M190202, GEH - Third Reply to NRC Request for Information Needed for GE-Hitachi Exemption Request for Alternate Decommissioning Schedules

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GEH - Third Reply to NRC Request for Information Needed for GE-Hitachi Exemption Request for Alternate Decommissioning Schedules
ML19319B845
Person / Time
Site: Vallecitos Nuclear Center, Vallecitos
Issue date: 11/15/2019
From: Feyrer M
GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas
To: Jack Parrott
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
Shared Package
ML19319B843 List:
References
M190202
Download: ML19319B845 (4)


Text

GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy Matt J. Feyrer

  • HITACHI Site Manager, VaUecitos Nuclear Center 6705 Vallecitos Rd Sunol, CA 94586 Proprietary Information Notice USA Attachments 2 through 5 to this letter contain GE Hitachi Nuclear T 925 918 6018 Matt.feyrer@ge.com Energy proprietary information which is to be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with lD CFR 2.390. Upon removal of attachments 2 through 5, the balance of this letter may be made public.

M190202 November 15, 2019 Jack D. Parrott, Senior Project Manager Reactor Decommissioning Branch Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 ATTN: Document Control Desk

Subject:

GEH Third Reply to NRG Request for Information Needed for GE-Hitachi Exemption Request for Alternate Decommissioning Schedules

References:

1. NRC License DPR-1, Vallecitos Boiling Water Reactor (VBWR), Docket 50-18, NRC License DR-10, ESADA Vallecitos Experimental Superheat Reactor (EVESR), Docket 50-183, NRC License TR-1, General Electric Test Reactor (GETR), Docket 50-70
2. Letter, GEH Vallecitos Nuclear Center (VNC) Request for Alternate Decommissioning Schedules for DPR-1, DR-1 O and TR-1 Licenses, Exemption Request, 7/15/16
3. Letter, J.D. Parrott (NRC) to S.P. Murray (GEH) Request for Additional Information, 1/18/18
4. Letter, S.P. Murray to J.D. Parrott (NRG), GEH Response Plan for NRC Request for Additional Information, 3/28/18
5. Letter, S.P. Murray to J.D. Parrott (NRC), GEH First Response to NRC Request for Additional Information, 5/31/18
6. GEH Interim Status Report to NRC Request for Additional Information (RAI),

10/23/18

7. Letter, M.J. Feyrer to J.D. Parrott (NRC), GEH Second Response to NRC Request for Additional Information, 3/28/19
8. NAC/GEH Telecom, Third Response to NRC Request for Additional Information, 11/12/19 As discussed with NRC staff on November 12, 2019 (Reference 8), attached is the GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy, LLC (GEH) third response to the NRC request for additional information needed for GE-Hitachi's exemption request to support alternate decommissioning schedules for the three shutdown reactors at the Vallecitos Nuclear Center (VNC) (Reference 1).

M190202 U.S. NRC November 15, 2019 Page 2 Attachments 2 through 5 to this letter provide the additional requested information for RAls 5 and 6 as described in References 4 and 7. Please note Attachments 2 through 5 contain company proprietary information that is requested to be withheld from public disclosure.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (925) 918-6018.

Sincerely, Matt Feyrer, Site Manager Vallecitos Nuclear Center Attachments: 1) GEH Affidavit

2) GEH Additional Requested Information, Third Supplement, 11/15/19
3) Seismic Evaluation of the Vallecitos Boiling Water Reactor (VBWR)

Shutdown Facility, Tier 1 Report, Revision O, Issued 7/3/19

4) Maintenance and Surveillance Plan, Vallecitos Nuclear Center Shutdown Reactors, Revision 0, Issued 8/5/19
5) Radiological Characterization and Source Term for the Shutdown Reactors at Vallecitos Nuclear Cente~, Revision 1, Issued 11 /13/19 cc: S. Anderson, USNRC RIV MJF 19-011

Attachment 1 - AFFIDAVIT I, Matt J. Fcyrer, state as follows:

( 1) I am the Site Manager of the Vallecitos Nuclear Center and have been delegated the function by GEH of reviewing the information described in paragraph (2) which is sought to be withheld, and have been authorized to apply for its withholding.

(2) The information sought to be withheld is contained in Attachments 2 through 5 to GEH*s letter, M 190202, Matthew J. Feyrer to Jack D. Parrott, Reactor Decommissioning Branch entitled "GEH Third Reply to NRC Request for Information Needed for GE-Hitachi Exemption Request for Alternate Decommissioning Schedules". GEH proprietary infonnation is contained in Attachments 2 through 5 and is identified by the statement "GEH Proprietary Information".

(3) In making this application for withholding of proprietary information of which it is the owner or licensee, GEH relies upon the exemption from disclosure set forth in the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 USC Sec. 552(b)(4), and the Trade Secrets Act, 18 USC Sec. 1905, and NRC regulations 10 CFR 9.17(a)(4), and 2.390(a)(4) fortrade secrets (Exemption 4). The material for which exemption from disclosure is here sought also qualifies under the narrower definition of trade secret, within the meanings assigned to those terms for purposes of FOIA Exemption 4 in, respectively, Critical Mass Energy Proiect v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 975 F2d 871 (DC Cir. 1992), and Public Citizen Health Research Group v. FDA, 704 F2d 1280 (DC Cir. 1983).

(4) The information sought to be withheld is considered to be proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs (4)a. and (4)b. Some examples of categories of information that fit into the definition of proprietary infonnation are:

a. Information that discloses financial, a process, method, or apparatus, including supporting data and analyses, where prevention of its use by GEH' s competitors without license from GEH constitutes a competitive economic advantage over GEH and/or other companies.
b. Information that, if used by a competitor, would reduce their expenditure of resources or improve their competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing of a similar product.

(5) To address 10 CFR 2.390(b)(4), the information sought to be withheld is being submitted to the NRC in confidence. The information is of a sort customarily held in confidence by GEH, and is in fact so held. The information sought to be withheld has, to the best of my knowledge and belief, consistently been held in confidence by GEH, not been disclosed publicly, and not been made available in public sources. All disclosures to third parties, including any required transmittals to the NRC, have been made, or must be made. pursuant to regulatory provisions or proprietary and/or confidentiality agreements that provide for maintaining the information in confidence. The initial designation of this information as proprietary information, and the subsequent steps taken to prevent its unauthorized disclosure are as set forth in the following paragraphs (6) and (7).

(6) Initial approval of proprietary treatment of a document is made by the manager of the originating component, who is the person most likely to be acquainted with the value and sensitivity of the information in relation to industry knowledge, or who is the person most likely to be subject to the terms under which it was licensed to GEH. Access to such documents within GEH is limited to a uneed to know" basis.

(7) The procedure for approval of external release of such a document typically requires review by the staff manager, project manager, principal scientist, or other equivalent authority for technical content,

competitive effect, and determination of the accuracy of the proprietary designation. Disclosures outside GEH are limited to regulatory bodies, customers, and potential customers, and their agents, suppliers, and licensees, and others with a legitimate need for the information, and then only in accordance with appropriate regulatory provisions or proprietary and/or confidentiality agreements.

(8) The information identified in paragraph (2) above is classified as proprietary because it contains details of GEH's processes, design and manufacturing facilities.

(9) Public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to GEH' s competitive position and foreclose or reduce the availability of profit-making opportunities. The facility design and licensing methodology is part of GEH's comprehensive safety and technology base, and its commercial value extends beyond the original development cost. The value of the technology base goes beyond the extensive physical database and analytical methodology and includes development of the expertise to determine and apply the appropriate evaluation process. In addition, the technology base includes the value derived from providing analyses done with NRC-approved methods.

The research, development, engineering, analytical and NRC review costs comprise a substantial investment of time and money by GEH. The precise value of the expertise to devise an evaluation process and apply the correct analytical methodology is difficult to quantify, but it clearly is substantial. GEH's competitive advantage will be Jost if its competitors are able to use the results of the GEH experience to normalize or verify their own process or if they are able to claim an equivalent understanding by demonstrating that they can anive at the same or similar conclusions.

The value of this information to GEH would be lost if the information were disclosed to the public.

Making such information available to competitors without there having been required to undertake a similar expenditure of resources would unfairly provide competitors with a windfall, and deprive GEH of the* opportunity to exercise its competitive advantage to seek* an adequate return on its large investment in developing and obtaining these very valuable analytical tools.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on this 15th day of November 2019.

Matt J. eyrer GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas, L.L.C.