L-2005-098, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report
ML051440525
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/12/2005
From: Jones T
Florida Power & Light Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-2005-098
Download: ML051440525 (62)


Text

FPL I~ I ?, 'no L-2005-098 10 CFR 50.36b U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-00001 Re:

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 2004 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Enclosed is the 2004 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4, as required by Technical Specification 6.9.1.3.

Should there be any questions or comments regarding this information, please contact Walter Parker at (305) 246-6632.

Sincerely, Terry 0. Jones Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant SM Enclosure Regional Administrator, Region II Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant

,j7;'3 S an FPL Group company

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT UNITS 3 & 4 LICENSE NOS. DPR-31, DPR-41 DOCKET NOS. 50-250, 50-251 Data Submitted by: Florida DOH Prepared by:

Reviewed by: ;I.

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION Introduction Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Discussion and Interpretation of Results Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Annual Summary Deviations / Missing Data Analyses with LLDs Above Required Detection Capabilities Land Use Census Key to Sample Locations Radiological Surveillance of Florida Power and Light Company's Turkey Point Site First Quarter, 2004 Second Quarter, 2004 Third Quarter, 2004 Fourth Quarter, 2004 Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, 2004 PAGE 1

1 3

TABLE 1 TABLE 1A TABLE 1 B TABLE 2 ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT C i

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3 & 4 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

The data obtained through the Turkey Point Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples are not increasing. These measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, during the surveillance year, is well within the limits established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I. The sampling period was from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004.

Additionally, supplemental samples collected by the State of Florida, DOH, do not indicate adverse trends in the radiological environment.

ii

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 I.

INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9 of Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Technical Specifications. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the calendar year indicated. This report covers surveillance activities described in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) meeting the requirements of Unit 3 and Unit 4 Technical Specifications.

II.

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM A.

Purpose The purpose of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of members of the public resulting from station operation. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.

B.

Program Description The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for the Turkey Point Plant is conducted pursuant to Control 5.1 of Turkey Point Unit 3 & 4 ODCM.

1.

Sample Locations, Types and Frequencies:

a.

Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 22 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). TLDs are collected and analyzed quarterly.

b.

Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations. Samples are collected and analyzed weekly. Analyses include Iodine-1 31, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements.

c.

Surface water samples are collected from three locations. Samples are collected and analyzed monthly. Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements.

1

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4

d.

Shoreline sediment samples are collected from three locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

e.

Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations coinciding with two of the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually.

Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

f.

Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed monthly.

Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies.

2.

Analytical Responsibility:

Radiological environmental monitoring for the Turkey Point Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health (DOH). Samples are collected and analyzed by DOH personnel.

Samples are analyzed at the DOH Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.

C.

Analytical Results Table 1, Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Annual Summary provides a summary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period.

Deviations from the sample schedule, missing data and/or samples not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted and explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively. Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided in Attachment B.

D.

Land Use Census A land use census out to a distance of 5 miles radius from the Turkey Point Plant is conducted annually to determine the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation, in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors.

A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year is provided in Table 2, Land Use Census Summar.

2

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 E.

Interlaboratorv Comparison Proaram The intercomparison program consists of participating in programs sponsored by the Department of Energy (DOE). The first round of samples was from Environmental Measurements Lab (EML) Quality Assessment Program (DOE-QAP). The second round of samples was from the DOE Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP). DOE's EML was transferred to the Department of Homeland Security. A decision was made that continuing the QAP program would not be part of their new mission.

DOE's Office of Corporate Performance Assessment (EH-3) made a decision that the continuance of a similar program was in the best interests of the DOE and opened the program to non-DOE facilities. This other program provides similar testing (matrices, nuclides, and levels) as the former QAP and is referred to as the Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP); however, MAPEP 12 did not include a vegetation matrix (MAPEP 13, for 2005, does). The State applied to participate and was accepted starting with MAPEP Session 12.

The samples are analyzed using the methods applicable to the REMP (gamma spectroscopy, Gross Beta, and Tritium for water). The results for nuclides associated with the REMP are listed in ATTACHMENT C,

RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM.

III.

DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS A.

Reporting of Results The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information required by Control 1.4 of ODCM. Table 1 provides a summary of the measurements made for the nuclides required by ODCM Table 5.1-2, for all samples specified by Table 5.1-1. In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not related to station operation. These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, and Be-7 which are common in the Florida environment.

B.

Interpretation of Results

1.

Direct Radiation:

The results of direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for the specified locations.

The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant. The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the pre-operational surveillance program.

Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.

3

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4

2.

Air Particulates/Radioiodine:

The results for radioactive air particulate and radioiodine monitoring are consistent with past measurements and indicate no trends attributed to plant effluents. All samples for radioiodine yielded no detectable 1-131.

Gamma isotopic measurements yielded no indication of any nuclides attributed to station operation. The results for air particulate/radioiodine samples are consistent with measurements that were made during the pre-operational surveillance program.

Air particulate and radioiodine monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.

3.

Waterborne, Surface Water:

The results of radioactivity measurements in surface water samples are consistent with past measurements. Tritium was reported as present in 4 of the 36 surface water samples collected.

These results are consistent with the known subsurface interchange that occurs between the closed cooling canal and its surrounding waters, and the pressure gradients caused by the flow of aquifer subsurface waters in South Florida. The highest reported tritium is less than 5% of the required detection level specified by ODCM Table 5.1-3.

4.

Waterborne, Sediment:

The results are consistent with past measurements. Only cosmic-ray produced Be-7 and naturally occurring isotopes were identified.

5.

Waterborne, Food Products:

The results are consistent with past measurements; only naturally occurring radionuclides were detected.

6.

Broad Leaf Vegetation The results of radioactivity measurements are consistent with past measurements. Cs-1 37 was detected, as in the past, in samples collected from the indicator and control locations. The maximum concentration reported was less than 10% of the reporting level specified by ODCM Table 5.1-2. No other fission products were detected.

7.

Land Use Census There were no changes to the land use relative to last year's report.

No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census.

No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20% greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census.

4

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4

8.

Interlaboratory Comparison Program The State laboratory participated in QAP-60 and MAPEP 12.

In QAP-60, all results for those nuclides associated with nuclear power plant operation and using analytical methods used in the REMP are Acceptable.

In MAPEP 12, the results for Soil, Water, and Gross Beta on a filter matrix for those nuclides associated with nuclear power plant operation and using analytical methods used in the REMP are acceptable. The Air Sample had one warning for one nuclide, Cs-134; all others were acceptable.

Although the result for Cs-1 34 is within the acceptance range, the warning was issued based on the bias.

The results are listed in Attachment C.

C.

Conclusions The data obtained through the Turkey Point Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to members of the public, are not being increased.

Additionally, supplemental to the ODCM program, sampling of the direct exposure, inhalation, and ingestion pathways, performed by DOH, does not show adverse trends in levels of radiation and radioactive materials in unrestricted areas.

The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, during the surveillance year, are well within "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)" criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.

5

TABLE 1 Page 1 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade. Florida

, Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2004 (County, State)

PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD UNITS: micro-R/hr Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance &

Range Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD)

Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f) Range Exposure Rate, 86d 5.4 (82182) 4.4-7.7 NW-10 10 mi., NW 7.5 (313) 7.3 - 7.7 6.2 (4/4) 5.9 -

6.4 Number of Non-routine Reported Measurements = 0

TABLE 1 Page 2 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade. Florida

, Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2004 (County, State)

PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

UNITS: vCVm3 RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance &

Range Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD)

Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f) Range 131I, 260 0.024

< MDA

< MDA Gross Beta, 260 0.0025 0.015 (207/208) 0.004 - 0.031 T-72

< 1 mi., WSW 0.015 (52/52) 0.008 - 0.031 0.015 (52/52) 0.007 - 0.026 Composite Gamma Isotopic, 20 7Be 0.0052 0.1551 (16/16) 0.1020 - 0.1997 T-72

<1 mi.,WSW 0.1645 (4/4) 0.1136 - 0.1908 0.1678 (4/4) 0.1317- 0.1928 134Cs 137Cs 0.00069

<MDA

<MDA 0.00066

<MDA 0.0228 (6/16) 0.0183 - 0.0258 T-72

< 1 mi., WSW 0.0245 (4/4) 0.0227 - 0.0258

< MDA 0.0269 (4/4) 0.0233 - 0.0304 Number of Non-routine Reported Measurements = 0

TABLE I Page 3 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade. Florida

, Reporting Period January 1 - December 31, 2004 (County, State)

PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER UNITS: pCVL Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance &

Range Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD)

Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f) Range 4V. -

Tritium, 36 230 97 (4/24) 74 - 131 T-81 6mi.,S 97 (4/12) 74 - 131

<MDA Gamma Isotopic, 36 60 318 (24/24) 192 - 448 T-81 6 mi., S 324 (12/12) 192 - 448 188 (12/12) 112 - 405

<MDA

`Mn 5 9 Fe 58co 4

<MDA 8

<MDA

<MDA 4

<MDA

<MDA 4

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA 6Zn 9sZr-Nb 131i 134cs 137cs

'4013a-La 8

<MDA 7

<MDA

<MDA 5

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA 5

<MDA 5

<MDA

<MDA 11

<MDA

<MDA Number of Non-routine Reported Measurements = 0

TABLE 1 Page 4 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade. Florida

, Reporting Period January 1 - December 31, 2004 (County, State)

PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: pC/kq, DRY Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD)

Locations Mean (f)b Range Mean (f) Range Gamma Isotopic, 6 7Be 40K 210Pb mRa 232Th 2 3 8 u 58co loco 134cs 137cs 100 140 49

< MDA 268 (4/4) 136-369

<MDA 874 (4/4) 743 - 973

< MDA 712 (2/4) 309-1114

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA T-81 6mi.,S T-81 6mi.,S T-81 6mi.,S 1357 (2/2) 345 - 369 948 (212) 922 - 973 1114 (1/2)

<MDA 638 (212) 638 - 639

<MDA 1309 (2/2) 1292 - 1327 50 (1/2) 1501 (2/2) 1169-1833

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA 9

12 14 12 Number of Non-routine Reported Measurements = 0

TABLE 1 Page 5 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade. Florida

, Reporting Period January 1 - December 31, 2004 (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

UNITS: pCVkq, WET CRUSTACEA Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance &

Range Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD)

Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f) Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 130 1571 (212) 1541 -1601 562 (1/2)

T-81 6 mi., S T-81 6 mi., S 1571 (2/2) 1541 -1601 562 (1/2) 26Ra 20 1070 (2/2) 930- 1209 679 (1/2)

< MDA mRa s4Mn 59Fe s~Co 6'co 65Zn 134cs "3Cs

< MDA 9

< MDA

< MDA 16

< MDA

< MDA 9

<MDA

< MDA 19

< MDA

<MDA 17

< MDA

< MDA 9

< MDA

< MDA 9

< MDA

< MDA Number of Non-routine Reported Measurements = 0

TABLE 1 Page 6 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade, Florida

, Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2004 (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: FISH UNITS: pC/kg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance &

Range Control Locations;-.

of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD)

Locations Direction Mean (f)bRange- -

Mean (f) Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 7Be

<MDA

<MDA 130 2500 (2/2) 2462 - 2539 T-81 6mi.,S 2500 (2/2) 2462 - 2539 2834 (2/2) 2554 -3114 5Mn 59Fe 58co 9

<MDA

<MDA 16

<MDA

<MDA 9

<MDA

<MDA 10

<MDA

<MDA 65Zn 17

<MDA

<MDA 9

<MDA

<MDA 137Cs mRa 9

<MDA

<MDA 20 595 (2/2) 346 - 844 T-81 6 mi., S 595 (2/2) 346 - 844

<MDA Number of Non-routine Reported Measurements = 0

TABLE 1 Page 7 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade. Florida

, Reporting Period January 1 - December 31, 2004 (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

UNITS: pCikq, WET BROAD LEAF VEGETATION Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance &

Range Control Locations A of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD)

Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range - -

Mean (f)Range Gamma Isotopic, 36 7Be 71 1261 (24/24) 468 - 2148 T-40 3mi.,W T-41 2 mi., W/NW 1289 (12/12) 551 -1829 1097 (12/12) 641 -1842 100 4445 (24/24) 2286 - 5927 5027 (12/12) 3760 - 5927 3224 (12/12) 2282 - 4726 wCo 68co 60CO 1311 134Cs

'"Cs 9

10

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA

<MDA 9

<MDA

<MDA 8

<MDA

<MDA 8

59 (21/24) 12 - 181 T-40 3mi.,W 76 (11/12) 38 - 181 90 (2/12) 37 -142 21 0Pb 840 (2/24) 618-1062 344 (4/24) 233 - 554 T-40 3mi.,W T-41 2 mi., W/NW 1062 (1/12) 554 (1/12)

< MDA 594 (2/12) 541 - 646 Number of Non routine Reported Measurements = 0

TABLE 1 Page 8 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, Docket No(s). 50-250 & 50-251 Location of Facility Miami-Dade. Florida

, Reporting Period January 1 - December 31, 2004 (County, State)

NOTES

a.

The LLD is an "a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system background that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal.

LLDs in this column are at time of measurement. The MDAs reported in Attachment B for the individual samples have been corrected to the time of sample collection.

b.

Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f).

c.

Specific identifying information for each sample location is provided in Attachment A.

d.

Results were based upon the average net response of three elements in a TLD. (Thermoluminescent Dosimeter).

MDA refers to minimum detectable activity.

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 1A (Page 1 of 3)

DEVIATIONS / MISSING DATA A)

Pathway:

Location:

Dates:

Deviation:

Description of Problem:

Corrective Action:

B)

Pathway:

Location:

Dates:

Deviation:

Description of Problem:

Corrective Action:

C)

Pathway:

Location:

Dates:

Deviation:

Description of Problem:

Corrective Action:

Direct Exposure S-10, 8 miles South Second calendar quarter Failure to provide continuous monitoring.

TLDs missing when collection was attempted.

Replaced missing TLD.

Direct Exposure NW-10, 10 miles Northwest Third calendar quarter Failure to provide continuous monitoring.

TLDs missing when collection was attempted.

Replaced missing TLD.

Airborne, Radioiodines & Particulates T-58, 1 mile, Northwest First three weekly samples for January Failure to provide continuous monitoring.

Run times: 179/189 hours, 139/145 hours, 144/212 hours (hours run/ hours in monitoring period)

Partial sample collected; sampling station had repetitive electrical system failure Determined cause to be faulty building circuit breakers which were replaced.

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 1A (Page 2 of 3)

DEVIATIONS / MISSING DATA D)

Pathway:

Location:

Dates:

Deviation:

Description of Problem:

Corrective Action:

E)

Pathway:

Location:

Dates:

Deviation:

Description of Problem:

Corrective Action:

F)

Pathway:

Location:

Dates:

Deviation:

Description of Problem:

Corrective Action:

Airborne, Radioiodines & Particulates T-51, 1 mile, North-northwest 01/12/04 to 01/21/04 Failure to provide continuous monitoring.

Run time: 195 hours0.00226 days <br />0.0542 hours <br />3.224206e-4 weeks <br />7.41975e-5 months <br /> out of 212 hours0.00245 days <br />0.0589 hours <br />3.505291e-4 weeks <br />8.0666e-5 months <br /> monitoring period.

Partial sample collected; sampling pump burned out during period.

Replaced sampling pump; verified equipment operating correctly.

Airborne, Radioiodines & Particulates T-72, less than 1 mile, West-Southwest 03/09/04 to 03/15/04 Failure to provide continuous monitoring.

Run times: 128 hours0.00148 days <br />0.0356 hours <br />2.116402e-4 weeks <br />4.8704e-5 months <br /> out of 145 hour0.00168 days <br />0.0403 hours <br />2.397487e-4 weeks <br />5.51725e-5 months <br /> monitoring period.

Partial sample collected; sampling pump burned out during period.

Replaced sampling pump; verified equipment operating correctly.

Airborne, Radioiodines & Particulates T-51, 2 miles, North-northwest 03/23/04 to 03/29/04 Failure to provide continuous monitoring.

Run time: 53 hours6.134259e-4 days <br />0.0147 hours <br />8.763227e-5 weeks <br />2.01665e-5 months <br /> out of 141 hours0.00163 days <br />0.0392 hours <br />2.331349e-4 weeks <br />5.36505e-5 months <br /> monitoring period.

Sampling pump found running in reverse direction.

Replaced sampling pump; verified equipment operating correctly.

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 1 A (Page 3 of 3)

DEVIATIONS / MISSING DATA G)

Pathway:

Location:

Dates:

Deviation:

Description of Problem:

Corrective Action:

H)

Pathway:

Location:

Dates:

Deviation:

Description of Problem:

Corrective Action:

I)

Pathway:

Location:

Dates:

Deviation:

Description of Problem:

Corrective Action:

Airborne, Radioiodines & Particulates T-58, 1 mile, NorthWest 03/24/04 to 04/06/04 Failure to provide continuous monitoring.

Run time: 51 hours5.902778e-4 days <br />0.0142 hours <br />8.43254e-5 weeks <br />1.94055e-5 months <br /> out of 194 hour0.00225 days <br />0.0539 hours <br />3.207672e-4 weeks <br />7.3817e-5 months <br /> monitoring period Electrical system failure; GFCI tripped three times during week.

Reset GFCI. Contacted LU, arrange for replacement of GFCI Airborne, Radioiodines & Particulates T-57, 4 miles, Northwest 06/22/04 to 06/29/04 Failure to provide continuous monitoring.

Run time: 158 hours0.00183 days <br />0.0439 hours <br />2.612434e-4 weeks <br />6.0119e-5 months <br /> out of 168 hour0.00194 days <br />0.0467 hours <br />2.777778e-4 weeks <br />6.3924e-5 months <br /> monitoring period.

Loss of power to sampling site.

Utility contacted & power restored.

Airborne, Radioiodines & Particulates T-58, 1 mile, Northwest 07/21/04 to 07/26/04 Failure to provide continuous monitoring of particulates.

Sampling hose became disconnected between particulate filter and iodine cartridge during monitoring period.

Reattached sampling hose; verified tight connection.

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT-UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 1 B ANALYSIS WITH LLDs ABOVE ODCM TABLE 5.1-3 DETECTION CAPABILITIES 1/1/2004-12/31/2004 The values specified in ODCM Table 5.1-3, Detection Capabilities, were achieved for all samples.

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS Distance to Nearest (a. b)

Sector 7/04 Milk (c) Animal 7/04 Residence (g) 7/04 Garden (d)

N NNE NE ENE E

ESE L (e) 0(f) 0 0

0 0

0 0

L L

L L

2.0/354 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 L

0 0

0 SE 0

SSE 0

0 S

L L

SSW L

L SW L

L L

L WSW W

WNW L

L L

L L

3.7/302 3.7/311 4.5/303 4.2 /323 NW NNW L

4.4/333 4.6/327

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS NOTES

a.

All categories surveyed out to 5 miles radius from the Turkey Point Plant.

b.

The following format is used to denote the location:

distance (miles)/bearing (degrees)

For example, a residence located in the north sector at a distance of 2.0 miles bearing 354 degrees is recorded as 2.0 / 354.

c.

Potential milk animal locations.

d.

Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or more.

e.

L denotes that the sector area is predominantly a land area unoccupied by the category type.

f.

0 denotes that the sector area is predominantly an ocean area.

9.

Non-residential occupied buildings in these sectors include the following:

Sector Distance Description N

1.9/349 24-hour Security Staff Building NNW 1.9/ 349 Security booth at park entrance

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A KEY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 NEAR SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS w ars L,;7,^;'dii%'...

t I.

s................

!:::::.,-'-"....... ::::

. - I........NWV.2 II.

l

~~~~~~~~~~~~.t....,;_..'. f; ',.....

V.

, f',...

.,...,..,,...-.,4..

. ;t::....:

:_- 1:i.

.......... -v.

.. :... -. :.. :.:.:...:.:.T-71..

0...

...........v 4,

b..'.'...........-

.,.'........N

b '::

's :., ::

......... I. "I..v

........... T

::: -1:::::::; ' : :::::

X':

':N:

v

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 DISTANT REMP SAMPLING LOCATIONS en 6'

/

-;" j.

'.X:;stt:..~~ t..........

.T-67 N

2.'.

-: SouiMl~ml. -;.:I,,,,,{.,,,............

.........,Y

... 't- 'C~t 1-3de,

................ X:,:.........

sou'thJmau-~ihs I.

r

(

.4.

tw~i

^

St,..............................

/,

~~~~.

.. -..., j---*

.v...... ;

~~~~~~~~~.

..:-..: /.

............ :R.:.

.... '. z.l..:.s Gom~~e dT51.*.............* ):Z

.:t W

,1....E.,0..........t.

4&

~~~~~.

-;.lY

X>;

D

PN,

,,,; Z.

...............w@e,.\\;

//

a

\\

.8

..........-...*.-x

~~~~~~ :

~~~~~~~~~~~~~...........................-.

'!N'::'::-.;-_;

rFab W

W 8 ;'..

.. \\. i..'~ ;

........ y. W...........

~~~~~~~~~~~~~.....

.......:.;: :::.X.-.:.

S.

.. -/

~~~~~~~~~~

.. /::;:

......... U,?5..t

............+.

-:N

. /~~ -^.

.......... We

- -. '. :':.:.'.11'.:'. ':^:.

'(;

i:.:;::

A

.;.J'";.:

':;:'::................................;:..:.i::.'.';'::

. g...;..............

T-1 I

. G W X

:::: ; l :
Jll:; vi r

s..

.-...... s i8,,\\g/g,

% 7 X ' :t.:,.aW,:....f-5. :-.'...i:o::Al'.::,~f 8'\\...

lF*

-S'~~~~~~~~~~~~~.

... 'NS;,,,,""

................ J ; xs

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A PAGE 1 OF 4 PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: QUARTERLY Location (a)

Name Description N-2 Convey Point, Parking Area N-7 Black Point Marina Parking Lot N-10 Old Cutler Rd. approx. 196th Street NNW-2 East End North Canal Road NNW-10 Bailes Road & U.S. #1 NW-1 Turkey Point Entrance Road NW-5 Mowry Drive & 11 7th Avenue NW-10 Newton Road, North of Coconut Palm Drive WNW-10 Homestead Middle School W-1 On-Site, North Side of Discharge Canal W-5 Palm Drive & Tallahassee Road W-9 Card Sound Road, 0.6 mile from U.S. #1 WSW-8 Card Sound Road, 3.4 miles from U.S. #1 SW-1 On-Site near Land Utilization Offices SW-8 Card Sound Road, 5 miles from U.S. #1 SSW-5 On-Site, Southwest Corner of Cooling Canals SSW-l0 Card Sound Road, west side of Toll Plaza S-5 On-Site, South East Corner of Cooling Canals S-10 Card Sound Road at Steamboat Creek SSE-1 Turtle Point SSE-1 0 Ocean Reef Control NNE-22 Natoma Substation, 2475 SW 16 Ct.

aThe location name is the direction sector - approximate distance (miles)

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A Page 2 of 4 PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIQIODINE AND PARTICULATES SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: WEEKLY Location Name Direction Sector T-51 NNW Approximate Distance (miles) 2 4

1 T-57 Description NW Entrance Area to Biscayne National Park SW 107th Avenue at Mowry Canal Turkey Point Entrance Road T-58 NW T-72 WSW

<1 Just before entrance to Land Utilization's access gate.

Control:

T-64 NNE 22 0.5 Natoma Substation, 2475 SW 16 Ct.

On site "Red Barn" picnic area.

This sampling station may be used as an alternate to T-51.

Note T-71 NNE

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A Page 3 of 4 PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER (OCEAN)

SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: MONTHLY Location Name Direction Sector ENE Approximate Distance (miles)

<1 T-42 T-81 S

6 Description Biscayne Bay at Turkey Point Card Sound, near Mouth of Old Discharge Canal Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park Control:

T-67 N, NNE 13-18 SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Location Name Direction Sector T-42 ENE T-81 S

Approximate Distance (miles)

<1 6

13-18 Description Biscayne Bay at Turkey Point Card Sound, near Mouth of Old Discharge Canal Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park Control:

T-67 N, NNE

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT A Page 4 of 4 PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA AND FISH SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Location Name Direction Sector Approximate Distance (miles) 6 Description T-81 S

Card Sound Vicinity of Turkey Point Facility Control:

T-67 N, NNE 13-18 Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park SAMPLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: MONTHLY Location Name Direction Sector Approximate Distance (miles) 3 Description T-40 W

T-41 WNW 2

13-18 South of Palm Dr. on S.W. 11 7th Street Extension Palm Dr., West of Old Missile Site near Plant Site Boundary Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park Control:

T-67 N, NNE

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT B RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S TURKEY POINT SITE 2004 First Quarter, 2004 Second Quarter, 2004 Third Quarter, 2004 Fourth Quarter, 2004

TP QR IQ-2004 TURKEY POINT SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Sampling First Quarter, 2004 Number of Samples Sample Tvpe Collection Frequency Locations Sampled

1. Direct Radiation
2. Airborne 2.a. Air lodines 2.b. Air Particulates
3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water 3.b. Shoreline Sediment
4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation Quarterly Weekly Weekly 22 22 5

65 5

65 Monthly Semiannually Semiannually Semiannually Monthly 3

3 9

3 2

2 1

2 3

9 Total: 176 NOTE:

Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

The marine fauna listed in this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.

1 of 7

TP QR IQ-2004

1. DIRECT RADIATION - TLDs - (uR/hour)

Sample Site N-2 N-7 N-1 0 NNW-2 NNW-10 NW-1 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-10 W-1 W-5 W-9 Deployment 09-Dec-03 Collection 17-Mar-04 5.5 fi0.2 4.5t

+/-0.2 5.1 +0.2 4.4 +/- 0.2 5.1 +/-0.2 6.2 +/- 0.2 4.5 +/- 0.2 7.6 +/- 0.3 6.2 +/- 0.2 6.4 +/- 0.2 5.1 +/-0.2 4.7 +/- 0.2 Sample Site WSW-8 SW-i SW-8 SSW-5 SSW-lo S-5 S-10 SSE-1 SSE-10 NNE-22 Deployment 09-Dec-03 Collection 17-Mar-04 4.9 +/- 0.2 4.5 +/- 0.2 5.3 +/- 0.2 4.8 +/- 0.2 4.7 +/- 0.2 4.5 +/- 0.2 5.2 +/- 0.2 4.6 +/- 0.2 5.7 +/- 0.2 5.9 +/- 0.2 2 of 7

TP QR IQ-2004 2.a. 10DINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES - (pCi/M 3)

Collection T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 Date 06-Jan-04

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02 (A)

<0.01

<0.02 12-Jan-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 (B)

<0.02

<0.02 21-Jan-04

<0.01 (D)

<0.01

<0.02 (C)

<0.01

<0.01 28-Jan-04

<0.02

<0.03

<0.03

<0.03

<0.03 04-Feb-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 11-Feb-04

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01 18-Feb-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 24-Feb-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 02-Mar-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 09-Mar-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 15-Mar-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 (E) 23-Mar-04

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 29-Mar-04

<0.02 (F)

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 (A)

Breaker had flipped, run time estimated at 179 hours0.00207 days <br />0.0497 hours <br />2.959656e-4 weeks <br />6.81095e-5 months <br /> out of 189.

(B) Breaker had flipped, run time estimated at 139 hours0.00161 days <br />0.0386 hours <br />2.29828e-4 weeks <br />5.28895e-5 months <br /> out of 145.

(C) Breaker had flipped, run time estimated at 144 hours0.00167 days <br />0.04 hours <br />2.380952e-4 weeks <br />5.4792e-5 months <br /> out of 212, breaker inside hut was replaced.

(D) Pump failed. Run time estimated at 195 hours0.00226 days <br />0.0542 hours <br />3.224206e-4 weeks <br />7.41975e-5 months <br /> out of 212.

(E) Pump failed. Run time estimated at 128 hours0.00148 days <br />0.0356 hours <br />2.116402e-4 weeks <br />4.8704e-5 months <br /> out of 145.

(F) Pump found running in reverse. Pump was replaced. Forward run time estimated at 53 hours6.134259e-4 days <br />0.0147 hours <br />8.763227e-5 weeks <br />2.01665e-5 months <br /> out of 141.

3 of 7

TP QR IQ-2004 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES - GROSS BETA - (QCi/M 3)

Sample Sites Collection Date 06-Jan-04 12-Jan-04 21 -Jan-04 28-Jan-04 04-Feb-04 11-Feb-04 18-Feb-04 24-Feb-04 02-Mar-04 09-Mar-04 15-Mar-04 23-Mar-04 29-Mar-04 Mean:

T51 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 (D) 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.005 (F) 0.015 +/- 0.001 T57 0.012 + 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.020 t 0.002 0.027 +/- 0.003 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.001 T58 0.010 +/- 0.002 (A) 0.013 +/- 0.002 (B) 0.024 +/- 0.003 (C) 0.025 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.017 t 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.011 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.001 T64 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.003 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.001 T72 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.031 +/- 0.003 0.010 +/-0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.003 0.013 +/- 0.002 (E) 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.001 (A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

Breaker had flipped, run time estimated at 179 hours0.00207 days <br />0.0497 hours <br />2.959656e-4 weeks <br />6.81095e-5 months <br /> out of 189.

Breaker had flipped, run time estimated at 139 hours0.00161 days <br />0.0386 hours <br />2.29828e-4 weeks <br />5.28895e-5 months <br /> out of 145.

Breaker had flipped, run time estimated at 144 hours0.00167 days <br />0.04 hours <br />2.380952e-4 weeks <br />5.4792e-5 months <br /> out of 212, breaker inside hut was replaced.

Pump failed. Run time estimated at 195 hours0.00226 days <br />0.0542 hours <br />3.224206e-4 weeks <br />7.41975e-5 months <br /> out of 212.

Pump failed. Run time estimated at 128 hours0.00148 days <br />0.0356 hours <br />2.116402e-4 weeks <br />4.8704e-5 months <br /> out of 145.

Pump found running in reverse. Pump was replaced. Forward run time estimated at 53 hours6.134259e-4 days <br />0.0147 hours <br />8.763227e-5 weeks <br />2.01665e-5 months <br /> out of 141.

2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/M3)

First Quarter, 2004 Sample Site T51 Be-7 0.1638 +/- 0.0143 K-40

<0.0316 Cs-1 34

<0.001 5 Cs-1 37

<0.001 3 Pb-21 0

<0.0577 T57 0.1742 + 0.0172

<0.0296

<0.001 7

<0.001 1

<0.0606 T58 T64 T72 0.1997 +/- 0.0123 0.1928 +/-t 0.0132 0.1706 :+/- 0.01 82

<0.0220

<0.0012

<0.0008 0.0203 +/- 0.0038

<0.01 71

<0.0011

<0.0011 0.0233 +/- 0.0049

<0.0122

<0.001 9

<0.001 5 0.0247 +/- 0.0062 4 of 7

TP QR IQ-2004 3.a. SURFACE WATER - (PCi/L)

Sample Site Collection Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 T42 28-Jan-04 25-Feb-04 17-Mar-04 T67 27-Jan-04 25-Feb-04 18-Mar-04 T81 28-Jan-04 25-Feb-04 17-Mar-04

<119

<122

<125

<119

<122

<125 131 +/-23 74 +/-23 104+/-24 266 +/- 34 278 +/-29 294 +/- 30 127+/-45 112 +/-23 121 +/-29 254 +/-31 260 +/-43 289 +/-45

<4

<4

<3

<5

<4

<3

<3

<5

<5

<3

<7

<4

<7

<3

<6

<5

<11

<4

<8

<3

<6

<4

<7

<4

<12

<6

<12

<4

<4

<4

<6

<4

<4

<5

<5

<6 Zr-95 Zn-65 Nb-95 (A)

<8

<6

<8

<6

<10

<6

<9

<9

<7

<7

<8

<4

<9

<7

<14

<11

<9

<10 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137

<5

<4

<6

<7

<4

<5

<5

<6

<7

<4

<4

<3

<6

<3

<4

<4

<6

<5

<3

<3

<4

<7

<3

<4

<4

<5

<4 Ba-1 40 La-140 (B)

<7

<9

<5

<5

<9

<5

<8

<8

<10 (A)

These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B)

These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-1 40, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

5of7

TP QR I Q-2004 3.b. SHORELINE SEDIMENT - (pCi/kq. dry weight)

Sample Collection 04-o ni^+

R0-7 Q I IU T42 T67 T81 L

IU~I K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Pb-21 0 Ra-226 Th-232 U-238 28-Jan-04

<61 136 +/- 43

<7

<6

<7

<6

<448 857 +/-11

<30 309 +/- 121 28-Jan-04

<115 639 +/- 76

<12

<12

<14

<14 1579 +/-361 1327 +/- 22

<62 1169 +/- 306 28-Jan-04

<145 345 +/- 95

<15

<18

<16

<15

<2688 973 +/- 23

<82 1114 +/- 391 4.a.1. CRUSTACEA - Blue Crab. (PC!/kg. wet weight)

Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ra-226 Ra-228 T67 23-Mar-04 1209 +/-158

<19

<20

<41

<21

<42

<21

<16

<396

<73 T81 This sample has not yet been collected.

4.a.2. FISH - Mixed Species - (pCi/kq. wet weight)

Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-Cs-Ra-226 Ra-134 137 228 T67 18-Mar-04 2554 +/- 141

<13

<13

<25

<14

<30

<13

<13

<211

<51 T81 18-Mar-04 2539 +/- 139

<19

<19

<42

<21

<52

<20

<19 346 +/- 98

<69 6 of 7

TP QR IQ-2004 4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION - Brazilian Permer - (oCi/ka. wet weiaht)

_ _....,...,. h.... A...

Sample Site T40 T41 T67 Collection Date 28-Jan-04 25-Feb-04 17-Mar-04 28-Jan-04 24-Feb-04 17-Mar-04 27-Jan-04 25-Feb-04 Be-7 1490 +42 1327+81 1554 +/- 47 1341 +/-84 1488 +/- 94 1689 +/-44 924 +/- 59 1011 +/-75 K-40 2804 +/- 82 3443 +/- 170 2286 +/-75 5927 +/- 224 4511 +/-186 5733 +/- 91 2282 +/- 113 2960 +/-182 3757 +/- 208 1-131

<6

<12

<9

<15

<15

<8

<12

<15

<20 Cs-1 34

<6

<15

<6

<15

<16

<6

<9

<17

<18 Cs-1 37 53+/-4 38 +/- 7 41 +/-4 36+/-7 64+/-9 12 +/- 3

<10

<14

<22 Pb-210

<994

<1666

<995

<2162

<2069 618 +/-176

<788

<2189

<2294 Ra-226 233 +/-73

<212

<131

<239

<298

<131

<290

<278

<286 18-Mar-04 1582 +/- 103 7 of 7

TP QR 2Q-2004 TURKEY POINT SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Sampling Second Quarter, 2004 Sample Type Collection Frequencv Locations Sampled Number of Samples

1. Direct Radiation
2. Airborne 2.a. Air lodines 2.b. Air Particulates Quarterly Weekly Weekly 22 21 5

5 65 65

3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water 3.b. Shoreline Sediment
4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly Semiannually Semiannually Semiannually Monthly 3

0 9

0 1

0 3

1 0

9 Total: 170 NOTE:

Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background and with greater than a 50% error term are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD),

which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

The marine fauna listed in this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.

1 of 7

TP QR 2Q-2004

1. DIRECT RADIATION - TLDs -. (uR/hour)

Sample Deployment 17-Mar-04 Sample Deployment 17-Mar-04 Site Collection 08-Jun-04 Site Collection 08-Jun-04 N-2 5.5 + 0.2 W-9 4.9 +/-i 0.2 N-7 4.8 +/- 0.2 WSW-8 5.0 +/- 0.2 N-10 5.5 +/-0.2 SW-1 5.1 +/-0.2 NNW-2 4.4 +/- 0.2 SW-8 5.9 +/- 0.2 NNW-10 5.6 +/- 0.2 SSW-5 4.8 +/- 0.2 NW-1 6.7 +/- 0.3 SSW-10 4.9 +/- 0.2 NW-5 4.4 +/- 0.2 S-5 4.8 +/- 0.2 NW-10 7.7 +/- 0.3 S-10 A

WNW-10 6.2 +/- 0.2 SSE-1 4.8 +/- 0.2 W-1 6.9 +/- 0.3 SSE-1 0 5.9 +/- 0.2 W-5 5.3 +/- 0.2 NNE-22 6.4 +/- 0.2 A - The TLD at site S-10 was missing when collection was attempted. A new TLD was deployed.

2 of 7

TP QR 2Q-2004 2.a. IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES - (pCi/m3)

Collection Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 06-Apr-04

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02A

<0.02

<0.02 12-Apr-04

<0.03

<0.03

<0.03

<0.03

<0.03 20-Apr-04

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01 27-Apr-04

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01 04-May-04

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01 12-May-04

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01 19-May-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 25-May-04

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01 02-Jun-04

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02 08-Jun-04

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01 15-Jun-04

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02 22-Jun-04

<0.0 1

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01 29-Jun-04

<0.02

<0.02C

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 A.

The power was off at various times during the sampling period due to a failed breaker. Run time was estimated at 51 hours5.902778e-4 days <br />0.0142 hours <br />8.43254e-5 weeks <br />1.94055e-5 months <br /> out of 194. The breaker was replaced.

B. The power was off for four hours at the beginning of the sampling period due to the replacement of a failed power cord on the pump.

C. The power was off at the end of the sampling period due to a loss of power at the site. Run time was estimated at 158 hours0.00183 days <br />0.0439 hours <br />2.612434e-4 weeks <br />6.0119e-5 months <br /> out of 168.

3 of 7

TP QR 2Q-2004 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES

- GROSS BETA - (Ci/m 3)

Sample Site Collection Date 06-Apr-04 12-Apr-04 20-Apr-04 27-Apr-04 04-May-04 12-May-04 19-May-04 25-May-04 02-Jun-04 08-Jun-04 15-Jun-04 22-Jun-04 29-Jun-04 Mean:

T51 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.025 +/- 0.003 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.003 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.017 0.0 02B 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.027 +/- 0.003 0.018 0.001 T57 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.025 +/- 0.003 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.003 C 0.018 +/- 0.001 T58 0.017 +/-0.002A 0.022 +/- 0.003 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.019 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.001 T64 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.026 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.003 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.001 T72 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.025 +/- 0.003 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.026 +/- 0.003 0.018 +/- 0.001 A. The power was off at various times during the sampling period due to a failed breaker. Run time was estimated at 51 hours5.902778e-4 days <br />0.0142 hours <br />8.43254e-5 weeks <br />1.94055e-5 months <br /> out of 194. The breaker was replaced.

B. The power was off for four hours at the beginning of the sampling period due to the replacement of a failed power cord on the pump.

C. The power was off at the end of the sampling period due to a loss of power at the site. Run time was estimated at 158 hours0.00183 days <br />0.0439 hours <br />2.612434e-4 weeks <br />6.0119e-5 months <br /> out of 168.

2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/M3 )

Second Quarter, 2004 Sample Site Be-7 T51 T57 0.1797 +/- 0.0141 0.1525 +/- 0.0172 K-40 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37

<0.0319

<0.0014

<0.0012

<0.0407

<0.0013

<0.0012 Pb-210

<0.0565

<0.0531 T58 T64 T72 0.1531 +/- 0.0140 0.1705 +/- 0.0129 0.1831 +/- 0.0133

<0.01 66

<0.0012

<0.0012

<0.0220

<0.0013

<0.0009

<0.0208

<0.0011

<0.0010 0.0183 +/- 0.0052 0.0267 +/- 0.0042 0.0258 +/- 0.0053 4 of 7

TP QR 2Q-2004 3.a. SURFACE WATER - (pCi/L)

Sample Site Collection Date T42 13-Apr-04 19-May-04 09-Jun-04 T67 12-Apr-04 19-May-04 08-Jun-04 T81 13-Apr-04 19-May-04 09-Jun-04 Zr-95 H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 (A)

<119 326 + 30

<3

<3

<6

<4

<9

<7

<121 421 +/-34

<3

<3

<7

<5

<7

<7

<124 334 + 38

<3

<3

<7

<4

<7

<6

<124 132 +/-31

<4

<6

<10

<5

<11

<9

<121 172 +/-30

<3

<4

<7

<3

<7

<5

<124 327 +/-49

<5

<5

<10

<6

<13

<10

<119 359 +/- 37

<4

<3

<9

<5

<5

<6

<121 394 +/-34

<4

<3

<7

<5

<8

<5

<124 300 +49

<5

<5

<9

<6

<11

<10 Ba-1 40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (B)

<4

<4

<4

<11

<4

<4

<5

<5

<4

<3

<4

<8

<7

<6

<6

<10

<5

<4

<4

<6

<6

<4

<6

<13

<4

<4

<4

<6

<4

<4

<4

<8

<6

<5

<6

<15 (A)

These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B)

These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-1 40, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

5 of 7

TP QR 2Q-2004 3.b. SHORELINE SEDIMENT - (pCi/kq. dry weight)

Sample Site Collection Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 These samples were previously collected.

Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 U-238 4.a.1. CRUSTACEA - (PCi/kg. wet weight)

Sample Site T67 T81 Collection Date K-40 This sample was previously 24-Jun-04 1601 +/- 252 Mn-54 Co-58 collected.

<28

<32 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ra-226 Ra-228

<81

<32

<64

<25

<26 562 +/- 276

<120 4.a.2. FISH - (PCi/kg. wet weight)

Sample Site T67 T81 Collection Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 This sample was previously collected This sample was previously collected Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 6 of 7

TP QR 2Q-2004 4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION - Brazilian Pepper - (pCi/kq. wet weight)

Sample Site T40 T41 T67 Collection Date 12-Apr-04 19-May-04 09-Jun-04 12-Apr-04 19-May-04 09-Jun-04 12-Apr-04 19-May-04 08-Jun-04 Be-7 1057 +/- 83 1367 +/- 106 551 +/- 50 857 +/- 43 646 +/- 69 468 +/-27 760 +/- 86 1634 +/- 93 1082 +/- 68 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-21 0 Ra-226 4372 +/- 197 3443 +/- 227 3056 +/- 148 4830 +/-110 5438 +/- 253 4661 +/- 96 3390 +/- 203 3893 +/- 202 3183 +/- 144

<17

<14

<10

<7

<15

<5

<16

<15

<12

<15

<18

<13

<8

<16

<6

<17

<15

<10 83 +/- 10 76 +/-11 41 +/-7 26 +/-4

<20 15+/-3

<16

<13 37+/-7

<2082

<2239

<1511

<1022

<2185

<853

<2106

<2257

<724 303 +/- 139

<389

<255

<130

<319

<104

<302 649 +/-199

<267 7 of 7

TP QR 3Q-2004 TURKEY POINT SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Sampling Third Quarter, 2004 Collection Freauencv SamDle Type Locations Sampled 22 Number of Samples 21

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly
2. Airborne 2.a. Air lodines 2.b. Air Particulates
3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water 3.b. Shoreline Sediment Weekly Weekly Monthly Semiannually 5

5 65 65 3

3 9

3

4. Ingestion 4.a.Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation Semiannually Semiannually Monthly 2

2 3

0 0

9 Total: 172 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background and with greater than a 50% error term are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

The marine fauna listed in this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.

I of 7

TP QR 3Q-2004

1. DIRECT RADIATION - TLDs - (uR/hour)

Sample Deployment 08-Jun-04 Sample Deployment 08-Jun-04 Site Collection 21-Sep-04 Site Collection 21-Sep-04 N-2 5.3 +/- 0.2 W-9 4.9 +/- 0.2 N-7 4.5 +/- 0.2 WSW-8 5.2 +/- 0.2 N-1 0 5.2 +/- 0.2 (A)

SW-1 5.5 +/- 0.2 NNW-2 4.6 +/- 0.2 SW-8 5.9 +/- 0.2 NNW-10 5.8 +/- 0.2 SSW-5 5.4 +/- 0.2 NW-1 6.6 +/- 0.2 SSW-1 0 5.3 +/- 0.2 (A)

NW-5 4.6 +/- 0.2 S-5 5.0 +/- 0.2 NW-10 (B)

S-10 5.9 +/- 0.2 WNW-10 6.8 +/- 0.2 SSE-1 5.0 +/- 0.2 W-1 6.8 +/- 0.2 SSE-1 0 5.7 +/- 0.2 W-5 5.8 +/- 0.2 NNE-22 6.3 +/- 0.2 (A) TLDs were found on the ground upon collection.

(B) TLD at site NW-1 0 was missing when collection was attempted. A new TLD was deployed.

2 of 7

TP QR 3Q-2004 2.a. IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES - (pCVm 3)

Collection Date T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 06-Jul-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 13-Jul-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.03

<0.02 21-Jul-04

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01 26-Jul-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 02-Aug-04

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01 09-Aug-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 17-Aug-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 24-Aug-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 30-Aug-04

<0.03

<0.03

<0.03

<0.03

<0.03 07-Sep-04

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01 14-Sep-04

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01 21-Sep-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 29-Sep-04

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02

<0.02 3 of 7

TP QR 3Q-2004 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES - GROSS BETA - (pCi/m3)

Sample Site Collection Date 06-Jul-04 13-Jul-04 21 -Jul-04 26-Jul-04 02-Aug-04 09-Aug-04 17-Aug-04 24-Aug-04 30-Aug-04 07-Sep-04 14-Sep-04 21-Sep-04 29-Sep-04 Mean:

T51 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/-0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.015 t 0.003 0.006 +/-t 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/-t 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.001 T57 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.003 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.003 0.004 +/- 0.001 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.001 T58 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.009 +/- 0.002

<0.007 (A) 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.001 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002

<0.011 T64 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.026 +/- 0.003 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.003 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.001 T72 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.003 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.001 (A)

The air hose leading to the particulate filter became disconnected sometime during the collection period. The gas meter measured volume was used for calculation purposes but the actual volume pulled through the particulate filter is unknown.

2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/M3)

Third Quarter, 2004 Sample Site T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 Be-7 0.1020 +/- 0.0112 0.1 086 +/- 0.01 03 0.1080 +/- 0.0127 0.1317 +/- 0.0112 0.1136 +/- 0.0095 K-40

<0.0278

<0.0320

<0.0236

<0.01 98

<0.0199 Cs-1 34

<0.0015

<0.0009

<0.0016

<0.0009

<0.0009 Cs-1 37

<0.0011

<0.0009

<0.0011

<0.0010

<0.0007 Pb-210

<0.0485

<0.0528

<0.0417 0.0272 +/- 0.0041 0.0227 +/- 0.0034 4 of 7

TP QR 3Q-2004 3.a. SURFACE WATER - (PCVL)

Sample Site Collection Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 T42 14-Jul-04 09-Aug-04 22-Sep-04 T67 14-Jul-04 09-Aug-04 21-Sep-04 T81 14-Jul-04 09-Aug-04 21-Sep-04

<127 403037

<127 322 +/- 34

<126 330 + 32

<126 405 +/- 49

<127 133 +31

<126 156 +/-40

<126 431 +35

<127 448 +41

<126 418 +/- 35

<4

<4

<3

<3

<2

<3

<5

<6

<5

<7

<4

<4

<4

<4

<4

<4

<2

<3

<7

<7

<6

<11

<11

<9

<9

<7

<5

<5

<7

<3

<7

<4

<9

<8

<11

<6

<9

<5

<10

<4

<8

<3

<7

<4

<9 Nb-95 (A)

<7

<7

<7

<9

<10

<8

<6

<7

<5

<5

<4

<5

<4

<4

<3

<4

<4

<4

<6

<6

<7

<7

<7

<6

<5

<6

<4

<5

<5

<4

<5

<4

<4

<5

<3

<3 La-1 40 (B)

<9

<7

<8

<11

<11

<7

<9

<4

<5 (A) - These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) - These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-1 40, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-i 40, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

5 of 7

TP QR 3Q-2004 3.b. SHORELINE SEDIMENT - (pCi/kq. dry weight)

Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 T42 22-Sep-04

<101 222 t46

<9 T67 21-Sep-04

<163 638+107

<15 T81 21 -Sep-04

<137 369 + 63

<13 Co-60

<11

<17

<11 Cs-134

<11

<20

<14 Cs-1 37

<10

<16

<12 Pb-210

<657

<1468

<815 Ra-226 Th-232 743 +/- 28

<39 1292 +

26 50 +/-18 922 + 22

<52 U-235

<97

<141

<118 U-238

<403 1833 +/- 433

<570 4.a.1. CRUSTACEA - (DCi/kg. wet weight)

Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 T67 This sample has not yet been collected.

T81 This sample has not yet been collected.

4.a.2. FISH - (PCi/kg. wet weight)

Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 T67 This sample has not yet been collected.

T81 This sample has not yet been collected.

I 6of7

TP QR 3Q-2004 4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION - Brazilian Pepper - (pCi/kq, wet weight)

Sample Site T40 T41 T67 Collection Date 14-Jul-04 09-Aug-04 21-Sep-04 14-Jul-04 09-Aug-04 21-Sep-04 14-Jul-04 09-Aug-04 21-Sep-04 Be-7 564 + 42 1208 +/- 42 1622 +/- 117 595 +/- 74 1205 +/- 103 1304 +/- 92 753+/-85 1122 +/- 84 985 +/-73 K-40 3543 +/- 130 5639 +/- 114 4716 +/- 220 5195 +/- 220 5280 +/- 239 4012 +/- 192 3509 +/- 185 4726 +/- 178 3146 +/- 212 1-131

<11

<8

<18

<15

<19

<13

<17

<13

<15 Cs-134

<12

<8

<17

<19

<18

<14

<19

<13

<17 Cs-1 37

<11 39 +/- 4 94 +/- 11 31 +/-11

<18 61 +/-8 142 +/-11

<12

<15 Pb-210

<1388

<1018

<2574

<2247

<2498

<1826

<1943

<681

<2328 Ra-226

<233

<136

<361

<290

<316

<304 541 +/-137

<250

<364 7 of 7

TP QR 4Q-2004 TURKEY POINT SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Specifications Sampling Fourth Quarter, 2004 Number of Samples Sample Type Collection Frequency Locations Sampled

1. Direct Radiation
2. Airborne 2.a. Air lodines 2.b. Air Particulates Quarterly Weekly Weekly 22 22 5

5 65 65

3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water 3.b. Shoreline Sediment
4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly Semiannually Semiannually Semiannually Monthly 3

0 9

0 2

1 3

2 2

9 Total: 174 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background and with greater than a 50% error term are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD),

which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

The marine fauna listed in this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.

1 of 7

TP QR 4Q-2004

1. DIRECT RADIATION - TLDs - (uR/hour)

Sample Site N-2 N-7 N-1 0 Deployment 21-Sep-04 Collection 13-Dec-04 5.7+/-0.2 4.9 +/- 0.2 5.1 +/-0.2 NNW-2 NNW-1 0 4.6 +/- 0.2 6.0 +/- 0.2 Sample Site WSW-8 Sw-1 SW-8 SSW-5 SSW-1 0 S-5 S-10 SSE-1 SSE-1 0 NNE-22 Deployment 21-Sep-04 Collection 13-Dec-04 5.0 +/- 0.2 5.3 +/- 0.2 5.6 +/- 0.2 5.1 +/-0.2 5.2 +/- 0.2 4.9 +/- 0.2 5.7 +/- 0.2 4.6 +/- 0.2 5.9 +/- 0.2 6.1 +/-0.2 NW-1 NW-5 NW-10 6.8 +/- 0.2 4.7 +/- 0.2 7.3 +/- 0.3 WNW-1 0 6.5 +/- 0.2 W-1 W-5 W-9 6.9 +/- 0.3 5.6 +/- 0.2 5.1 +/-0.2 2 of 7

TP QR 4Q-2004 2.a. IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES - (pCi/m 3)

Sample Site Collection Date 06-Oct-04 12-Oct-04 19-Oct-04 28-Oct-04 04-Nov-04 09-Nov-04 16-Nov-04 24-Nov-04 30-Nov-04 08-Dec-04 13-Dec-04 20-Dec-04 28-Dec-04 T51

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01

<0.03

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02

<0.01 T57

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01

<0.03

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02

<0.01 T58

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01

<0.03

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02

<0.01 T64

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01

<0.03

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02

<0.01 T72

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01

<0.03

<0.02

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.02

<0.02

<0.01 3 of 7

TP QR 4Q-2004 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES - GROSS BETA - (DCi/m3)

Sample Site Collection Date 06-Oct-04 12-Oct-04 19-Oct-04 28-Oct-04 04-Nov-04 09-Nov-04 16-Nov-04 24-Nov-04 30-Nov-04 08-Dec-04 13-Dec-04 20-Dec-04 28-Dec-04 Mean:

T51 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.003 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.019 + 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.001 T57 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/-0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.022 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.016 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.001 T58 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.001 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.003 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.001 T64 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.003 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.003 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.001 T72 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.003 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.003 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.001 2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES - GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/M3)

Fourth Quarter, 2004 Sample Site Be-7 T51 T57 T58 0.1548 +/- 0.0140 0.1602 +/- 0.0135 0.1664 +/- 0.0168 K-40 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37

<0.0326

<0.0019

<0.0013

<0.0255

<0.0020

<0.0010

<0.0257

<0.0016

<0.0011 Pb-210

<0.0595

<0.0563

<0.0514 T64 T72 0.1 763 +/- 0.01 20 0.1908 +/- 0.0133

<0.0211

<0.0008

<0.0010

<0.0185

<0.0010

<0.0009 0.0304 +/- 0.0041 0.0248 +/- 0.0037 4 of 7

TP QR 4Q-2004 3.a. SURFACE WATER - (DCi/L)

Sample Site Collection Date T42 12-Oct-04 09-Nov-04 08-Dec-04 T67 12-Oct-04 09-Nov-04 08-Dec-04 T81 12-Oct-04 09-Nov-04 08-Dec-04 Zr-95 H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 (A)

<123 215 +/- 24

<2

<2

<5

<3

<5

<4

<125 237+/- 29

<4

<3

<8

<4

<8

<6

<123 332 +/- 31

<3

<3

<6

<4

<8

<6

<123 219 +/- 27

<3

<4

<9

<5

<9

<6

<125 192 +/- 29

<3

<3

<6

<3

<8

<6

<123 158 +/- 23

<4

<3

<6

<5

<7

<7

<123 212 +/- 43

<4

<4

<9

<4

<8

<8

<125 327 +/- 33

<3

<4

<6

<4

<7

<5 78 +/- 23 192 +/- 46

<7

<6

<12

<7

<10

<11 Ba-1 40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (B)

<3

<2

<3

<4

<5

<3

<4

<7

<6

<4

<4

<4

<4

<4

<4

<7

<5

<4

<4

<7

<6

<5

<4

<7

<6

<5

<4

<4

<4

<4

<4

<5

<9

<5

<6

<10 (A) - These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) - These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-1 40, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on La-i 40, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

ingrowth of 5of7

TP QR 4Q-2004 3.b. SHORELINE SEDIMENT - (DCi/ko. dry weight)

Sample Site Collection Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 These samples were previously collected.

Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Pb-21 0 Ra-226 U-238 4.a.1. CRUSTACEA - (PCi/kqg wet weight)

Sample Site T67 T81 Collection Date 03-Dec-04 02-Dec-04 K-40 930 +/- 145 1541 +/-170 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65

<21

<23

<57

<19

<44

<26

<25

<54

<22

<57 Cs-134

<25

<24 Cs-1 37

<19

<18 Ra-226 679 +/-179

<515 Ra-228

<81

<104 4.a.2. FISH - (PCi/kg. wet weight)

Sample Site T67 T81 Collection Date 22-Dec-04 28-Dec-04 K-40 3114 +/- 279 2462 +/- 296 Mn-54

<30 Co-58

<29 Fe-59

<72 Co-60

<31 Zn-65

<60 Cs-1 34

<36 Cs-1 37

<32 Ra-226

<588 Ra-228

<119

<25

<28

<61

<29

<59

<28

<28 844 +/- 292

<117 6 of 7

TP QR 4Q-2004 4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION - Brazilian Pepper - (DCi/kg. wet weight)

Sample Site T40 T41 T67 Collection Date 12-Oct-04 09-Nov-04 08-Dec-04 12-Oct-04 09-Nov-04 08-Dec-04 12-Oct-04 09-Nov-04 08-Dec-04 Be-7 1111 +78 1829 +/- 112 1785 +/-44 1167 +/-85 2148 +/-100 1890 +/- 52 641 +/-77 1842 +/- 95 826 +/- 98 K-40 3711 +/-183 4896 +/- 251 4455 +/- 82 5058 +/- 184 5922 +/- 196 3760 +/- 105 2556 +/- 170 3056 +/- 156 3435 +/- 197 1-131

<13

<17

<9

<16

<18

<12

<12

<19

<28 Cs-1 34

<13

<19

<5

<13

<13

<8

<17

<16

<17 Cs-i 37 92 +/- 10 181 +/-13 96+/-4 62+/-8 18 +/- 5 82+/-5

<13

<13

<18 Pb-210

<1851

<2377 1062 +/- 181

<778

<803

<1153

<2113

<2030

<2494 Ra-226 287 +/- 102

<378

<129

<276

<280 554 +/- 85

<352

<318

<379 7 of 7

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 ATTACHMENT C RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 2004 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY QAP 60, June 2004 AND MAPEP 12, December 2004

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 DOE-QAP 60 RESULTS Reported Reported EML EML Reported Radionuclide Value Error Value Error EML Evaluation Matrix: Al Air Filter Bq/filter Co60 37.850 0.130 35.400 0.850 1.069 A

Cs137 17.060 0.100 18.200 0.402 0.937 A

Cs137 30.080 0.100 26.400 0.860 1.139 A

Am241 0.130 0.020 0.105 0.002 1.244 A

Gross Beta 3.000 0.050 2.850 0.280 1.053 A

Matrix: SO Soil Bq/k K40 616.000 8.000 539.000 29.110 1.143 A

Cs137 1509.000 3.000 1323.000 66.170 1.141 A

Th234 96.500 5.300 84.000 5.960 1.149 A

U238 98.000 8.000 89.730 4.220 1.092 A

Am241 14.600 1.000 13.000 0.430 1.123 A

Matrix: VE Vegetation Bq/kg K40 800.000 10.000 720.000 37.920 1.111 A

Co6O 15.200 0.600 14.470 0.640 1.050 A

Cs137 634.000 3.000 584.670 29.230 1.084 A

Am241 5.400 0.800 4.930 0.290 1.095 A

Matrix: WA Water Bq/L H3 237.170 4.750 186.600 3.300 1.271 A

Co6O 160.100 0.500 163.200 5.900 0.981 A

Sr9O 4.640 0.270 4.760**

0.500 0.975 A

Cs137 52.040 0.490 51.950 2.700 1.002 A

Am241 1.340 0.300 1.3100 0.040 1.023 A

Gross Alpha 328.400 8.400 326.000 32.000 1.007 A

Gross Beta 1009.000 9.100 1170.000 117.000 0.862 A

    • = Grand mean average used in lieu of experimentally determined EML value Evaluation : A = Acceptable, W = Acceptable with Warning, N = Not Acceptable

2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TURKEY POINT PLANT - UNITS 3 & 4 DOE-MAPEP 12 RESULTS Ref.

Flag Value (Evaluation)

Radionuclide Result Matrix: RdF Air Filter Bq/filter MN54 3.13 C057 2.43 C060 2.35 ZN65 4.59 CS134 2.22 CS137 1.90 Acceptance Range 3

2.4 2.3 4

2.9 2

A A

A A

W A

2.10 - 3.90 1.68-3.12 1.61 - 2.99 2.80 - 5.20 2.03 - 3.77 1.40-2.60 Matrix: MaS K40 MN54 C057 C060 ZN65 CS134 CS137 Matrix: MaW H3 MN54 C057 C060 N163 ZN65 SR90 CS134 CS137 Soil Bq/kg 692 572 465 574 835 408 948 604 484.7 399.6 518 699.3 414.4 836.2 Water Bq/L 90.5 262.1 168.3 158.1 91.4 212.8 8.2 180.9 234.5 422.8 - 785.2 339.3 - 630.1 279.7 - 519.5 362.6 - 673.4 489.5 - 909.1 290.1 - 538.7 585.3-1008 58.1 - 107.9 186.9-347.1 129.5-240.5 114.1 -211.9 70 - 130 145.6-270.4 4.9 - 9.1 145.6 - 270.4 175 - 325 83 267 185 163 100 208 7

208 250 Matrix: MaV Vegetation, Bq/sample:

Not included in this round Matrix: GrF Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 1.27 1.2 A

0.6-1.80 Evaluation: A = Acceptable, W = Acceptable with Warning, N = Not Acceptable From the MAPEP handbook:

Acceptance criteria were developed from a review of precision and accuracy data compiled by other PEPs, the analytical methods literature, from several MAPEP pilot studies, and from what is considered reasonable, acceptable, and achievable for routine analyses among the more experienced laboratories.