with the PI setpoint methodology. In many cases, the ITS values are less restrictive 1, FU 2a, 2.3.A.2.a, than what is contained in the CTS, 3a, 3b, 8a, 2.3.A.2.b, 8b, 10, 12, 2.3.A.2.c, 16.b.2, 16.c, 2.3.A.2.g, 16.d, 16.e, 2.3.A.2.i, Table 3.3.2- 2.3.B.2.b, 1 FU 6d, 2.3.B.3,

_Table 3.3.3- 2.3.B.4, I CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 2

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (Not listed sequentially)

No DOC Sumar ITS Section CSSc 1,Change Nor>>~- ~ Sumary'I

~ TS Sct~ Type~

2 FU 1d, Table 3.5-1, and 4c FU 3 and 5 L3.3-33 Relaxes CTS Completion Time by one hour to restore an inoperable breaker to OPERABLE prior LCO 3.3.1 LCO 3.0.C 6 to initiating a plant shutdown. Cond P and Table 3.5-2A Action 9 Part b and Action 10 L3.3-36 Eliminates CTS requirement for the automatic initiation of SI on a high containment pressure in Table 3.3.2- Table 3.5- 4 Mode 4. 1 2B, FU le and Table 4.1-1 B Function lb

_ _.................................._a nd 2 b L3.3-37 Eliminates CTS requirement for the automatic initiation of containment spray on high containment Table 3.3.2- Table 3.5- 4 pressure in Mode 4. 1, FU 2c 2B, FU 2b and Table 4.1-1B Function 2b CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 3

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (Not listed sequentially)

DOC~ K S urn y ITS Section ~CTS' Sect ~Change L3.3-42 Relaxes CTS requirements from requiring the MSIVs to be OPERABLE in Mode 2 for each Table 3.3.2- Table 3,5- 1,2 subfunction of steam line isolation to not requiring this specification to be applicable when both 1, FU 4a, 2B, FU 5 MSIVs are closed. 4b, 4c, 4d, and and 4e Table 4.1-1B Function 5 L3.3-45 Relaxes CTS requirements from requiring the Applicability in Mode 2 for each subfunction of Table 3.3.2- Table 3.5- 1,2 feedwater isolation to not being applicable when all MFRVs and MFRV Bypass valves are closed 1, FU 5a, 2B, FU 6 and de-activated or isolated by a manual valve. 5b, 5c, and and Note e Table 4.1-1B Function Note 29 6, L3.3-53 Relaxes CTS requirements by allowing the radiation monitoring system to continue to operate for LCO 3.3.2, Table 3.5-2B3 4, 6 up to 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months with one train inoperable. Cond A and Action 22 B

L3.3-67 Relaxes CTS requirements by allowing credit for a check valve with flow through the valve secured Table 3.3.3- Table 3.15-1 1, 4 providing a containment leakage prevention barrier. 1 Note a Note b L3.3-74 neutron fluxCTS Eliminates instrumentation requirementseach refueling. a response time test on the intermediate range for performing Table 1, FU 43.3.1- Table 4.1-iA Function 5 3 CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 4

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (Not listed sequentially)

L3.3-82 requirements to caiDrate ihe KIL; DreaKer open tur L3.3-83 Relaxes CTS Frequency for testing the RCP breaker open trip instrumentation every 24 months Table 3.3.1_- lTable 4.1i-lAj3,10 instead of every shutdown in excess of 2 days. 1 FU 11 Function 16 L3.3-86 Relaxes CTS Frequency from performing the SR prior to each startup following shutdown in SR 3.3.1.8 Table 4.1 -1A 3, 10 excess of 2 days if not done in the previous 30 days to be performed prior to each startup if not Notes 4 and done in the previous 92 days and every 92 days thereafter. 17 L3.3- Replaces CTS weekly check of RWST level instrumentation with a monthly check. Also monthly Table 3.3.3- Table 4.1- 3,10 113 functional test was deleted. 1 IC Function 8

L3.3- Eliminates CTS requirement for the OTAT and OPAT functions being calibrated or OPERABLE in NA Table 4.1- 3,10 117 Mode 3. 1C Function 18 and Note L3.8- Eliminates CTS SRs for the hydrogen monitor channel check, calibration, and functional testing. 34 NA Table 4.1 - 3 118 1C, FU 29 CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 5

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (Not listed sequentially)

L3.3 Relaxes CTS requirements for verification of the core quadrant power balance daily and 10%

125 power changes when one excore nuclear channel is inoperable and power above 85% to verify ILCO 3.3.1, LCO 6j, IU Condition D 13.10.C.4 core quadrant power balance every 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

1-3 Re x s CTSS. r q.............................

Relaxe r m s i i t the ea l, a lt i M d, 2t. a... ve , 6i,,t.o.........L.

t d o onTa e335-ab 34 ............

2,4 129 Mode 2. 1, FU 4 2A, FU 5 Note c, and and Note k Table 4.1-1,A

. .. . . . . . . .... Functi o n 5 L3.3- Eliminates CTS column titles and associated limits for the "Channels to Trip" and "Minimum Table 3.3.1- Table 3.5-2A 4 132 Channels Operable." This change is based on the new ISTS format. I and and 3.5-2B Table 3.3.2 L3.3- Eliminates CTS requirements to enter LCO 3.0.C for two source range neutron flux channels LCO 3.3.1 Table 3.5- f4, 6,10 135 inoperable. The ITS provides specific Required Actions to avoid an unnecessary reactor Cond I 2A, Action 4 shutdown.

and L3.3-

_____ I ____________________________________________________ _______LCO 3.0.C ___

Relaxes CTS requirements for RTB being opened when one manual trip channel or one source LCO 3.3.1 Table 3.5-2A 4 136 range neutron flux channel is inoperable. The ITS provides specific actions to initiate action to fully Cond C and Action 5 and insert all rods and place the rod control system in a condition incapable of rod withdrawal. J 8 CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 6

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (Not listed sequentially)

"S1 Summarycs~e <. ITS No j <2 ;mmr ~;t L3.3-

~Type Relaxes CTS requirements for a core quadrant power balance to be performed when a power LCO 3.3.1 Table 3.5-2A 4 137 range neutron flux channel is inoperable and RTP is above 85%. The ITS only requires a Cond D Action 2c determination that the core quadrant power balance when the power range neutron flux input to QPRT is inoperable.

L3.3- Relaxes CTS requirements for a quarterly verification in Modes 3, 4, and 5 that P-6 and P10 are in Table 3.3.1- Table 4.1 1Ar3, 10 138 their required state with a COT on the source range neutron flux instrumentation. The ITS only 1, FU 5 Function 6b requires verification that P-6 and P-10 are in their required state for existing plan conditions associated with the COT on power range.

L3.3- Relaxes CTS SR requirements for performing a CHANNEL CALIBRATION for the radiation 168 monitors for Containment Purge System Frequency from prior to CORE ALTERATIONS to 24 months.

CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 7

5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (Not listed sequentially)

LIKJ.6-4ti details for AFW manual initiation function, 1 Table 3.5 2B, FU 7 and Table 4.1 1B, Function 7n LR3.3-96 Relocates CTS descriptive information

';e11o;(Baesfor verification and performance of

_ _ permmissives. 5.5.12, Bases Control Program T~ases Table

.1-4.1 -

1A, Note 10 12, 3 LR3.3-101 Relocates CTS notes detailing "what and how" SRs are performed on the 5.5.12, Bases Bases Table 4.1- 3 undervoltage and shunt trip mechanisms. Control Program 1A, Notes 13 and 14 LR3.3-102 fRelocates CTS details for the quadrant power tilt monitor alarm function in the 10CFR50.59 TRM Table 4.1- 2 control room.

1A, Note 18 LR3.3-112 Relocates CTS details for the RHR pump flow function. 10CFR50.59 TRM Table 4.1- 1,2 1C, Function 6

LR3.3-116 Relocates CTS details for channel check and functional testing requirements 10CFR50.59 TRM Table 4.1- 3 for the Coolant Flow RTD Bypass Flowmeter.

1C, Function 18 INu I Ytt-

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (Not listed sequentially)

Relocates CTS details for reactor coolant flow SR to be performed specifically 5.5.12, Bases LCO at elbow taps. Control Program 2.3.A.2.f LR3.3-131 Relocates CTS descriptive information for the f delta I Function. 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 2, 3 Control Program 2.3.A.2.d LR3.3-139 Relocates CTS descriptive information for a single point comparison of incore 10CF50.59 USAR Table 4.1- 2 to excore nuclear instrumentation for axial off-set. 1A, Note 6 LR3.3-154 Relocates CTS details in accordance with LAR. NA NA Table 3.5-2B 2 Function 6C and Table 4.1-1B Function 6C LR3.3-156 Relocates CTS notes detailing "what and how" SRs are performed on the 5.5.12, Bases Bases Table 4.1-1C3 undervoltage and shunt trip mechanisms. Control Program Functions 15, 26, 27, and 28 LR3.3-157 Relocates CTS details for Containment Temperature Monitors. 10CFR50.59 TRM Table 4.1-1C12 Function 30 CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 2

5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (Not listed sequentially)

Aads new requirements for when one or more Control Rods are not fully inserted. Table 3.3.1-1, Table 3.5-2A Note a Note a, Table 4.1-1 Note 1, Table 3.5-2A Note a, and Table 4.1-1A M3.3-1 5 Adds a new Function to the CTS for the RTS interlocks, number of OPERABLE channels, Applicable Table 3.3.1 -1, Table 3.5-2A MODES, Required Actions, and Surveillance Testing. FU 16 and and LCO 3.3.1 Table 4.1 -1 A Cond Q, R, Function 16 and S

M3.3-16 Adds new requirements and operational constraints for RTB Undervoltage and Shunt Trip Mechanism. Table 3.3.1-1, Table 3.5-2A FU17and18 and Table 4.1-1A Function 19 M3.3-17 Modifies CTS Note providing additional restrictions for the reactor trip system OPERABILITY under Table 3.3.1-1, Table 3.5-2A specific plant conditions. Note h Note d and Table 4.1-1A Note 16 fM3.3-26 Adds new Required Action to CTS to address when two source range neutron flux channels are LCO 3.3.1 Table 3.5-1A, inoperable. Cond I Action 4 1

5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.3 -Instrumentation (Not listed sequentially)

-educes C 16 Completion Time to repair a diverse trip feature, place the breaker in bypass, or declare it Fable 3.3.1-1 Table 3.5-2A inoperable from 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months . and Action 9 LCO 3.3.1, Cond J and P M3.3-40 Adds a new Allowable Value for the HI-HI Steam Generator Level to the CTS. Table 3.3.2-1, Table 3.5-1 FU 5b Function 11 M3.3-49 Adds new Mode of Applicability to the CýTS equrn th edae slto oio be OPERABLE in Tal332-,abe35B MODE 3. The CTS does not have this Applicability. FU 5a Function 6d M3.3-52 Adds new Applicability of When associated DG is required to be OPERABLE by LCO 3.8.2, 'AC LCO 3.3.4, . Table 3.5-2B Sources - Shutdown' "to the CTS for the loss of power function. Condition B Function 8 M3.3-57 Revises CTS Action Statement to take specific actions, thus affecting more equipment, when three LCO 3.3.4, Table 3.5-2B channels per bus of degraded voltage or undervoltage are inoperable. Cond C Action 33

[M3.3-59 Adds new specification to the CTS for the DG load sequencers. LCO 3.3.4, LCO 3.7.A Condition B M3.3-60 AAdds new requirements to CTS to reduce power to Mode 4 within 18 hours2.083333e-4 days 0.005 hours 2.97619e-5 weeks 6.849e-6 months or shutdown. LCO 3.3.2, Table 3.5-2B, Cond G Action 28 M3.3-61 Adds new Required Actions to the CTS for an inoperable DG load sequencer . LCO 3.3.4 Table 3.5-2B, Conditions C Action 33 and D M3.3-64 Eliminates CTS exception for not entering LCO 3.0.C. Elimination of this exception may require LCO 3.3.3 LCO 3.0.C additional plant shutdowns. and 3.15.D 2

5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.3 -Instrumentation (Not listed sequentially) increases CTS Frequency of performing a COT for power range, neutron flux-low, intermediate range, Table 3.3.1-1, Table 4.1-1A and source range instrumentation from no specific time to 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

FU 2b, 4, and Function 2b, 5 5, 6a, and SR 3.3.1.8 Note 10.

Kln~fý M3.3-87 Reduces CTS Frequency for the pefofrmance of the SR if the reactor goes to Mode 3 if not performed SR 3.3.1.15 Table 4.1-1A within the previous 31 days. The CTS only requires the SR if the unit was shutdown for more than 2 Note 4 days.

M3.3-88 Revises CTS Note to require performance of SR within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months after RTP exceeds 15% and every 31 SR 3.3.1.3 Table 4.1-1A EFPD. The CTS does not provide any specific time to perform the SR. Note 6 M3.3-91 Revises CTS Note requiring the SR to be performed within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months of reaching 15%. The CTS does SR 3.3.1.2 .Table 4.1 -1A not have a specific time limit. No te 5 M3.3-92 'Revises CTS Note requiring performance of SR within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months of reaching specific RTP. The CTScioes SR 3.3.1.6 Table 4.1 -AA not require any specific time to perform the SR. Note 8 M3.3-105 Adds a new Note to CTS requiring verification that the time constants associated with the instrumentation SR 3.3.1.10 Table 4.1-1A are adjusted to prescribed values. The CTS does not require this SR. Note and and 4.1-1B

.......... SR 3.3.2.6 Note M3.3-106 Adds restriction to CTS Mode of Applicability for the Feedwater Isolation Logic to Mode 3 except when.Table 3.3.2-1 Table 4.1--1 B the MFRVs and MFRV Bypass valves are closed.

Function 6d M3.3-108 Adds new requirements to CTS for the reactor trip bypass breaker to be tested prior to placing it in SR 3.3.1.4 Table 4.1-1A service. Note note 16 M3.3-145 Reduces CTS Frequency from 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months to 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months for performing a channel check. Table 3.3.5-1 Table 4.1-1 B Function 4e 3

5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.3 -Instrumentation (Not listed sequentially) caluon to0 I Tor u;ontrol Room Special Ventilation System.

M3.3-160 Adds new Specification to CTS for Spent FlueltPoolSpecialVentilation System.. -- 0---_3-.7 "...

M3.3-170 Adds new requirement to cTs to reduce power to Mode 4 for inoperable steam line isolation - manual LCO 3.3.2 Table 3.5-2B channel.

Cond F Action 27 M3.3-171 Adds SR requirements to CTS for testing master and slave relays.

Table 3.3.1-1, Table 4.1-1lB SR 3.3.2.2, Function le, 3.3.2.7, and 12c, 3c, 5e, 6d, 3.3.2.8 and 7f.

M3.3-1 72 Increases the CTS Allowable Value for the steam generator low-low level in accordance with Table 3.3.2-1, LCO 2.3.A.3.b Westinghouse NSAL 02-3.

FU 6b and

. . . .. Table 3.3.1-1,

. . . FU 13 4

5/8/2002

Table R - Relocated Specifications and Removed Details ITS Section 3.3 - Instrumentation (Not listed sequentially)

Keiocates u Izi zipecitication tor Control Rod Stops.

R3.3-115 Relocated various instruments in accordance with an approved LAR. USAR 10CFR50.59 Table 4.1-1C 2,6 Functions 13, 16, 17,19, 20 and 31.

R3.3-152 Relocated specific Functions for high temperature vent ducts. TRM 10CFR50.59 Table 3.5-1 2,6 Function 8 and Table 4.1-1C Function 24 CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Relocated Redundant Requirements

5. Relocated Specification not meeting 10 CFR 50.36 (c)(2)(ii) criteria

6. Relocated Specification/Surveillance Requirement/ Administrative Control Requirement

7. Performance Required for Indication 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4 - Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially)

Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not LC LCO 3.1, 3.3, change or delete any technical requirements. 3.10, Table 4.1 2A, Table 4.1-2B, Table 4.1-1C, 4.3 and 4.6 A3.4-03 Removes general CTS Applicability and Objective statements at the beginning of each CTS section. LCO 3.4 LCO 3.1 and 4.3 These statements only provide general information and do not impose any operational or technical requirements.

A3.4-08 Replaces CTS prose descriptions of Modes with equivalent ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY. The LCO 3.4 LCO 3.1 .A.1 .a(2),

plant Modes to which this specification apply have not changed. 3.1 .A.1 .b(l),

3.1.A.1.b (2),

3.1.A.1.c(3),

3.1.A.1 .c(3),

3.1.A.1.d, 3.1.A.2.a(1),

3.1 .A.2.a(2),

3.1 .A.2.a(3),

3.1.A.2.b(1),

3.1 .A.2.c(1),

3.1 .A.2.c(1 )(a),

3.1.A.2.c(1)(b),

3.1 .A.2.c(1)(b)3, 3.1 .B.1 .b, 3.1.C.1, 3.1 C..2, 3.1.C.2.d, 3.1.C.3, 3.1.D.2, 3.1.D.2.a, 3.1.D.2.b, 3.10.J and 4.3.

1 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4- Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially)

Did not include CTS statement that "STARTUP OPERATION which is duplicative to ITS general rules LCO 3.1 .A.1 .b(2),

for use and applicability governing how the plant may operate. Among these rules is Specification 3.0.4 which, unless specifically excepted, does not allow the plant to startup with inoperable TS 3.1 .A.2.a(2),

3.1 .A.2.b(1) and required equipment.

3.1.A.2.c(1)(b)

A3 .4-18 Did not include CTS actions which are defined by the format of ITS. NA LCO 3.1.A.1.b(3)

A3.4-22 Did not include CTS requirements for the plant to shut down which are provided by ITS format. . NA LCO 3.1 .A. .b(3)

A3.4-28 Divides operationCTS Specification when in MODE 4requiring and MODEtwo methods of cooling the RCS to be operable with one in .

5, loops filled into two separate Specifications. LC.3.4.7 C.. 3 1 A...c-.

A3.4-39 Revises CTS format to be consistent with the ITS. The format for CTS and ITS fundamentally differ in LCO 3.4.3, LCO 3.1.A.2.a(2).

the presentation of shutdown tracks but the Completion Time requirements are the same. LCO 3.4.9, 3.1.A.2.a(3),

Conditions 3.1.A.2.c.(1)(b)(1),

A, B, and C, 3.1.A.2.c.(1)(b)(3),

LCO 3.4.11, 3.1 .B.1 .b and Conditions 3.1.C.2 D, E, and G, LCO 3.4.14, Conditions B, C, and D, and LCO 3.4.15 A3.4-46 Incorporates CTS allowance for pressurizer safety valves to be 2485 psig+/- 3% when tested for LCO 3.4.10 LCO 3.1 .A.2.b (1) operability.

2 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4- Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially)

AJ .4-4U Vid not include CTS required action since it is included based on ITS format.

IN\ L;O J.1 .A.2.C (1)(b)(1),

3.1.A.2.c(1)(b)(3),

3.1 .A.2.c(1 )(b)(4),

and 3.11.A.2.c(1)(b)(5)

A3.4-61 Revises CTS requirements for maintaining RCS pressure and temperature limits by dividing them into LCO 3.4.3 LCO 3.1.B.1.b two sets of action statements. This change also includes changing to the NUREG-1431 use of MODES to define plant conditions rather than use of prose descriptions. These are editorial and format changes and do not change PI operating practices or intent.

A3.4-71 Clarifies CTS requirements to immediately enter into LCO 3.0.3, which is the appropriate action if no LCO 3.4.16 LCO 3.1.C.1 and leakage detection instrumentation is OPERABLE. This is consistent with current P1 practices. 3.1.C.2.d A3.4-73 'Clarifies CTS LEAKAGE requirements making it consistent with the ITS definition of LEAKAGE. This LCO 3.4.14, LCO 3.1.C.2.a change is consistent with PI current operating practices.

Conditions A and C A3,4-77 Did not include CTS requirements since it is included in the ITS format. .NA .LCO 3.1..C.2.d A3.4-78 Revises CTS requirements for inservice steam generator tube inspection to include in ITS Section 5.5. 3.4.14, LCO 3.1.C.2.e No technical changes are associated with this change.

Condition D and SR 4.12 and SR 3.4.14.2 A3.4-83 Clarifies CTS Applicability to be consistent with the ITS format.

LCO 3.4.12 LCO 3.3.A.3 and and 3.4.13 3.3.A.4 A3.4-99 Revises CTS SR Frequency general statement from prior to resuming power after each refueling to SR 3.4.15.1 SR 4.3 every 24 months.

3 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4- Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially)

Jiarnires u i zi requirements tor RCS total flow rate. Only editorial changes were made and no LCO parameter, technical or operational changes made.

A3.4-102 Replaces CTS statement, "whenever the reactor coolant system average temperature is below 350 F" LCO 3.4.6 LCO 3.1.A.l.c (1) with the ITS equivalency of MODE 4. The temperature limit of 350 F in the CTS is the same as ITS Mode 4.

A3.4-103 Replaces CTS statement, "whenever the reactor coolant system average temperature is below 350 F" LCOG3.4.11 LCO 3.1 .A.l.c (1) with the ITS equivalency of MODE 5 with RCS loops filled. The temperature limit of below 350 F in the CTS is enveloped in the ITS Mode 5 with RCS loops filled.

A3.4-104 Editorially revises CTS act*.io.n statement for only one OPERABLE method of removing decay heat. The LOC 3.4.12 LCO 3.1i.A.l c.(2) actions are the same in both CTS and ITS.

and 3.4.13 A3.4-105 Editorially revises CTS shutdown requirements with one method of decay heat removal inoperable.

TLCO 3.4.12 LCO 3.1.A.1.c (2)

The Actions and Completion Times in both the CTS and ITS are the same, no technical or operational and 3.4.13 changes have been made to this requirement.

A3.4-106 Editorially revises CTS requirement with no methods of removing decay heat. CTS and ITS actions L. O 3.4.13 ILCO 3.1 .A.1.c (3)

and Completion Times remain the same.

A3.4-107 Editorially revises CTS requirements for defining the acceptable methods for removing decay heat. LCO 3.4.11 LCO 3.1.A.1.c (1)

CTS and ITS allow the use of the same decay heat removal system or a combination of the two to meet the LCO requirements.

A3.4-1 10 Clarifies intent of CTS requirements by adding a note stating that the Required Actions do not have to LCO 3.4.11 LCO 3.1.A.2.c (1) be entered if sole reason for the block valves being declared inoperable is a result of power being removed to comply with other Required Actions. No operational or technical changes are associated and 3.1 .A.2.c(1 )(b)(4) with this change.

4 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4- Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially)

/A%3.'.--I -I -I Clarifies intent of CTS requirements by adding a Note that with both block valves inoperable, restore LUU J.4.1 1 IL;.U 3.1 .A.Z.C one block valve to OPERABLE status within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months , if sole reason for the block valves being declared inoperable is a result of power being removed to comply with other Required Actions. No operational 1(1)(b)(5) or technical changes are associated with this change.

A3.4-112 Clarifies CTS requirements that the Primary System Leakage be evaluated daily, but not required to SR3.4.14.1 Table 4.1-2A Item be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after establishment of steady state operation. Performance of this SR at 9 steady state conditions is standard PI operating practice and consistent with the intent of the CTS.

A3.4-113 Clarifies CTS requirements by adding a Note stating that the SR is to be performed in MODES i and 2 SR 3.4.11.1 Table 4.1-2A Item for the Pressurizer PORV Block. Performance of this SR in MODE 3 is standard PI operating practice 6 and consistent with the intent of the CTS.

A3.4-1414 Clarifies CTS requirements by adding a Note stating that the SR is to be performed in MODES 1 and 2 SR 3.4.11.2 Table 4.1-2A Item to functionally test the PORVs. Performance of this SR in MODE 3 is standard PI operating practice 7 and consistent with the intent of the CTS.

A3.4-120 Editorially revises CTS requirements that two methods of decay heat removal be OPERABLE when LCO 3.4.11 LCO 3.1.A.1.c (2) the reactor is in MODE 5. With only one OPERABLE method of removing decay heat, initiate prompt and 3.4.12 action to restore two OPERABLE methods of removing decay heat. The ITS requires two loops of decay heat removal be OPERABLE when the reactor is in MODE 5. With one required loop inoperable and one RHR loop OPERABLE, immediately initiate action to restore a second loop to OPERABLE status. Since the only changes were editorial, the Required Actions and associated Completion Times are the same and no technical changes or operating practices were changed.

A3.4-121 Editorially revises CTS requirements for two methods of decay heat removal be OPERABLE when the LCO 3.4.11 LCO 3.1 .A.1.c (2) reactor is in MODE 5. These changes were editorial; the Required Actions and associated Completion and 3.4.12 Times are the same and no technical changes or operating practices were changed.

5 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.4- Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially)

Editorially revises CTS Required Actions with no methods of removing decay heat. These changes were editorial; the Required Actions and associated Completion Times are the same and no technical changes or operating practices were changed.

A3.4-124 Editorially revises CTS requirement by combining the SR and Footnote and replacing power operation SR 3.4.17.3 Table 4.1-2B Item with MODE 1.

A3.4-125 Editorially revises CTS requirement for performing this SR at reactor power with MODE 1.

SR 3.4.17.2 Itable 4.1-2B Item 2

A3.4-127 Did not include CTS requirements that reactor vessel head be removed. This flexibility exits the NA LCO 3.3.A.3(b) specification Applicability as defined in ITS.

6 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.4 - Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially)

Relaxes CTS requirements by deleting the limitation for the pressurizer pressure limits during an increase in power. The ITS applies this limit to both increasing and decreasing power.

L3.4-05 Increases CTS Completion Time from 4 to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months for reducing power to MODE 2. LCO 3.4.1 LCO 3.10.J 6 L3.4-16 Increases the CTS Completion Time from 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months to 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months for reducing RCS temperature below LCO 3.4.5, LCO '6 350 F, if an inoperable reactor coolant loop cannot be restored to OPERABLE. Conditions 3.1.A.1 .b(2)

A and B L3.4-36 Relaxes CTS requirements allowing one RHR loop to be inoperable for surveillance testing while LCO 3.4.7 LCO 3.1.A.1.d 1, 3, 4 the other RHR loop is OPERABLE and in operation. and 3.4.8 Note 2 L3.4-47 Eliminates CTS requirement for one pressurizer safety valve to be operable when the head is on NA LCO 3.1 .A.2.b 1 the reactor vessel.

(2)

L3.4-48 Eliminates CTS requiremenifo iitePSVs to meeithe & CO lift setting limits in MODE 3, when the.LCO . LCO3.1.A.2.b 2,3,4 plant is starting up, to allow adjusting the settings under hot conditions.

3.4.10 (1)

Note CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Change ITS Section 3.4- Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially)

Increases CTS Completion Time from 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months to 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months to place the plant in MODE 5 when the RCS temperature is greater than the SI pump disable temperature and less than the OPPS enable LCO LCO 3.1 .A.2.c 3.4.12, (2)(a) and temperature.

Conditions 3.1 .A.2.c.(2)(b)

L3.4-68 Relaxes CTS requirements of requiring a plant shutdown in the event that one of the means of LCO LCO 3.1.C.1 4, 6 leakage detection were inoperable. The ITS provides specific Required Actions and remedial 3.4.16, actions in the event one or both means of leakage detection are inoperable and not just requiring a Conditions plant shutdown. A, B, C, and D L3.4-79 Relaxes CTS Completion Time from 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months to 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months to isolate the flow path of a PIV with leakage LCO LCO 3.1.C.3 4, 6 outside the allowed limits and 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months to restore the PIV to within limits. 3.4.15, Condition C

L3.4-82 Eliminates CTS requirements for RCS specific activity limits when the RCS temperature is below NA LCO 3.1 .D.3 2, 4 500 F and above cold shutdown.

and Table 4.1 2B Item 4a L3.4-86 Increases CTS SR interval from 18 to 24 month interval for PORV functional testing and SR SR 4.6.C and 8 emergency pressurizer heater power supply. 3.4.11.2 Table 4.1-2A I t ~Iltem 7 7_ _

CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 2

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Change ITS Section 3.4- Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially)

DOC No. M?

Summary CTS Sed- Changý L Increases CTS requirements for PIV leakage from 1.0 to 0.5 gpm per Sectio~n I [Type",

L3.4-87 inch of nominal valve size up SR to 5 gpm maximum. SR 4.3 3 3.4.15.1 L3.4-88 Increases CTS SR interval from 5 times per week to once per week for RCS gross activity SR3.4.17.1 Table 4.1-2B determination. 3,10 Item 1 L3.4-91 Eliminates CTS requirement to sample once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months when specific activity exceeds 100/E LCO Table 4.1-2B uCi/gram. 13,10 3.4.17 Item 4a L3.4-109 Increases CTS Completion Time for restoring an inoperable Pressurizer Safety Valve to OPERABLE from 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months . LCO 3.1.A.2.b 6 L3CO..

L3.4-118 Relaxes CTS actions to de-energize all control rod drive mechanisms in the event that both are inoperable or not in operation. The ITS does not restrict the plant RCPs TCO 3.4.5 LCO 4 to only using one method, as 3.1 .A.1 .b(3) the CTS, of placing the control rod drive system in a condition incapable of rod withdrawal.

CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 3

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Change ITS Section 3.4- Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially)

Summary jITSý Section .Type ChType euixes Me %,I S requirement tor Doth an R-<CP and its associated SG as an acceptable method of LCO 3.4.6 LCO 3.1.A.1.c 1,4 ecay heat removal. The ITS only requires the SG as an acceptable method of decay heat removal and 3.4.7 (1) id does not require its associated RCP.

I ~

_ -_ - _1 _ _,

CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 4

5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.4 - Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially)

Relocates CTS spec ; umrts Tor Nu,, Iave and pressurizer pressure to the 1, 2,3 COLR.

LR3.4-24 Relocates descriptive information of what equipment is included in a system. 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 1,2 This information is needed to assist in making OPERABILITY determinations. Control Program 3.1.A.1.c(1),

3.1 .A.lc(2),

3.1.A.1.d(1),

and 3.1 .A.2.a(1)

LR3.4-53 Relocates specific status of block valve and back up air supply charge for the 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 1,2 PORVs since they are included through the definition of OPERABILITY. Control Program 3.1.A.2.c (2) and 3.1 .A.2.c(3)

LR3.4-74 Relocates descriptive information explaining that the results of the evaluations 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 2, 3 for the sources of leakage are to be used for continued safe operation. Control Program 3.1.C.2.b LR3.4-94 Relocates the RCS Radiochemistry and RCS Tritium activity requirements 10CFR5O.59 TRM Table 4.1-2132,.3 since these items are not significant in limiting SGTR offsite dose. Items 5 and 6 and Note 2 CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.4- Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially) 11 CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 2

5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.4 - Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially)

DOC, No.~

M3.4-04 Summary Replaced CTS prose description of the conditions of applicability adding specific ITS MODES which ITS Section jCTS'Section]

LCO 3.4.4 LCO 3.1 .A.1.a impose plant equipment requirements earlier in the plant startup evolution.

(1)

M3.4-06 Adds a restriction to CTS for RCS ioop inoperability during low power PHYSICS TESTS requiring power LCO 3.4.18 LCO 3.1.A.1.a level to be less than P-7 in addition to providing an associated action statement.

(1)

M3.4-07 Adds SRs to the CTS to be performed during low power PHYSICS TESTS. SR 3.4.18.1 3.1.A.1.a(1) and 3.4.18.2 M3.4-1 1 Adds new SR to verify each RCS loop is in operation while at power.

1SR 3.4.4.1 3.1 .A.1 .a(2)

M3.4-12 Adds APPLICABILITY constraints to the CTS prose descriptions resulting in new actions and additional LCO 3.4.5 LCO 3.1 .A.l.b requirements being placed on plant operations.

M3.4-13 Adds new requirements to the CTS requiring both RCS loops to operate if the Rod Control System is LCO 3.4.5 LCO capable of rod withdrawal or only one loop is required to operate if the Rod Control System is not 3.1 .A.1 .b(1) capable of rod withdrawal.

M3.4-17 Adds new Actions to the CTS which address one RCS loop not in operation with the reactor trip breakers LCO 3.4*.5, LCO closed and the Rod Control System capable of rod withdrawal.

Condition C 3.1.A.1.b(3)

M3.4-21 Adds new SRs to the CTS verifying that the required RCS loop is in operation, the SG is capable of S R 3.4.5.1, 3.1 .A.1 .b(3) decay heat removal, and power is available to the RCP that is not operating. 3.4.5.2, and 3.4.5.3 M3.4-26 Adds new specific operability requirements to the CTS requiring that the SG is capable of decay heat Jremoval. j LCO 3.4.7 LCO 13.1 .A. 1.c(1 )

1 5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.4 - Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially)

,.,DOC,:No.,~~~ Summary ~__~ ITS -Section

';~~~

. CT$SoSction' M3.4-31 Adds new SRs requiring verification that the required RHR or RCS loop is in operation, the SG is capable SR 3.4.6.1, NA of decay heat removal, and power is available to the required RHR or RCP that is not operating. 3.4.6.2, and 3.4.6.3 M3.4-32 Adds new SRs requiring verification that one RHR loop is in operation, the SG is capable of decay heat S R 3.4.7. 1, INA removal, and power is available to the RHR pump that is not operating. 3.4.7.2, and 3.4.7.3 M3.4-33 Adds Required Action that when both RHR loops are inoperable, suspend operations involving reduction LCO 3.4.8, LCO 3.1 .A.1 .d in RCS boron concentration. Condition B M3 4-34 Restricts CTS from allowing an RHR pump to be shutdown for 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months to allow an RHR pump to be LCO 3.4.8, LCO shutdown for 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months in an 8 hour9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months period. Note 1 31 .A.1.d(1) fM3.4-37 Adds SRs to require verification that one RHR loop is in operation and verify power is available to the RHR pump that is not operating.

SR 3.4.8.1 tNA and 3.4.8.2 M3.4-38 Restricts CTS from allowing an RHR pump to be shutdown for 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months to allow an RHR pump to be LCO 3.4.6 LCO 3.1 .A.1 .d shutdown for 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months in an 8 hour9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months period. and LCO 3.4.7 Note I M3.4-41 Increases CTS operational restrictions by lowering the pressurizer high water level Allowable Value LCO 3.4.9 LCO below the level required in the CTS to assure that there is a steam bubble in the pressurizer.

3.1.A.2.a(1)

M3.4-42 Eliminates CTS flexibility by deleting the 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months allowed to initiate actions necessary for shutdown. LCO 3.4.9, LCO 3.1.A.2,a Condition A, (3), 3.1.C.2.c, LCO 3.4.14, 3.1.C.2.d and Conditions C 3.1.C.2.e and D M3.4-43 AAdds new Required Actions for the possibility that the pressurizer is inoperable. LCO 3A4.9, LC0 Condition A 3.1.A.2.a(3) 2 5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.4 - Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially) 766Z7Koý M13.4-44 !Adds a new 44 . reqiing ne.3.4 SR rdds rn narinr~ii %inIEI~i

,,I ;fi C i" U= erwaer.eve......

. . . .. QcIT I S*niCuri*z etonj~S _ tio n Ii S....

.. .. "1.... aI".... I.

, ,,uo VH atl U the pressurizer water level is _-<90 . SR 3.4.9.1 NA M3.4-45 Restricts CTS APPLICABILITY by requiring two RCS PSVs to be operable NA-temperatures are greater than the OPPS enable temperature specified whenever both RCS cold leg LCO 3.4.10 LCO in the PTLR. This requires more components to be operable for more plant conditions. and 3.4.10, 3.1.A.2.b(1)

Condition B M3.4-51 Adds new Action Statements and restrictions requiring immediate action to be taken for the Condition of LCO one or two SI pumps being capable of injecting into the RCS. The 3.4.12 LCO CTS would allow 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months to take action instead of being required to immediately take action. and 3.4.13, 3. 1.A.2.c(2)

Condition A and 3.1 .A.2.c(3)

M3.4-52 Adds a new Required Action, Completion Time, and SR restrictions to the CTS for ECCS accumulator isolation. LCO 3.4.12 and 3.4.13, LCO 3.1.A.2.c (2) and Condition B, 3.1 .A.2.c(3) and SR 3.4.13.1, 3.4.13.2, 3.4.13.3, and 3.4.13.4 M3.4-54 Adds new SRs and associated Frequencies requiring verification that only one (or no) SI pump capable of injecting, RCS is vented and PORV block valves are open as SR 3.4.12.1, NA applicable for the MODES of operation and the method of providing overpressurization protection. 3.4.12.2, 3.4.12.3, 3.4.13.1, 3.4.13.2, 3.4.13.3, and 3.4.13.4 M3.4-57 Adds a new Specification, LCO, Conditions, and SRs for RCS Minimum Temperature for Criticality. LCO 3.4.2 NA and SR 3.4.2.1 M3.4-62 Adds Frequency of 72hours for evaluating the integrity of the RCS following an out-of-limitcondition. LCO 3.4.3, LCO 3.1.B.1.b Condition A 3

5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.4 - Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially)

QDC No. 2 '-fi x. ; 'Summary;ý;"K ITS ýSeq Iion CTSSection M3.4-63 Adds new Required Actions for out-of-limit conditions when the RCS is below 200 IF.

LCO 3.4.3, LCO 3.1 .B.1.b Condition C M3.4-64 Adds new SR to verify that RCS pressure, temperature and heatup and cooldown rates are within the SR13.4.3.-1 NA specified limits.

M3.4-72 Adds SRs to perform Channel Checks, COTs and Calibrations of containment radiation monitors and SR3.4.161,"NA Calibration of sump pump run time instrumentation.

3.4.16.2, 3.4.16.3, and 3.4.16.4 M3.4-81 TAdds a Frequency ofever 4 hour4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months sfor verifying that the limits of dose equivalent 1-131 primary coolant LCO 3.4.17, LCO 3.1I.D.2.a specific activity limit are within limits.

Condition A M3.4-84 increases the Frequency to perform the functional test of the OPPS from each refueling outage to SR 3.4.12.4 TIable 4.1-1C monthly when the RCS temperature is below the LTOP enable temperature.

Item 25 M34-5 Adds a Frequency of 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months to perform the OPPS mitigation SR. ~SR 3.4.12.4 Table 4.1 -10C

- " rI No te 3 8 M3.4-108 1 Adds Frequency requirements to perform a RCS flow test within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months after reaching 90% RTP. ~SR 3.4.1.3 fLCO 3.10O.J M3.4-1 17 Adds a specific limit of 31 days to the CTS for initial performance of RCS Radiochemistry E SSR3.4.17.3 ITablIe 4.1-2B determination.

Note 1 M3.4-123 Eliminates CTS flexibility by requiring that the block valves be restored to OPERABLE and does not LCO 3.4.10 3.1.A.2.c provide an alternate option of placing the PORVs in manual as in the CTS.

(1)(b)5 4

5/8/2002

Table R - Relocated Specifications and Removed Details ITS Section 3.4 - Reactor Coolant System (Not listed sequentially)

Relocated CTS reactor vessel head vent system LCO, Required Actions, and LCO 3.1.A.3 and associated Surveillances. SR 4.18 R3.4-66 Relocated CTS pressurizer heatup and cool down Specification including LCO, PTLR NRC approval of LCO 3.1..B.2 1,2, 5, 6 Required Actions, and Surveillances. methodology R3.4-67 Relocated CTS steam generator pressure/temperature limits specification. PTLR NRC approval of LCO 3.1 .B.3 1,2,5,6 methodology CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References

5. Relocated Specification not meeting 10 CFR 50.36 (c)(2)(ii) criteria

6. Relocated Specification/Surveillance Requirement/ Administrative Control Requirement

7. Performance Required for Indication 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.5 - Emergency Core Cooling Systems (Not listed sequentially)

-aitonai cnanges were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not Lro J.5.2 LCO 3.3, change or delete any technical requirements. Table 4.1-2B, and 4.5 A3.5-01 Revises specific CTS details of RWST OPERABILITY requirements for volume and boron concentration LCO 3.5.4 LCO 3.3.A.1.a Ito an SR. 1 LC A3.5-04 fRevises CTS details for the ECCS Accumulators OPERABILITY requirements for volume, boron LCO 3.5.1 LCO 3.3.A.1.b concentration, nitrogen cover pressure, and verification that the isolation valves are open to the SRs.

A3.5-07 jReplaces CTS Applicability Statement to exclude MODE 4.

1LCO 3.5.2 {LCO 3.3.A.1.c A3.5-15 Replaces CTS Action Statement for Accumulator inoperability to exclude boron concentration events. LCO 3.5.1 LCO 3.3.A.2.e A3.5-17 Clarifies CTS requirements for entering a shutdown track is one ECCS train is inoperable and the other train cannot supply 100% flow.

A3.5-20 Incorporates NRC approved LAR entitled, "Removal of Boric Acid Storage Tanks from the Safety SR 3.5.4.2 LCO Injection System," submitted April 17, 2000.

3.3.A.1 .a, Table 4.1-2B, 4.5.B.3.a, and 4.5.B.3.c A3.5-22 Did not include CTS reference to the IST Program using a Specification number with the actual title of IST.

NA SR 4.5.B.1.a 1

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.5 - Emergency Core Cooling Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Removes general CTS Applicability and Objective These statements only provided general informationstatements at the beginning of each CTS section.

and do not impose any operational or technical LCO 3.5 LCO 3.3 and SR 4.5 requirements.

A3.5-302 Revises CTS Specification titles for Safety Injection and Residual Heat SR 4.5 Removal System, and ECcS Safety Injection System to ECCS. LCO 3.5 and [CO 3.3.A, SR 3.5.2.5 SR 4.5.B.1,.a, and 4.5.B.3.f A3.5-303 Replaces CTS prose descriptions of Modes with equivalent ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY.

[CO 3.5.2 LCO 3.3.A.1 and 3.3.A.2 A3.5-304 Replaces CTS OPERABILITY range for accumulator volume and nitrogen cover pressure expressed in by the equivalent simple range over which SR"3.5i.1.

terms of a median value plus or minus the allowable variation [CO the parameters are acceptable. 3.3.A.11.b(3)

A3.5-306 Clarifies CTS requirements, "any one of the following conditions of inoperability may exist.. ." This requirement prevents two or more of the listed conditions from SR 3.5.2 LCO 3.3.A.2 existing at the same time. In the ITS, these conditions may be in more than one specification. The SFDP provides a mechanism to assure that entry into multiple TS Conditions will not result in loss of safety function.

A3.5-307 Incorporates NRC approved [AR titled, "Increase ECCS Accumulator Allowed Outage Time to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months ." iCO 3.5.1 ILCO 3.3.A.2.e A3.5-309 Clarifies CTS Actions to be taken if both accumulators were inoperable.

ITS specifically has a Condition requiring entry into LCO 3.0.3. The CTS would require entry into SR 3.5.1.1 LCO LCO 3.0.C since there would not be a specific Action Statement for both accumulators being inoperable. 3.3.A.1.b.(1)

A3.5-316 Incorporates both PI specific valve numbers with their associated Westinghouse valve numbers. Both numbers are utilized in the control room. SR 3.5.2.1 LCO 3i3.A1 .g (1) and (2) 2 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.5 - Emergency Core Cooling Systems (Not listed sequentially)

I1 .A I- Reduces CTS requirements for two trains of ECCS in MODE 4 down to the SI pump disable LUU 0.0.0 1, Z, 4 114A temperature to be OPERABLE. The ITS only requires one train of ECCS to be OPERABLE in MODE 4 above the SI pump disable temperature.

Reduces CTS shutdown requirements of MODE 5 within 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months to MODE 4 in 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months in the LCO 3.5.2 LCO 3.3.A.2 4 6 event that one or more trains of ECCS are inoperable for longer than 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months .

L3.5-16 i . . . -

. /, i . .J , , -. .. . . . . . .

increases G I , allowed outage time trom 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months to 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months for boron concentration in one LCO 3.5.1 NA accumulator to be outside its limits.

6 L3.5-19 Increases CTS Completion Time from 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months to 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months to restore the RWST boron LCO 3.5.4 NA 6,9 concentration to within its limits.

L3.5-25 Increases CTS SR interval from 18 to 24 months for throttle valve position verification. SR 3.5.2.7 SR 4.5.B.3.g.3 CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.5 - Emergency Core Cooling Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Relaxes CTS requirements adding a Note allowing, in MODE 3, both SI pump flow paths may be isolated by closing the isolation valves for up to 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months to perform pressure isolation valve testing.

L3.5-315 Relaxes CTS requirements allowing combinations of ECCS components or subsystems to be LCO 3.5.2 LCO 4, 6, 9 inoperable provided at least 100% ECCS flow equivalent of a single ECCS train remains 3.3.A.2.f OPERABLE.

L3.5-317 Eliminates CTS OPERABILITY requirements for valve position monitor lights for SI valves and NA LCO 1,4 RHR valves, and requires valve position monitor lights and alarms to be OPERABLE for ECCS 3.3.A.1 .g and accumulator valves. 3.3.A.2.g CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 2

5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.5 - Emergency Core Cooling Systems (Not listed sequentially) jD.aiL bases LCW Control Program 13.3.A.1 .f LR3.5-14 Relocates specific details on system components, which could be 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 1,2 inoperable. Control Program 3.3.A.2.a, 3.3.A.2.b, 3.3.A.2.c, and 3.3.A.2.d LR3.5-21 Relocates specific test parameters, conditions and acceptance criteria. 5.5.12, Bases Bases SR 2, 3 Control Program 4.5.A. 1.a and 4.5.A.d .b LR3.5-23 Relocates details to test specific components such as pumps and valves. 5.5.7, IST Program IST SR 3,4 Program 4.5.B.1 .a LR3.5-24 Relocates details for verifying ECCS throttle valve stop position after each 10CFR50.59 TRM SR 2,3

, ~stroking or maintenance.

4.5.B.3.g.1 LR3.5-26 Relocates details for performing ECCS post-modification flow tests. 10CFR50.59 TRM SR _1,_2,_3 4.5. B.3. h CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.5 - Emergency Core Cooling Systems (Not listed sequentially)

IAdds new SR 3.5.4.1 NA IM.5-UZ MV3.5-03 Adds a new requirement establishing the upper limits for boron concentration in the RWST to 3500 SR 3.5.4.2 LCO ppm. 3.3.A.1.a M3.5-05 Adds new SRs requiring verification that the isolation valves are fully open, the water volume is within S.R 3.5..1.1, NA limits, the cover pressure is within limits and power is removed from the ECCS accumulator isolation 3.5.1.2, valves.

3.5.1.3, and 3.5.1.5 M3.5-06 Revises CTS requirements stating the SI pumps, RHR pumps, and RHR heat exchangers are to be LCO 3.5.2 GCO OPERABLE. The ITS requires the ECCS Trains to be OPERABLE which not only envelopes the CTS 3.3.A.1 .c, equipment but is more inclusive of other equipment than the specific requirements of the CTS.

3.3.A.1 .d, and 3.3.A.1.e M3.5-08 Adds new SRs requiring verification of ECCS MOV positions, non-MOV positions, MOV breaker SR 3.5.2.1, NA positions and containment sumps clear of debris.

3.5.2.2, 3.5.2.3, and 3.5.2.8 M3.5-10 Adds new SRs to verify valve position, verify power has been removed for specific valves,verify EGOS SR 3.5.3.1 NA throttle valves are in their correct position, and verify ECCS sump suction inlet is not restricted by debris.

M3.5-18 Adds CTS requirements to remove power from EccS accumulator isolation valves instead of just [NA LCO relying upon monitor lights and alarms.

3.3.A.1.g (3) 1 5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.5 - Emergency Core Cooling Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Reduces CTS Completion Time to place the reactor in Mode 3 by 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months . CTS LCO 3.0.C allows 1

hour to initiate reactor shutdown, an additional 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months to be in MODE 3 and another 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months (total 37 hours4.282407e-4 days 0.0103 hours 6.117725e-5 weeks 1.40785e-5 months ) to be in MODE 5. The ITS would require the reactor be placed in MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and

< 1000 psig within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

M3.5-31 1 FReduces CTS ehour to plan forCompletion shutdown, Time allowance when entering LCO 3.0.C. CTS LCO 3.0.C would allow 1 7 hours8.101852e-5 days 0.00194 hours 1.157407e-5 weeks 2.6635e-6 months to be in MODE 3 and 37 hours4.282407e-4 days 0.0103 hours 6.117725e-5 weeks 1.40785e-5 months LCO 3.5.4 LCO to be in MODE 5. The ITS requires the unit to be in MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and be in MODE 5 within 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months . 3.3.A.1 .a rfMA35-312 Adds new LCO, for ECCS RHR and SI subsystems. The CTS does not require any I I restore the RHR or SI subsystem to OPERABLE therefore requiring entry into specific time to LCO 3.5.3 LCO 3.3.A.1 LCO 3.0.C. CTS LCO 3.0.C allows 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months to initiate reactor shutdown, an additional 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months to be in MODE 3 and another 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months (total 37 hours4.282407e-4 days 0.0103 hours 6.117725e-5 weeks 1.40785e-5 months ) to be in MODE 5. ITS allows 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months to be in MODE 5.

M3.5-313 Adds n~ew Required Action, Completion Time, and associated shutdown track for the RWST if ii cannoi LCO 3.5.4 LCO 3.3.A.2 be returned to OPERABLE status within the associated Completion Time.

M3.5-314 Adds new Condition requiring that if one or more trains of ECCS are inoperable for longer than the 72 LCO 3.5.2 ILCO 3.3.A.2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months , the plant must be placed in Mode 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and Mode 4 within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months , The ITS requires reducing RCS temperatures to Mode 4 in 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months instead of 30 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months to be in Mode 4 which is allowed by the CTS.

2 5/8/2002

Table R - Relocated Specifications and Removed Details ITS Section 3.5 - Emergency Core Cooling Systems (Not listed sequentially)

INONE INONE INUNE INONE INONE INONE INONE CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References

5. Relocated Specification not meeting 10 CFR 50.36 (c)(2)(ii) criteria

6. Relocated Specification/Surveillance Requirement/ Administrative Control Requirement

7. Performance Required for Indication 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording in accordance with the L-kU ,.1.0 LUU 1.U, guidance of NUREG-1431. These changes do not change or delete any technical requirements.

3.3.B, Table TS.3.5-1, 3.6, Table TS.4.1 1C, Table TS.4.1-2B, SR 4.4, and 4.5 nfl hMO.U-UO 1

I Replaces general CTS prose descriptions with equivalent ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY. The plant S..............................

1 .................. .....................................

IWI*

LCO 3.6 LCO 3.3.B.1, Modes to which this specification apply have not been changed. 3.3.B.2, 3.6.A.1, 3.6.A.2, 3.6.B.1, 3.6.C.2, 3.6.D.2, 3.6.G, 3.6.H.1, 3.6.1.1, 3.6.1.2, 3.6.J.1, 3.6.J.2, 3.6.K.1, 3.6.K.2, 3.6.L.1, 3.6.M.1, 3.6.M.2.c, 3.6.M.3, and Table 4.1-1C Note 39, SR 4.4.G and 4.4.4.H.

.1. ______ 1 1

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Kevise L; I b UUN I AIMIN I IN I -URITY on Items 1, 3 and 4 to include in various I L%,U J.t0.I, 1.U Specifications and SRs. 3.6.2, and CONTAIMENT 3.6.3 INTEGRITY A3.6-09 Did not include general CTS Applicability and Objective statements at the beginning of each CTS NA LCO 3.6,SR section. These statements only provide general information and do not impose any operational or 4.4, and 4.5 technical requirements.

A3.6-1 1 Revises CTS wording for defined times for Required Actions. The ITS defines all action times from the LCO 3.6 LCO 3.3.1B.2, time the first initiated action occurs. Thus the ITS is equivalent to the CTS Required Action time. 3.6.A.2, 3.6.G, 3.6.1.2, 3.6.J.2, 3.6.K.2, 3.6.M.2.c and 3.6.M.3 A3.6-19 Clarification of the CTS is provided for guidance for multiple valves in multiple penetrations is provided in LCO 3.6.3, .LCO 3.6.C.1 an equivalent Note allowing separate Condition entry for each containment flow path. Note 2 A3.6-22 Clarifies intent of CTS for inoperable or leaking barriers. These provisions are the same as PI current LCO 3.6.3, LCO 3.6.C.1 practice therefore these changes are administrative. Notes 3 and 4 A3.6-23 Clarifies CTS by adding a Note to apply the requirements to those penetrations which do not use a LCO 3.6.3, LCO 3.6.C.3 closed system as a barrier. Condition A A3.6-24 Clarifies CTS by including the clause, "penetration flow paths with one" to those penetration flow paths LCO 3.6.3, LCO 3.6.C.3 with a single inoperable barrier. The Condition for a penetration flow path with two inoperable barriers is Condition C addressed separately.

2 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (Not listed sequentially)

DOC NO. Summary IT Seto T eto A3.6-26 Clarifies CTS wording which allows a valve to be deactivated when a containment isolation valve is LCO 3.6.3 LCO inoperable.

3.6.C.3.(b)

A3.6-42 'Clarifies CTS stating that entry into LCO 3.6.1 is required if airlock leakage exceeds the Containment LCO 3.6.2 LCO 3.6.M Leakage Rate Test Program acceptance criteria. This is the same action the plant would take under the CTS.

A3.6-48 Clarifies CTS by providing two Notes. These changes are editorial and are consistent with PI operating SR 3.6.2.1 SR 4.4.A.2 practices and technical requirements.

and 4.5.A.2.a A3.6-49 Clarifies intent of CTS actions for two inoperable doors in an air lock if both doors in the same air lock are LCO 3.6.2, LCO 3.6.M.1 inoperable. Conditions A and B A3.6-54 Clarifies CTS SIR Frequency for a functional test of the containment vacuum breakers to be provided SR 3.6.8.1 Table4.1l C.1 .

quarterly consistent with current PI procedures.

Function 10 A3.6-62 Restates CTS requirements for the inservice purge penetration leakage. .LCO 3.6.8 .. CO 3.6.13.3 A3.6-77 Clarifies CTS requirements by entering a reactor shutdown track per LCO 3.0.C. LCO 3.6.3, LCO 3.6.D.2.e Conditions and D, E

A3.6-80 Clarifies CTS requirements for testing of containment spray and spray additive valves. These changes SR 3.6.6.4 SR 4.5.B.3.f do not change the type or number of valves which are tested under CTS.

3 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (Not listed sequentially)

LJ.b-1Z Increases CTS Completion Time from 36 to 84 hours9.722222e-4 days 0.0233 hours 1.388889e-4 weeks 3.1962e-5 months to place the unit in MODE 5 for an inoperable LCO 3.6.5, LCO 3.3.B.2 16 containment spray train or inoperable spray additive system. Condition B L3.6-21 Relaxes CTS requirements administrative control within from being capable one minute of closing to allowing containment penetrations isolation valves under to be unisolated LCO 3.6.3 LCO 3.6.C.1 4, 6 intermittently.

L3.6-27 Increases CTS flexibility by allowing two additional options for isolating a penetration arrier.' LCO 3.6.3, LCO 4 Condition B 3.6.C.3.(c)

L3.6-28 Relaxes CTS requirements allowing a startup to commence with one hydrogen recombiner LCO 3.6.7, LCO 3.6.L 1,4 Inoperable by stating LCO 3.0.4 is not applicable. Condition A L3.6-33 Increases CTS Completion Time from 4 to 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months to isolate a penetration flow path with an LCO 3.6.3, LCO 6 "inoperable boundary. isolation barrier when a closed system provides the other containment isolation Condition C 3.6.C.3.(c)

CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (Not listed sequentially)

L,0.10-46 Keiaxes U I[ requirements by allowing passage through an inoperable air lock door for up to seven LCO 3.6.2, LCO days if both air locks are inoperable. 4,6,9 lCondition A 13.6.M.2 L3.6-46 Relaxes CTS requirements administrative means. by allowing verification of locked air lock doors in high radiation areas by LCO 3.6.2, LCO Conditions 3.6.M.2.b A and B L3.6-53 Increase CTS SR interval from monthly to 184 days to test the caustic standpipe NaOH SR 3.6.6.3 Table 4.1- 10i concentration.

2B Item 11 L3.6-63 Relaxes CTS requirements by allowing the system test to be initiated by an actual or simulated SR 3.1.5.3, SR4.4.B.3.c, 3 signal instead of just a simulated signal. 3.1.5.4, 4.4.C, 4.4.E, 3.6.3.7, 4.5.A.2.a, 3.6.5.5, and 3.6.5.6, 4.5.B.3.f 3.6.5.7, 3.6.6.4, and 3.6.8.1, 3.6.3.7 CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 2

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Relaxes CTS requirements for declaring an air lock door inoperable based on the interlock LCO 3.6.3, LCO 4 mechanism. Condition B 3.6.M.3 G-.6-75 Relaxes CTS requirements for initiating a reactor shutdown when one air lock is inoperable and an LCO 3.6.2 LCO 3.6.M 3 inoperability on the other air lock by allowing separate Condition entry for each air lock thus delaying or avoiding a reactor shutdown.

L3.6-76 Relaxes CTS requirements for requiring both access doors to be closed by allowing one door being SR3.6.10.1 1.0 4

verified closed.

L3,6-81 Eliminates CTS requirements for allowing one of several conditions time to allowing simultaneous inoperabilities for the same equipment.of inoperability existing at one LCO 3.6.5 LCO 3.3.B.2 4, 9 L3.6-83 Relaxes CTS requirements to enter CTS 3.0.C if two valves in the vacuum breaker system were LCO3.6.5 .LCO . i, Iinoperable with respect to their vacuum relief function. The ITS will allow the plant to continue 3.6.B.2, operation if two valves in the same train are inoperable with respect to their two containment 3.6.B.3, isolation valves in the same train are inoperable.

and 3.0.C CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 3

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Increases CTS SR interval from 18 to 24 months for testing the Shield Building Ventilation System initiated from a safety injection signal.

L3.6-90 Relaxes CTS requirements by allowing entry into both the VBT and Containment Isolation Valve TS 3.6.3 and 3.6.B.1 and 4, 6 in the event of an VBT inoperability. 3.6.8 3.6.B.2 CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.O.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 4

5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Relocates CTS definition of Containment Integrity and specific details that the Conrbol Prgases hatch must be closed and sealed. Control Program LR3.6-02 Relocates specific CTS details for shield building integrity. 5.5.12, Bases Bases 1.0 2 Control Program LR3.6-06 Relocates specific CTS details for the Spray Additive Tank which are also included 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 1,2 in the applicable SR statements. Control Program 3.3.B.1.c LR3.6-07 Relocates specific CTS controls on containment cooling valve positions. 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 2,3 Control Program 3.3.B.1 .d and

_ _.................._ _ 3.3.B.1 .e LR3.6-16 Relocates specific CTS details for the vacuum breaker system components 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 1,2 required for OPERABILITY. Control Program 3.6.B.1 LR3.6-36 Relocates specific CTS details for the 36-inch containment purge system and 18- 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 1,2,3 inch containment inservice purge system including provision for the isolation Control Program 3.6.D.1, valves to isolate, and meet containment leakage rate acceptance criteria, or the 3.6.D.2.a, system is to be blind flanged. 3.6.D.2.c,

___________________________________________ and

____3.6.D.2.e ____

CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (Not listed sequentially)

DO oControl~~ Summary# Cha Lnge Loato in T~ Change' CTes Sect____

LR3.6-56 Relocates specific CTS details for how the SBVS quarterly test is to be conducted 10CFR50.59 TRM SR 4.4.B.1 2, 3 and the input assumptions. and Figure 4.4-1 LR3.6-57 Relocates specific CTS details for conducting the ventilation filter tests. 5.5.10, VFTP SR 1,2, 3 Ventilation Filter 4.4.B.3.a, Test Program 4.4.B.3.b, 4.4.6.4.a, 4.4.B.4.b, 4.4.B.4.c, and 4.4.B.5 LR3.6-64 Relocates specific CTS details for how each hydrogen recombiner SR is to be 5.5.12, Bases Bases SR 4.4.I.a, 2, 3 performed. Control Program 4.4.1.b, and 4.4.1.c LR3.6-66 Relocates specific CTS details for conducting the containment spray system SR 5.5.12, Bases Bases SR 1, 3 test along with its associated acceptance criteria. Control Program 4.5.A.2.a and 4.5.A.2.c LR3.6-67 Relocates specific CTS details for conducting the containment fan cooler unit SR 5.5.12, Bases Bases SR 4.5.A.3 1,3 tests along with its associated specific parameters to be monitored. Control Program LR3.6-71 Relocates specific CTS details for conducting the containment spray pump SR 5.5.7,1SST IST SR 1, 3 tests along with their associated acceptance criteria. Program 4.5.B.1 .a CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 2

5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (Not listed sequentially)

DOC No' .'SIrnmary Summary,; o tr Location T Sect

~ ,~~.Process:ý

______ ______ Type'-j LR3.6-72 Relocates specific CTS details for conducting the Containment Fan Motor SR test 5.5.12, Bases Bases SR 4.5.B.2 1, 3 along with its associated specific parameters to be monitored. Control Program LR3.6-73 Relocates specific CTS details for spray additive tank valve testing. 5.5.7, IST IST SR Program Program 4.5.B.3.d CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 3

5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (Not listed sequentially)

M.J.b-U4 Restricts CTS LCO by requiring an 'S Train to be OPERABLE instead of only requiring specific L.U ,.,. 1 .a components. and 3.3.B.1.b M3.6-13 Adds new SR requiring verification of containment spray system valve positions if the valves are not SR 3.6.5.1 NA locked sealed or otherwise secured in position.

M3.6-14 Adds new SRs requiring verification of spray additive system valve positions if the valves are not SR 3.6.6.1 NA locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position and verification of spray additive tank solution volume, and 3.6.6.2 M3.6-17 Revises CTS to include all containment isolation valves instead of just selected valves. LCO 3.6.3 LCO 3.6.C.1 M3.6-29 Eliminates CTS flexibility of allowing 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months to initiate a reactor shutdown when LCO 3.0.C is entered. LCO 3.6.9 LCO 3.6.H M3.6-31 *Adds a new requirement to verify that penetration flow paths are isolated. LCO 3.6.3 LCO 3.6.C.3.c M3.6-32 Adds a new requirement for isolation of penetration flow paths with two inoperable penetration barriers. LCO 3.6.3, LCO 3.6.C.3 The CTS would allow 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months to perform this whereas, the ITS only allows 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months . Condition B M3.6-34 Adds SRs requiring verification that the 36-inch containment purge blind flange is installed, that SR 3.6.3.1, NA penetrations outside containment required to be closed post-accident are closed if not locked, sealed, 3.6.3.3, or otherwise secured, that penetrations inside containment required to be closed post-accident are 3.6.3.4, and closed if not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured, and automatic isolation valve closure time. 3.6.3.5 M3.6-37 Adds a new SR requiring verification that one shield building door in each access opening is closed SR 3.6.10.1 NA during plant conditions requiring shield building integrity.

1 5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (Not listed sequentially)

,-imlates u i o iteximuiiy o0 aiiowing 1 nour to prepare for a reactor shutdown. Instead the ITS requires the plant to initiate shutdown when the Required Actions and associated Completion Times are not Condition E met.

M3.6-39 Eliminates CTS flexibility of allowing 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months to prepare for a reactor shutdown if a recombiner is LCO 3.6.7, LCO 3.6.L.2 inoperable for more than 30 days. Instead the ITS requires the plant to initiate shutdown when the Condition B Required Actions and associated Completion Times are not met.

M3.6-41 Adds new SR requiring verification that containment pressure is within limits. SR 3.6.4.1 NNA M3.6-44 Adds a Completion Time that in one hour verify that the OPERABLE air lock door is closed. LCO 3.6.2, LCO 3.6.M.2.a Condition A M3.6-51 Adds new requirements to immediately verify containment leakage rates and 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months to verify that one LCO 3.6.2, LCO 3.6.M.3 air lock door is closed. Condition C M3.6-52 Adds a new SR requiring verification only one air lock door can be opened at a time. .SR 3.6.2.2 {NA M3.6-61 Reduces CTS flexibility replacing terminology of a circuit with a train. A train may include more SR 3.6.9.1 SR 4.4.B.4.d equipment than a circuit.

M3.6-68 Adds a new requirement generating additional actions that if the secondary containment bypass LCO 3.6.3 LCO 3.6.B.3 leakage is not within limits, restore to within limits, within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months . Condition D M3.6-82 Adds a new Note which requires entry into the "Containment Integrity" Specification when vacuum LCO 3.6.8 LCO 3.6.8.3 breaker isolation valve leakage results in exceeding the overall containment leakage rate acceptance criteria.

2 5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (Not listed sequentially) r--11na[Ies U I Z TiexioiTy Dy restricting the time allowed for one containment fan cooler train and one LUU 0.0.0, LUU 3.3.B.z.a containment spray train to be out of service to 10 days from discovery of failure to meet the LCO. The Conditions A and 3.3.B.2.b CTS does not require such a limitation. and C M3.6-91 Reduces CTS Completion Time from 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months to 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months to correct the temperature of the containment LCO 3.6.1, LCO 3.6.J.2 shell or temperature differential between the containment air temperature and shield building annulus. Condition A and 3.6.K.2 5/8/2002

Table R - Relocated Specifications and Removed Details ITS Section 3.6 - Containment Systems (Not listed sequentially)

INUNL INUNE IN()NF INNNF INONE ]NONE .

N. -... INHN-CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References

5. Relocated Specification not meeting 10 CFR 50.36 (c)(2)(ii) criteria

6. Relocated Specification/Surveillance Requirement/ Administrative Control Requirement

7. Performance Required for Indication 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially)

OCN_ K Summaryr . , ITS 'Siction OTS'ection A3.7-00 Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes do not LCO 3.7 LCO 3.3.C, change or delete any technical requirements. Table TS.3.5 2B, 3.6.D, 3.7, 3.7.A.5(a),

3.8.B, 3.13, Table TS.4.1 2A, Table TS.4.1-2B, SR 4.4.B, 4.5, 4.7, 4.8, 4.14, 4.15, and 4.20 A3.7-01 Removes general CTS Applicability and Objective statements at the beginning of each CTS section. NA LCO 3.4, 3.13, These statements only provided general information and do not impose any operational or technical SR 4.7, 4.8, requirements. 4.14, 4.15 and 4.20 A3.7-02 Replaces CTS prose descriptions of MODES with equivalent ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY. The LCO 3.7.1, LCO 3.4.A, plant MODES to which this specification apply have not changed. 3.7.4, 3.7.5, 3.4.B, 3.4.D.1, 3.7.7, and 3.3.C.1.a, 3.7.12 3.3.D, 3.6.E and 3.6.F A3.7-04 Replaces CTS prose descriptions of MODES with equivalent ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY. The LCO 3.7.1 Cond LCO 3.4.A.2, plant MODES to which this specification apply have not changed. B, 3.7.4 Cond 3.4.B.2, C, 3.7.5 Cond 3.3.C.1.b, C, 3.7.6 Cond 3.3.D.2 and B, 3.7.7 Cond B, 3.13.A.2 3.7.8 Cond D, 3.7.9 Cond D, and 3.7.10

-J .- --- Cond A and C 1

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially)

DOC No.' .. . .. ... Summary .. . .. .ITS , Section

.*TSSection.

A3.7-05 Replaces CTS prose descriptions of MODES with equivalent ITS MODES of APPLICABILITY. The LCO 3.7.1 LCO 3.4.A.2, plant MODES to which this specification apply have not changed. Cond B, 3.7.4 3.4.B.2, 3.4.D, Cond C, 3.7.5 3.3.C.1.b, Cond C, 3.7.6 3.3.D.2, Cond B, 3.7.7 3.13.A.2 and Cond B, 3.7.8 3.6.E.1.

Cond D, 3.7.9 Cond D, 3.7.10 Cond A, C, F, 3.7.12 Cond B and C, and 3.7.14 Cond A A3.7-06 Clarifies CTS defined times for required actions from the time a new action is initiated. The ITS LCO 3.7.1 Cond LCO 3.4.A.2, defines all action times from the time the first initiated action occurs. Thus, the ITS is equivalent to B, 3.7.4 Cond 3.4.B.2,,

the CTS required action time. C, 3.7.5 cond C, 3.3.C.1 .b, 3.7.6 Cond B, 3.3.D.2, 3.7.7 Cond B, 3.13.A.2 and 3.7.8 Cond D, 3.6.E.1.

3.7.9 Cond D, 3.7.10 Cond F, and 3.7.12 Cond B and C A3.7-09 Includes AFW requirements for two units operating in the ITS LCO such that the requirements are LCO 3.7.5 LCO 3.4.B.1 .b the same for each operating unit. Therefore, a separate statement for two unit operation is not required. This change is consistent with the intent of the CTS.

A3.7-20 Divides CTS requirements contained in one specification into separate specifications in the ITS. This LCO 3.7.6 Cond LCO 3.4.B.2 is consistent with P1 operational practices. B A3.7-21 Clarifies CTS requirements for completion of turbine driven AFW pump testing. This is consistent LCO 3.7.5.2 LCO 3.4.B.2.a with current PI operating practices. Note 2

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially)

>DOC~NQ.' ~9 .~~ ' K Summary ~jITS .Section ICTýS Section A3.7-36 Did not include CTS specifications stating requirements for single unit or two unit operations. This is NA LCO 3.3.C.1 included in the intent of the ITS and does not change any operational practices.

A3.7-44 Restates CTS requirements for safeguards CL pump inoperability to state "No safeguards pumps LCO 3.7.8 Cond LCO 3.3.D.2.a OPERABLE for one train.. ."This statement is substantively the same as the CTS requirements B with no change in operational practices.

A3.7-45 Rewords CTS requirements to further align with ISTS phraseology. LCO 3.7.8 Cond LCO A3.7-47 Rewords CTS requirements to further align with ISTS phraseology in addition to including the LCO 3.7.8 Cond LCO requirements into the ITS. C 3.3.D.2.b(1) and (2)

A3.7-57 Clarifies CTS Action Statements for CRSVS during plant operation (MODES 1,2,3, and 4) and LCO 3.7.10 . LCO 3,13.A.1 irradiated fuel handling operations. This is consistent with PI operating practices. Cond D and E and 3.13.A.2 A3.7-62 Restates CTS requirements for Auxiliary Building Special Ventilation Zone Integrity in ITS 3.7.12 LCO 3.7.12 LCO 3.6.E.1 requirements for the ABSVS; thus the title of this section is also revised. Cond B and C A3.7-66 Rewords CTS applicability by expanding it beyond involving a spent fuel cask containing fuel to state LCO 3.7.16 LCO 3.8.B.1 .C the boron concentration is to be maintained at 1800 ppm at all times when spent fuel is stored in the spent fuel pool. This change is consistent with PI operating practices.

A3.7-74 Restates CTS LCO 3.0.C which is equivalent to ITS LCO 3.0.3. LCO 3.7.13 LCO 3.8.D.4 Action Notes, and 3.8.E.1 3.7.16 Cond A,

. and 3.7.17

. . . . . . . . .Cond A A3.7-77 Restates CTS title of this specification to be consistent with the title of ITS 3.7.17. LCO 3.7.17 LCO 3.8.E.1 3

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially)

DOC, No.i' *TS SummarY IT...S Section: C' Sectio.n A3.7-78 Restates CTS title and terminology within this specification to be consistent with the title and LCO 3.7.16 and LCO 3.8.E.2 terminology in ITS 3.7.16. No technical or operational changes have been made as a result of this SR 3.7.16.2 and Table 4.1 change.

2B FU 13 A3.7-83 Restates CTS requirements for testing MSIV closure time upon receipt of an actuation signal by SR 3.7.2.2 . SR 4.7 dividing it into two ITS SRs.

A3.7-94 Rewords CTS statement that test shall be performed within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months of entering power operation.

LCO 3.7.5.2 and SR 4.8.A.8 POWER OPERATION in this context has been defined as MODE 1 in accordance ITS definitions.

3.7.5.4 Note Note A3.7-97 Rewords CTS specification with an explicit requirement to verify that each pump starts. This is consistent with the acceptance criteria PI uses for this test. LCO 3.7.7.3 SR 4.5.A.4...

A3.7-105 Reswaoes CTS reqciicatio ith anxplicit euiremelding novrma/ventilation system is iss37a73oS .5.A.4...........

with the SR. This change does not result in any operational or technical changes to the CTS.

A3.7-113 Restates CTS Frequency from refueling outage to 24 months. The CTS defines the Frequency for LCO 3.7.7.2, SR 4.5.A.4.a, refueling outage as not to exceed 24 months. Therefore, the CTS and ITS are consistent and no 3.7.7.3, and 4.5.A.5.a, technical or operational changes are made.

3.7.8.5 4.5.B.3.e, 4.5.A.B.3.f.

4 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially)

L3.7-03 Increases CTS Completion Time from requiring entry into a reactor shutdown track to allowing 4 LCO 3.7.1 hours1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months to restore the inoperable MSSV to operable status before begining preparations to shut Cond A and 3.0.C the plant down.

L3.7-07 Increases CTS Completion Time from 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months to 7 days for one SG PORV to be inoperable and LCO 3.7.4 LCO 6, 9 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months for two SG PORVs inoperable instead of entering a reactor shutdown track as would be Cond A and 3.4.A.2.a and required by the CTS. B 3.0.C L3.7-1 1 Relaxes CTS requirements by considering the AFW operable during alignment and operation for LCO 3.7.5 LCO 3.4,B. 1.c 1,3, 4 SG level control if capable of being manually realigned to the AFW mode of operation.

L3.7-22 Increases CTS Completion Time from 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months to 7 days and 10 days from discovery of failure LCO 3.7.5 LCO 3.4.B.2 6 to meet the LCO with one steam supply to the turbine driven AFW pump inoperable. Cond A L3.7-25 Increases CTS Completion Time from 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months to 7 days to restore an inoperable CST to LCO 3.7.6 LCO 3.4.B.2.c 6 OPERABLE. Cond A CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Relaxes CTS requirements by allowing the safeguards diesel generators and CL pumps to have LUU .i. (.b LUUO 4,6 their fuel oil supply below the required limits for 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months and 9 days from discovery of the failure 3.3.D.1.d and to meet the LCO with an appropriate track for declaring them inoperable.

3.7.A.5(a)

L3.7-54 Relaxes CTS MODES of APPLICABILITY requirements for the Control Room Special Ventilation LCO 3.7.10 LCO 3.13.A.1 2 System being OPERABLE at all times to only MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4.

L3.7-56 Relaxes CTS APPLICABILITY requirements from during CORE ALTERATONS to irradiated fuel !LCO 3.7.10 ýLCO 3.13.A.1 2' .........

handling operations. Cond D and 3.13.A.2 L3.7-72 Eliminates CTS requirements to demonstrate operability of the redundant SFPSVS train when LCO 3.7.13 LCO 3.8.D.2 4 one train is inoperable. Cond A and B

L3.7-85 Eliminates CTS requirements to demonstrate RCS full flow test each refueling shutdown. SR 3.7.5.2 SIR 4.8.A.1 3 L3.7-88 Eliminates CTS requirement to verify the position of valves that are locked in position. NA SIR 4.8.A.6 3 L3.7-89 Eliminates CTS requirement to verify the normal AFW flow path to the SGs after each cold NA SR 4.8.A.7 3 shutdown.

UNAN E- I YHHS

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time 7 Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 2

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially)

DOC No. ~ .,

Summnaryy. ITS Section .,CTS Sect~ tp e L3.7-91 Increases CTS SR interval from 18 to 24 months for verifying AFW system automatic actuation. SR 3.7.5.3 SR 4.8.A.8 8 3.7.5.4 L3.7-92 Relaxes CTS requirements by requiring verification of valve position for those valves that are not SR 3.7.5.3, SR 4.8.A.8 3

locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position. 3.7.7.2, 4.5.A.4, and 3.7.7.3, and 4.5.A.5 3.7.8.3 L3.7-93 Increases CTS flexibility by allowing credit to be taken for the performance of the SR by using SR 3.7.2.2, SR4.7, either a test or actual signal. 3 3.7.5.4, 4.8.A.8, 3.7.7.2, 4.5.A.4, 3.7.8.5, 4.5.A.5, 3.7.10.3, 4.14.A.2, 3.7.12.4, 4.4.B.3.c, and 4.4.E,

..... 3.7.13.3 4.14.A.2, and

.. ..... ... . ... .4.15.A.2 L3.7-95 Increases CTS interval from monthly to quarterly for testing of the SG PORVs. .SR 3.7.4.1 .SR4.8.B 110 FL3.7-101 Increases CTS SR interval from 18 to 24 months to test the automatic initiation of the Control SR 3.7.10.3 SR 4.4.2.B.3, 8 Room Special Ventilation System. 414A a 4.15.A CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time 7 Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 3

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially)

L3.7-103 Increases CTS SR interval from at least once per operating cycle to 24 months on a staggered 1 I1N .5 . .U.4 4.14.b.1 .c ts test basis to test the Control Room Special Ventilation System. and and 3.7.13.4 4.15.B.1 .c L3.7-114 Relaxes CTS requirements for entering into LCO 3.0.C when two MSIVs are inoperable at the LCO 3.7.2 Table 3.5-2B 4 same time by allowing separate Condition entry for each MSIV. Cond C Action 27 and 3.0 .C L3.7-117 Eliminates CTS requirements of only allowing one of several conditions of inoperability existing LCO 3.7.7 LCO 4, 9 at one time to allow simultaneous inoperabilities for the same equipment. Cond B 3.3.C.1 .b L3.7-118 Relaxes CTS requirements initiating a reactor shutdown if the control room boundary is not intact LCO3.7.10 LCO 3.13.A.1 1, 2, 9 to allowing the boundary to be intermittently open under administrative controls. In addition, the Cond B ITS allows two CRSVS trains to be inoperable for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months , due to control room boundary in MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4.

CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time 7 Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 4

5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Relocates specific CTS details of the OPERABILITY requirements for the 5.5.12, Bases condensate storage tank, including backup water supply requirements. Control Program 3.4.B.1 .d LR3.7-18 Relocates specific CTS details of the OPERABILITY requirements for AFW 10CFR50.59 TRM LCO 2,3 system motor operated and manual valves, and condensate cross connect valve 3.4.B.1 .e, to the AFW system. 3.4.B.1.f and 3.4.B.1.g LR3.7-19 Relocates CTS details on the conditions of inoperability for the AFW pump and 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 2 associated valves. Control Program 3.4.B.2.a LR3.7-24 Relocates specific CTS details for the motor driven AFW pump, piping and 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 2, 3 system valves. Control Program 3.4.B.2.b LR3.7-28 Relocates specific CTS details of inoperability conditions for the AFW backup 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 1,2, 3 supply of water from the cooling water system. Control Program 3.4.B.2.d LR3.7-29 Relocates CTS details of inoperability conditions for AFW system valves. The 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 2, 3 ITS AFW system OPERABILITY and associated ACTIONS envelopes these Control Program 3.4.B.2.e requirements.

LR3.7-38 Relocates CTS definition of specific components required to be OPERABLE. In 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 1,2 the ITS, the specific equipment is included in the ITS in accordance with the Control Program 3.3.C.1.a.(2) definition of OPERABILITY. and 13.-3.C'4 b(14)

CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially) ieiocaies L; j z aetaiis Tor equipment required to detine two OPERABLE trains. 5.5.12, Bases In the ITS the specific equipment is included in accordance with the definition of Control Program OPERABILITY.

LR3.7-43 Relocates CTS details of equipment required to define two OPERABLE trains. In 10CFR50.59 TRM LCO 1, 2, 3 the ITS, the definition of OPERABILITY would include the additional equipment 3.3.D.1.a, in addition of relocating details for the non-safeguards CL pumps. and 3.3.D.1.c LR3.7-63 Relocates specific CTS details of inoperability conditions and controls for the 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 3.6.E.2 2, 3 ABSVS. Control Program and 3.6.E.3 LR3.7-64 Relocates CTS details of supporting equipment for operability of ABSVS. In the 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 3.6.F.1 2,3 ITS, LCO and associated ACTIONS envelopes these requirements. Control Program LR3.7-67 Relocates CTS details to continuously monitor radiation levels in the SFP area 10CFR50.59 TRM LCO 2,3 during fuel handling. 3.8.B.1 .a LR3.7-68 Relocates CTS details to test fuel handling cranes prior to fuel handling. 10CFR50.59 TRM LCO 2,3 3.8.B.1 .b LR3.7-82 Relocates specific CTS details for the surveillance interval for the Steam Line NRC review of IST SR 4.7 3,4 Isolation - Manual Functional test. Program CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 2

5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially)

t, I 3 scneaule Tor pertorming tne AF-W pump Program LR3.7-86 Relocates CTS details for the SR testing of the AFW system discharge and NRC review of IST SR 4.8.A.3 3, 4 motor-operated valves. Program and 4.8.A.4 LR3.7-87 Relocates CTS details that the AFW SR control board indications and visual 5.5.12, Bases Bases SR 4.8.A.5 2, 3 indication operate properly. Control Program LR3.7-98 Relocates specific CTS details for testing of Component Cooling Water System 5.5.12, Bases Bases SR 2, 3 using control room indication. Control Program 4.5.A.4.b, 4.5.A.5.a, 4.5.B.1 .b, 4.5.B.1 .c, 4.5.B.3.e, 4.4.B.2, 4.4.B.3.c and LR3.7-99 Relocates specific CTS details for inspecting each component cooling water 10CFR50.59 TRM SR 4.5.A.5.b 3 diesel. R LR3.7-100 Relocates specific CTS details for the ABSVS to actuate on a high radiation 5.5.12, Bases Bases SR4.4.B.3.c 2,3 signal. Control Program CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 3

5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially) ocates specific CTS details for conducting the ventilation filter tests. b.b5.1U, Ver SR 4.14.A.1, Filter Test 4.14.B, Program 4.4.B.3, 4.4.B.4, 4.4.B.5, 4.15.A.1, 4.15.B.1, 4.15.B.2, and 4.15.1B.3 LR3.7-112 Relocates specific CTS details to sample the Secondary coolant gross Beta- 10CFR50.59 TRM Table 4.1-2B 3 Gamma activity and Secondary coolant chemistry. Items 14, 16, and Note 6 CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 4

5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Increases the amount of equipment required to be OPERABLE to support the AFW system. The ITS LCU 3.7.5 LCO requires entire train of AFW to be OPERABLE and not just selected equipment within the system. Cond C and 3.4.B.1 .a and 3.7.6 Cond B 3.4.B.2 M3.7-12 Adds new SR requiring verification that the AFW valves are locked, sealed or otherwise secured in SR 3.7.5.1 NA position, are in the correct position.

M3.7-13 Adds a new LCO requiring two MSIVs to be OPERABLE. LCO 3.7.2 NA M3.7-14 Adds new Specification requiring two MFRVs and associated bypass valves to be operable. LCO 3.7.3 NA M3.7-15 Adds SRs requiring verification of the isolation time for the MFRV and MFRV bypass valves on an actual SR 3.7.3.1 NA or simulated signal. and 3.7.3.2 M3.7-1 6 Increases the CST volume of water required to 100,000 gallons for each unit. fLCO 3.7.6 ILCO 3.4.B.1 .d M3.7-29' Increases the amount of equipment required to be OPERABLE to support the AFW system. The ITS LCO 3.7.5 LCO requires entire train of AFW to be OPERABLE and not just selected equipment within the system. Cond A and 3.4.B.2.a B

M3.7-26 Adds a new requirement to verify the cooling water supply availability within four hours and every 12 LCO 3.7.6 LCO hours thereafter. Cond A 3.4.B.2.c M3.7-27 IAdds a new SR requiring verification of the CST inventory every 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months . SR 3.7.6.1 NA M3.7-30 CTS requires the plant to shutdown to MODE 4 if the secondary chemistry is not within limits. The ITS LCO 3.7.14 LCO 3.4.D requires the plant to shutdown to MODE 5. Cond A 1

5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially) e m-nrrlinates t- I Tiexaiouty allowing one hour to prepare for initiating a reactor shutdown. LCO 3.7.14 the one hour preparation time and requires initiation of reactor shutdown sooner.

Cond A M3.7-37 Increases the amount of equipment required to be OPERABLE, by the CTS, to support the CC system. LCO 3.7.7 LCO The ITS requires entire train of CC to be OPERABLE and not just selected equipment within the system. Cond B 3.3.C.1.a.(1) and 3.3.C.l.b(1)

M3.7-39 Adds a new SR requiring verification that CC valves in flow paths to safety 3.3.C.1 .b(1) related equipment that are not SR 3.7.7.1 NA locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, are in the correct position.

!M3.7-42 ReducesbyCTS System flexibility requiring the ofentire listing theofspecific train Coolingequipment required Water to be to be OPERABLE for the CoolingW OPERABLE. LCO 3.7.8 LCO 3.3.D.1 M3.7-46 Adds a specific Completion Time to the CTS of 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months to verify the vertical motor driven CL pump is LCO 3.7.8 LCO operable.

Cond C 3.3.D.2.b and (2)

M3.7-48 Adds a new SR to the CTS requiring verification that CL valves in flow paths to safety related equipment SR 3.7.8.1 NA that are not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, are in the correct position.

M3.7-49 Adds a specific Completion Time to the CTS of 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months to verify with one Safeguards Traveling Screen LCO 3.7.9 LCO inoperable, verify the sluice gate position.

Cond A 3.3.D.2.c M3.7-51 Adds a specific Completion Time to the CTS of one hour to verify the sluice gate position. LCO 3.7.9 LCO Cond A 3.3.D.2.d M3.7-52 .Adds a specific Completion Time to the CTS of 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months to verify the sluice gate position.

LCO 3.7.9 LCO Cond C 3.3.D.2.e 2

5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Ml. (-bij Adds new to the CTS requiring verification that the safeguards traveling screens are operable.

SR 3.7.9.1 M3.7-55 Eliminates CTS flexibility allowing 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months to prepare for initiating a reactor shutdown. The ITS deletes the LCO 3.7.10 LCO 3.13.A.1 I hour preparation time and requires initiation of reactor shutdown sooner.

Cond F M3.7-58 Eliminates CTS flexibility allowing two hours to stop fuel handling and placing the OPERABLE CR-SVS train inservice. ITS requires these actions to be initiated immediately. fLCO 3.7.10 LCO 3.13.A.1 Cond E M3.7-59 Adds new Specification, Required

.L.O Actions and SRs requiring two safeguards chilled water trains to be 3.7.11 NA operable.

Cond D M3.7-60 Adds new SR requiring monthly verification that the CL diesel fuel oil supply meets the required limits. SR 3.7.8.3 .NA M3.7-61 Adds SRs requiring verification that each SCWS train actuates on an actual or simulated actuation signal SR 3.7.11.1 NA in addition to the OPERABILITY of the SCWS components.

and 3.7.11.2 M3.7-65 Eliminates CTS flexibility of allowing one hour to prepare for initiating a reactor shutdown.

The ITS deletes LCO 3.7.12 LCO 3.65F.2 the one hour preparation time and requires initiation of reactor shutdown sooner.

Cond C M3.7-73 Reduces the Completion Time to suspend movement of irradiated fuel from unlimited to immediately. JLCO 3.7.13 .LCO 3.8.D.3 M3.7-75 Adds a new Specification requiring the fuel storage pool water level to exceed 23 feet over the top of L. O 3.7.15 NA irradiated fuel seated in the storage racks during irradiated fuel movement.

M3.7-76 Adds a new SR requiring verification of the fuel pool level during movement of irradiated fuel . SR 3.7.15.1 NA M3.7-104 Increases CTS SR requirements from only requiring the Control Room Ventilation circuits to be operated SR 3.7.10.1, SR 4.14.B.4, monthly to operating the entire system.

3.7.12.1, and 4.4.B.4.d and 3.7.13.1 4.15.B.4 3

5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially) a new SR reouirina verificatinn nf nr-h f. .1 .... ;^. - .... - _-

-7 .... ........... .... ,* *o~lluy p, orI Lo moinU~fg the assembly.

SR 4.20 M3.7-108 Reduces CTS interval for performing the RCS activity level SR from every six months when the activity level is less than 10% of the limit, to every 31 days regardless the activity SR 3.7.14.1 level. Item 15 and Not e 5 M3.7-109 Restricts CTS allowed outage time for the AFW equipment to a maximum of 10 days from discovery-of failure to meet the LCO. LCO LCO 3.7.5 Cond B 3.4.B.2.a Restricts CTS allowed outage time for the Cooling Water pump or header M3.7-1 10 to a maximum of 10 days from discovery of failure to meet the LCO. LCO 3.7.8 LCO Cond B and 3.3.D.2.a and C 3.3.D.2.b M3.7-115 Increases the CTS volume of fuel oil supply required for the CL diesel from 19,000 to 19,500 ga l1ons. LCO 3.7.8 LCO Adds a new SR requiring the SG PORV block valves be manually cycled 3.3.D.1 .d M3.7-116 every 24 months. SR 3.7.4.2 SR 4.8.B M3.7-119 Adds Completion Time for closing an inoperable MSIV in 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months before initiating the shutdown track whereas the CTS does not provide any Completion Time. Co 3.7.2 Table 3.5-2B Action 27 CodD Acin2 M3.7-121 Increases CTS requirements from requiring two PORVs OPERABLE to requiring two OPERABLE lLCO PORV 3.7.4 LCO lines. The ITS will require more equipment to be OPERABLE.

3.4.A.1 .b 4

5/8/2002

Table R - Relocated Specifications and Removed Details ITS Section 3.7 - Plant Systems (Not listed sequentially)

LCO 3.4.C and SR 4.8.C R3.7-69 Relocated CTS requirement to limit the number of recently discharged fuel TRM 10 CFR50.59 LCO 3.8.C 1, 5,6 assemblies stored in the small pool (Pool 1).

R3.7-79 Relocated CTS snubber LCO and SR requirements. TRM 10CFR5-0.59 SR. 3.-12, 2,5,6 SR 4.13-1 R3.7-81 Relocated CTS requirements for periodic testing of the turbine stop valves, TRM 10CFR50.59 Table 4.1-2A 2,5,6 governor valves and intercept valves.

R3.7-106 Relocated Specification .M requirements to inspect AR crane lifting devices 5,6 to handling heavy loads.prrfR 1 O R5.9SR49 j2 CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References

5. Relocated Specification not meeting 10 CFR 50.36 (c)(2)(ii) criteria

6. Relocated Specification/Surveillance Requirement/ Administrative Control Requirement

7. Performance Required for Indication 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (Not listed sequentially)

DOC No. T Summary A3.8-01 Did not include general CTS Applicability and Objective statements. ITS administratively ITS Secqtion- CTS Section, LCO 3.8 LCO 3.7 and incorporates these statements within each specification, the plant design features, or systems to SR 4.6 which it applies. These statements have been administratively incorporated, into the ITS, describing plant design features or systems since they do not establish any regulatory or operational requirements.

A3.8-10 Did not include CTS requirements for all engineered safety features equipment associated with the LCO 3.0.6 and LCO 3.7.13.1 OPERABLE DG to be OPERABLE. These requirements are "built in" the format of the ITS and LCO LCO 3.8.1 Cond and 3.7.B.3 3.0.6.

B and D A3.8-13 Clarifies CTS requirements entering LCO 3.0.C due to the CTS into lack of have any specific LCO 3.8.1 LCO 3.0.C Required Actions for the subject Condition. ITS does provide a specific Condition which is to enter Condition G LCO 3.0.3.

A3.8-15 Reformats various CTS requirements by specifically identifying which Specification (s) apply for LCO 3.8.1, VARIOUS various plant conditions. Condition D A3.8-17 Reformats CTS to ITS format and verbiage. In addition, ITS implements LCO 3.0.6 (SFDP) which is LCO3.0.6,3.81 LCO 3.7.B consistent with current operating practices of Pl.

Cond F, 3.8.4 Cond D, 3.8,7 Cond C, and 3.8.9 Cond A 1

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (Not listed sequentially)

"60CIdNO. 'Summary.

ITS Section O CTS Section' A3.8-20 Reformats and clarifies CTS requirements for two reactor protection instrument AC inverters LCO 3.8.7, LCO 3.7.B.9 inoperable.

Condition A and B

A3.8-22 Clarifies CTS by adding a specific Required Action to enter LCO 3.0.3 in the event that two trains LCO 3.0.3, and LCO 3.0.C with inoperable distribution subsystems result in a loss of safety function. This is consistent with the LCO 3.8.9, intent and practices of Pl. Since the CTS does not have any specific Actions for this Condition, the Condition E plant would enter LCO 3.0.C.

A3.8-23 Clarifies CTS requirements for the service building electrical power subsystem components when LCO 3.8.5 LCO 3.7.B being used for the safeguards DC electrical power subsystems during a plant outage.

This is consistent with current plant procedures plant design, and past operating practices.

[A3.8-25 Revises CTS fuel oil storage tank level to specify the total available fuel oil quantity. This change tSR 3.8.3.1 SR 4.6.A.16.b provides an accurate description of the PI design.

A3.8-30 Clarifies CTS statements by stating that only one DG be started at a time. This is current operating practices. PI .SR 3.8.1.3 Note SR 4.6.A. 1 3

A3.8-38 Did not include CTS non-pertinent information.

NA SR 4.6.A.1 .e, 4.6.A.2.c, and 4.6.A.3.b.2 A3.8-39 Clarifies CTS by specifically stating the requirements to verify fuel oil properties of new and stored SR 3.8.3.2 SR 4.6.A. c ...

fuel oil. This is consistent with current plant procedures and practices.

A3.8-40 Did not include non-pertinent CTS information by specifically stating that the fuel oil transfer pump is NA SRNA.6.A. I-d started and operating. If the pump is operating then it has been started.

5/8/2002 2

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (Not listed sequentially)

DOC No'. Summary f~TSI Sectioni CTS Section A3.8-51 Did not include non-pertinent CTS information. NA SR 4.6.A.1 .e A3.8-53 Clarifies CTS requirements by replacing the word tested with verify. SR 3.8.4.1 SR 4.6.B.1 A3.8-56 Did not include CTS descriptive wording for MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4. NA LCO 3.7.A A3.8-57 Clarifies CTS wording requiring determination that the OPERABLE DG is not inoperable due to LCO 3.8.1 LCO 3.7.B common cause failure. Condition B A3.8-58 Revises CTS adding specific verbiage to more accurately reflect PI testing of the DGs. SR 3.8.1.2 SR 4.6.A.1 .e A3.8-60 Reformatted CTS SR clarifying voltage and frequency testing requirements. SR 3.8.1.6 SR 4.6.A.2.a A3.8-62 Clarifies CTS requirements for the battery discharge test. For batteries during the first refueling and SR 3.8.6.6 SR 4.6.B.4 once every 5 years thereafter.

A3.8-63 Clarifies CTS that one 4 kV safeguards bus and/or its associated 480V bus including associated LCO 3.8.9 Cond LCO 3.7.B.6 MCC may be inoperable or not fully energized for 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months provided the 4 kV safeguards bus and its A associated 480V safeguards buses are verified to be OPERABLE and the DGs and safeguards

........ equipment associated with the redundant train are OPERABLE.

A3.8-68 Clarifies CTS intent by stating that if the DG fuel oil cannot be restored to within limits, declare the LCO 3.8.3, NA DGs inoperable and enter the applicable Conditions and Required Actions of LCO 3.7.8. Condition D 3

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (Not listed sequentially) 3.8-07 Eliminates CTS requirements for entry into LCO 3.0.C since there is not-any 1T* -Seccitio~CT ii Secti££1

-Change specific Actin o feature(s) supported by an inoperable DG. The ITS provides specific JNA t..n......ct . .....

Required Actions LCO 4,9Type eliminating entry into LCO 3.0.3.

3.7.B.1, 3.7.B.4, and 3.7. B.6. 1, 31.8-09 Eliminates CTS requirements for the associated DG(s) to 3.0.C be tested within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months if an offsite path is inoperable. The ITS does not require the DG testing and only requires verification of the NA LCo . . 3, 4 other offsite path. 3.7.B.2, 3.7.B.3, 3.7.B.3**,

3.7.,B.4, 3.7.B.5, 3.7.B.6, and 3.7. B.9

.8-11 i Increases CTS Completion Time from 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months when two required pathsfrom the grid Ito the 4 kV safeguards distribution system are inoperable. LCO 3.8.1 LCO 3.7.B.4 6 CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design

8. Information Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.8- Electrical Power Systems (Not listed sequentially)

FOC No- Summary, ITS Section (CT~ a-$

Phange Change L3.8-121 Relaxes CTS requirements allowing 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months to restore fuel oil supply instead of declaring the LCO 3.8.1 DGs inoperable when the fuel oil gets to a specific level. LCO 3.7.A.5 6 and 3.8.3 Cond A L3.8-16 Relaxes CTS requirements of declaring supported equipment inoperable and potential shutdown 4II LCO 3.8.9 I ________________________________________

by implementing ITS LCO 3.0.6 (SFDP). LCO 3.7.B.6 1,4 Cond A, B and E L3.8-28 .Relaxes CTS SR testing by allowing the performance of a modified start test for the DG.

SR 3.8.1.2 SR 4.6.A.I.e 3 Notes 1 and 3

L3.8-29 Increases CTS flexibility by not invalidating a SR if there is a momentary transient0outside the loa'd SR -3.8..3 . 4.6..1..

ý R4.6 -- e 33 range of the DG.

Notes 2, 3, and 4 L3.8-35 Increases CTS Frequency from 18 months to 24 months for various testing of the DG. SR 3.8.1.10 "SR4.6.A.3 8 CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 2

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.8- Electrical Power Systems (Not listed sequentially) oDOC No. Summary Change.

ITS Section , CTS Sect change.

L3.8-36 Relaxes CTS requirements allowing credit to be taken for an actual signal to initiate the protective I SR 3.8.1.10 SR 4.6.A.3.b13 I ~Tvne i function being tested.

and e L3.8-46 Eliminates CTS SR for verifying the station battery fuses are good when the battery charger is NA running.

I SR 4.6.B.5 3 L3.8-59 Relaxes CTS requirements for testing the DG upon the associated DG failure to start. TFheITS ....

allows an evaluation to be performed to verify that the failure LCO 3.8.1 LCO 3.7.8.1 3, 4 was not due to common cause.

Cond B L3.8-61 Elim in tes CTS tf tin r, ,i . &*....I. .... .. ......... ...

.... I S.......... rating in less .than ,,60 seconds specific , L,,L Me DCube manually synchronized and loaded to a NA SR 4.6.A.2.b 3,10 and operate for at least one hour every 6 months. ý3,10 CHAN GE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 3

5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (Summaries not listed sequentially)

FDOC No. <K SuChanyeLocation

~ :ControlChnehag SummarYProcess .:Ty~eY CTS'Sect LR3.8-02 Relocates CTS descriptive details on plant design for the electrical buses, DGs, 10CFR50.59 USAR LCO 3.7.A, 1,2 and instrument panels.

3.7.A.2, 3.7.A.3, 3.7.A.4, 3.7.A.5, 3.7.A.6, 3.7.A.7, and 3.7.B.9 LR3.8-34 Relocates CTS SR details inspecting DG inaccrdance with procedures 1CFR5..59 TRM SR 4.6.A..3.. 3 prepared per manufacturer's recommendations.

LR3.8-37 Relocates CTS details for SR requirements for during .CFR5r.59 the loss of offsite power TTRM SR 3 in conjunction with a SI signal test, that operation of the emergency lighting 4.6.A.3.b.3 system shall be ascertained.

LR3.8-43 Relocates CTS details about testing battery cells, Frequency, and data. recording 10CFR50.59 TRM SR 4.6.B.1, 46.B.2, and 3f .

4.6. B.3 LR3.8-44 'Relocates CTS details about testing the DG ful load carrying capability of the I10CFR50.59 and usAR SiR 4.6'.A.3. c 3 continuous rating for the emergency DG and information about its continuous 5.5.12 Bases and rating. Control Program Bases CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (Summaries not listed sequentially)

.DOC No. nar tt Control Change LR3.8-45 Relocates CTS SR details verifying that all electrical connections Process Locatiojn CTS Sect, FChinge are tight. 100FR5O.59 Battery SR 4.6.B.4

",:Type' Maintena I

nce Program 3 CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 2

DI/OIZUUZ

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (Not listed sequentially)

Raas new snutaown -jpeciTications to (.; i S. LLU ,3.0-.4, NA 3.8.5, 3.8.6, 3.8.8, and 3.8.10 M3.8-06 Adds Required Action to CTS that within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months determine OPERABLE DG is not made inoperable LCO 3.8.1 3.7.B.1 due to a common mode failure. Condition B M3.8-14 Adds new Specification to CTS for Diesel Fuel Oil testing. LCO 3.8.3 NA Condition B, C, and D M3.8-18 Adds Completion Time requirements of 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months to CTS for verifying associated battery, other train LCO 3.8.4 LCO 3.7B.7 charger, and DG and safeguards equipment on the other train. Condition A M3.8-19 Adds a 2 hour2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months Completion Time to CTS for verifying the other battery and both battery chargers are LCO 3.8.4 LCO 3.7.B.8 OPERABLE. Condition B M3.8-21 Adds new second Completion Time to CTS of 16 hours1.851852e-4 days 0.00444 hours 2.645503e-5 weeks 6.088e-6 months from discovery of failure to meet LCO for the LCO 3.8.9 NA reactor protection instrument AC panel. Conditions B and C M3.8-24 Adds new SR Frequency to CTS from discharging the batteries every 5 years to verify battery capacity of SR 3.8.6.6 SR 4.6.B.4 the battery > 80% of the manufacturer's rating every 5 years and 12 month when the battery shows degradation, or reached 85% of the expected life.

M3.8-27 Adds new SR to CTS verifying correct breaker alignment and indicated power availability for each SR 3.8.1.1 NA qualified path every 7 days.

1 5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (Not listed sequentially)

DOCf No.

M3.3-31 Adds SR requirements to CTS stating that another ITS Section' CTS Section SR shall be performed immediately following, shutdown, the DG test. without SR 3.8.1.3 SR 4.6.A.1 e M3.8-41 Adds new SRs to CTS for the shutdown Specifications.

LCO0 3.8.2, NA 3.8.5, 3.8.6, 3.8.8, and 3.8.10 M3.8-42 Adds new SRs to CTS verifying correct breaker alignments and voltage to safeguards AC, DC, reactor protection instrument AC electrical power and SR 3.8.9.1 distribution subsystems within 7 days. NA and 3.8.10.1 M3.8-47 Adds new SR to CTS requiring verification that each battery charger supplies a specific current and float voltage every 24 months. rating SR 3.8.4.2 NA M3.8-49 Adds new SR to CTS to verify correct inverter voltage and alignment to the Reactor Protection Instrumentation AC panels every 7 days. SR 3.8.7.1 NA M3.8-50 Increases CTS SR Frequency from every 3 months to monthly for verifying the water level in the battery cell. SR 4.6.B.2 SR 3.8.6.3 M3.8-52 Increases CTS SR Frequency from testing the batteries monthly to every 7 days.

SR 4.6.B.1 R 3.8.4.1 5/8/2002 2

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (Not listed sequentially)

'~' .3 Summary its. CTS requires the buses, which verify the DGs start, whereas o be verified.

iy adding a second Completion Time of 14 days from discovery of nd one offsite path are inoperable.

3 that with one DC electrical power subsystem inoperable ,for oth power subsystem to OPERABLE within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months .

a battery service test to verify design requirements of the DC ele y adding a second Completion Time of 16 hours1.851852e-4 days 0.00444 hours 2.645503e-5 weeks 6.088e-6 months from discovery o ig that on a 24 month basis, either by a simulated or actual loss o' art.

3 5/8/2002

Table R - Relocated Specifications and Removed Details ITS Section 3.8 - Electrical Power Systems (Not listed sequentially)

CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References

5. Relocated Specification not meeting 10 CFR 50.36 (c)(2)(ii) criteria

6. Relocated Specification/Surveillance Requirement/ Administrative Control Requirement

7. Performance Required for Indication 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.9 - Refueling Operations (Not listed sequentially)

,6C No., Summary A3.9-00 Editorial changes were made in reformatting, renumbering, and rewording in accordance with the I ~ ectin.,ý Table LCO 3.9

ýCT84q Sci~on.

TS.1-1, guidance of NUREG-1431.

3.8, Table TS.4.1-2A, and Table TS.4.1-2B A3.9-02 Did not include general CTS Applicability and Objective statements at the beginning of each CTS LCO 3.9 section. These statements only provide general information and do LCO 3.8 not impose any operational or technical requirements.

A3.9-03 Revises CTS format such that each specification in the Refueling Operations Section contains its own Applicability and the CTS specifications are marked up to correspond LCO 3.9 ELC1.31.8.A4. 1-to these Applicabilities.

A3.9-03 Rewords CTS by adding the words "when connected " and "limits are met" clarifying the intent of the CTS. LCO 3.9.1 Table 1-1

.1 _____________________

A3.9-06 Clarifies CTS that containment closure requires four bolts required to hold the equipment hatch in place when it is considered closed which is consistent with the CTS.

LCO 3.9.4 LCO 3.8.A.l.a.1 A3.9-07 Restates CTS requirements which allow for at least one isolation valve to be OPERABLE (that is by automatic closure) or locked. L 3.9.4

,O ,CO M.A. 1.a.I A3.9-1 0 Rewords CTS requirements for isolation of lines which penetrate containment and provide a direct LCO 3.9.4 path from containment atmosphere to the outside atmosphere. LCO 3.8.A.1.a.1 A3.9-12 Rewords CTS requirements making minor editorial changes.

..CO 3.9.4 LCO 3.8.A.1.a.2 1

5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Section 3.9 - Refueling Operations (Not listed sequentially)

summnary .. .

lid not include CTS clause, "folio wing a fuel handling accident in containment" as the basis for equiring an OPERABLE air lock or operating containment fan coil. It is understood that the p'urpose f this Specification is to mitigate the consequences of a fuel handling accident in containmeint since iat is the regulatory basis for a R efueling Operations LCO.

ients consistent with the ISTS.

specification to apply to movement of fuel assemblies "in

) incorporate the Applicability changes for each individual ously.

ng for not reducing boron concentration.

Jipment hatch and penetration closure.

vhen the one RHR pump is not operating and the water levi el flange.

2 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.9 - Refueling Operations (Not listed sequentially)

Relaxes CTS requirements from considering accidents postulated to occur during core alteration, inadvertent criticality (inadvertent loading of, and subsequent operation with a LCO fuel 38.A. l.a assembly in an improper location) to only considering the fuel handling accident.

L3.9-31 Eliminates CTS requirements to verify water level prior to moving fuel or control rods. The ITS SR 3.9.2.1 LCO .

only requires water level to be verified prior to commencing movement of fuel. 3 L3.9-34 Eliminates CTS requirement from allowing the operating RHR pump to be shut down for one hour to facilitate movement of fuel or core components to allow the RHR pump to be

_T up to LCO 3.9.6 T

38.A.1. e, Table 4.1-2A es t 5 3...CO 3 1 , 4, 6.

shutdown for one hour for any reason.

L3.9-49 Reduces CTS Frequency from daily to 3 days for verification of boron concentration, LCO 3.9.1.1 Table 4.1-2B, 10 Note 5 inoperable for up to 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months for SR testing. Note 2 3.8.A.1.g ..

CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Section 3.9 - Refueling Operations (Not listed sequentially)

LR3.9-01 Relocates specific SDM details for all analyzed plant refueling conditions. Methodology COLR Table 1-1 LR3.9-13 Relocates specific CTS details for equipment needing to be OPERABLE 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 1, 2, 3 following a fuel handling accident in containment. Control Program 3.8.A.1 .a.(2)(b)(i ii) and 3.8.A.11.a.(2)(b)(i LR3.9-17 Relocates specific CTS details for containment radiation monitors, which 10CFR50.59 TRM LCO 3.8.A.1.b 1,2 provide monitoring for personnel safety.

LR3.9-18 Relocates specific CTS details for the neutron flux monitor to have 5.5.12, Bases Bases LCO 3.8.A.1.c 1 continuous visual indication in the control room. Control Program LR3.9-27 Relocates specific CTS details to maintain 23 feet of water above the 10CFR50.59 TRM LCO 3.8.A.1.e 2 reactor vessel flange during movement of control rods out of the reactor vessel.

LR3.9-44 Relocates specific CTS details for communication between the control room 10CFR50.59 TRM LCO 3.8.A.1.h 2 and containment.

LR3.9-46 Relocates CTS restriction for moving fuel prior to 100 hours0.00116 days 0.0278 hours 1.653439e-4 weeks 3.805e-5 months after the reactor 10CFR50.59 TRM LCO 3.8.A.l.i 2 is subcritical.

CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.9 - Refueling Operations (Not listed sequentially)

Adds new Condition, Required Actions, Completion Times, and SRs if the boron concentration is not within limits. LGO 3.9.1, Condition A M3.9-16 Adds SRsverification days and requiring verification of inserviceofpurge containment purge and valve actuation inservice every purge penetration status every 7 24 months. SR 3.9.4.1 and 3.8.A.1 LCO .a.2.b.iv 3.9.4.2 M3.9-21 Expands the CTS MODE of APPLICABILITY for monitoring the core subcritical neutron flux from LCO 3.9.3, . LCO 3.8.A.*I.c whenever the core geometry is changed to MODE 6.

Applicability MmrtL....Adds an Action Statement requiring additional verification of boron concentration once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months if fLCO 3.9.3, LCO 3.8.A.1.c both neutron flux monitors are inoperable.

Condition B M3.9-23 Adds an Action Statement requiring additional verification of boron concentration once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months if LCO 3.9.3, . LCO 3.8.A.1 .c the audible count rate indication is not operable.

Condition C M3.9-24 Adds SRs requiring a CHANNEL CHECK every 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months and a CHANNEL CALIBRATION every 24 SR 3.9.3.1 and JLCO 3.8.Al.c months of the neutron flux monitors.

3.9.3.2 M3.9-32 Expad CTS Applicability from requiring one RHR pump to be OPERABLE and operating during LCO 3.9.5 and LcO 3.8.A.1 .f CORE ALTERATIONS to requiring one RHR pump OPERABLE and operating during all of MODE 6. 3.9.6 M3.9-33 Eliminates CTS flexibility of allowing an RHR pump to be shutdown for up to 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months over an unlimited LCO 3.9.5, LCO 3.8.A.1.f period to one hour per 8 hour9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months period.

Note M3.9-36 Adds a new SRrequiring verification every 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months that the RHR loop is in operation.

SR 3.9.5.1 NA 1

5/8/2002

Table M - More restrictive Changes ITS Section 3.9 - Refueling Operations (Not listed sequentially)

,DOC No., Su r .m J ITS Section M3.9-37 Increases CTS MODE of APPLICABILITY from specific operations during MODE 6 to whenever the LCO 3.9.6 unit is in MODE 6.

M3.9-43 Adds SRs requiring verification that one RHR loop is in operation every 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months and verify proper SR 3.9.6.1 ani breaker alignment and power available to the other RHR pump every 7 days. 3.9.6.2 M3.9-51 Adds new requirements to verify that the containment purge system will isolate when a required RHR LCO 3.9.5, an pump is not operating.

3.9.6 M3.9-53 Eliminates CTS flexibility of allowing an RHR pump to be shutdown for up to one hour over an LCO 3.9.6, unlimited period to one hour per 8 hour9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months period in addition to adding restrictions on temperature, and Note 1 dilution and draining operations.

2 5/20/UU2

Table R - Relocated Specifications and Removed Details ITS Section 3.9 - Refueling Operations (Not listed sequentially)

INONE INONE INC)NF INNNF IN NE INONE ]NONEF ~ N CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References

5. Relocated Specification not meeting 10 CFR 50.36 (c)(2)(ii) criteria

6. Relocated Specification/Surveillance Requirement/ Administrative Control Requirement

7. Performance Required for Indication 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Chapter 4.0 - Design Features (Not listed sequentially)

~ Surmairy irmatting, renumbering, and rewording in accordancE

tor core to conform to ISTS format..

e a statement for the spacing o0new fuel storage an

.TS to agree with the ITS location of the information.

rthat the spent fuel pool design prevents draining thE age capacity.

n the paragraph.

1 5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Chapter 4.0 - Design Features (Not listed sequentially)

L4.0-03 Relaxes CTS intent by limiting fuel assemblies to those fuel designs that have been analyzed 4.2 5.3.A 7 with applicable NRC staff approved codes and methods and shown by tests or analyses to comply with all fuel safety design bases.

I CHANGE TYPES

1. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Chapter 4.0 - Design Features (Not listed sequentially)

DO6bý N1,~ y Control Change. LýainOSChange;

_________________________________________ Process. ____ _____ Type LR4.0-01 Relocates CTS descriptive information for the containment design features. 10CFR50.59 USAR 5.2 1 LR4.0-04 Relocates description for the RCS and reactor protection systems toUthe USAR' 10CFR5059 . USAR 5.3.B and-i Rbut will not be transcribed verbatim to the USAR. 5.3.C LR4.0-08 Relocates description of the spent fuel storage design features. 10CFR50.59 USAR 5.6.B and 1 5.6,C CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Chapter 4.0 - Design Features (Not listed sequentially)

%DOCNo~1~

~ ~ um~mary TSetion~

c CTS Section.

FNONE JNONE INONE 5/8/2002 1

Table R - Relocated Specifications and Removed Details ITS Chapter 4.0 - Design Features (Summaries not listed sequentially)

INONE ]NONE INONE ]NONE INONE INONF IOE NOEINONE N E CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References

5. Relocated Specification not meeting 10 CFR 50.36 (c)(2)(ii) criteria

6. Relocated Specification/Surveillance Requirement/ Administrative Control Requirement

7. Performance Required for Indication 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Chapter 5.0 - Administrative Controls (Not listed sequentially)

Sjummary .

n reformatting, renumbering, and rewording. These changes d(

Irequirements.

the Steam Generator (SG) tube surveillance Program as an ient.

r Steam Generator (SG) tube surveillance Program in the admir imbering, and punctuation.

be consistent with 1OCRF50.59.

nts for shift manning since they are included in 10 CFR5O.54(m iel job titles with general job titles.

anges to make it consistent with ISTS as currently modified by t nt spray system (CS), by design, as one of the example system e containment.

rstanding when complying with 10 CFR 55.4 requirements.

,ect to the applicability of CTS 4.0.A and 4.0.B to properly interfz and 10 CFR 50 Appendix J.

1 5/8/2002

Table A - Administrative Changes ITS Chapter 5.0 - Administrative Controls (Not listed sequentially)

Clarifies reporting requirements stating that a single submittal may be made for the plant combining sections common to a two unit plant. 6.6.A, 6.6.B and 6.6.C A5.0-27 Did not include cTS requirements for monthly reporting of challenges to the pressurizer power operated relief valves or pressurizer safety valves. NA 16.6.D A5.0-28 Includes COLR reference to latest Prairie Island Plant approved steam line break methodology. 5.5.5 16.5.E A5-.0-31 Replaces CTS list of limits and corresponding TS with a new list of ITS specifications which reference 5.6.5 16.6.E the COLR. Each of these ITS specifications either corresponds to a CTS which references the COLR or justification was previously provided in the appropriate ITS package for relocating the limit to the COLR.

5O-32 IRep aces CTS st of TS referencing the PTLR with a new list of ITS specifications which I A5.0-32 PTLR. Each of these ITS specifications either corresponds to a CTS which reference the references the PTLR or

1 5.6.6 6.6.F justification was previously provided in the appropriate ITS package for relocating the limit to the PTLR.

A5.0-33 Revises CTS requirements for high radiation area updating the acceptable alternate controls to those 5.7 16.7 given in 10 CFR 20.1601 which provide an equivalent level of radiation protection to that currently provided.

A5.0-34 Revises CTS Section titles to agree with the recommendations of Regulatory assure that adequate protection is provided without unnecessary radiation exposure. Guide 8.38 which will 5.7.1 and 5.7.2 6.7.A and 6.7.B A5.0-36 fRestates PI requirements for battery monitoring and maintenance. .5.5.15 AArr%,- "o- -1.-......... . . . ."3o ......... .. ...... . .......... ... .. ......... ,................. ............ .

J.J.UJ(J Restates C I S reporting requirement for EM as an administrative report. 6.5 ""

5 .0....

S.

... . . . .. . .. , .. . .. .. . .... . ... . ... . . .. 5.6 2

5/8/2002

Table L - Less Restrictive Changes ITS Chapter 5.0 - Administrative Controls (Not listed sequentially)

CHANGE TYPES

,. Relaxation of LCO Requirement

2. Relaxation of Applicability

3. Relaxation of Surveillance Requirement

4. Relaxation of Required Action

5. Relaxation of CTS Reporting Requirements

6. Relaxation of Completion Time

7. Deletion of Requirements Redundant to Regulations or Design Information

8. Relaxation of Surveillance Frequency from 18 months to 24 months

9. Relaxation of CTS 3.0.C Requirements

10. Relaxation of SR Frequency 5/8/2002

Table LR - Less Restrictive - Relocated Details ITS Chapter 5.0 - Administrative Controls (Not listed sequentially)

Relocates CTS ASME Section XI Inservice Inspection (ISI) requirements including definition of corrective measures and record keeping requirements. 4.Z.A. 1, 4.2.13, and

,i1) r,-t

____________________ I . . '.- I I R5 O-Nq d9C I Relocates CTS requirements for inservice testing to the Inservice Testing(1ST) I 5.5.7, Inservice IST I 4.2.A.2 Program. 4 Testing Program, NRC approval LR5.0-03 Relocates CTS requirements for reactor coolant pump flywheel inspection to Administrative Controls Section 5.5, Reactor Coolant Pump Flywheel Inspection 5.5.6, Reactor RCPFIP Table 4.2-1 4 Coolant Pump and 6.5.F Program.

Flywheel, 10CFR50.59 LR5.0-22 Relocates CTS requirements for testing of safety related ventilation filters to the Ventilation Filter Test Program (VFTP), a new program in the ITS Administrative 5.5.9, Ventilation VFTP 16.5.1 14 Filter Testing Controls Section 5.5.

Program I

CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References 5/8/2002

Table M - More Restrictive Changes ITS Chapter 5.0 - Administrative Controls (Not listed sequentially) corporating the requirements of the "new" 10 CFR Part 20.

unction Determination Program, requiring a system OPERABII iever LCO 3.0.6 is entered.

ifying that the duty shift manager shall hold an SRO license.

1 5/8/2002

Table R - Relocated specifications and Removed Details ITS Chapter 5.0 - Administrative Controls (Not listed sequentially)

I.---.- - - I.

CHANGE TYPES

1. Details of System Design and System Description including Design Limits

2. Description of System or Plant Operation

3. Procedural Details for Meeting TS Requirements and Relocated Reporting Requirements

4. Redundant Requirement References

5. Relocated Specification not meeting 10 CFR 50.36 (c)(2)(ii) criteria

6. Relocated Specification/Surveillance Requirement/ Administrative Control Requirement

7. Performance Required for Indication 5/8/2002

ML021400043

Contents

Text

RESPONSE

RESPONSE

RESPONSE

Navigation menu

ML021400043

Text

RESPONSE

RESPONSE

RESPONSE

Navigation menu

Search