IR 05000364/1978017
| ML19256A998 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 11/28/1978 |
| From: | Conlon T, Crowley B, Walters D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19256A982 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-364-78-17, NUDOCS 7901170376 | |
| Download: ML19256A998 (7) | |
Text
.
UNITED sT ATes
/g* REGoq(o, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,
REGloN II
{
,y, g
101 M ARIETT A sTRE ET.N.W.
- -
r
-
o
%.. - f
..
Report No..
50-364/78-17 Docket No.: 50-364 License No.-
CPPR-86
.
Category: A2 Licensee:. Alabama Power Company P. O. Box 2641
- Birmingham, Alabama 35291 Facility Name:
Joseph M. Farley Plant, Unit 2 Inspection at: Ashford, Alabama Inspection conducted: October 24-27, 1978 Inspectors:
B. R. Crowley D. K. Walters R. J. H rd ick, Jr. (Training)
/# ff/ ff Reviewed b.-
~
'
TI. E. Conlon, Chief
/ Date Engineering Support Section No. 2 Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch Inspection Summary Inspection on October 24-27, 1978 (Report No. 50-364/78-17)
Areas Inspected:
Routine unannounced inspection of preservice inspection plans; safety related piping; instrument cable installation and quality records; instrument components and systems installation and quality records; storage of electrical penetration assemblies.
This inspection involved 32 inspector-hours on site by two NRC inspectors.
Results: Of the five areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in three areas, two apparent items of noncompliance Failure to follow procedures for instrument installations, (Infraction
-
Details II, paragraph 5; and Inf raction - Failure to follow procedures for EPA storage, Details II, paragraph 4) were identified in two areas.
790117637G
.
RII Rpt. No. 50-364/78-17 I-1 s 7/
DETAILS 1 Prepared by:
M.. JS
/
,
EngineeringSupportSecticah[o.2 B. R. Crowley, Metallurgicil ngineer Date Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch ete of Inspection: October 24, 1978 Reviewed f f_
/4 5g TN E. Conlon, Chief
/ Da(e Engineering Support Section No. 2 Reactor Construction and Engineering
'
Support Branch
1.
Persons Contacted Alabama Power Company (APCO)
R. E. Hollands, QA Supervisor R. S. Fucich, QA Engit -r J. D. Woodard, Assistant Plant Manager W. B. Shipman, Maintenance Superintendent D. Morey, Maintenance Supervisor M. Brown, Engineer 2.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Actions on previous findings were not examined during this inspection.
3.
Unresolved Items No unresolved items were identified during this inspection.
4.
Independent Inspection Effort a.
Walk-through Inspection A general walk-through inspection of tb auxiliary building and reactor building was made.
General housekeeping and overall welding and inspection activities were observed.
b.
Preservice Inspection (PSI) Plans The inspector discussed with licensee personnel the plans for PSI. These discussions revealed the following:
.
.
RII Rpt. No. 50-364/78-17 I-2 (1) The PSI will be conducted in accordance with the Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 197, cdition with addenda through the sumner of 1975.
(2) The first planned inspections are portions of the Main Steam and Feedwater systems. These inspections are planned for the latter part of November after steam hydrostatic testing.
'
generator (3) The remainder of the piping inspections are planned for after cold hydrostatic testing, which is now scheduled for March 10, 1979.
-
,
(4) PSI of the reactor vessel is planned for abou+ October of 1979.
(5) Eddy current testing of steam generator tubing is planned for December of 1978.
In addition to discussion of PSI plans, the inspector observed several large diameter main steam pipe welds in the containment and main steam valve room that had been prepared for UT inspection.
,c.
Safety-Related Pipe Welding The inspector observed the following pipe welds during in process welding:
Line Q-2-E21-CCB-1B-E7843 Welds 43, 45, 46 and 47 Line Q-2 B13-HCB-41-E7670 Weld IF Line Q-2-E21-CCB-1C-E-8927 Weld 24F
.
.
Line Q-2-N21-EBD-4-EG2-7 Welds 14 and 15 Line Q-2-N21-EBD-4-EG2-8 Weld 43
.
.
.
RII Rpt. No. 50-364/78-17 I-3 For these welds the inspector examined the " Weld Control Record" for the socket welds, " Controlled Weld Joint Record" for the butt welds, the weld appearance, use of the correct welding filler material, and use of the correct welding procedure.
'
In the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
Exit Interview The inspector had no items of noncompliance or deviations.' These findings and a list of areas inspected were turned over to D. K. '4 alters (RII) for presentation at the exit to be conducted on Octobe. 27, 1978.
.
.
t RII Report No. 50-364/78-17 II-1
///17[/6 DETAILS II Prepared by:
.
D. K. Wafters,' Electrical Engineer
' Date Engineering Support Section No. 1 Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch Dates of Inspection:
October 24-27, 1978 88)27 78 Reviewed by:
n y _
., 3-
' Da t'e
,
J. C. Bryant,\\ Chief g
Engineering Support Section No. 1 Reactor Construction and Engineering
,
Support Branch 1.
Persons Contacted a.
Alabama Power Company (APCO)
- R. E. Hollands, QA Supervisory Engineer
- C. R. Kualheim, QA Engineer
- A. W. Hankins, QA Engineer b.
Daniel Construction Company (DCCA)
- Denotes those present at the exit interview.
2.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Licensee actions on previous inspection findings were not reviewed during this inspection.
"
3.
Unresolved Items
.
No unresolved items were identified during this inspection.
4.
Independent Inspection The in place storage of twelve electrical penetration assemblies (EPA)
was o.
-ved on the inside of the containment. Covers for the EPA's identitied as B020, B025, B028, B030, B031 and B038 were not installed and no work involving the EPA's was being performed.
In the EPA's identified as having covers removed, a metal can was observed in one, rags were observed in two, and construction debris was observed in all six.
.
.
,e
.
RII Report No. 50-364/78-17 II-2 Field Quality Control Procedure (FQCP) 5.2.4, " Storage and Handling",
paragraph 5.1.4.2, states " Covers removed for internal access at any time for any reason shall be replaced immediately after the activity is complete."
The failure to follow FQCP 5.2.4 appears to be in noncompliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V and has been identified as an infraction, 364/78-17-02: Failure to follow procedure for EPA storage.
.
Instrumentation (Components and Systems I) Observation of Work 5.
and Work Activities The inspector selected the reactor coolant flow process variable in the reactor protection system for reactor coolant loops 1 and 2.
The inspector observed the instrument component and system installation from the reactor coolant flow transmitters identified as FT414 (loop 1); FT415(loop 1); FT416 (loop 1); FT424 (loop 2); FT425 (loop 2);
and FT426 (loop 2) to the trip logic in process instrument cabinets identified as:
PIC2505A-1, PIC2505A-2 and PIC2505A-3, including sensing lines and other associated devices. The component and system identification and location, support and protection, in-process inspection and physical separation were observed. The inspector noted that the installed sensing lines for the six flow transmitters were not sloped in the area cf the flow transmitters as required by Note 5 of the associated er ection traveler drawings.
A slope of one Inch per foot minimum was specified by the erection traveler drawings. FQCP 5.4 4.2,
" Instrument Installation and Inspection," paragraph 4.1 states part that "... instrument sensing and control lines
.. shall be installed in accordance with approved drawings, specifications and codes." The reactor coolant flow transmitters had been inspected and accepted.
This failure to follow procedure appears to be in noncompliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V and is identified as an infraction, 364/78-17-01: Failure to Follow Procedure for Instrument Installation.
6.
Instrumentation (Components and S3 stems I) - Review of Quality Records The quality records for receipt inspection, material certification, storage, handling, identification, and installation were reviewed for the instrument components and systems listed in paragraph 5.
Within the areas examined there were no items of noncompliance identi-fie.
.
.
,
RII Report No. 50-364/78-17 II-3 7.
Instrumentation (Cables and Terminations I) - Observation of Work and Work Activities The inspector selected the twelve instrumentation cables listed below for inspection.
2VIV5002H 2V1V5002J 2V1V5001H 2VIV5001J 2V2V5002H 2V2V5002J
-
2V2V5001H 2V2V5001)
2V3V5002E 2V3V5002F 2V3V5001E 2V3V5001F Cable storage, handling, identification, and installation were reviewed.
The inspector reviewed cable issue control procedures and use of specified material.
The cable location, routing, separation and protection between instrument component and process instrument cabinets was visually inspected. Cable tray identification, grounding, bonding, and loading were inspected. Cable terminations were verified visually using cable termination scheme and cable lead identification tags.
Within the areas examined there were no items of noncompliance identi-fied.
8.
Instrumentation (Cable and Terminations I) - Review of Quality Records The quality records for receipt inspection, materials certification and installation were reviewed for the instrument cables listed in paragraph 7.
The cable pulling and termination records had been completed in accordance with FQCP 5.4.3.1., " Cable Pulling",and FQCP 5.4.3.1. A, " Cable Terminations". Cable traceability was verified.
Within the areas examined there were no items of noncompliance identi-fied.
9.
Exit Inte rview The inspector met with the licensee representatives and others denoted in paragraph 1, at the conclusion of the inspection. The scope and findings of the inspection of electrical penetration assembly in place storage, instrument cable installation and records, and instrument component installation and records were discussed.
Infractions 364/78-17-01 and 364/78-17-02, failure to follow procedures, were discussed in detail.