IR 05000440/1978016
| ML19261B572 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 01/09/1979 |
| From: | Julie Hughes, Maxwell G, Spessard R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19261B565 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-440-78-16, 50-441-78-15, NUDOCS 7902280221 | |
| Download: ML19261B572 (10) | |
Text
$h
%
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIOS OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEW NT
REGION III
Report No. 50-440/78-16; 50-441/78-15 Docket No. 50-440; 50-441 License No. CPPR-148; CPPR-149 Licensee:
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Post office Box 5000 Cleveland, OH 44101 Facility Name:
Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At:
Perry Site, Lake County, OH Inspection Conducted:
December 5 - 8, 1978
/
,.
m
.
Inspectors: d.\\ T.
ax hl ]
~
'.f i *
l
/
'
-/.',^,-
// u, s
,
'
^\\
J, Hughes
'
,-
~~'
I /' t ~
_
s
.
- - ;- (
7. -
.
Approved Ev:
R.
L.
Spes rd, Chief
',! ?
Engineering Support Section 1 Inspection Summarv Inspection on December 5 - 8, 1978 (Report No. 50-440/78-16; 50-441/79-15)
Areas Inspected:
Licensee action related to previous items of noncom-pliance and unresolved items (Units 1 and 2): licensee action relativc to RIII Immediate Action Letter of Februarv 8, 1978, (Units 1 and 2):
ongoing construction activities (Units 1 and 2); QA implementing procedures relative to electrical comoonents and systens (Unit s 1 and 2),
QA program for instrumentatior, components and systems and site fire prevention and protection program (Units 1 and 2).
This inspection involved a total of 56 onsite inspector-hours by two NRC inspectors.
Results: No items of noncompliance were identified.
79022802a/
,
DETAILS Persons Contacted Principal Licensee Employees
- M.
R. Edelman, Manager, Nuclear QA Department
- G.
W. Groscur, Manager, Nuclear Engineering Department
- R.
E.
Boals, General Supervisor, Construction
- D.
A. Fitzpatrick, Site Construction Manager
- J. M. Lastovka, CQS General Supervising Engineer
- E.
Riley, Manager, Contracts Administration Other Personnel R.
P.
Ross, QC Manager (Ernst-Comstock)
- W.
J. Kacer, COS Quality Control Supervisor (KEI)
P.
L. Gibson, CQS Quality Administration Supervisor (KET)
- l.
L. Arney, CQS Supervisor (GAI)
G. J. Gibson, CQS Lead Electrical Quality Engineer (GAI)
J.
J. Connelly, CQS Lead Civil quality Engineer (GAI)
R. E. Crofton, CQS Lead Piping Quality Engineer (gal)
- J.
M. Pepp, Construction Quality Section (KEI)
J.
Jones, QAR, (Johnson Controls Inc.)
J.
Bushnell, Project Manager, (Johnson Controls Inc.)
The inspectors also contacted other licensee and contractor employees. including members of the quality, technical and engineerin,; s taf f s.
- Denotes those who attended the exit interview.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Unresolved Item (440/78-03-01; 441/78-02-01):
Dick Corporation QA program review. Those concerns identified in CEI CQA audit report Se. 57 about Dick Corporation's requirements for personnel qualifi-cation; training; inspection, test and operating status; and corrective action have been resolved.
(0 pen) Noncompliance (440/77-07-09; 441/77-07-09):
Calibration records not reaiily traceable to National Bureau of Standards or equivalent - Newport News Industrial Corporation, Units 1 and 2.
The licensee conducted an audit of Newport News Industrial Corporation calibration program on or about October 5, 1978; as a result, several significant conditions were documented in CAR 0450.
Since the-2-
.
t conditions noted in CAR 0450 effect the traceability of standards used by Newport News Industrial for calibratinc reasuring/ test equipment, this item remains open pending satisfactory resolution of CAR 0450.
(Open) l'nresolved Item (440/ 78-11-02; 441/ 78-10-02):
CEI not conducting an audit to evaluate the recently developed specification contrcl syster (NEWSPEC).
As of December 8, 197A, tFe audit has n. :
been conducted; the inspector was informed that the audit for NEWSPEC is scheduled to be conducted within two months.
This item remains open pending review of the CEI audit of the NEWSPEC system.
_ 3_
.
.
Section I Prepared by G.
F. Maxwell Reviewed bv R.
L.
Spessard, Chief Engineering Support Section 1 1.
CE) Action Relative to RIII Immediate Action Letter of February 8, 1978, Units 1 and 2 Relativt to item 8 of the RIII Immediate Action Letter of February 8, 1978:
a.
The inspector reviewed the CEI Project Administration Manual Procedures 1002, 1301, 1003 and n201.
b.
As a result of the procedure review, the inspector noted that commitments to Regulatory Guides 1.37, 1.38, 1.58 and 1.74 are delineated in CEI Project Administratior Procedures 1002, 1301, 1003 and 0201, respectively.
Item 8 of the RIII Immediate Action Letter of Februarv 8, 197S, remains open pending the inspecter's review of CEI Project Administration Procedures 1001, 0202, 0901, 0301, 1701, 1004, 1005 and 040i; NOTE:
These procedures have not yet been developed bv CEI.
Further evaluation of site contractor's quality assurance contract specifications will be made, on a selective basis, by the RIII inspector af ter all of the af orementioned proj ect administrative procedures have been developed.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
2.
Quality Assurance Program Review - Instrumentation, Units 1 and 2 a.
The inspector reviewed selective sections of the Johnson Controls Inc., QA program.
Johnson Controls Inc., is an instrumentation contractor with installation / inspection responsibilities for safety related instrumentation at the Perry Nuclear Plant.
Those sections which were selected and reviewed are as follows:
(1) Organization Structure and nA Personnel (reviewed Johnson's QA manual, Section 3 and Procedure QAS-201, Revision 0).
- ' -
.
.
(2) Procurement Document Control (reviewed Johnson's QA manual, Sections 5 and 9 and Procedures QAS-501, Revision 1 and QAS-702, Revision 1).
(3) Work and Quality Inspection Procedure requirements (reviewed Johnson's QA manual Section 6 and Procedure QAS-402, Revision 1).
(4) Material Control (reviewed Johnson's QA manual Sections 9 and 14 and Procedures QAS-1401, Revision 0 and QAS-1601, Revision 0).
(5) Document Control (reviewed Johnson's OA manual Sections 2 and 7 and Procedure QAS-402, Revision 1).
(6)
Special Processes (reviewed Johnson's OA manual Section 10).
(7) Test Control (reviewed Johnson's QA manual Section 12).
(8) Control of Measuring and Test Equipment (reviewed Johnson's QA manual Section 13 and a draft copy of procedure QAS-1301).
(9) Quality Records (reviewed Johnson's QA manual Section 18 and a draft copy of OAS-1802 and QAS-802, Revision 1).
(10) Corrective Action (reviewed Johnson's OA manual, Section 17 and Procedure QAS-1701, Revision 0).
(11) Audits (reviewed Johnson's QA manual, Sections 8 and 19 and Procedures QAS-1901, Revision 1 and QAS-202, Revision 1).
b.
The inspector compared the above procedures with the Ouality Assurance requirements which are specified in the CEI/F-C contract specification, SP-709-4549-00, dated August 12, 1974; 10 CFR 50, Appendix B; and ANSI N45. 2-1971.
(1) The inspector had concerns about training and quali-fication requirements for inspection personnel.
(2) The inspector was also concerned that Johnson's Procedures QAS-1802 and QAS-1301 have not yet been submitted to CEI for approval.
_5_
.
.
With respect to items (1) and (2) above, the inspector was informed by Gilbert QA personnel, that Johnson Controls Inc. has been instructed to revise the applicable procedures to ass.ure that tim requirements of SP-709-4549-00, Paragraph 1:06.2 (in reference to the qualification and training rtquirements of ANSI N45.2.6) are complied with and that Johnson Controls Inc. will be required to have Procedures QAS-1802 and QAS-1301 submitted for review and approval in a timely manner to assure that the applicable work does not proceed until these two procedures have been approved by CEI.
At this time, the inspector has no further cuestions about these matters.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
_- _
.
Section Il Prepared by J.
Ilughes Reviewed by R. L. Spessard, Chief Engineering Support Section 1 1.
Fire Prevention / Protection a.
The inspector ascertained that there were procedures and methods established relative to a fire emergency during construction activities which included:
(1) NFPA standards for construction.
(2)
Fire brigades.
(3) General housekeeping, including flammable liquic and materials.
(4) Alarm system.
(5) Watch service (Security Force).
b.
P4 -indic insnections are performed by the insurance inspector.
c.
There is an organized fire brigade made up of designated personnel, who received training in the use, cart and locations of hydrants, noses and fire extinguishers.
The training included the proper techniques for fighting and isolating the various types of fires.
Training records are maintained by the Security Department.
d.
The inspector observed several fire stations, including water hydrants and dry chemical extinguishers.
General observations are as follows:
(1) Water hydrants were pressurized. Tocls were located inside cabinets at the stations.
There was no evi-dence of deterioration of hoses.
- 7-
,
.
(2) The inspection log indicated that the dry chemical fire extinguishers were being inspected monthly.
(3)
Several welding and flame cutting operations were observed throughout the buildings.
The inspector reviewed three subcontractor's welding procedures and the Plant Protection Manual for the site.
Only one of the subcontrarcor's welding procedures referenced a fire watth/ safety pre-caution requirement.
The licensee's Security Department is in the process of incorporating fire watch requirements into the Plant Protection Manual, which is distributed to all site personnel and subcontractors.
The inspector has no further questions on this matter at this time.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
2.
Quality Assurance Implementing Procedures Review - Electrical, Units 1 and 2 a.
The inspector reviewed selective Ernst-Comstock OA/nC procedures. Those procedures which were selected and reviewed are as follows:
(1)
Cnntrol and Identification of Equipment and Components, E-C Procedure 4.6.1, dated October 10, 1978.
(2)
Field Engineering Changes. E-C Procedure 4.2.2, dated June 1, 1978.
(3) Cable Tray and Conduit Installation, E-C Procedure 4.3.1. dated October 10, 1978.
(4) Cable Tray and Conduit Identification, E-C Procedure 4.3.2, dated October 10, 1978.
(5) Work Instructions for Field Storage and Paintenance of Class 1E Motors, E-C Procedure 4.3.15, dated December 1, 1978.
(6) Welding Procedure for Galvanized Sheet and Tubing, E-C Procedure 4.7.7, dated August 1, 1978.
-8-
,
(7) Procedure Specification for Flux-Cored Arc Welding of Structural Steel, E-C Procedure 4.7.10, dated November 1, 1978.
(8)
Inspection Procedure for Field Storage and Maintenance of Class IE Motors, E-C Procedures 4.8.2, dated December 1, 1978.
b.
The inspector compared the above procedures with the requirements which are specified in the CEI/E-C contract specifications 7 P-3 3-4 5 4 9-0 0, Revision 1 and SP-709-4549 00, Revision 3.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
3.
Review of Quality Records - Cable Trays The RIII inspector reviewed Ernst-Comstock's receiving inspection documents dated Neverber 28, 1978, for Class IE cable trays which included the following:
Statement of Conformance (6); mill test certs; and seismic analysis report which was reviewed and accepted by Gilbert Associates, Inc.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
Plant Tour The RIII inspectors observed a nonseismic drain line routed over a Class 1E (seismic 1 counted) cable tray in the Control Complex Building.
The inspectors were informed that this matter had been identified to the A/E's field engineer and that corrective actions would be taken.
The inspectors expressed concern relative to similar installations involving other nonseismic piping in close proximity to safety related components which could adversely affect these components in the event of an earthquake.
The licensee informed the inspectors, prior to the exit interview, that Site Engineering will establish a log book to track those cases uhere seismic 1 systems / components are mounted under nonseismic 1 systems / components in order to assure that appro-priate actions are taken to correct the condition prior to plant completion.
The inspectors have no further questions on this matter at this time.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
Exit Interview The inspectors met with site staff representatives (denoted under Persons Contacted) at the conclusion of the inspection on December 8, 1978.
9_
.
The inspectors summarized the purpose and findings of the inspection.
During the exit interview, the inspectors were informed that reevaluations of site contractor's QA programs are being made.
The reevaluations, which will be completed by December 30, 1978, are being conducted to:
followup on original program review audits which were the results of the RllI Immediate Action Letter of February 8, 1978 and to evaluate the initial responses received in order to verify implementation of corrective action responses to the original program review audits.
The licensee acknowledged the findings reported herein.
.
- 10 -
-
.
.
_
-
- - -- 4
...
FEB 7 1973 INTERIM REPORT Acces: ion No. 79s?.2fo718 Contractor's Report No.
Contract Program or Project Title:
Physical Protection of Nuclear Facilities Project Subject of this Document:
Progress reported for November & December 1978
_
Type of Document:
Informal letter progress report Author (s):
Leon D. Chapman Date of Document: 1/30/79 Responsible NRC Individual and NRC Office or Division:
Richard C. Robinson,Jr. Technical Support Branch, SAFER:RES
.
This document was prepared primarily for preliminary or internal use.
It has not received full review and approval. Since there may be substantive changes, this document should not be considered final.
Distribution:
Prepared By S. Levine, RES Sandia Laboratories C. Beck, RES P.O. Box 5800 T. Sherr, NMSS (10)
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185
-
E. Howard, I&E (6)
F. Pagano, NRR (2)
R. Jones, SD (3)
Prepared for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission Washington, D.C. 20555
.
,
NRC FIN No.
A1060-l INTERIM REPORT
.