IR 05000344/1988012

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Mgt Meeting Rept 50-344/88-12 on 880325.Areas Discussed: Procedure & Maint Improvement,Outage Activities & Barton Pressure Transmitter Troubleshooting
ML20153G283
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 04/21/1988
From: Mendonca M, Pereira D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20153G275 List:
References
50-344-88-12-MM, NUDOCS 8805110193
Download: ML20153G283 (57)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - 

 .

1 e .- 

 ,
.

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION V

Report No. 50-344/88-12 Docket No. 50-344 License No. NPF-1 Licensee: Portland' General Electric Company 121 Salmon-Street Portland, Oregon 97204 Facility Name: Trojan Nuclear Plant Inspection at: Regin , Wa t ek, California 

       .

Report Prepared by: de ' ', 6Mht d- s.Per 1,af Project Inspector Dat Signed Approved by: 7g / 4//h/ [// M. M. Mendonca, Chief Date Signed Reactor Projects section 1 Meeting Summary: Meeting on March 25,-1988 (Meeting Report No. 50-344/88-12) 

'

A management meeting was held in the Region V office on March 25, 1988 to discuss the licensee's efforts in the areas of procedure and maintenance improvement, outage activities, and Barton pressure transmitter troubleshootin Enclosure (1) provides additional details of the licensee's presentatio PDR ADOCK 05000344 g DCD 

  ._, , . -- .- ._ . _ - . . - . - - - _ . . . . . .

F g i f 

... . ,
.-
   ~ DETAILS 1. Meeting Attendees Licensee Attendees D. W. Cockfield, Vice President, Nuclear T. D. Walt,- Manager, Nuclear Safety and Regulation R. P. Schmitt, Manager, Operations and Maintenance D. W. Swan, Manager, Technical Services D. L. Bennett, Maintenance Supervisor NRC Attendees _

J. B. Martin, Regional Administrator B. H. Faulkenberry, Deputy Regional Administrator D. F. Kirsch, Director, Division _of Reactor Safety and Projects M. M. Mendonca, Chief, Reactor Projects Section I R. A. Scarano, Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards F. A. Wenslawski, Chief, Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch G. Knighton, Director, Project Directorate V, NRR R. C. Barr, Senior Resident Inspector D. B. Pereira, Project Inspector Details of Management Meeting Mr. Faulkenberry opened the meeting recognizing the value of NRC-Licensee informational meetings. He also noted Mr. Martin would be delayed due to a conflicting meetin Mr. Walt began the Portland General Electric (PGE) presentation by stating the meeting topics: a discussion of the planned activities during the 1988 refueling outage, overview of the maintenance improvement and procedure improvement programs, and an update of pressurizer pressure transmitter (Barton Model 763A) troubleshootin Mr. Schmitt began the 1988 refueling outage presentation by listing the subtopics: outage scope and schedule, pre-outage planning, post outage activities and 1987 refueling outage lessons learne Mr. Cockfield briefly described the recently implemented PGE 5-Year Pla He explained the Plan was enacted to improve PGE's long range planning efforts. He explained that in the past, due to not having a well defined long term planning vehicle, commitments and modifications were sometimes deferred beyond the need date Mr. Schmitt continued the outage presentation by listing and briefly discussing each major planned activity for the 1988 refueling outage: defueling, fuel pellet search and retrieval, refueling, steam generator tube inspection and sludge lancing, reactor coolant pump seal inspection and remote shutdown panel installatio __ _ _ .__ __ 

.
' '

. 

,

,-

M Cockfield other stated pressurized PGE is planning)six water-reactor (PWR licenseesdays vice three plan, priordays, which most to allowing unrestricted containment access. He noted the six day period was chosen to assure proper decontamination and surveys of containment, and to assure the outage starts on a deliberate positive ste Mr. Schmitt then reviewed the additional measures PGE was planning to implement to assure positive control of discrete radioactive particles (DRP's). Mr. Xirsch asked what additional initiatives were planned to monitor contract health physics personnel. Mr. Cockfield stated that two new supervisors were added to the permanent staff to easble the radiological control supervisors to spend approximately 25% of their time monitoring the performance of both contract and PGE health physics technician Next, Mr. Swan explained the technique to be used in the retrieval of the fuel pellets. He identified the technique as a water vacuum process that filtered small particles. Mr. Cockfield stated several contractors are involved in the retrieval effort and that Westinghouse would be the coordinating contractor. He noted that the pellet retrieval contract contained incentives and penalties to assure a well coordinated high quality effor.. Mr. Kirsch requested a discussion on the involvement of the Quality Aswrance organization in the fuel pellet retrieval effor Mr. Cockfield stated that substantial contract quality control personnel were added for outage activities. Mr. Wenslawski questioned as to how the fuel particles would be disposed. Mr. Swan stated the retrieved pellets would be transferred to the spent fuel pool in a dummy-like fuel assembly via the fuel transfer canal. He also noted that the amount of material retrieved would determine what future actions would be taken concerning handling storage and shipping of the retrieved material. M Cockfield also noted the contract with Westinghouse for fuel pellet retrieval was a 2-year contract if future retrieval efforts would be needed in the 1989 Refueling Outage. Mr. Cockfield stated the retrieval effort was being undertaken to minimize future discrete radioactive particle events. A brief discussion followed on PGE plans to reconstitute fuel assemblies damaged by baffle jetting impingement during the 1982 operating cycl Mr. Schmitt next described the planned steam generator (S/G) tube inspections. He noted th2 'B' and 'D' SG's were being inspected to address the concerns of NRC Bulletin 88-02. A discussion ensued on the techniques used to inspect the steam generator tubes and to control the reactor flow during mid-loop operation Mr. Bennett next discussed 71anned testing of motor operated valves. He stated that during the past year of operation, safety concerns were generated due to the inability of some safety related motor operated valves to function as designed. He explained the actions planned to further evaluate the concerns and correct the deficiencies with these valve Next, Mr. Swan briefly described the major design change packages (DCP's) planned for the 1988 refueling outage: remote shutdown panel installation, steam generator blowdown system modification, control room . . . - - . - _ _ . - - - - - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

      . _. . _ - _ - - - . _ - - -

' '
,

.

ventilation cooling system modification, station battery replacement and selected feedwater piping inspection and replacement. Mr. Cockfield discussed changes in the requirements for submitting Request for Design Changes (RDCs) in order to improve timeliness. He noted all RDCs for the 1988 refueling outage were required to be submitted by December 31, 198 He said this requirement ensured parts availability, procedure changes and adequate reviews and training. An in-depth discussion followed on 

-

the details of the remote shutdown panel modificatio Mr. Walt stated significant effort would be expended for the inspection of piping supports and their associated anchors. He noted approximately one hundred supports and anchors would be inspected and that approximately fifty supports were scheduled for modificatio Next Mr. Schmitt described improvements made since the 1987 Refueling Outage: development of a 5-Year Plan, pre-determined end date (9/4/87) for score addition, request for design change cut-off date (12/31/87), required procedure change cut-off date (?/31/87) and well-defined operator training. He followed by describing the planred post outage activities. Mr. Schmitt noted improvements had been made in operational preparations, review of documentation and design change processing. He described the start-up verification process in detail. Mr. Schmitt noted that during the start-up following the outage, specific hold points were planned so that plant process parameters could be compared to design parameters. He stated that this would assure early identification of any unexpected system response or equipment malfunctio Mr. Schmitt next discussed the change in the procedure for emergency work authorization. Mr. Cockfield stated that in the past emergency work requests were not required to have detailed work instructions to be approved by the shift supervisor. He stated the change required all emergency work requests, with the exception of those required for immediate protection of the public or plant personnel safety, would require detailed work instructions prior to commencing repair Mr. Martin questioned how the "personnel accountability issue" was prugressing at Trojan. Mr. Cochfield stated programs such as Toward Exceller.cc have resulted in improved performance and a total understanding of accountabilit Mr. Schmitt next described thL past year's efforts aimed at improving the area of maintenance - Maintenance Improvement Program. He noted a self-assessment had been conducted in response to an INP0-NUMARC reques PGE performed the assessment using INP0 provided guidelines. He stated the self-assessment generated forty-three improvement plans. The plans had been assigned to individuals to scope the priorities and manpower needed to implement the recomended actions. Mr. Martin requested a discussion of what the self-assessmeni concluded in the area of preventive maintenance (PM). Mr. Bennett responded stating that no centralized PM program existed. He stated that PMs were performed by procedure, however, the program was not integrated. Mr. Bennett noted that by integrating the PM program, improvements would be realized. M Schmitt also noted PGE is implementing initiatives to improve field supervision.

l 

   . . - . _ - .
    - - . . _ . _ _

_ __ . . _ 

.
' '
.
,   4
.

Mr. Schmitt next discussed improvements being implemented in work planning and control: control of urgent maintenance requests, troubleshooting guidelines, control of lifted leads and post maintenance testin He also briefly discussed maintenance quality controls. Two areas discussed in detail were the philosophy of quality and improvement actions. He noted that the maintenance program required newly hired maintenance technicians to go through a four month training program. He stated this program assured well-trained knowledgeable craftsmen upon their first conduct of plant maintenanc Next Mr. Swan presented the Procedure Improvement Program: background, program development, implementation and planned actions. He stated that in March 1987 a task group was formed to evaluate the quality of Trojan plant procedures. The task force developed a 5-phase improvement plan that was initiated in mid-1987. He stated the Procedure Improvement Program was integrated with the design basis document effort and was scheduled to be completed in 199 Mr. Cockfield next presented the progress made in resolving the cause of the Barton Model 763A pressure transmitters used to sense pressurizer pressure. He stated that pressure transducers and temperature sensors had been added to all pressurizer pressure transmitter sensing line These were added to detect any rapid pressure pulses or temperature changes that might be contributing to the cause of the failures. M Cockfield noted no pressure or temperature transients had been detected since the sensors had been installed. He also noted a Barton pressurizer pressure transmitter had failed since the installation of the sensor Mr. Cockfield stated that as a result of the most recent failure, and having seen no unexpected pressure or temperature transients, PGE concluded the Kerotest isolation valves were operating as designed and not contributing to the Barton 763A pressure transmitter failures. M Cockfield stated that the temporary bypass line which had earlier been installed around the Kerotest isolation valve, was removed following the transmitter failure. He stated that Barton has identified that the bourdon tube lots for the failed 763A instruments was different fro: the previously reliable 763 instruments. He stated the determination of root cause was continuin Mr. Martin concluded the meeting by stating PGE efforts in the areas presented appeared to be thorough and comprehensive. He restated that informational meetings were an effective communication teol to update Regional management of ongoing utility efforts for self-improvements, l l l l 

      :

, 

    ----w --

w .w w

m , u' g 

., Uk     <
.. , ..    ,

g r 

  <
 .   .
     (
?
.. ,;f l
 .

PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC' TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT QUARTERLY COMMUNICATION MEETING 

   -

INTRODUCTION -.T..D. WALT 

   -

1988 OUTAGE - R. P. SCHMI1T 

   -

MAINTENANCE - R. P. SCHMITT 

   -

PROCEDURE UPGRADE - D. W. SWAN 

  .-

PRESSURIZER PRESSURE TRANSMITTERS - D. W. C0CKFIELD .

O Escbrare L _ . _ - . _ _ _ _ _ . . . - - _ ._ . - - _ . . 

. _. . _ . . _ . _ . _ . _ ,.. _ . . _ .. _ _ .  .. . _ _ _ . . _ . . .
         '

s.. x . 

>
.
 '
.            ..
  1. , g. _ ' 'o
'

i s 

+
 .

" 1988 OUTAGE + OUTA'GE SCOPE'AND SCHEDULE: PRE-0UTAGE PLANNING * 

   -POST-0UTAGE ACTIVIIIES i
:    LESSONS LEARNED: FROM LAST OUlAGE
            ,

i 

            :

            ;
            >

e f . 

            :
            .
            ,

r h l r 

            !

l 

            .

i 

            !

t 

  -
            :

i i 

            !

' 

    - . _ . , _ . . . . - - . , . . . . . _ , _ _ _ _ - . . . _ _ . , . _ _ , _ _ . _ _ . . _ , . - . . . _ . -

          . . ,
          . .A 1988 OUTf'E      .e .

April May , 1314151617181920212223242526272829301 5 M S M S M 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S9 10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031 M S M S M S M - Nit Off Line 

* Reactor Shutdown l - -- lContainmentSurveys l-l Decontamination and Lead shielding
.
 " Open Containment
 * Polar Crane l- l Pre-refueling Activities
  * Remove Reactor Head l l Unioad Fuel  l l Vacutsn Reactor Flange and Fuel Path / Core Map l  l Fut1 Pellet Retrieval l lReloadFuel l==l Set Reactor Head / Install Tent l  lSteamGeneratorStudgeLance   l lCavityDecon l  lPostRefuelingActivities l   lEddyCurrentSteam Generators "A" and "D" a Fill and Vent l   l "B" and "D" Reactor Coolant Ptsup Seal Inspection i

l lReadyforStartup Startupl l ! 

        * Work Completion Date
         : Unit on Line a

i 

 !st  2nd  3rd  4th  5th i  I I  i I  i l  i I  i sM  sM  s M-  s M-  sM  s sM 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

 .- ..
.
\
' '
(- ,

e d' DISCRETE RADI0 ACTIVE PARTICLE (DRP) CONTROL 

.,
 -

RETRIEVAL OF FUEL PAR 11CLES FROM THE REAC10R VESSEL AND REFUELING CAVITY 

 -

ZONE CONTROL 0F CONTAINMENT AND OTHER AREAS WHERE DRPS ARE LIKELY 10 OCCUR 

 -

NEW SURVEY TECHNIQUES FOR LOCATING DRPS 

 -

IMPROVED PERSONNEL MON 110 RING TECHNIQUES - ADDED FRISKER B00lHS FOR PEOPLE LEAVING CONTAINMENT 

 -

UPGRADED RADIA110N TECHNICIAN TRAINING PROGRAM 10 STRESS DRP MONITORING, MEASURING, AND CONTROL TECHNIQUES 

 -

UPGRADED GENERAL EMPLOYEE TRAINING 10 STRESS DRP PROBLEMS 

     '

, - RECLEANED 93-F001 AND 105-F00T AREAS OF 1HE FUEL l BulLDING 10 ELIMINATE ERRAN1 PAR 11CLES 

 -

ADDITIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION STAFF 10 ENSURE MORE i FIELD SUPERVISION AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT i ! - PLANNING FUNC110N - RADIA110N WORK PERM 11S/ALARA WORK PLAN / RADIATION PROTEC110N WORK INSTRUCTIONS l l 

  *

i ! l .. 

^
        ~'
 , \- _
. . -,  .*
-O .

s 1 * . *' l' U s 1 

: '

. FUEL-PELLET-RETRIEVAL - 

     -

REACTOR VESSEL VIDE 0 INSPECTION 

      -- LOWER' CORE PLATE
      -- TIE' PLATES - LOWER INTERNALS
      -- LOWER INTERNALS LEDGE
     - VACUUM
     - REMOVE-CORE BARREL
     - VACUUM LOWER ELLIPTICAL HEAD
     -

REFUELING CAVITY l l , t - l-l l ! 

     .

i l l l t 

- . , , , , - , - - - , . ~ ~ ~ . - _ . - - , , , - - , , , - - - , , , -  - \
'  *

, ( , 

%
-

l l l l ( FUEL PELLET RETRIEVAL i YActAN SYSTEM ASSDELY (SCHEWATIC) ! l 

      .

i , LIFTDtG . l Mn

-

AIA SUFFLY 

            \

L'ATER LEVEL CONDUIT MAST N-15 SECTIONS 6 60') 7 ~ 

             .PLHP
    '
    .

r 

    '
     .
     -

s 

      , FILTER   /

A3ST 

    /

2" DISCRAAGI NOSE I 2" SUCTION BOSE k 

    '          l
   '
     (won cotursIsLx)        r
             .- -
             ,

J0ENSON 

    '         SCREIN
             .

NOSE CuMP5 1 - . ir 

     -

            .
    "

FICK UP MOZ.ZLZ ' 

   ./ f            .

l l l l - -- . . - - - . - - - - - - _ - _ , - _ , - - _ _ _ _ , - - _ _ . . _ , _ , . . . - . _ . . . - - - - , . - . - - - . . . - - - - - - - - - , .

--_______-____-___ ___________- __________-_ _ _-____ - __ _ ___________-_ - -__ 

               ;
               .
               *-
               .'
               .*

FUEL PELLET RETRIEVAL - LOWER CORE INTERN.'.LS 

     .
            .

Manway Cove, Fuel Assembly Gaide Psi (386) 

       -n mu "I i g"'r r  -
           -- A !!r- _ x !!_ . _ l h, hrP .Mf/ i i

QT' 

          "

Ri}X1thdyhj1ghf"r}l Suppost Ring ' Lower Cose Plate J 

      .
       ,.-. . - . - - - --,
          ,
          - -. - - -
             .
      .. ,   T .
           .
       '

Radial Support --+ 

       
          ..k l p'.   '\,

Key (6) ., NN h ! q . Co.e S.-t > 

      :, % y' '. ,

4 -(-%4$- 9;p ,-(-y.-f-g f -f 

            /
 -

T / l (Core Support Column 

              "

Cove Supposa '* - 

             '

Column & Sleeve (96) 1' 1 2 2 2 b< :*) Upper Tee Plate 

        '

1 I . 

          '~
            !Zh l Lower Tee Plate - ) -
          '
          -

Instrunentation Guide Column (Cruciformi (25) f' , Butt Type Column (30) Off Set instrumentation Secondary Core Suppost Column 

\
.

i e 4 . 

*
.t
,

e me!" - Wk '*\ , 

     $ ??%%v . ,.

m r'p 8" en 

      )I h i1 -

4 

      *

x c=> fa , 

       ?
  '
  \   'NT * * *t.:fsgs?    /5 O    #@@ T"g;j g3j    , p
  [[   MU:g;;;iii!$gj;;;g:,3;;33 tI30 I n: Pi:     1 7 6i::i:iH:il!::

j:a ;::: u :e:r - e }l ....!!.!.i.,I,.a:i..:! 2:E il1 ,Jj',Il, a 

    .   .
     .-

5 }l2.').....:: g j - 

    - u!.:i!!iii:S  e .! -

m. ::a::<. g , y 1 1 l liiW" ,. 3 - cp I l5 ' ) }}N I /"lC]t w 

       ,

i J j a? i .I: 

       ,

ci I I J .. l h 

    -
        /,. i s I. :.,i {

g4i ] =g . :il[m._ . 

        ,-g -,,ig{ >

ff s li - 

.z Y
 ;!

e{ ,_% < 

    -
    &   } *w%*    ;
$     J van._ . 1tQf,7;  - g }   g  %    _.,
$ g 1.- .f ' m;.. '  / '? /h_   4 h; - ]

b e z e  ; 

   / W'   PF a
        "*-~
          -N j+'.

c: - - !. smhs -- 

       >
        /.-u stJ 'n  a:

H ct g J

8-8t 1[t 'p4A / r.03 2 / [K g i 

    **    4 W w   Il
        - lI N p w   .: t jg
     .
      / ,,%w-  . E'  ,. *T t-

  (, ,. s   :
     /
      '

c'-:fl-ge 

        . M. .'.!. -

  ,3-
     '%
     .
       -=. ,cl) A,  1.',
  ,'
     ' %%", . a.i >= ==#J l  -

a  : I. - 

 -G } ' '

C t' s a ..} jsA i ) T ' 

          ,:4::
          .-
          %
          'f

, 

 -

m,. c:

l I

5!- 1; vg __ p ,. - gi ~ . t ur--d2 4 h .: z $  !. *) I**; t .e ,- 

         +  -;

l  ![ g ;j qt ..i 

         -

i, s . p': 12 N'N Q 

       ~
       "  -; t
 '
   [.        ;
          '
         [i

. l ij q' l!:. i t! '*

I Iib:. l . :: !. w 

        &- e--
    : n.n<

T I - ?-" ,, st t k:.- 1 

   ;0
         ~ }y I

l 

    'i!::,. '

7- I jjg4 r ,... 

      ..

a , 

         ,

l

I i I l 

           ,

l l 

   !
,

kh r ss wlet e aap euP i f sl a CW NF l n n e ura a FTC 

-    \

ti P g i n t r o d i t a P a o l v r o L e e r k u l E o e 

-
.

_ s F D d a t n l e gs rn C e u i eo p F ia f sp l\ g S w e n nU ar m N g a Te l es t l I m FS uy F 

   \ o gh r   jmin nc o    at i f

t ah FLW ri wle vei cn #'/ e ul NFEW . e e gr nu rl so Cat x e ag Ch i prnar RCF peo Ut nS t I r r femo sed y l nt n t i v e a so uryp a FTSU rl so C e na ag D wr r oeo - in l Lt t e I nS f u e R 

   -

r,^ o r 

   - o C

m e d 

     . O ll

'
..
' *
;< ,
 ,

.., 

.

J _ 1988 OUTAGE SCOPE 

 -

APRll 13TH TO MAY 31ST - 49 DAYS 

 *

OTHER MAJOR OUTAGE ACTIVITIES 

 - INSERVICE INSPECTIONS
 - "A", "C", AND "D" REACTOR COOLANT PUMP' MOTOR OIL COOLER INSPEC110N
 -
 "B" REACTOR C0OLANT LOOP H01 LEG ELB0W EXAMINATION
 - SNUBBER 1NSPECTIONS-
 - CONDENSER TUBE INSPEC110HS
 - CONTAINMENT LOCAL LEAK RATE TES11NG
 - GTEAM GENERATOR SECONDARY SIDE INSPECTION
 -

VALVE AND PUMP MAINTENANCE 

  .

-
,

s s' 

%     >

e M0 VATS 

-

PERFORMED TES11NG IN 1987 OUTAGE PER BULLETIN 85-03 

 - DEVELOPED DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE AND THRUST BASELINE DATA
-

THREE VALVES FAILED IN DECEMBER 1987 

 - ONE FAILURE DUE 10 INADEQUATE STEM LUBRICA110N -

ENGINEERING 10 RESOLVE THIS PROBLEM BEFORE THE END OF THE 1988 OUTAGE ' 

 - REMAINING TWO FAILURES OCCURRED ON VELAN VALVES WHICH MAY HAVE A UNIQUE PROBLEM

' ' 

 - STANDARD THRUST VALUES FOR VELAN VALVES WERE UNACCEPTABLE - NEW THRUST VALUES HAVE BEEN CALCULATED AND VALVES TESTED SATISFACTORY
-

1988 OUTAGE 

 - ADJUST THRUST VALUES FOR SIX ADD 1110NAL VELAN VALVES
-

UPDATE BULLETIN 85-03 SUBMIT 1AL IN MAY 1988 

-

WORKING W11H M0VAlS 10 REFINE DIFFEREN11AL PRESSURE AND THRUS1 VALUES l l l t 

 .

l 

-
-, u,
. ,- -, .
 
;AY'1,
., .
.

J

r 

 - . PLANT MODIFICATIONS
 -- REMOTE SHUTDOWN PANEL
 -- STEAM GENERATOR BLOWDOWN SYSTEM
 -- CONTROL ROOM VENTILATION
 -.FEEDWATER PIPING (EROSION / CORROSION)
 -- STATION' BATTERIES-
 -- LARGE-BORE PIPE SUPPORT VERIFICATION

, 

 --

WHIP RESTRAINT ROCK BOLT INSPECTION l ( l i 

  .

 .
.S
, . .
'

B . REMOTE SHUTDOWN PANEL 

-

REASON FOR MODIFICATION 

 - EXISTING PANEL NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPENDIX R
 - ORIGINALLY DESIGNED AS AN AUXILIARY FEEDWATER (AFW)

CONTROL PANEL ONLY 

 - INADEQUATE HUMAN FACTOR DESIGN
-

MODIFICATION TO BE PERFORMED 

 - REPLACE EXISTING AND ADDING PANEL
 - RELOCATE FROM TURBINE BUILDING TO CONTROL BUILDING
-

WHA 1 NEW PANEL WILL DO 

 - CRT DISPLAYS OF KEY SYSTEMS
 - AFW CONTROLS
 - STEAM GENERATOR POWER-OPERATED RELIEF VALVE CONTROLS
 - CHARGING AND LETDOWN CONTROLS
 - ALARM FUNCTIONS FOR CRITICAL PARAMETERS
 .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ._ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

,
 :-
'
's  .
.

STEAM GENERATOR BLOWDOWN 

  -

REASON FOR MODIFICATION 

  - RESOLVE OPERATIONAL PROBLEMS AND' PERSONNEL SAFETY CONCERNS
  - INCREASE CAPACITY FROM 50 10 100 GPM/ STEAM GENERATOR
  *

MODIFICATION 10 BE PERFORMED 

  - REPLACES ENTIRE SYSTEM (TANK, HEAT EXCHANGER, PUMP, CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVES, CONTROLS)
  - PRvVIDES FOR HEAT RECOVERY IN 3B FEEDWATER HEATER
  - ADDS NEW LIQUID RADWASTE DEMINERAllZERS
  +

WHAT WE GET 

  - IMPROVED STEAM GENERATOR CHEMISTRY
  - HEAT RECOVERY FROM BLOWDOWN
  - IMPROVED PERSONNEL SAFETY AND RELIABILITY l

l l l . l 

 . ., . .
@* : ;(ML . .  -
, .c . :. m - - . .
.$, . ,n..,,

g;W,.a? 

.
'
 -

3av t , n'- 

:y bi
  -

, > c ' CONTROL ROOM VENTILATION 

     .
<
 ' REASON FOR MODIFICATION
  - IMPROVE COOLING DURING OPERATION OF EMERGENCY-VENTILATION SYSTEM
  - IMPROVE INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS
 * MODIFICATION TO BE PERFORMED pg
  - ADD TWO NEW CHILLERS
  - ADDING FLOW MEASURING INSTRUMENTATION

,

l '.

, ' 

,

{ i l i e 

. . - - .. . . . - .

.
--. ..
-v -
 ,
,
,

1-, 

 .

, 

     .-

FEEDWATER PIPING 

 -

EMBARKED ON MAJOR INSPECTION AND REPLACEMENT EFFORI DURING THE 1987 OUTAGE 

 -

VENDOR. PERFORMED INDEPENDENT REVIEW 0F PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS . 

 -

CONTINUING INSPECTION AND REPLACEMENT EFFORT IN 1988 g l l l l 

  -

! l t- , 

*
, .
.;,
.
.
.
.
 -

STATION BATTERIES 

 -

REASON FOR MODIFICATION 

 - INSUFFICIENT CAPACITY MARGIN
 - OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS
 - N0 NEW LOADS CAN BE ADDED
 - ANTICIPATED STATION BLACK 0UT REQUIREMENTS
 *

MODIFICATION TO BE PERFORMED 

 - REPLACE EXISTING BATTERIES WITH LARGER CAPACITY BATTERIES (1800 AMP-HOURS VERSUS 700 AMP-HOURS)
 - REPLACE MAIN BATTERY BREAKERS TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH INCREASED CAPACITY
 - ESTABLISH PERMANENT TEST BREAKER CONNECTIONS TO IMPROVE TEST CAPABILITY
 - FUSING ALL DISTRIBUTION PANEL BRANCH FEEDERS

I t i 

  .

i 

 -  ,-. . . - - . . .
\~

m , 

 '
( ~ -J.' .

ii " ,. 

  ,LARGE-BORE PIPE _ SUPPORT VERIFICATION
     ,

l 

 * COMPLETION OF PlPE SUPPORT DESIGN VERIFICA110N PROGRAM FROM 1987 OUTAGE
 * VERIFY ADEQUACY OF EXIS11NG DESIGN (SUPPORT CALCULA110NS, WELD ADEQUACY, LOADS)
 - AS OF MARCH 21, 1988, VERIFICA110N COMPLETED ON 3070 SUPPORTS (3565 TOTAL SUPPORTS IN PROGRAM) '
 - IN111AL VERIFICA110N TO BE COMPLETE BY APRll 15, 1988
 - TO BE SUBST ANTI ALLY COMPLETE W11H WHOLE PROGRAM BY -

JULY 1, 1988 , 

     ,
 *

COMPLETE MODIFICA110NS IDENTIFIED DURING VERIFICATION , PROGRAM 

 - AS OF MARCH 21, 1988, ~50 MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN IDEN11FIED - NO MODifICA110NS AFFEC1 SYS1EM OPERABIL11Y
 -

WALKDOWN. SUPPORTS INSIDE CON 1AINMENT REQUIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMA110N 10 COMPLETE CALCULA110NS

. - AS OF MARCH 21, 1988, ~125 SUPPORTS ARF, 10 BE WALKED DOWN L

l i ! ! i 

  .

l l . 

      .
       <

d\ . .l . 

       '

I 

.,.
.

4*.,'- _ 

 ,
      .,-
 '
.,       b l

' 

       !

q 

,
   - WHIP RESTRAINT ROCK ~ BOLT INSPEC110N

.. 

 -

REASON FOR INSPECTION 

 - FOLLOW-UP ON ROCK BOLT ADEQUACY VERIFICATION PROGRAM FROM 1987 OUTAGE
 - CONF 1RM AS-BUIL1-DEPTH OF INSTALLAT10N OF ROCK BOLTS USED FOR WHIP RES1RAINTS
       !
 -

ACliv1 TIES TO BE PERFORMED 

 - MEASURE EMBEDMENT DEPlH'0F ACCESSIBLE ROCK BOLTS FOR WHIP-RESTRAIN 1S     :
       .
       !
       !
,

a !i

'l . 

. _ . _ . _ _ - _ . _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . , _ _ _ -- - . .

 . _ _ . .
     .
,

s 

* *     '
.c ,
'
     ,
,
.
     !

PRE-0UTAGE PLANNING IMPROVEMENTS [ FIVE-YEAR PLANNING 

 -

OUTAGE FREEZE ON JOBS AFTER SEPTEMBER 4, 1987 ALL DESIGN CHANGES ISSUED BY THE END OF 1987 DESIGN CHANGES INCORPORATED INTO PROCEDURES BY MARCH 31,

1988 ' TEST PROCEDURES ISSUED BY MARCH 31, 1988 

 * OUTAGE MATERIAL ONSITE BY MARCH 4, 1988 MONTHLY SENIOR MANAGEMENT MEETINGS SCHEDULE WALKDOWNS AND INSPECTIONS TO MINIMlZE OUTAGE SCHEDULE IMPACT OPERATOR TRAINING

, j 

 - INP0 OUTAGE ASSISTANCE VISIT

! COMBINED SCOPE SINGLE VENDOR CONTRACT FOR REFUELING AND MAJOR CONTAINMENT WORK i l 

  '

l i , 

    .
 '
,t
' '

s , 

,, -
.
     '

OPERATOR TRAINING 

 -

PRE-0UTAGE CLASSROOM TRAINING ON NEW DESIGN CHANGES AND PROCEDURE CHANGES 

 - ALL TRAINING COMPLETED PRIOR TO START OF OUTAGE
 -

REMOTE SHUTDOWN STATION TRAININ CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION ON SYSTEM OPERATION AND PROCEDURE CHANGES 

 - HANDS-ON TRAINING'TO UPERATE THE SYSTEM AND WALK-THROUGH PROCEDURES
 -

READY-FOR-STARTUP TRAINING ON FIELD MODIFICATIONS ON CHANGES MADE DURING OUTAGE AND LESSONS LEARNED FROM PREVIOUS STARTUPS 

 -

PRE-SHIFT BRIEFING DURING OUTAGE BEFORE ALL MAJOR EVOLUTIONS, SPECIAL EVENTS, OR UNUSUAL TESTS - - PROCEDURE USE AND COMPLIANCE 

 -

RECOGNITION AND RESPONSE TO UNUSUAL CONDITIONS 

 -

FORMALITY l 

-

! \ - l l 

--
     .

,t
* *
,, , ,
.

PROCEDURE USE AND COMPLIANCE 

 -

PLANT MANAGER AND VICE PRESIDENT MEETINGS WITH ALL EMPLOYEES 'f0 DISCUSS STANDARDS AND EXPECTATIONS FOR PROCEDUPE COMPLIANCE AND OTHER KEY AREAS - JUNE / JULY 198 FOLLOW-UP MEETINGS W11H ALL MANAGERS AND SUPERVISORS TO CON 11NUE 10 REINFORCE MANAG"MENT STANDARDS AND PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON PERFORMANCE - i NTINUIN TRAINING FOR ALL PERSONNEL ON PROCEDURE COMPLIANCE - DECEMBER 1987/ JANUARY 198 PLAN 1 MANAGER AND VICE PRESIDENT PRESENTATIONS TO ALL EMPLOYEES DURING GENERAL EMPLOYEE RETRAININ REINFORCEMENT OF PHILOSOPHY IN DAILY MANAGEMENT WALK-1HROUGHS, AR1'S LINK-LETTER, CORRESPONDENCE, ET QUAllTY ASSURANCE EMPHASIS ON EVALUATING PROCEDURES AND COMPLIANCE DURING AUDIT PLANT MANAGER TO VIS11 ALL PLAN 1 WORK GROUP DEPARTMENT MEE11NGS TO DISCUSS PROCEDURE USE AND COMPLIANCE AND ANSWER OVEST10NS - FEBRUARY / MARC PRE-001 AGE EVALUA110N BY PERFORMANCE MON 110 RING / EVENT ANALYSIS 10 DETERMINE CONTRACTOR AND TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE i UNDERS1ANDING OF PROCEDURE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS.

l 

 .

l (

it i \ 

,,
' ' .1 .-
 '

o,' 

.

POST-0UTAGE ACTIVITIES- 

 *

READY FOR STARTUP 

 - FORMAL PROGRAM TO ENSURE PLANT IS READY TO RETURN TO OPERATION

 - 24 AREAS OF REVIEW
 -- OPERATIONAL PREPARA110NS VALVE LINEUPS CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS AND ANNUNCIATORS SURVEILLANCE STATUS OPERATOR TRAINING LOCKED VALVE LIST PLANT HOUSEKEEPING AND CLEANLINESS SYSTEM INTEGRITY IN CONTAINMENT CONTAINMENT INTEGR11Y PLANT CHEMISTRY CREW BRIEFING MANAGEMENT SHIFT COVERAGE POSI-MAINTENANCE TESTING
 -- DOCUMEN1AT10N REVIEW NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS / NONCONFORMING AC11VITY REPORTS CLEARANCE LOGS AND SAFETY-RELATED OUTAGE SHEETS MAINTENANCE REQUESTS REQUESTS FOR EVALUA110N COMM11 MENT TRACKING LIST TECHNICAL SPECIFICA110N CHANGES EVENT REPORTS POST-TRIP REVIEWS PHYSICS TESTING PROGRAM
 -- DESIGN CHANGES REQUEST FOR DESIGN CHANGE (RDC) STATUS TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS RDC WORK COMPLETION
 - FINAL SIGN-0FF AND AFPROVAL BY PLANT MANAGER
 -

NEW PROGRAM FOR FORCED OUTAGES 

  .

a 

. ,
 -  , .- - . . . , . . - .. . .- - .-
 '
  !
 .

3,, I*. . .. 

-
      ,
. . .
,

P 

       ,
       ?

STARTUP VERIFICATION 

       .j
 -

FORMAL PROGRAM TO ENSURE OPERATION WITHIN DESIGN PARAMETERS FOLLOWING STARTUP 

 -

IDEN11FY AND EVALUATE KEY PLANT PARAMETERS i 

 - - FORMAL TEST PROCEDURE AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
,
 -

FORMAL HOLDS DURING POWER ESCALATION CORRESPONDING TO PHYSICS TES11NG

- COLLECT DATA
 - MANIPULATE CONTROLS / VERIFY RESPONSE

't 

 -

ENGINEERING REVIEW AND DUTY PLANT MANAGER APPROVAL PRIOR 10 CON 11NUED POWER ESCALATION .

1 i l

l 

   .
 -e,- - - . . - - - . . - - . , m, c. - ,

 , . . - -  . _ . _ . ..
. i hl ?. . .

. .p' '~' T 

.
:,
'

r t 

 .

INPO OUTAGE ASSISTANCE VISIT PURPOSE 

 - REVIEW PREPARATIONS FOR 1988 OUTAGE
 - EVALUATION OF OUTAGE PERFORMANCE
 -- MAY 1988
 * AREAS REVIEWED
 - OUTAGE MANAGEMENT
 - PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
 - OPERATIONS INVOLVEMENT
 - EXPERIENCE UTILIZATION
 - MAINTENANCE     ,

t 

 - PLANT MODIFICA110NS
 - DESIGN INTERFACE
 - MATERIALS MANAGEMENT    ,
 - RADIATION PROTECTION
      !

l 

      ,
      .
-
   , - , , - . , , . -- -- - - . - . . - ,

<
;i
-
    ,
,
.. .
'
..
.

L 

 -

CONCLUSIONS 

 - STRENGTHS-
 -- OUTAGE SCHEDULE WELL-DEVELOPED USING INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES
 -- WELL-DEVELOPED PROCEDURES FOR DEALING WITH RADI0 ACTIVE PARTICLES DURING REFUELING AND MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS
 -- GOOD COOPERATION BETWEEN PLANT DEPARTMENTS AND GOOD UTILIZATION OF RESOURCES
 - IMPROVEMENTS
 -- IMPROVE TRACKING PROGRESS OF PRE-0UTAGE ACTIVITIES AND REPORTING PROGRESS TO MANAGEM' INT
 -- DEVELOP ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES TO DEFINE DUTIES OF PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH OUTAGE PLANNING l  -- IMPROVE ORDERING AND RECEIPT INSPECTION OF SPARE I  PARTS AND MATERIAL
 -- IMPROVE OPERATIONS INVOLVEMENT IN PREPARATION OF OUTAGE SCHEDULE AND WORK PR10RllIZAT10N l
 -- IMPROVE RADIATION PROTECTION PRACTICAL FACTORS TRAINING

, 

  .

L

. - . Jt 

*.' .-
.

MANAGEMENT' LESSONS LEARNED 

.

GREATER AWARENESS OF RESPONSIBILITIES AND DIRECTION 

 - BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF MOTHERHOOD
-

RAPID AND DIRECT MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT 

-

GREATER ATTENTION TO DETAll 

*

IMPROVED MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION 

-

PERSONAL ACCOUNTABILITY 

-

FORMAL APPROACH TO PROBLEM SOLVING 

 .

=

0 ' 

.,
*

s,

MAINTENANCE 

 > +

SELF-ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 

 -

ORGANIZATION 

 *

WORK PLANNING AND CONTROL 

 -

MAINTENANCE QUALITY CONTROL i l l .

i l l ,

i ! l l l 

 .

  .. _ _ _ _ _ _.__ __-_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _   _ _ _ _ _ _  __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
'
^a
,                 ,
.,
.. .
 '
. ?: . . i
                 -:
f a

SELF-ASSESSMENT PROGRAM i 

 . PURPOSE
 -

RECOGNIZED' IMPROVEMENT REQUIRED I 

 -- EVALUATE TROJAN MAINTENANCE PROGRAM-IN RELATION T0-
  - INP0 CRITERIA
 -

IDENTIFY AREAS OF 1.MPROVEMENT 

!

l - . > 

 * SCOPE                '
                 .
 -

REVIEWED ALL AREAS RECOMMENDED BY INP0  ! MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND APPROVAL 

                 :
 * ACTION PLANS e

.

REASSESSMENT

! 

                 ! t

, < t, 

                 ;

l i ' , f l 

                 ;

' i l , . 

                 }

! i c' ~ 

 -

w s ,--em.- g~~am- -,,- ,,,-_,.--_m-, ,.n.,_,, , , _ . _- - - , ,., ,--,..e., . . . , - , - - , .. -n. - -- ..,- m- - - -

_ _ _ _ . 

,".
.
,
.
,,
.

SELF-ASSESSMENT SCOPE MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION OF MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL MAINTENANCE FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, AND TOOLS TYPES OF MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PRc' tDURES PLANNING, SCHEDULING, AND COORDINATION OF MAINTENANCE CONTROL OF MAINTENANCE ACTlvlTIES POST-MAINTENANCE TESTING PROCUREMENT OF PARTS, MATERIALS, AND SERVICES MATERIAL RECEIPT, INSPECTION, HANDLING, STORAGE, RETRIEVAL, AND ISSUANCE CONTROL AND CAllBRATION OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT CONTROL STATION MATERIAL COND1110N INSPECTION MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT ! , MAINTENANCE HISTORY ANALYSIS OF MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS

l ! l l ! i i 

 .

   '

E s N t  %  % 

%      %  %
. a     N  N
,      N  N
*      N  %
.*  L     %  %
 %     %  %
. <      N -

N N 

     %   %

N N 

     %   %
     %   %
     %   %
     %   %

N N N  % N N L N N { ce N N E N  % - 

     %   %
     %   %
     %   %
     %   %
     %   %
    - %   N N %   %
    % %   %
    % %   %
    % %   %
 .O   N N   N c   % %   %

A N N- 

   % %   %
   % %   N N %   %
   % %   %

N N N 03  % % N co N N N 

 @  N N   N N  % %   N N %   %

C  % % . N ce s %  % N 

~

9  %  % - 

  %  %   %

D  %  %  % 9  %  % N h  % N 

    %

N 

       %

N G  %  % N 41  %  %  % 

  %  %   %
  %  %   %
.. N  -   N 8-0  N     N E 4  %     %
'1 c  %     % -

Ll 

'
'

N % N N N  % M N N N M N N  % 

 % %

o % % O 

.-

2  % 

  %

N 

  %
<  % %
%'  % %
'  % %
  % %
  % %

W  % - 4  % E N N 

 .J N U N O  N N

N N N N 

  %
  %
  %
  %
 .J N A %

G % L1 

 %
 %
 %
 %

N N to N 

 & N N N N

M N D % 

 <
  .J W  L   T w

O i C 

 .C d  4 J C >  @ L O in
 % w G C o C sa .C  O E C w ft 3 4 .* O .d uu uw C re C
 @4 @  L 4J .d * C .d .c @ Q .C) - C 4 .J U C .J
  *d O U +J 'd rf - to u .d C .* * Aw u .3a * C C A C Mw A < U .O C 0 .d .J w .J .J L 9 0 (U O c ac Cd A cc C w w .* 3 cC C 3
 .J f k 4E C CE A u +8 ft J .O LT- O Q-U .ta u O u te 3 o CC 3 u * ce 4w w O
      .J u O u uO w u  w u Mo4W uL 4 O. .Cc E .)

m GW GG E .4d ttw G C we 4d u6 U O U U L 0C u6 > to ta3 > > ct to u > V 4D .O .a In: A L1 U < < CE L C to @ 0 u O c .cd @w to @ cc4 L A@ < A Q< A CE A QA 4 3 CE tt 2 4 e * 

'
,
..
 '

l, * .. 

*x
.
,

MAINTENANCE SELF-ASSESSMENT ACTION PLAN INDEX ACTION PLAN NUMBER SUBJECT A-1 CONDUCT OF DEPARTMENT MANUAL A-2 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT A-3 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE l-1 STAFFING l-2 G0ALS AND OBJECTIVES 11-1 TRAINING PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION, AND UPGRADE 11-2 QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR 0JT EVALUATORS 11-3 MINOR REVISION TO TAP-170 11-4 DELETION OF AP-2-1 AND AP-2-2 111-1 LAYOUT OF SHOP AND SATELLITE WORK AREAS 111-2 SHOP CLEANLINESS 111-3 MAINTENANCE LAYDOWN AND STAGING AREAS l 111-4 STORAGE IACILITIES l 111-5 0FFICE E.*JIPMENT V-1 PROCEDURE 

   '

V-2 VENDOR MAN Vll-1 MAINTENANCE REQUEST PROCESS IX-1 MATERIAL CONTROL DEPARTMENT CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS MANUAL IX-2 SPARE PARTS UPDATE FOLLOWING DESIGN CHANGES l IX-3 SELECTION OF PROCUREMENT SOURCES l l 

 .

lw 

-
.;. .
.

ACTION PLAN NUMBER SUBJECT IX-4 STOCK REPLENISHMENT "REPEATER CARD" BACKLOG IX-5 SHELF-LIFE LIMITATIONS AND INTERCHANGEABILITY CERTIFICATIONS IX-6 POOLED SPARE PARTS SYSTEM IX-7 RESOLUTION OF DEFICIENT AND NONCONFORMING ITEMS IX-8 PARTS AND MATERIALS REORDER SYSTEM IX-9 MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS OF PARTS OR MATERIALS IX-10 LONG LEAD TIME REQUIREMENTS X-1 QC RECEIPT INSPECTION X-2 STORAGE FACILITIES X-3 SEGREGATION OF MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT X-4 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE X-5 SHELF-LIFE X-6 PARTS DESIGNATED FOR MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES OR MODIFICATIONS X-7 HOISTING EQUIPMENT XI-l ISSUANCE XI-2 PROCEDURE UPGRADES Xi-3 IDENTIFICATION OF M&TE X11-1 TOOL AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE l X11-2 SPECIAl. TOOLS AND EculPMENT X111-1 MATERIAL AND HOUSEKEEPING INSPECTION X111-2 CIGARETTE AND TRASH RECEPTACLES XV-1 MAINTENANCE HISTORY PROGRAM XVI-l MINOR PROCEDURE REVISIONS 

 -

l L 

 . _ - _ _ _ _ _ __ - _ _ _
     '
>

j , . 

. , . .  ...

_.y- . 

:' . .
             !

KEY MAINTENANCE ACTION PLANS ACTION PLAN DESCRIPTION __ l V-1 PROCEDURES A-1 CONDUCT OF DEPARTMENT MANUAL 4 A-3 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE A-2 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT XV-1 MAINTENANCE HISTORY .; l-1 STAFFING VII-1 MAINTENANCE REQUEST PROCESS 11-1 TRAINING PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT 

     .

J 

  . . . m.---_m.-_ . , _ , , - .,__r . _ _ . . -. ,, ., y,_,u,..._ _ _ , , , , , _ . - . . . , _ _ _ _ _ , _ . _ , _ . . _ _ _ , _ _ . _ ,


.
.;, * '
.
,

KEY SUPPORT ACTION PLANS

ACTION PLAN DESCRIPTION X-2 WAREHOUSING FACILITIES 111-4 STORAGE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN IX-10 LONG LEAD TIME REQUIREMENTS IX-8 PARTS AND MATERIAL REORDER SYSTEM IX-9 MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS IX-6 P0OLED SPARES SYSTEM IX-2 SPARES UPDATE FOLLOWING DESIGN CHANGE XI-1 CONVERTING M&TE TOOL CONTROL TO BAR CODE XI-3 IMPROVED MANAGEMENT OF M&TE 111-1 SHOPS AND SATELLITE WORK AREAS 

       :

X-3 SEGREGATION OF MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT IX-5 DEFICIENCIES /NONCONFORMANCES , RE STANDARD CONTRACT CLAUSES X-7 SAFE OPERATION HOISTING EQUIPMENT X-6 STAGING MATERIAL IX-1 MATERIAL CONTROL CONDUCT OF OPS MANUAL 

 .      i
  ,_ m_ .. , . , . . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ . , _ _ _ . _ .

    .-

c' 

 ,.-
-
,, .,_ -.
-$ T i'  .

POST-ASSESSMENT:(LIVING DOCUMENT) ~1 

 -

ASSIGN RESPONSIBILITIES 

 - - PRIORITIZE ACTION PLANS l
 -

IDENTIFY REQUIRED RESOURCES , - DEVELOP LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ' 

 -

ENTER ACTION PLANS IN TRACKING PROGRAM 

 -

MONITOR ACTION-PLAN PROGRESS i - PERIODIC REASSESSMEN1 l , , a ! I , i l

i i

, t i l l 

'

t 

.    . ,
. ,
.
.

MAINTENANCE 

  *

SELF-ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 

>

' ORGANIZATION WORK PLANNING AND CONTROL 

  -

MAINTENANCE QUALITY CONTROL _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ..______________ _ __ __________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ e' 

                     *
                     .
                     *
                      '
                     .
                      .

e e MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION 

  .             .a . . a .
              * 4 81 H WP,4 dt
              .
               '

I I  ; E eseifint & ast (peapat at iII( Ing as wasserg wage t usesit osamrt 3 aves esp Massil Naast [ *, 3 s 3 livi% 43 

         ',01:10*wt'JWE         tg est faa f pt I    I   I    I Ta f f tput at     rive t& C teostasm &  esame t t wa nsr r r( aD Ifvu ittrw
       %t#1 #wf'.ON SUrt fewf',Ost f I e ( 0 rew at  t est.as t MS  asase f esM IR      a*.", nse i e ".4 e1 of vr J de\
       ,,,,, ..%,. , , ,
         .

f **e esag *,en1 sevesse i senluf t eenNEC EstAfdDe w at i I sentastE neass[C CtDeIntL assD suf 11F1EW110 Oeasett.AL, SUPfUlrI IEECTRICAL SLp%eV110B Surtav3 tor 

            . -
  [       l    --
             '
             - _

i~ agsgstasty assistaser asstsvasey ' I I I edE Oenanta sFtran#60a per penantat PL '" # > StPE RVIIING I 

               , m gggggggg g   RNITeruse ss? ,

SUPE RVI1tBr IUPE Rvlitsr stra avtsgyt 304 DE Pe I E neast E L I E&lE M #dI10R E CID'"UL WEAS/VElasteD W E LBD steers . Eurt evt5tur e iurt e'v11(3D L__LC N . i (- - _ __ uMDI IJul3EERE G) 733U.se se -- 

                  =

we == . - sc vits,,,,, , - ,1 , ,, a.-. _- r 1 

  ""o'a"

_ u.rv.Crm o Ern _,_,,,,,o, gu 

                ,_er,m I tea r surr m ann
                   ,,} =T suremsise
       - UTILITY VEREERS  -J1JCTWCat PuseER (p    fgmD    3&C  M I-f   $ scan      tsc ruessa 6    _ tuC,,u
               '

gr ' ~' l m - _., o, ~ 

          - seasNTE=r SCdstTLit Indstatsu[NT E
                 - ELECTRIClaNS   ggytTFDL TfDen i

=
, a #

o g S 

*

MAINTENANCE 

 -

SELF-ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 

 -

ORGANIZATION 

> a WORK PLANNING AND CONTROL
 -

MAINTENANCE QUALITY CONTROL 

.

  . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,.'
-
,; . . - ,
..-

WORK PLANNING AND CONTROL 

 -

CONTROL OF URGENT MAINTENANCE REQUESTS (MRS) 

 - PRIOR POLICY
 -- URGENT MRS
 --- HEALTH AND SAFETY
 --- POWER PRODUCTION

' 

 --- RELIABILITY
 --- REACTOR SAFETY
 - NEW POLICY
 -

TROUBLESH00ilNG GUIDELINES 

 - DETAILED WORK PLAN
 - LEVELS OF INVESTIGATION / TROUBLESHOOTING
 - DOCUMENTATION
 - MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT
 -

CONTROL OF LIFTED LEADS 

 - ESTABLISHED POSITIVE CONTROLS
 - DOUBLE VERIFY RETERMINATION ON QUALITY-RELATED EQUIPMENT
 - OPERATIONS REVIEW AND APPROVAL OVER SHIFT CHANGE
 - DOCUMENTATION
 -

POST-MAINTENANCE TESTING 

  .

.y

,

MAINTENANCE 

*

SELF-ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 

*

ORGANIZATION 

*

WORK PLANNING AND CONTROL 

> *

MAINTENANCE QUALITY CONTROL 

.

;.. & c
* '

..- .. s b 

     ,

MAINTENANCE QUAlllY CONTROL 

*

QUAL 11Y PHILOSOPHY l 

 - PERFORM CONSISTENT, HIGH-QUAll1Y MAIN 1ENANCE WORK BY
 -- CON 11NUED IMPROVEMENT OF WORK PERFORMANCE AND QUAll1Y
 -- BE11EP. UTILIZA110N OF OC INSPEC110NS
*

IMPROVEMENT AC110NS 

     .
 - SELF-ASSESSMEN1 IMPROVEMENTS - DEFINE STANDARDS AND EXPECIATIONS
 - REVIEW QUALITY PHILOSOPHY AND OBJEC11VES IN SHOP MEE11NGS - EMPHASIZE WORKER RESPONSIBILITY FOR QUAll1Y
 - IMPROVE MAINTENANCE SKILLS THROUGH ENHANCED TRAINING
 - IMPROVED PROCEDURES
 - INCREASED FIELD SUPERVISION OF MAINTENANCE
 - PROVIDE BET 1ER DEFIN1110N OF ALITY INSPEC110N POINTS
 - IMPROVE QC INSPECTOR SKILLS AND 1 RAINING
 - STRENG1 HEN QC OBSERVA110NS BY PROVIDING IMMEDIATE FEEDBACV 10 FIRST-LINE SUPERVISOR
 - DEVELOP SPECIFIC INSPEC110N PLANS FOR RECURRING ACllV111ES TROJAN EXCELLENCE OUR WAY OF DOING BUSINESS  i
 .
   .we,. ,,- , ,-g - , - -

'
~

,;. - 

; -
.

PGE PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM 

 -

BACKGROUND 

 -

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION 

 -

FUTURE WORK ( 

.
   . _ _ _ _ ,

. .;
      '
      <
.

s 9;. .*... _ * 

* ;; * '-

l: 

.

1 . , BACKGROUND 

.

NEED FOR-SIGNIFICANT PROCEDURE IMPROVEMENT IDENTIFIED BY: 

'
  -

i 

  - PGE EVALUATION 0F EVENT REPORTS
  - INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR POWER OPERATIONS EVALUATIONS
  - NRC INSPECTIONS AND FINDINGS i
  - CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS

! !' i e

4 'r

e 

<
*-s re+s-, ,,--.--, , ,,.v.e , , , , ,

 .  . - . . .-. _ . . . . __
.
     '
.
.it' .
L;. - l '"  ;
-'
     >
     :
     !
     .

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION 

-

PROCEDURES IDEN11FIED AS A KEY ISSUE 

-

PROCEDURE IMPROVEMENT TASK GROUP FORMED IN 1987 INCLUDES SENIOR PLAN 1 MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL 

- MANAGER, OPERA 110NS AND MAINTENANCE
- MANAGER, TECHNICAL SERVICES
- MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT SUPERVISOR
- OPERA 110NS DEPARTMENT SUPERVISOR
- GNGINEERING DEPARTMENT SUPERVISOR
 .

_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ .. 

  . .
*
-
;,y, [ ' '
.;;; -l--
..

PLAN _ UPGRADE PLANT.0PERATING MANUAL PROCEDURES ' OBTAIN CONTRACTOR SUPPORT TO HELP COMPLETE UPGRADE

PROVIDE DIRECTION AND OVERSIGHT BY THE TASK GROUP 

- -

IMPLEMENT PHASED APPROACH 

 - NEEDS ASSESSMENT
 - WRITER'S GUIDES
- TEST UPGRADE PROCESS
 - UPGRADE HIGH-PRIORITY PROCEDURES
 - FUTURE WORK

. O 

,.e ,
. : 7 "* .' *

_ 

.-

TYPES OF PROCEDURES BEING UPGRADED OPERATIONS 

   *
 -
 '0PERATING INSTRUCTIONS (01)
 -

GENERAL OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS (G01) 

 -

0FF-NORMAL INSTRUCTIONS (ONI) MAINTENANCE 

 *

MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES (MP) 

 -

PERIODIC INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL TESTS (PICT) ENGINEERING 

 -

PERIODIC ENGINEERING TESTS (PET) 

 -

PERIODIC OPERAllNG TESTS (P0T) 

 -

TEMPORARY PLANT TESTS (TPT) 

 -

FUEL HANDLING PROCEDURES (FHP) , RADIATION PROTEC110N MANUAL PROCEDURES (RPMP) l CHEMISTRY MANUAL PROCEDURES (CMP) PLANT SAFETY (PS) PLANT MODIFICATIONS PROCEDURES (PMP) i ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (AO) , , l 

 .

i 

      *
     . .
      , .' -
      "

ICE PldOCEDURE UPGRADE SCIIEDULE '. 

      .

_ PliASE 1 - Review and Interviews E . I PilASE 2 - Develop Writer's Guide ll For Each Department

PilASE 3 - Pilot Program Upgrade 30 Procedures PIIASE 4 - Upgrade Approximately 200 Priority Procedures 

 - Operating, Test, and Mctintenance Procedures for 13 systems
 - Administrative Orders PIIASE 5 - Upgrade Remainder of Plant Operating Mantial
 - Approximately 520    .

Additional Procedures l l 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 _ m 

, , 5 
. .; e
,, -
 .s .
 ,
,

UPGRADE HIGH PRIORITY PROCEDURES 

 *

95 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS 

 - 105 OPERATING, MAINTENANCE, AND TEST PROCEDURES ASSOCIATED WITH 13 PLANT SYSTEMS i

l l l l l l ! l 

  -

! ! l l t 

  .. .- , . .. . _
. .t *
. g _ .s .

, ' %; -;.I' 

,
..

PRIORITY SYSTEMS  : UPGRADE 105 OPERATING, TEST, AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING SYSTEMS:  ; ' 

 -

120-VOLT PREFERRED INSTRUMENT ALTERNATING CURRENT SYSTEM p AuxlLIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM 

   .

125-VOLT DIRECT CURRENT SYSTEM 

     :

EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATORS 

-
     ,

EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS i CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM , HYDROGEN MIXING SYSTEM ' CONTROL BUILDING VENTILATION SYSTEM t 

 -

PKIMARY CONTAINMENT INCLilDING CONTAINMENT PENETRATIONS r ' SERVICE WATER, SYSTEM / TRAVELING SCREENS . REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM l

COMPONENT COOLING WATER SYSTEM

l 00NTAINMEN1 AIR COOLERS , t l 

     .
     -

l * l , i l t 

     . _

,y-o
,e 2 o .

n .,. O HIGH PRIORITY PROCEDURES SCHEDULE: AVERAGE 4-5 PROCEDURE UPGRADES PER WEEK BEGINNING MARCH 4, 1988 STATUS: FIRST 9 PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN DRAFTED l l l ! 

 .

l I 

  . .. __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ._ _ _ _ _

J,0 a .v o 

'-
.'        !
.

e IRANSMITTERS RECENT ACTIVITIES 

-

SENSOR TIME RESPONSE TESTING 

-

PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE TRANSDUCERS AND RECORDER INSTALLED ON FEBRUARY 19, 1988 - NO SPIKES OR CYCLIC TRANSIENTS 

-

SPECTRUM ANALYZER USED - NO SENSING LINE RES0 NANCE DE1EC1ED 

-

PT 456 FAILED ON FEBRUARY 23, 1988 - NO PRESSURE SPIKES < s 

        .
-

ENGINEERING METALLURGICAL ANALYSIS OF FAILED BOURDON TUBE 

       ..
-

PGE-VENDOR MEETING ON MARCH 16, 1988 

        !
-

PGE CONSULTANT 10 EVALUATE EFFECTS OF WELDING ON BOURDON 10BE t & 

        !
-

REPLACE MODEL 763A'S Wi1H MODEL 763'S UNLESS CAUSE OF , FAILURES IS DETERMINED AND CORRECTED  ! i 

        '
-

VENDOR 10 CONTINUE INVESTIGATION OF FAILURE CAUSE 

        !
        :

i a l l t 

      .

J }}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000344/1988012&oldid=2958193"