IR 05000413/2003301
| ML040120611 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 05/15/2003 |
| From: | Ernstes M Operator Licensing and Human Performance Branch |
| To: | Gordon Peterson Duke Energy Corp |
| References | |
| 50-413/03-301, 50-414/03-301 50-413/03-301, 50-414/03-301 | |
| Download: ML040120611 (35) | |
Text
........................
. ~.
.I~~c
~
~ J.J%.
d.
A
-. 1 Ad rn i n istrative Docu rnents CATAWBA EXAM 2003-301 50-41 3 & 50-41 4 March 31 - April 4 &
April 10, 2003 Exam Preparation Checklist....................
ES-201-1 ES-291-2 Exam Outline Quality Checklist.................
Exam Security Agreement.....................
ES-201-3 Administrative Topics Outline (Fival)............. ES-301-1 L/
(Final)....................................
ES-301-2 Lc Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-through Test Outline Operating Test Quality Check Sheet............. ES-301-3 Simulator Scenario Quality Check Sheet.......... ES-301-4 Transient and Event Checklist.................. ES-301-5 &,-
ES-301-6 J Competencies Checklist......................
Written Exam Quality Check Sheet.............. ES-4012fk Written Exam Review Worksheet................ ES-401-9 Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist.......... ES-403-1 ES-501-1 Post-Exam Check Sheet......................
RFCc O F
& E a E c T a P k/!
,Ed-Y d / - f
...
......
.......
~
.....
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist For111 ES-201-2
..........-
...
........-
..........
- acilil Item -
- W R
I T
T E
N - I M
- W I
T
- G a. AI Task Description
,- Sazt'on D.1 of ES-401 and whether al\\.$.+Ao!i?mE!e appmpnately sampled b. Assess whether the wtrine WRS aystematica :y and rn:idody prepared m accocdn:ice with i:.
-ii-
...
...
...,.,b&lk
..... 41
.....
...............
................
.~.
........
...........................
.............
......
d. Assess whether the justili&?tioris for deselected or iejoizad fflA:&$$Mmts are a m ; : : :.
..
.........
................
a usmj Form ES-OU1-5. veldy m b. ASSSS whothe: there are enodgh sc mix of app.caqts in accordance wi!h th cmpromis ng exnin integrity. ensLre e wgnifcant y mildilieo sceiiar 0. ma ana scanaiios w II not be repeale c To the enent poss ble. assess 6'
b. Verifythat:
(2) on6 task is conducted in a I implement an alternate path gency or abnormal condition, and b. Facility Reviewer (3 c. NRC Chief Examiner (t)
d. NRC Supelvisor NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 24 of 25
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 Pre-Examination
"
I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who ha by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate. or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromise.
Post-Examination To the best of my kn during the week($ o instruct. evaluate, or noted below and authorized by the NR d Rtiivulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered from%& date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not ormance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY
_-
NOTES:
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24
i i Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensin date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information ab by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct. evaluate, or p authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measure procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may action against me OF the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility manage examination security may have been compromise.
Post-Examination C licensing examinations administered of examination administration, i did not noted below and authorized by the NR PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPQNSlBlLl
....- __
~
13.-__-_-
25 Qf 25 NUREG-1 021. Draft Revision 9
-..
ES-201 Examination Security Agrement
............... FGrm CSI201-3 (R8, SI)
Pre-Examination g/3&-Q.I -I%
v 4 l acknowledge that 1 have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of^//^/^ as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore. I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromise.
Post-Examination To the best of my kn during the week(s) o instruct, evaluate, or noted below and aut ivulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered th:
date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not ance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSlBlLlTY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE NOTE t. 7 3 p : ~ i>, fitllcr r)cO E-SHirFf 2. Al1.p~ a. &wk Do* 'l;,C..Ac
-__
1.
NOTES:
-__
N W
W 9 E$-201 Examination Security Agreement Farm ES-201-3 Pre-Examination i acknowledge that i have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRG licensing examinalions scheduled lor the week(s) of 34 -%d3 as of the date of my signatwe. I agree lhal I will nol knowingly divulge any i n f m a h aboul these examinalions lo any persons who have not been aulhorized by the NRC chielexaminer. I understand lhal I am not Lo instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants sehedu8ed lo be adminislered Vlese licensing examinalions from this dale until completion of examination adminislration. except as spedfically noted below and acilhorized by We NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical securily measures and requiremenls (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may resull in cancellation of the examinalions endlor an enforcement
'action againsl me or the facility licensee. I wil immediately report lo facility management or the NRC chief examine+ any indications or suggestions mal examinalion security may have been compromise.
Posl-Examination To lhe besl of my knowledge. I did n d divulge to any unaulhorized persons any informalion concerning the NRC licensing examinalions administered during the week(?.)
of
. From lhe date that i entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration. I did not inslruct, evaluate. or provide performance f e e d b k lo thme applicants who were administered these licensing examinalions, except as specifically noted bebw and aulhorized by the NR PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILiTY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SlGNATURE(2) DATENOTE i i
@ G Z 1. J2&!Lb-o3B-&a-
.-_SId&%
I ATOL 3. W * L @ e T 7 S d C i W. 1 ~ P W E.
L-
,-I__
-
.
m
&
a
-
-
SI&-.
&2zK&2E_
-
I__
S R O
____l-_______.-ll
-
W c
NOTES:
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24
'dj a ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 Pre-Examination
\\ acknowledge ha! I have acquifed specialized knowledge about the W X
licensing examinations scheduled forb week@) of %t -%h as ofthe dale of my sig;iature, 1 agree !hat I w!ll FOI kncwingly dwu!ga any infomation about these examinations lo any persons who have not been authorized b$ Ihe NRC chiel examiner. I understand Ulal I am not to instrud, evraluate. or provide perfomarpce feedback (a :hose applicants Scheduled lo be admir6lered theselitersing examhatiow from this dale until cmdetion oV examination adminislratiar, except as specifically wted below awd autho:ised by Me NRC.FurPermwe, I ar, awaa of Ihe physical secudty measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licenseek procedures) and undersland that violation o i tho conditians of W 5 agreement may result in cancellation of the examinafions andlor %n enbrcement aclion aga~rsl me or the faciiity licersee, I will immediately repod l0 faci'ity management or !he NRC chief examimer any indications or sugggsliins that examinalior secudty may "Mve been campromise.
Posl-Exanin3-70 i'le best of my knowledge. I did nab divulge lo any unauthorized perso-6 any infomath concerning he NRC licensing examinations administered during the week($ of
. From Ihe dale that I entered into Wis Security agreeemmi until the mrnpletian OF examination adminisIralion, I d:d mt i?s!rud, evaluate, or provide performance feedback lo those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations. except as specifically nokc! bloiv ar,d wlhorized by the NR PW4'ED NAME JOS TITLE f RESPONSIBILITY SIGYATURE (1)
DATE NOTE 1. YL
' '"di i, ~G+%%LI
---.
S! f).jLA7cC C W r<Jc-~&
2. Y&C9?&8&ke44LL__
-
~
~
~
.
~
~
~
~
3. lM?%*LPL%z2&-_
___II-__-_____
SciO
^ __-_-_-_.____-_
I._-
7. -----_._I_-_--
-I-.---
-
9.__I_____-
__
-
_^___-I_._^___..1_
____I_-_-_.------_-_.--_----_-._____--__
&do3
__
-_i I-_._ - I
_
__--_
-
__I-_-_-.__-_-__.__I_-____
-_I--.
_"
. I Y)
v)
a a
..
NOTES:
NUREG-8021, Revision 8, Su~plt?fflefi?
24 o i 24
.....................................................................................................................
G I
.Pt E l Z l
01
8
.............................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
............................................................
................................................................................................
............................
...........................................................
.........
...
..........
.............................................
....................................
.......................................................
May 19, 2003 Mr. Edwin L.ea US NRC Region I1 Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, S. Suite 231'85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Edwin, Enclosed is the security agreement for the Initial Licensing Exams atfministered the weeks of March 31 through April 16, 2003. You will notice that the final signatures for David O'Farrell and Jeffrey Bcrkowski were obtained on fax c0pie.s of the original security agreement. This was necessary because these individuals are no longer on the Catawba site. Also, Paul Swetrand signed on the line by Ron Fortier's name. Because of this, Ron Fortier signed on the next available line. The signature line by Paul Swetland's name is blan If you have any questions, please contact Reggie Kimray at (803) 831-31 18 or John Suptela at (803) 831-512
Sincerely, 124 G. Vp. wamiiton Operations Training Manager
~
~
E§-302 Final Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 L-,
Date of Examination: March 31, 2003 -April 18, 2003 Radiation Control te Low Pressure Service NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for only the administrative topics, when 5 are s unless they are retaking
..
~,
NUREG-1024, Draft Revision 9 22 of 27
ES-301 Final Administrative Topics Outline Form 3-301-1
' Date of Examination: March 31, 2003 -April 18, 2003 NUREG-ZO21, Draft Revisiofl 9 22 of 27
............
..............
__............-
........
Form ES-%X..2 Fical Control RoomAn-Plant Systems Outlirie
-.
.........
.........
..............
__..........
Date of Examination: Mar 32-Apr 18, 2003 Exam Level (circle Operating Test No.: 1 System I JPM Title Bolded items 2006 initial exam at Catawb.
23 of 27 NUREG-1022, Draft Revislcn 9
.......
~
..........
Fcrm ES-301-2 ES3CI
.........-.
. Final
......... Control Room/lri-Plant Systems Outline
............
...........
Facility: Catawba Exam Level (circle one): R-SRB(U)
Bate of Examination: Mar 31-Apr 18, 2003 Operating Test No.: 1 001 initial exam at Catawh of 27 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
_........
Final Cotlird Roomlln-PlantSystems Olltline Forrn ES-301-2 ES-301
..
__...........
.........
Exam Level (circle one): RO / SRO(I)
Operating Test No.: I System / JPM Title ified from bank, (N)ew, @)Iternate path, (C)ontrol B ~ l d e d ite d initial exam at Catawb cf 27 NUREG-l02T, Braff Revision 9
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3
-
Test Number: t 1. GENERAL CRITERIA a
'I ha aperarin(i lest conforms,wtb lhe previuLsly ap~irovod o.ltlmfl changes are conslrfienr wirh :<
satnp!mg raqu remenis (e y ' 0 CFR 55.45 oporntiona nportance salety fLn-I widljbibt.Ii&;'
....
................. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
d. NRC Supervisw lnitia J
I NOTE:
- The facility signature is not apNicable for NRC-developed test # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "ci" chief examiner concurrence require NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 24 of 29
Final ES-381 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4
.
..
QUALITATIVE AlTRIBUTES
[Ai( Each event descnption cOnSiStS Of the point in the Scenana when it is to be initiated 25 of 27 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
Final Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 ES-301 25 of 27 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
ES-301 Final Transient and Event I Checklist Form ES-301-5
~
~
OPERATING TEST NO.: 1
.
Scenario Number
..
...
ing test number and Form ES-5-1 event numbers for Section C.2.a of Appendix D. * Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basi Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should tx included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requiremen (3)
Author:
Chief Examiner:
NUREG-1021, Draft Wevisi0119 26 of 27
Form E§-301-6 E§-301 Final Competencies
.~... Checklist
~
-
Competencies Interpret / Diagnose Events and Conditions
.,
Comply With and Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control Boards (2) ~.
~.
Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability(3)
~
-.
Comply With and Use Tech S$ecs. (3)
Notes:
-
-
1 -
3-10
-
1-10
-
N/A
-
1-10
-
3-10
.-....
3-40 : 3-9-
-
3-5 8,lO
-
3.4, 8-10
-. 4, 8-1 0 1, NIA-
__
-
NiA
-
..~
.
nter one or more event numbers that will allow the Chief Examiner:
-
4.5,.,
9 S, 7 7,4, 5.7,
? NIA 7a,
'1, 4,
-
~-
Page 27 of 27 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
Written Examination Form ES-4Q1-9 Review Worksheet ES-401 2. I 3. Psychometric Flaws 1-5) Stem F ues TIF 1 4. Job Content Flaws I 5. Other 1 6. 1 ib-Minutia
"kl Explanation II a report from the STA that all CSFs........ FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF FR-PI AND A REPORT FROM THE STA THAT ALL CSFS ARE GREEN, WHICH IS TH CORRECT TRANSITION DistractorD could be correct based on the judgment madt by the candidate. The stem made need additional information (WA is EA2.1 not 2.21)... CHANG WA IF THE SRO DETERMINED THAT THEY ARE RESPONDING TO THE EVENT IN THE WRONG PROCEDURE... WHICH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING IS THE EARLIEST TIME THAT THE SRO COULD HAVE TRANSITIONED TO ES-.....
How can the most restrictive release rate and the recommended release rate be the same? CHANGE I
I!
STEM Is I
II QUESTION MAY TAKE 20 MINUTES..... THE Instructions
[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concept. cceptable). Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive leve Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
The stem or distractors contain cues (Le., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
The answer choices are a collection of unrelated trueffalse statement Qne or mare thmmedistractors is not credibl One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e& if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contra by stem). Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
The question is not linked to the job requirements (1.e.. the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content:
The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be nown from memoly).
The uestion contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g.. panel meter in percent with question in galons).
The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirement.
Check westions that are san?pled for conformance with the approved Klk and those that are desionated SRO-Cniy (ffiA and license level mismatches are unacceptable)..
Based on the reviewers judgment, is the question as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
At a minimum, explain any U ratings (e.g., how the Appendix 5 psychometric attributes are not being met).
Form ES-40 s-401
i 34 of 34 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
34 of 34 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-9 Review Worksheet ng each of the follo
[Refer to SBctin D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional info.
Enter the level of kmvdedge &OK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igh Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating 5 4 range are acceptable) Check the appropriate box if a qsychornehic flaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.9, The stem or distraciors contain CUBS (i.e., clues, specific determ r choices are a collection of unrelated trueffalse state e t@mmdlstrar.tors is not credibl e dstractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the a OT too much needless information)
ns that are not contradicted by stern). Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identifie The question is not linked to the job requirements The question requires the recall of knovded tha The question contains data with an unrealisE lev The question requires reverse logic or application en, is not operational in content).
ode (i.e., it is not required to,be known from memory)
I meter in percent with question in gallons). Check Questions that are sampled for cmformance with th desiqnated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
ir or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
Explanation
SP contrals and ilullcation to lower with Feed pumps still Reactor Trip is on SIG lo-lo water these. Also mine problems Mth
.OK LQD FiH) I (1-5)
I 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 3. Psychometric Flaw
~MHIAN WILL ADD INF~RMATION TO THE STEM II
.
.
.
i 01 1'1658 systems !o ma opere!.m 4 the fac:lq Tne !OS:% question
- deals N+tn pnority and reasxs for t \\ y s to dgressJ ze the RC :ThERE IS NO CHAhGE NEEDE3TO THE Q;'EST!ON. THE WA IS OK.._.._.._
C61 A2.05 (3.V3.4) WA Ability to (a) predict the impact of the following malfunctions or operations on the AFW; and (b) based on those predictions. use procedures to correct. control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations. The listed question does not meet part (b) of the WA, need to add procedures to mitigat THERE IS REALLY NO NEED TO TRY AND MATCH EVERY ASPECT QFTHE K/A" IAl IS A MATCH WHICH IS SUFFICIENT: THEREFORE It I WE CAN LEAVE'IT AS IS
3. Psvchometric Flaws r 4.
Job Content=
item Cue: T Dis tained. I think this
. BRlANWlLL
/I 062AA1.02 13.7J;3.31 Ab!dy IC apera:e a m ai moiitor th6 !31!o~(lr.s as
!ne? apply to the LJSS af NLCI-: Serica Water (SNS).oads on the SINS in the ccnlroi rc3m. Tne 3~8s!ioo is asma w a t would hamen cn a fault, but does not address a& laads off the S k S. DECIDE6 iHAT I
I I K/A WILL WORK
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist 5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
..
.
ES-501 Post-Examination Check Sheet Form ES-501-1 Task Description 1.
Facility written exam comments or graded exams received and verified complete Facility written exam comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC grading completed, if necessary Operating tests graded by NR6 examiners.
Date Complete (L?n a_p NRC Chief examiner review of written exam and operating test aradina comaleted Responsible supervisor review completed License and denial letters mailed
Facility notified of results 1 5//4bDDJl1 Examination report issued (refer to NRC MC 0612)
I -%,+5/Jad
ce material return 21 of 23 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
__I^
-
.
.___
Tier an Grou..............
...........
...........
...........
..............
...............
...............
1-1 RO 1-2 KO
__
2-1 RO Randomly Selected WA APE 015/01?
......................................
.........................
.........................
.......................
.......................
........................
.......................
.......................
A1.04isN/A at Catawba Replaced with K2.10 APE WE03 Replaced EK3.2 with EK2.02 for Rebalancing System 003 Replaced K5.04 with K2.02 for Rebalancing For Official Use Only Record of Rejected KJAs Form ES-401-4
__
~-
Reasons for Rejection
. -
.. -
.....
Replaced M E 015/01? A1.04 Ability to operate and/or monitor the following as they apply to the Reactor Coolant Pump Mayunctions (Loss of RC Flow): AA1.04 RCP ventilation coolingjun run indicutors (CFR 41.7 / 45.5 /
45.6) because there are no RCP cooling fans installed at Catawb Randomly selected K2. IO Knowledge of the interrelations between the Reuctor Coolant Pump Muljiunctions (Loss of RC Flow) and the following: AK2.10 RCP indicutors and controls 2.8* 2.8(CFR 41.7145.7)
Randomly replaced EK3.2 Knowledge ofthe reasoiis for the following responses as they apply to the (LOCA Cooldown and Depressurizatiotl) EK3.2 Normal, abnormal and emergency operating procedures associated with (LOCA Cooldown and Depressurization). IMPORTANCE RO SRO 3.9 in order to randomly select a sufficicnt number of Ems in sample plan for balanc Randomly reselected EK2.2 Knowledge of the interrelations between the (LOCA Cooldown and Depressurization) and the following: Facility S ireat removal systems, including primary coolant, etnergenc), coolant, the decay heat removal systems, and relations between the proper operation of these systems to the operation of the facilit IMPORTANCE RO 3.7 SRO 4.0 for balance. There were Randomly repidccd K5.04 Knowledge of the operational implications of the following concepts as ihey apply LO the RCPS: EJfkcts of RCP shutdown on secondar),paranIeter such as steam pressure, sfeanl flow, and feed flow 3.2 (CFR: 41.5 145.7) in order to balance sample plan for K2 Randomly reselected Knowledge of bus power supplies to rhe following: K2.02 CCWpunlps 2.5* 2.6* (CFR: 41.7)
There were insufficient K2s in the injtial sampl insufficient - ~ -
E m s in the original sampl. ~-
-.
Page 4 1!10:03
.
ES-401 Tier and Group
!-1 RO
!-1 RO 1-3 RO 1-3 ko Randomly Selected K/A System 007 Replaced A2.04 with
--
G2. To prepare a better question
.~
System 022 K4.05 Keplaced with K2.01 Question construction I_-_
System 005 Replaced A403 with K2.01 for Rebalancing System 041 Replaced A2.02 with K3.02 for For Official Use Only Record of Rejected WAS Form ES-401-4 I
~.
_~
Reasons for Rejection
__
Unable to write a satisfactory question on A2.04 Ability to (aj predict the impacts of the following masfunctions or operations on the P S; and (b) bused on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those maljmctions or operations: A2.04 Overpressurization of the waste gas vent header 2.5 (CFR: 41.5143.5/45.3 /45.13) The waste ga. header is sized to prevent overpressure from the PRT. Obtained Chief Examiners permission to replac Randomly selected KIA G 2.4.4 Ability to recognize abnormal indications for system operating parameters that are entiy-level conditions for emergency and abnormal operatingprocedures. (CFR 41.10143.2 145.6) to prepare a better questio Replaced KIA 4.05 Knowledge of CCS design featurefs)
and/or interlock(s) which provide j?>r the following: K4.05 Containment cooling after LOCA destroys ventilation ducts 2.6*
2.7 (CFR: 41.7) - Unable to construct good questio Randomiy selected WA A2.01 Ability to (a)predict the impacts of the follow8iizg malfinctions or operations on the CCS; and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: A2.01 Fan motor over-current 2.52.7(CFR: 41.5/43.5/45.3/45.13)
Approved by NKC Chief Examine Randomly replaced A4.03 Ability to manually operate and/or monitor in the control room: (CFU: 41.7 145.5 to 45.8) with, K2.01 Knowledge of bus power supplies to the following:
K2.01 RIfR pumps 3.0 3.2 (CFR: 41.7) In order to increase the number of K2s above the minimu Randomly replaced A202 Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following ma@nctions or operations on the SDS; and (h) based on those predictions or mitigate the consequences of those ma#unctions or operations: A2.0-7 Steam valve stuckopen (CFR: 41.5/43.5 145.3 145.13) with,
_.___I_
___-
K3.02 Knowledge ofthe &ect that a loss or malfunction of Page 5 1110103
..
Tierand 1 Randomly Record of Rejected UAs Form ES-401-4 Reasons for Rejection the SDS will haw an the fallowing: K3.02 RCS 3.8 (CFR: 41.7/45.6) in order to increase the number ofK3s above the minimu _ _ _ _ _. ~
For Official Use Only Page 6 1!10/03