IR 05000445/1987017
| ML20235F933 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 09/22/1987 |
| From: | Kelley D, Warnick R NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235F929 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-445-87-17, NUDOCS 8709290371 | |
| Download: ML20235F933 (4) | |
Text
_ _
_ _.._- -
l
,
.
t
-
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS NRC Inspection Report:
50-445/87-17 Permit: CPPR-126 i
Docket: 50-445 Category: A2 Construction Permit Expiration Date:
Unit 1: August 1, 1988 Applicant:
TU Electric Skyway Tower 400 North Olive Street Lock Box 81 Dallas, Texas 75201 Facility Name:
Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES),
Unit 1 Inspection At:
Comanche Peak Site, Glen Rose, Texas Inspection Conducted:
August 5 through September 2, 1987 f
{
Inspector:
_1 D
f[5>M i
D.L.Kellef,SenporRes'dentInspector,
' D4te Operations
,
(paragraphs 1, 2, 3 d 4)
]
FO<1mosa e/2v,rr Reviewed by:
,
R. F. Warnick, Assistant Director
'Da t'e for Inspection Programs Comanche Peak Project Division
]
Office of Special Projects
!
{
!
8709290371 870922
)
ADOCKOSOOggSj DR
______________-_____A
'
.
,
,.
Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted: August 5 through September 2, 1987 (Report 50-445/87-17)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced safety inspection of applicant's Retesting Program and plant tours.
Results:
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
,
r.
,
$
_ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _. - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _. _ - _
_
_,__ _ _ _ _
!,
'
.i*
'3.
DETAILS 1.
Persons' Contacted
- D.'B.
Allen, ISU Coordinator, TU Electric (TUE)
- R.
P. Baker, Regulatory Compliance, Manager, TUE
- D.
N. Bize, Regulatory Compliance Supervisor, TUE-
- M.
R. Blevins,. Technical Support, Manager, TUE
- M.
D. Gaden, Senior Review Team, CPRT, TUE
- P. E. Halstead, QC Manager, TUE
- T.'L. Heatherly, Regulatory Compliance Engineer, TUE
- D.
A. Hodge, CPRT Interface, ERC, TUE
- C.
R. Hooton,. Unit l' Manager, CPE CE, TUE
- J.
J. Kelley,' Director of Construction, TUE
- R.
L. Moller, Westinghouse Site Manager
- L.
D. Nace, Vice President, Engineering'& Construction, TUE
- D.
E. Noss, QA Issue Coordinator,~TUE
- G.
R. Purdy, Site QA, Manager
- M.
J. Riggs, Plant Evaluation, Manager, TUE
- A.
H. Saunders, EA Evaluations, Manager, TUE
- C.
E. Scott, Startup Manager, TUE
- A.
B. Scott, Nuclear Operations Vice President, TUE
- T.
G. Tyler, Projects Director, TUE
- C.
S. Weary,-Equipment Qualification, Supervisor, TUE The NRC inspector also interviewed other applicant employees during this-inspection period.
- Denotes personnel present at the September 2,'1987, exit interview.
2.
Retesting Program (70301)
.This portion of the NRC inspector's review of the applicants prestart test program consisted of a review of draft procedures for control of retesting activities.
The draft procedures were: (1) STA-630, " Test Clearances"; and (2)
.STA-808, "Prestart Test Program."
The retesting will be-performed by two groups, one~ group will be the startup testing group and the second will be the operations group.. The draft procedures have been written so that whichever group does the testing, that group's administrative procedures apply.
Unlike the previous preoperational test program, not all of the systems,' components, and structures are under the startup organization control.
Neither STA-630 nor STA-808 contain the specificity needed to define which systems, components, and structures are under which administrative control.
The identification of the organization with the responsibility for control is defined in Procedure STA-802, " Final Acceptance -
Station Systems and Equipment".
That is, if Plant Operations has accepted a system or equipment via STA-802, then the Station Administrative Procedures control all activities.
If
_ -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _
I
,,
I
l
!
this acceptance has not been accomplished or the system and equipment has been returned to the startup organization then Startup Administrative procedures control the activities.
!
The NRC inspector has discussed this with applicant representatives emphasizing the need for a straight forward, clear, and unambiguous set of controls for the prestart test
!
program.
For tracking purposes, this will be identified as an l
open item (445/8717-0-01).
No violations or deviations were identified.
3.
Plant Tours (71302)
i The NRC inspector performed frequent tours of Unit 1 and l
common plant areas during this inspection period.
In addition to the general housekeeping activities and general cleanliness of the facility, specific attention was given to areas where l
safety-related equipment was installed and where activities were in progress involving safety-related equipment.
These areas were inspected to ensure that:
l Work in progress was being accomplished using approved
.
procedures.
l Special precautions for protection of equipment were
.
implemented and additional cleanliness requirements were j
being adhered to for maintenance and welding activities.
]
Installed safety-related equipment and components were
.
,
!
being protected and maintained to prevent damage or deterioration.
l 4.
Open Items open items are matters which have been discussed with the licensee, which will be reviewed further by the inspector, and which involve some action on the part of the NRC or licensee l
or both.
An open item disclosed during the inspection is
'
discussed in Paragraph 2.
l
5.
Exit Interview (30703)
An exit interview was conducted on September 2, 1987, with the applicant's representatives identified in paragraph 1 of this report.
During this interview, the NRC inspector summarized the scope of the inspection.
l
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_