IR 05000416/2005002

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 850416-0502
ML20128M764
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf, Prairie Island Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/17/1985
From: Reyes L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20128M752 List:
References
50-282-85-11, NUDOCS 8506030076
Download: ML20128M764 (2)


Text

- - -- - . . . . . _- -. . . . . - . . - __-

. ..

.

Appendix ,

.

,

. NOTICE OF VIOLATION

1 Northern States Power Company Docket No. 50-282

-

As a result of the inspection conducted on April 16, 1985 through May 2, 1985, and in accordance with the General Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement

.

Actions, (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C),the following violations were identified:

f 1, '10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V as implemented by the Prairie Island Quality Assurance Plan, requ;res that activities affecting quality shall i be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in

.

accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings which shall l

include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for

'

determining that important activities have been satisfactorily  ;

accomplished.

J Contrary to the above, the procedures required to implement the leak rate j testing required by Technical Specifications and 10 CFR 50, Appendix J  ;

'

1 were not appropriate in that:

f The licensee's Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test (CILRT)

procedure (s) did not address the area temperature survey 4 requirements of ANSI N45.4-1972.

I The licensee's CILRT procedure (s) did not adequately reflect the i required 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J acceptance criteria of 0.75 Lt for the BN-TOP-1 or mass point calculated leakage at the upper 95%

confidence leve *

I The licensee's CILRT procedure (s) allowed the licensee to terminate j the supplemental verification test' portion of the CILRT with the

,

BN-TOP-1 calculated leakage outside of the test acceptance band.

l This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

!

' Prairie Island Technical Specification 6.5 requires detailed written procedures, including the applicable checkoff lists and instructions,

covering surveillance and testing requirements that could have an effect

on nuclear safety shall be prepared and followe .

i'

Contrary to the above, procedure SP-1071(8) Revision 0, step 3.15 required a BN-TOP-1 supplemental verification test of 11.25 hours2.893519e-4 days <br />0.00694 hours <br />4.133598e-5 weeks <br />9.5125e-6 months <br />, yet, the verification test was only 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> long and this step of the

!

procedure was signed of This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplemental I).

l

,

h%Q $

a

t

. _ _.___ _._ _ _._.._._ _ _, _. _ - _ , _ . _ - -

.. - - ~.. . . . . - . . . - . . _ - - - _ _ . . .-

.

.

'

.

Appendix . 2 .

.

! CFR.50, Appendix J, paragraph III.A.1 requires that "During the peridd between the initiation of the containment inspeciton and the performance of the Type A test, no repairs or adjustments shall be made so that the containment can be tested in as close to the "as is" condition as practical." ,

'

10 CFR 50, Appendix J, paragraph III.A.3.(a) requires that all Type a tests be conducted in accordance with the provisions of ANSI N45.4-197 ANSI N45.4-1972 paragraph 4.2 requires "For retesting, an initial record

,

proof test shall be conducted at time periods and pressures established by the responsible organization, before any preparatory repairs are mad This will disclose the normal state of repair of the containment structure and a record of the results shall be retained." ,

Centrary to the above, the licensee performed repairs to penetrations prior to performing the Type A test and failed to add the pre- and l post-repair differential leakage to obtain an as found value for j containment leakag This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).

~

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to

this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance: (1)cor-rective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be

,

taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance j will-be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause show '

'

&&AY 171985 ,

Dated . A.' Rey Chief l

Operation ranch i

i

.

!

$

!

!

I t

i

!

. -_ .