IR 05000331/1982017
| ML20028C763 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Duane Arnold  |
| Issue date: | 12/23/1982 |
| From: | Axelson W, Paperiello C, Phillips M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20028C760 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-331-82-17, NUDOCS 8301140078 | |
| Download: ML20028C763 (25) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:r --- I -.. . U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ~ .
REGION III
, Report No. 50-331/82-17(DEPOS) Docket No. 50-331 License No. DPR-49 Licensee: _ Iowa Electric Light and Power Company IE Towers.
Post Office Box 351 Cedar Rapids, IA 52406 Facility: Duane Arnold Energy Center Safety Evaluation Report onducted: December 1982 Inspector M. P.
l'ips /2 /- Emergency Preparedness Analyst ) m 1 2 1_/ 9 8 2-Approved By: W.
b ef , ' Emergenc Preparedness Section . Pap o Chief / A.8 Emergency Preparedness and / ' Program Support Branch Safety Evaluation Report Summary: Safety Evaluation Report - December 1982 (Report No. 50-331/82-17(DEPOS)) Routine Safety Evaluation Report of the emergency plans for the Duane Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light and Power Corporate organizations dated July 1982. The inspection involved 97 inspector-hours by one NRC inspector.
Results: The licensee's Duane Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light and Power Corporate Organization emergency plans related to emergency prepared-ness at the Duane Arnold Energy Center meet the planning standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix E.
. l l k $11 oc
C ._ _
v - - .. . . EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Safety Evaluation Report related to the operation of Duane Arnold Energy Center Docket No. 50-331 NRC Operating License No. DPR-49 Iowa Electric Light and Power Company U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission December 1982 '
.
i ' , . INTRODUCTION Iowa Electric Light and Power Company (hereinafter referred to as the licensee, the company,.:IELP) has submitted emergency plans for the Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC) and Iowa Electric Light and Power Corporate organization (both are hereinafter referred to as the plan) dated August 1981, July 1982, and October 1982.
The Commission staff conducted a review of the licensee's plan dated August 1981, against the requirements of 50.47(b) and Appendix E of 10 CFR 50, and the criteria of the 16 planning standards in Part II of the " Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants," NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1, Revision 1, dated November 1980. Comments resulting from this review were submitted to the licensee in a letter dated November 12, 1981, from Mr. James G. Keppler to Mr. Duane Arnold. The licensee responded to these comments by issuing revisions 2 and 3 dated July and October 1982 respec-tively.
We have completed our review of the October 1982 site and corporate emergency plans and pertinent correspondence dated November 30, 1981, and May 28, 1982, from Mr. L. D. Root to Mr. H. R. Denton; and. December 14, 1981, from Mr. L. D. Root to Mr. B. K. Grimes.
This emergency preparedness safety evaluation report lists each standard in " order followed by a summary of applicable portions of the plans as they apply principally to the licensee's planning standards. The final section of this report provides the staff review r2sults and conclusions, i
1
, ~ - , , _ s s , - - . . . - - ' r - d), " EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS . SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT.
~ .A.
Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) (Closed, 331/81-03-18)' " Planning Standard 1 - . Primary ~ responsibilities for emergency response b'y theinuclear fac'ilityj . licensee,-and by. State cnd_ local organizations within the. Emergency'. Planning Zones have been assigned.,the emergency responsibilities of' > the.various supporting organization's have been specifically established, and each principal' response organization has staff to respond and to- ' augment-its initial: response on'a. continuous basis.
Emergency Plan _.
During any classification of an emergency.at the Duane Arnold Energy: Center (DAEC), the Emergency Coordinator is responsible for assuming , command of the DAEC Emergency Response Organization (onsite). tThe , Emergency Coordinator is in charge of the emergency until the Emergency.
j Response & Recovery Director is in place. The Chief Engineer.normally functions as the Emergency Coordinator. The Shift Supervising Engineer" (SSE) at DAEC is initially' designated as the Emergency Coordinator.' When , i an abnormal condition arises,.it is his responsibility to make the intitial determination of the severity of the emergency and to implement the plan.
i There is 24 hour per day communication capability between DAEC and State l and local response organizations to ensure the rapid transmittal of accurate notification information and emergency assessment data.
+ The Corporate Emergency Response Organization (offsite) is shown in Figure 1, which specifies the key individuals by title. The Corporate Emergency Response Organization provides three principal functions in , .the overall response to an emergency at DAEC as follows: (1) establishes
a single focal point for performance of the radiological dose assessment i function including coordination and interface with local, State, and Federal support groups; (2) establishes a coordinated means to disseminate , ! information related to the accident and potential ramifications to pub-- lic officials, the news media, and industry public relations forums; and (3) establishes a prime focal point for obtaining and providing requisite , engineering and support services to assist the DAEC in establishing stable plant conditions and assisting in the coordination and performance of , radiological dose assessment activities. The duties and responsibilities
of key individuals and functional support groups are specified in the plan.
, . ! , l
o . ' . L
IOWA ELECTRIC LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY-Revision 1 j -< l - - CORPORATE EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN July 1982 FIGURE 1 . i CORPORATE EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION Legal IELP Corporate insurance & Advisor Management R1sk Manager Esergency Neos
i , ,8 Center Director . ,
Emergency Response
.. _ ',, & Recovery Director - Manager, } Redlological Emergency Easrgency & EOF Manager Coordinator Support Meneger Corporate - Quility Assurance , l I I Radiological DAEC Emergency Technical & Support Services County & Support Assessment Response Engineering Coordinator Agency Coordinator Organization Support Supervisor ' Coordinators - Security ( - En gi neer'. ng-Communications - Design - AdministratIvo - Construction - Transportation-Technical Services - F. astern /Osntra l/ Western - Plan & Schedules Fossil Services - Qmtract/ Agreements - Purchasing & Stores-Licensing & Fuels - Industrial Relations
- Mechanical / Nuclear - Saf ety Engineering f l .
!
._ _ _.
, , , s . . . < , ..
Thefconcept'of operations and relationship to the' total: effort is speci- -fled ~for.each organization'and suborganization'. The interrelationships ~ are illustrated in block ~ diagrams in the emergency plan'. - Interfaces- 'with governmental agencies, State and local; local. support services;;and: contractornand other nuclear facilities that ~are intended to. be' part of the overall response organization for the Emergency Planning Zones (EPZs) .are described in.the plan.
~0verall coordination of plant, co'porate, and offsitel emergency activities-r i is'the responsibility of the Emergency Response & Recovery Director,1who .is the Director, Nuclear Generation or his alternate. The responsibilities' " of.the Emergency Response & Recovery-Director.are described in the plan.
The qualifications and selection criteria for individuals.who will function in major emergency response organization positions are defined.
, ' Formal agreements exist on file with appropriate. agencies and organiza-
tions. including law enforcement, fire protection, ambulance services, medical.and hospital. support, Institute for Nuclear Power Operations (INPO), radiological support, and State and local authorities responsible ' for implementation of protective measures forLthe public. These agree-ments establish-an understanding of assigned responsibilities and ensure
- 5 proper coordination of activities in the event of an emergency.
]
The Emergency Response & Recovery Director is responsible for ensuring.
, continuity of resources (technical, administrative, and material). The Emergency Coordinator has been delegated the: authority to obtain necessary , assistance from outside_ agencies,-such as suppliers, contractors, INPO,
and consultants as required to establish l stable plant conditions.
The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, as described . in the Duane Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light and Power Corporate emergency plans to be adequate, i-B.
Onsite Emergency Organization (Closed, 331/81-03-19) Planning Standard On-shift facility licensee responsibilities for emergency response are unambiguously defined, adequate staffing to provide initial facility , accident response in key functional areas is maintained at all times, l l timely augmentation of response capabilities is available, and the ' interfaces among various onsite response activities and offsite support { l and response activities are specified.
! II Emergency Plan t The. normal plant organization is shown in Figure 2.
DAEC is managed - by a Chief Engineer who is responsible for direct management of the i plant. During an emergency situation (normal working hours) the Chief ! l Engineer is the Emergency Coordinator. During periods when the Chief l
. f
f i , t
L
- ..
.
._ . . . . . f .. - . . .. .-- - . .. . t..
I% s . . t .t. t =, .% .. 3.
.- -t.3 o.
.. ... .. .. - - . .. .5 .. .5 g =. g . . .- . 3..
- :
- :
=**- Akr* . . g .6
& & .5 d.a.
..- - - . 5.
.. .
. ..3 3.. . = - . tt .. . . t.. .. .. t.
.. - . .
.. o.
. . . .. - .. . .. a . c.
. . . . . . ..- .. .. .. .. . .. _ ,, . .. . . .- . .. -. _. .2 .3 . ... .. - .. -- .. . .
. - - ... . .
t .. . . .. - -. . . a . .. .. u.
.- .. ut.
.. . - ,
-.. ..
.2 . ...- .
. . .. . .- .- . ... .3 . ... .. .. . .. .. = .. - .. - m .-
... o ..t
. .
ra .
a . O . .. s -.
. a.
. u- . .- . .a . . 3..
.. . . . . - . _ . .... . .. , . .- .. -. n.
.. ....
. - 8 . . . . . . a ..- . .. ...t . k . . . . -..- -. . . ..- . . .. . .3
.5 .3 - - a .t . ... . .. .. -. - . -
E s.
.g _ o . - = . a.. . . ...t . . . . ... . .. -.. . . ..- . - ~ .. a.. a.. 3I2 112 .
. ... .. 3.
-.. ... ... -. ...... .... -.. ..... .. .. ... . . _ .. ... .. . . . .. . . .. . .. .
_& .. ..... ..... .... , . . .... ....
l l
. . _ _ . -.. - . - - _ _ _ -
, -- . , . - _ , , l ' < w- . -l . .
- . . Engineer--is' unavailable,2his responsibilities _are delegated to alter-t-nates w o_ sat s y t e requ rements of ANSI N18.1-1971, " Experience 1 h if h i . Requirements,for Plant Manager."- The Shift Supervising Engineer.(on. duty 24' hours"per day) is.the initial Emergency Coordinator and as such has the authority.for declaring an ' emergency and recommending protective actions to-local. authorities.
He~ is relieved of these duties upon arrival of the' designated Emergency:
. Coordinator. Those' responsibilities of the' Emergency Coordinator that may not be delegated are specified in the plan and include the respon-sibility for ensuring appropriate notification of Corporate, local, State, and Federal officials and agencies and for providing initial recommendations, as appropriate, to local'and. State authorities who . are. responsible for offsite protective measures.
~ The onsite emergency organization (normal working hours) is called the DAEC Emergency Response Organization,-and is shown in Figure 3.
11e - major: responsibilities, duties, and lines of. succession of these supervisors and coordinators are defined in the plan. 'As described - in Section A, the onsite emergency organization is augmented by the.
~ Corporate Emergency Response Organization.
The onsite emergency. organization for non-normal working hours, back-shifts, and holidays'is described in the plan. Emergency assignments have been made, and the relationship between this emergency organiza-tion and-the normal staff complement'is shown in the plan. Positions and/or titles and qualifications of shift and plant personnel both onsite and offsite who are assigned major emergency functional duties are listed. Minimum shift manning requirements are in the plan, and-guidance for shift augmentation based on the emergency classification is provided.
The plan has established the framework for a long-term augmented emer-- gency organization. This organization is under the command and control of the' Emergency Response & Recovery Director. Full ~ activation of the Corporate Emergency Response Orga;.ization is required for any Site Area 'or General Emergency.
Interfaces between and among the DAEC and Corporate Emergency Response Organization rtaff, governmental and private sector organizations, and technical and engineering contractor groups have been specified in the plan.
The minimum onshift staffing levels discussed in the plan generally meet the objectives of Table B-1 in NUREG-0654, Revision 1.
This on-shift staff includes the following expertise: one Shift Supervising-Engineer (Senior Reactor Operator (SRO)); one additional SR0; two Control Room Operators; two Auxiliary Operators; one Radwaste Operator; one Health Physics Technician; and one Shift Technical Advisor (STA).
The plan states that the Radwaste Operator onshift will perform Chemisty/Radiochemisty tasks until relieved by a Rad /Chemisty Techician.
This function will be augmented within 30 minutes.
In addition, noti-fication/ communication functions (24 hours per day) are performed by onshift Security Force personnel.
DAEC R:visicn 2 , , EMERGENCY PLAN July 1982 ) FIGURE 3 DAEC EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION EMERGEICY COORDlNATOR CHIEF ENGINEER .- l l ... TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTER SITE RADIATION PROTECTION SUPERVISOR COORDINATOR .. ASSISTANT CHIEF ENGINEER RADIATION PROTECTION OPERATIONS ENGINEER \\ ) F i i ' TECHNICAL & ENGINEERING SECURITY AND SUPPORT CONTROL R004 OPERATIONS SUPPORT CENTER SUPERVISOR SUPERV1SOR COORDINATOR SUPERVISOR
ASSISTANT CHIEF ENGINEER ASSISTANT CHIEF ENGINEER OPERATIONS HEALTH PHYSICS SUPERylSOR TECHNICAL SUPPORT RADIATION FROTECTION & SUPERVISOR SECURITY - Shi f t Technica l SHIFT SUPERVISING Advisors SECURITY ADMINISTRATION . ENGINEER SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR A Technleal Engineering Statf bSecurIty bAdelnIstrative -@erattons Porsonne1 Force Staff-Maintenance Supervisors ' . e ! . .
L
. . . The licensee's program for' timely shift augmentation is described in
. the plan. This augmentation will include 27 persons and provides all the necessary functions defined in Table B-1 of.NUREG-0654, Revision-1.
The interfaces between and among the'onsite functional areas of emergency activity, licensee corporate support, local services support, and State - and local response organizations are specified and illustrated by a-block diagram in the plan. The corporate management, administrative, and techn-ical support staff who will augment the plant staff have been/s' ecified - p in the plan, as well as contractor and private organizations who may be- _ requested to provide technical. assistance to and augmentation of the - emergency organization.
The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, as described in the Duane Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light and Power Corporate emergency plans to be adequate.
C.
Emergency Response Support and Resources (Closed, 331/81-03-20) Planning Standard Arrangements for requesting and effectively using assistance resources have been made, arrangements to accommodate State and local staff at the licensee's nearsite Emergency Operations Facility have been made, L and other organizations capable of augmenting the planned response have ' been identified.
Emergency Plan Arrangements for requesting and utilizing outside resources have been made. The licensee retains contractors to provide supporting services to DAEC. Among those services provided are the following: technical experts for accident analyses from INP0; high level reactor coolant analysis support; environs radiological monitoring and radiochemical analyses; and health physics support. Although the licensee will not directly request implementation of the DOE Radiological Assistance Plan or other Federal support, since their interface is with the Iowa Office of Disaster Services, the licensee will recommend that the State request and coordinate the support of the Federal agencies when deemed appropriate.
The licensee organization provides for dispatching licensee represen-tatives to the Linn County Emergency Operations Center if requested.
Working space is available for Federal, State, and local offsite repre-sentatives as well as contractor and other support groups in the li-censee's nearsite EOF. The EOF is the central point for providing information needed by primary response agencies for implementation of protective actions. Completion and staff evaluation of the permanent EOF which meets the guidance of NUREG-0696 and SECY-82-111B will be addressed in a separate report.
, . _ _ , --
4.i , " . .
The staff' finds this element'of emergency preparedness, as described in- ~ the Duane Arnold Energy Center and' Iowa Electric Light.and Power Corporate.
- emergency plans to be adequate.
D.~ Emergency Classification System (Closed,. 331/81-03-21) Planning Standard A' standard emergency classification and action'1evel scheme, the bases of which include facility system and effluent parameters, is in use by the nuclear facility licensee, and State and' local response plans call for reliance ca. information provided by facility licenrees for deter-minations of minimum initial offsite response measures.
Emergency' Plan Four standard emergency classes (Unusual Event, Alert, Site Area Emergency, and General Emergency) have been established. Emergency Action Levels (EALs) are indicated in the plan based' on onsite and offsite radiation monitoring information and based on readings from various plant sensors (such as pressure and temperature in containment, . response of vital electrical systems or emergency core cooling systems, and vital equipment status). EALs for natural phenomena such as earth-quakes, floods, and tornadoes have been developed. These EALs are used for rapid classification of emergency situations.
-The plan has identified example emergency conditions for each standard emergency classification. These initiating conditions include tha examples given in Appendix 1 of NUREG-0654, Revision 1, and the analyzed accidents in the DAEC Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR).
The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, as described in the Duane Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light and Power Corporate emergency plans to be adequate.
E.
Notification Methods and Procedures (Closed, 331/81-03-22) Planning Standard Procedures have been established for notification, by the licensee of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all response organizations; the content of initial and followup messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to provide early notification and clear instruc-tien to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established.
Emergency Plan Procedures have been established for notification of State and local response organizations in case of emergency. The plan has established procedures which describe mutually agreeable bases for notification of
, . .. - - -. . _ - . _ -. - -. _, -, , , - - .. -
_, L
. ! offsite response organizations consistent with the standard emergency classification and action scheme set forth in Appendix 1 of NUREG-0654, Revision 1.
The Shift Supervising Engineer has the authority and re-sponsibility as Acting Emergency Coordinator for initiating the emergency notification to these agencies during non-normal working hours. After declaration of an emergency condition, he will ensure that the following personnel and agencies are notified: State and county Emergency Operations Centers, Chief Engineer or alternate, Director - Nuclear Generation or alternate, and the NRC Operations Center, m The plan has established procedures for notifying, alerting, and mobiliz-ing licensee emergency response personnel. These procedures include both station and corporate personnel.
The contents of the initial emergency messages to be sent from the plant have been established. The contents of these messages include: infor-mation about the class of emergency, whether a release of radioactive material has taken place, potentially affected population and areas, whether protective measures may be necessary, offsite monitoring status, and assistance which may be desired (if any). The notification pro-cedures used also include means for verification of messages.
The licensee and the State have developed predetermined written messages intended for the public and consistent with the emergency classification scheme. These messages are part of the State's emergency plans and are not included in the licensee's plan.
The plan has established provisions for followup messages to State and local authorities. These messages include necessary information about the accident that would be needed to determine the appropriate pro-tective measures to be taken in both the ingestion and plume exposure pathway emergency planning zones (EPZs), following the guidance in NUREG-0654, Revision 1.
The prompt public notification system installed at DAEC is described.
This system provides an audible alert within a five mile radius and in population centers between five and ten miles.
In addition, the counties will provide mobile backup to the sirens for sparsely populated sectors in the five to ten mile area to supplement the fixed warning system.
The offsite warning system is designed to alert 100% of the population in an area extending 0-5 miles into the EPZ and 95% of the population in an area extending 5-10 miles into the EPZ. Activation of the system can be accomplished within 15 minutes of issuance of an advisory from either the Linn County Sheriff's Office or Benton County Civil Defense Office. The area covered by mobile sirens will be alerted within 45 minutes.
Sounding of the alerting sirens by local government will alert the public to the fact that they should turn on radios to a local radio station for detailed information on the situation. The sounding of
_ -. . . the alerting sirens and the deployment of the emergency vehicles is outlined in the State and local emergency response plans._ The purpcse of this notification system.is to advise citizens to either.take shelter or evacuate and to instruct them to tune to designated emergency.infor-mation radio stations.
-The staff _ finds this element of emergency preparedness, as described in the Duane Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light and Power Corporate emergency plans to be' adequate.
F.
_ Emergency Communications Planning Standard Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organizations to emergency personnel and to the public.
Emergency Plan The plan has established an extensive and reliable communications system from the facility control room, Technical Support Center (TSC), Opera-tional Support Center (OSC), nearsite Emergency Operations Facility (EOF), offsite monitoring teams, and State and local Emergency Operation Centers (EOCs). The system includes the use of normal and special telephone lines, radio system, mobile radio units, Iowa Warning Alert System (IWAS), microwave voice channels, and handitalkies, thus providing both a primary and several backup means for communications.
Several unlisted telephones are maintained for emergency use only.
A dedicated telephone communications system, the IWAS, is provided for the notification of State and local authorities in the event of an emergency.
In addition, a direct radio link is maintained with the State and county law enforcement organizations. This serves as a backup system for notifying offsite agencies. The IWAS system links together the plant's Security Control Point, TSC, EOF, and State and local ECCs.
Initial contact points are manned 24 hours per day.
Microwave communication systems are provided for the purpose of voice communication between the plant and EOF. The system consists of several microwave channels, which can be transmitted on two routes between the plant and the EOF.
The NRC has installed dedicated telephones from the station control room, TSC, and EOF to the NRC Operations Center in Washington, D.C.
and the regional NRC office in Glen Ellyn, IL.
Also, there is a separate dedicated telephone (Health Physics Network) between the NRC and the licensee's Radiation Protection Office, TSC, and EOF, The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, as described in the Duane Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light and Power Corporate emergency plans to be adequate.
-- - -. - .- .. - --
. . . -G.
Public Education and Information (Closed, 331/81-03-23) Planning Standard Information is made available to the public on a periodic basis on how they will be notified and what their initial actions should be in an emergency (e.g., listening to a local broadcast station and remaining indoors),_the principal points.of contact with the news media-for dissemination of information during an emergency (including the phys-ical location or locations) are established in advance, and procedures for coordinated dissemination of information to the public are established.
Emergency Plan The plan provides for the dissemination of information to the public regarding how they will be notified and what their actions should be during an emergency. This information includes educational information on radiation; whom the plan affects; local Emergency Broadcasting System Stations (EBS); location, zone, and designated evacuation routes; emer-gency preparations; evacuation and notification information; and instruc-tions on how to obtain additional information. This public information brochure is mailed to all residents in the plume exposure EPZ, and is also provfded to public places such as hotels, motels, hospitals, bus-inesses, and recreational areas to ensure transient population coverage.
Future plans call for having this information placed in the local tele- - phone directory. These public information brochures will be distributed on an annual basis. These actions should ensure that the public informa-tion program reaches the permanent and transient adult population with
the plume exposure EPZ.
The EOF provides support and interface between the licensee, State, and local agencies, and the news media. The plan provides for dispatching the Emergency News Center Director to the Emergency News Center (sixth floor of the EOF building).
The Emergency News Center functions under the direction of this persou and is the single point contact for dissemin-ating information to the public.
The Emergency News Center Director's responsibilities include coordinating information releases with Federal, State, and local agencies, and establishing coordinated arrangements for dealing with rumors.
A technical spokesperson knowledgeable about the plant and its operations will be available to brief the press at the Emergency News Center.
The licensee will offer programs at least annually to acquaint news media with emergency planning for the facility, information concerning radiation, and points of contact for release of public information in an emergency.
The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, as described in the Duane Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light and Power Corporate emergency plans to be adequate.
__.
__ -.
t . . . H.- ' Emergency Facilities and Equipment (Closed, 331/81-03-24) ' Planning Standard ~ Adequate emergency facilities and equipment:to support the emergency response are provided and maintained.- Emergency Plan Emergency facilities needed to support an emergency response have been . provided including a TSC, EOF, and OSC. The TSC and OSC will be acti-vated for any Alert or higher emergency classification, and the EOF will be activated for any Site Area or General Emergency clascification.
The TSC is located in a new facility _ adjacent ~to the Administration Building, and is staffed by plant management and technica1' personnel to provide technical support to control room activities.
Space is also provided for at least five NRC personnel. Personnel'in the TSC are protected from radiological hazards, including direct radiation and , airborne contaminants under accident conditions. To ensure adequate
radiological protection, permanent radiation monitoring systems have been installed. These systems continuously indicate radiation dose rates and airborne radioactivity inside the TSC while in use.
In addi-tion, closed circuit TV cameras with pan and zoom capabilities are installed in the control room and can be controlled from the TSC to provide direct video representation of the main control panel instrit-mentation. Protective breathing apparatus are available for use as needed. The TSC has access to a complete set of as-built drawings -and other records, including general arrangment diagrams, P& ids, piping system isometrics, and electrical schematics. A CRT display of critical plant parameters monitored by the process computer'is available in the TSC. Additionally, plant parameters and status information of signifi-cance to the event can be transmitted using a VAX computer terminal as well as by telephone, intercom, and radio.
The OSC is located in the Administration Building adjacent to the Security Control Point and Health Physics Control Point..This center will be used to coordinate onsite and offsite radiation monitoring teams, inplant survey efforts, rescue and emergency repair teams, and personnel who support control room emergency activities.
Portable environmental sampling and monitoring equipment is stored in this facility to support radiation monitoring teams.
In addition, emergency and decontamination kits at the OSC provide respiratory protection, protective clothing, and portable sampling and monitoring devices.
. Communications and management controls from the OSC to the TSC and control room are provided.
The EOF is located on the fourteenth floor of the IE Tower in Cedar Rapids, approximately ten miles from the plant, and can be activated under normal conditions within approximately one-half hour during normal work hours and approximately one hour during off hours. The EOF will be utilized l to evaluate and coordinate the emergency reentry / recovery operations on
15
-_~. _. .. _ _ _ -_ _ . - -
-... . , . _ .~ _
w , _ - > ' - . Laicontinuing' basis by the licen'see. SLiaison with' Federal, State [;and: ~ local officials.will.be maintained at'this center-4which will.also:be w , . used for receiptjand analysis ~of. field monitoring. data submitted'by.. . ' field' teams.
, . Completion and'sta'ff evaluatio.h'ofLthe permanent: EOF,LTSC,.0SC, andz =SPDS which! meet the guidancefof NUREG-0696 and SECY 82-111B will be' ' J . addressed in'aLseparate report.
- Emergency preparedness procedures'have..been developed including quar-terly inventory and operational readiness of' emergency equipment:and : supplies. _ Sufficient (equipment.for emergency l kits exists to ensure; i a minimum inventoryzin case of, replacement delay. 1The station main : .tains portable survey instrumentation to. assess.inplant,,onsite, and , offsite contamination levels, exposure. rates, and airborne gaseous, radioiodine, and particulate concentrations, q Onsite monitoring systems' have.been' identified and' established that:are.
to be used to initiate emergency measures in accordance with Appendix 1- . of NUREG-0654, Revision 1,:as well as those monitors used for: conducting-c ! assessment; e.g., seismic and hydrological monitors, process and radio- - ' logica1' monitors,'and' fire and' combustion monitors. These' systems; include-a meteorology system with wind speed and direction and temperature cap. ~ . ~ ability, installed process r,adiation monitors to measure deviations-in radiation levels in process lines that actually or potentially contain radioactive effluents, installed area radiation monitors to measure j: upward deviations in radiation levels:in specific locations in the station,' portable dose rate and radiation detection instruments, non, > ! radiological process monitors (such as containment pressure Land tempera-ture, reactor system pressure and temperature, etc.), and laboratory.
,
counting and analysis facilities.
I Provisions for offsite monitoring equipment have been made. Offsite . meteorological data can be obtained from.the Cedar Rapids airport !l meteorological facility as well as the weather service.
The Radiological Assessment Coordinatory is responsible for the receipt , l and analysis of all field monitoring data and the determination of where } environmental sample media will be taken for analysis.
i j Meteorology equipment at the facility currently meets the criteria of
Regulatory Guide 1.23, "Onsite Meteorological Problems," dated } February 17,'1972.
By letter dated May 28, 1982, the licensee sub-1e mitted a proposed schedule for upgrading the Duane Arnold Energy Center-I to meet all NUREG-0737 guidance. This submittal included the upgraded i meteorological measurements program to meet the guidance in Task Item III.A.2.
The. completion of this upgrade 'will be ' accomplished in accord-i ance with the guidance provided in SECY 82-111B, and will be addressed in a separate report.
) The staff' finds this element of emergency preparedness, as described-i- in the Duane Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light and Power Corporate emergency plans to be adequate.
' < J
L -, ,..,, -., _, .--.~,,.,--..--.._-,-_n- , -, , ,--.-,-..-_.---.,~,--..,...,n . _,.,, -,. -..,,,,
. .. _ .
. zn . - ~~
- _
"_ > , i L:
,- Cy s: -- V .I.; IAccident-Assessment (Closed; ~
331/81 03-25) - Planning Standard- -. LAdequate methods,Lsystems, and' equipment for assessing and' monitoring; actual:or potential.offsite' consequences of a radiological emergency; condition are in use.
- Emergency Plan The~ plan contains several plant system'and effluent parameter-values characteristic of a spectrum of-off-normal conditions and accidents.
. The plant parameter values and-_other reliable information are tabulated to cross-reference' initiating conditions for each of the emergency- < classes. Specific alarm-setpoints, both visual and audio,Lare in the control room to alert the operator. Emergency Preocedures incorporating the parameter and alarm setpoints are provided for= initiating the appropriate emergency classification.
The plan describes the onsite capability and resources which provide initial values and continuing assessment.throughout the. course of an accident, including postaccident sampling capability, radiation and.
effluent monitors, inplant iodine instrumentation, and containment-radiation monitoring. The methodology, equipment, and expertise to make assessments of the actual or potential magnitude and locations of any radiological hazards through liquid or gaseous release pathways- - have been provided in the plan. Means for relating the various measured parameters of radioactivity such as contamination levels and air and.
water activity levels to dose rates for key isotopes and gross radio-activity measurements have been provided.
~ Methods and techniques have been established'for determining the source term of releases of radioactive material within systems. The plan describes the method for estimating onsite and offsite exposures and contamination for various meteorological conditions.
Methods have been established for. determining the release rate / projected dose if the instrumentation used for assessment _are offscale or inoperable.
The capability and resources for field monitoring'within the plume ex-posure pathway EPZ have been described in the plan.
An interactive computer code has been developed to perform dose pro-jection calculations. Effluent radiation monitor. readings, flow rate readings, and real-time meteorological data are input to perform dose projections. The results of field surveys conducted offsite can be entered into the program and used as verification of dose projection calculations, or as a means to determine release rates in the event of a loss of appropriate ii. plant instrumentation. The code makes use of the straight-line Gaussian model with finite plume correction. The results of the dose projection is a table which provides the following: (1) summary of meteorological conditions; (2) release rate information; (3) normalized concentration, X/Q, for ground level and elevated releases; i t
L , ! ' . ~. . . ~ . . . . . _. _
E - - - - - - u , , , s , . - , , v s ' . . -. H '(4')!whole body' dose rates; (5)Lthyroid. dose commitment; (6); total plume-
width; and (7) plume; arrival time..These' values are provided atethe1 site boundary, the maximum X/Q,J 2 miles, 5 miles, J10-miles, L and any three L - otherLlocations desired.
' The: plan describes the'offsite radiological environmenta1' monitoring:
- program, including fixed continuous air' samplers-and a fixed thermo-
luminescent dosimeter (TLD) monitoring network which meets ~the NRC
< -Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position for Environmenta17 Radiological Monitoring Program. Maps are provided showing the TLDi and air sampler-locations.
~ The plan describes.the capabilities'and' resources for' field monitoring within the plume exposure EPZ. Teams will'have adequate monitoring equipment toslocate and' find the-plume, and'make airborne measurements of radiolodine to levels of.1 E-7 uCi/cc. Adequate communications' systems for the field teams are provided.
- The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, as' described in the Duane Arnold Energy. Center and Iowa' Electric Light and Power Corporate emergency plans to-be adequate.
, J.
Protective Response (Closed, 331/81-03-26) Planning Standard A range of protective actions.have been developed for the plume ex- .posure pathway EPZ for emergency workers and the public. Guidelines for the choice of protective actions during an emergency, consistent with Federal guidance, are developed and in place, and protective . ' actions for the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ appropriate to the l locale have been developed.
j Emergency Plan l-The plan describes the protective actions to be taken by=onsite personnel, Onsite predetermined assembly areas are designated. The station has a i siren system to signal personnel to assemble in these areas. Persons not having an emergency response assignment, including visitors and contractor '
personnel, are required to assemble when notified by the siren. An accountability check for all personnel who are within the protected areas ( will be conducted. The methods used are described in the emergency plan
implementing procedures, and will enable accounting for all individuals i within the protected area at the time the assembly is announced, ascertain ! the names of missing individuals within approximately thirty minutes,-and l account for all onsite individuals continuously thereafter, i F If site evacuation is necessary (such as for a Site Area or General i Emergency), personnel will be relocated and monitored at the Palo i Elementary School in Palo.
If the Palo Elementary School is not habit-i- able, the alternate reassembly area will be the Offsite Laboratory and ' Decontamination Facility, located at a company garage facility in i I l.
j.
F
- . Cedar Rapids. The plan indicates the' evacuation routes to the relocation center. Traffic control for onsite areas during a site evacuation will-be the responsibility of the station security force. The plan describes how radiological monitoring and decontamination (if necessary) will be provided for evacuees at the offsite relocation site (s).
The plan makes provisions for respiratory protection, use of protective clothing, and use of radioprotective drugs for onsite emergency workers.
Protective measures associated with the use of protective clothing and the use of respiratory protection equipment shall be taken in accordance with existing radiation protection requirements.
The plan provides the bases for recommendations'for protective actions for the public. These include the following factors: (a) potential for release based on plant conditions; (b) type of release; (c) length of release;'(d) time required for the plume to reach the population-at-risk; (e) prevailing meteorological conditions; (f) population distribution; (g) special population distributions (i.e., schools, hospitals); (h)~ evacuation time estimates; (i) radiological monitoring and environmental sampling results; (j) residential unit protection factors; and (k) alter-nate local sheltering facilities. These protective action recommendations are consistent with the guidance set forth in Table 5.1 of the Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions for Nuclear Incidents (EPA-520/1-75-001) and the guidance of the U.S. Food and Drug Administra-tion covering the contamination of human food and animal feed (Federal Register, Vol. 43, No. 242, December 15, 1978). The plan summarizes , possible recommended protective actions to be made to State and local ' agencies during an emergency. The plan clearly indicates that a prompt notification will be made directly to offsite authorities responsible for implementing protective measures within the plume exposure pathway and ingestion exposure pathway EPZs.
Population distribution by sector and distance within a ten mile radius have been compiled and are included in the plan. Maps indicating major evacuation routes for the public and station personnel are provided in the plan. Detailed evacuation routes (maps) for the general public are contained in the State and local emergency plans.
Evacuation time estimates for the plume exposure pathway EPZ for adverse weather conditions, special facilities, and normal conditions have been specified. These time estimates are generally in accordance with Appendix 4 of NUREG-0654, Revision 1.
The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, as described in the Duane Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light and Power Corporate emergency plans to be adequate.
K.
Radiological Exposure Control (Closed, 331/81-02-27) Planning Standard , Means for controlling radiological exposures in an emergency are established for emergency workers. The means for controlling radio-
, l-L
, , .. , = .4 Y~ . > . ._
< logical exposures shall include ' exposure guidelines consist'ent-with EPA : ~ s Emergency Worker.and Life Saving Activity Protective' Action' Guides.
, Emergency Plan- ' > ~ Emergency' response personnel may receive radiation exposure in' excess of the-limits imposed by 10 CFR 20.
The Emergency.Coordin'atorawill determine the: exposure allowed to perform an emergency mission;-however, in no case will the' exposure-be permitted to exceed 75 Rem.
The plan _ contains emergency. guidelines for whole-body and thyroid doses consistent with-EPA Emergency Worker and Lifesaving Activity Protective Action _ Guides.
The station.provides and distributes a self-reading and accumulative . type dosimeter to personnel involved in emergency onsite response,' ! regardless of affiliation. Dose records for workers will be maintained and checked throughout the emergency. The Site Radiation Protection Coordinator will be responsible for ensuring that personnel are informed of' permissible exposure limits and work' times.
Onsite contamination control procedures for personnel, equipment, and access control are in place. Decontamination of personnel and equip-ment is required when the contamination level exceeds predetermined ~ a values. Criteria for permitting return of contaminated areas and their contents to normal use are stated.in the appropriate contamination control procedures.
- i Necessary equipment and ' supplies will'be available for use at the offsite decontamination center, including provisions for extra clothing, decon-
i tamination methods suitable for the type of contamination expected, and radioiodine contamination of the skin.
l The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, as described , in the Duane Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light and Power ' Corporate emergency plans to be adequate.
j ] L.
Medical and Public Health Support j Planning Standard Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated injured individuals.
Emergency Plan i; ! The-facility provides for onsite first aid capability. A sufficient number of DAEC employees are trained and qualified to administer first aid. A first aid room is located in the OSC and is equipped with a i cot and a supply of bandages, splints, and other first aid supplies, r
IELP has made arrangements, confirmed in writing, with Mercy Hospital .in Cedar Rapids. This hospital is capable of receiving and treating , contaminated or overexposed persons. This hospital will be utilized i !
i ., -. - - - -, - Tr- . -., - . -- ,_m.--c,14.~ ,-, , , ...-,.-----.,,,-w--m r -.-. -,.w,
- ,-...
. , . ., , ~ w s u 's Y ,
V . - - e - > ,
, , rc, , , r a
' ' t 'for/ decontamination and-isitial-treatmentlof persons _'with injuries?in-. , volving radioactivity and: requiring' immediate hospital care.
~ E i ackup.
- i B
. medical support,' confirmed'in writing,'is a'ailableist theLUniversity.
v of Iowa ~1ocated in Iowa City. This hospital would be used to treat, ' - significant radiological emergencies requiring extended specialized.
. treatment.
! - IELP has made' arrangements',' confirmed in. writing, with the Palo'Vol- .unteer Fire Department and Area Amb'ulance Service to provide for ~ transporting persons'with injuries-involving' radioactivity from_the +
DAEC facility to a designated hospital. This service is available 24~ hours;per day.. Radiation monitoring will be provided by the station i whenever it becomes necessary1to use the ambulance service to. transport.
a' contaminated person.
, > t ' l. The staff finds this element of. emergency preparedness, as described - - , in~the Duane Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light'and Power-Corporate emergency plans to be. adequate.
J , l M.
Recovery and Reentry' Planning and Postaccident Operations (Closed..
- -
331/81-03-28) ! Planning Standard f f
- General plans for recovery and reentry are developed.
Emergency Plan ,
Procedures have been developed for entry to previously evacuated areas [
for the purpose of saving lives, search and rescue of missing. and ~ injured ' , . persons, or manipulation, repair, or recovery of critical ~ equipment or [ systems. The plan describes the method for periodically estimating total population exposure.
i
1
The plan describes the recovery organization (Figure 1) which is the ' same as the Corporate Emergency Response Organization structure with l modifications depending on the nature of the accident and postaccident ) , conditions. The Emergency Response & Recovery Director can reorganize
{ both plant and corporate staff personnel as. appropriate. 'ihe recovery organization will be activated upon activation of the EOF, which will ' ! automatically take place for any Site Area or General Emergency.
[
Designated IELP personnel will assemble at the EOF and assume additional ' . responsibilities for assigned positions. These responsibilities are j described in the plan.
, The Emergency Response & Recovery Director is responsible for deter- , mining that a recovery mode may be entered. The Emergency Response & ', Recovery Director is the designated-individual from IELP who has requisite authority, management ability, and technical knowledge to manage recovery
. ' j operations. The primary Emergency Response & Recovery Director is the Director, Nuclear Generation. Procedures have been developed which describe ! .how emergency classifications will be reduced and closed out, and'how ! i
,
j.
-
- i
!' . _ - - _, _ _ -,.-- -, _.. _. _... ~,.. -. - _. _.., _ -. _ _. _ _ _ _.,. _... _ _ _... _ -, _.,. _. -. _
. . . s j members of the emergency response organizations will be ' informed of accident status changes.
The. staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, as described'in the Duane Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light and Power Corporate emergency plans to be adequate.
N.
Exercises and Drills (Closed, 331/81-03-29) and (Closed, 331/81-03-32) Planning Standard Periodic exercises are (will be)-conducted to evaluate major portions of emergency response capabilities, periodic drills are (will be) con-ducted to develop and maintain key skills, and deficiencies identifiec' as a result of exercises or drills are (will be) corrected.
Emergency Plan The plan ensures that an annual exercise is conducted at the DAEC facility to test the adequacy of timing and content of implementing procedures and methods, to test equipment and communications networks, and to ensure that emergency personnel are familiar with their duties.
Once every six years, an exercise should be scheduled between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and midnight, and another between midnight and 6:00 a.m.
Where possible, exercises will be conducted under various seasonal conditions.
Full-scale exercises which test as much of the plans (licensee, State, and local) as is reasonably achievable without mandatory public part-icipation will be scheduled in order to permit agencies to fulfill their full-scale exercise frequency requirements as delineated in 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Sections IV.F.1 and IV.F.2.
Small-scale exercises which test the adequacy of communication links, establish that emergency reponse agencies understand the concept of . EALs, and test at least one other component of the offsite emergency response plans will be conducted each year that a full-scale exercise is not conducted.
A written scenario will be prepared for each annual exercise. This scenario will include the following: (a) the basic objectives of the exercise; (b) the date, time period, places,'and participating organ-izations; (c) the simulated events; (d) the time schedule of real and simulated initiating events; (e) arrangements for qualified observers; and (f) a narrative summary describing the conduct of the exercise to include such things as simulated casualties, rescue of personnel, de-ployment of radiological monitoring teams, and public information activities. Scenarios for the exercise will be sufficiently varied such that all major portions of the plans and organizations are tested at least once every five years.
,
- _ _ __ .- , '*... , , - "
, . q].
'
- [
r , . ~ ' Qualified observers'from Federal, State, or'loca1Lgovernments will be.
-invited to. observe.and critique'the~ exercise..A critique will be conducted as soon^as practical after each exercise to evaluate.the ability of the' emergency response. organizations 1to respond to a sie-y _ ulated emergency situation:as called for in the' plan. A formallevalua. . tion will result from'this critique..The Emergency; Planning Coordinator will ensure;that when deficiencies in the plan or corresponding imple- .menting procedures are discovered during exercises-and/or drills, such ~ documents will'be: revised as'necessary to ensure corrective actions are ~ implemented.
Medical emergency ' rills, involving a simulated contaminated individual,. d - will contain. provisions for participation by local support services.
- agencies (i.e., ambulance and offsit aupportzhospital);and will be con-ducted annually. Health physics drills will be conducted semiannually.
~ These' drills will-~ include response to, and~ analysis of,isimulated elevated-airborne'~and liquid samples and direct radiation measurements.at the DAEC.
'At_least annually, these drills will include a test of postaccident sampl-Ling. systems. Plant environs and~ radiological monitoring drills (onsite and offsite) will be conducted _ annually. _These. drills will consist'of the measurement!and analysis of simulated-radiological impacts in the environs surrounding the DAEC and include communications and record keeping. _ Fire-drills will continue to be conducted in accordance with the DAEC Fire Plan.
The~overall communications system described in Section F of the DAEC emergency plan.will.be-tested annually. These systems include'communica. tions between the facility,' State and local EOCs, and field assessment teams. The capability to notify the NRC from the control room, TSC, Land EOF will be demonstrated at least monthly. The-capability.to notify.the Iowa Office of Disaster Services, and. appropriate local agencies will be-demonstrated at least monthly.
The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, as described - in the Duane Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light and Power Corporate emergency plans to be adequate.
O.
Radiological Emergency Response Training (Closed, 331/81-03-30) Planning Standard ! Radiological emergency response training is provided to those who may-be called on to assist in an emergency.
Emergency Plan All DAEC personnel, including contractor personnel, will receive basic information on emergency planning during their initial indoc-trination and annually thereafter. Applicable portions of the' training programs will be performed whenever major personnel changes occur. This training is conducted to' ensure all personnel are aware of' actions they should take during an emergency. Each member of the emergency response organizations (for example, corporate personnel, medical support personnel, fire ~ brigade, security personnel, repair and corrective action / damage l
.
_ _ L . . control teams, first aid and rescue personnel, communicators, radiological monitoring teams, and supervisors and coordinators) will' receive initia11 and annual retraining on applicable portions of the plan. The American Red Cross Standard First Aid Training will be provided to a sufficient number of plant' personnel.
The proficiency of these emergency response personnel'is ensured by hands on experience as well as practicalLdrills in which each individual.
will demonstrate the ability to perform his assigned emergency function.
Records are maintained regarding all emergency personnel training.
On an annual basis, training will be offered to personnel from offsite agencies and local response organizations who may be called upon for assistance at the DAEC (such as firefighting, medical services, transport of injured, and other local' support services personnel). This training is designed to acquaint the participants with the special problems potentially encountered during a radiological emergency, notification procedures, and their expected roles. Those-organizations that must enter the site also receive training in site access procedures and the identity (by position and title) of those persons in the onsite organiza-tion who will control their support activities.
The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness, as described-in the Duane Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light and Power Corporate emergency plans to be adequate.
P.
Responsibility for the Planning Effort: Development, Periodic Review, and Distribution of Emergency Plans (Closed, 331/81-03-31) and (Closed, 331/81-03-33) Planning Standard Responsibilities for plan development and review and for distribution of emergency plans are established, and planners are properly trained.
Emergency Plan The Assistant Vice President, Nuclear Generation, has been delegated the overall responsibility and authority for radiological emergency response planning at the DAEC. This overall responsibility has been delegated in part to the Manager, Nuclear Licensing and Fuels, who is ' the Emergency Planning Coordinator. He has the responsibility for coordinating the maintenance of the DAEC plan. The Senior Vice President Energy Resources and Utilization, Research and Environment is responsible for recommending approval of the Corporate Emergency Response Plan to the President of IELP, who will exercise final approval authority. The plan describes the training program for the emergency planning staff.
To ensure that the plan and the corresponding implementing procedures are kept current and updated, the Emergency Planning Coordinator will ensure the reviewing and updating of the DAEC and Corporate emergency plans and coordinating of offsite emergency planning efforts.
.
_ - -
- ,, . . . , . . - ~.. . ~ >Y , s-[ -{' - d " ' . c g_ , ' u; i , ~
- '
, .: -. . n, ' _ < . + .., = . = , - The Emergency Planning Coordinator;is responsibleffor maintaining ~a ~ distribution list.offall; holders of the plans. -Changes to1these documents will be. distributed;in accordance with the_ appropriate Administrative ' ,
- Control Procedures. Revised pages.will be dated and_ marked to show:
a ' where changes have.been made. : Telephone' numbers contained in emergency ,
_ ' procedures used for-notification will be' reviewed and updated quarterly.
~ - The. Emergency Planning Coordinator is responsible for ensuring that~an-annual. review:of-the plans is conducted. The plan will be updated,'as appropriate, and at least every :two years to : include the results of: training sessions and drills conducted;1to-reflect: relevant changes in-
!the IELP, DAEC,-l' cal, State, or Federal organizations; or.-to reflect o - - changes in licensing requirements or' regulatory guides. The' Emergency - F Plan Implementing Procedures will be reviewed concurrently with the plan = and changes made or new procedures. written, as necessary; _ In addition,-
~ ' ~ the: plan and procedures will be revised whenever significant-changes are- - made or deficiencies are identified-during the course of the year.
Each' plan contains a detailed listing of supporting plans anditheir - , source. A section in the plan outlines the. required: content of imple- '
- .
menting. procedures, and lists the subjects of proceduresirequired to implement the plan. :The plan containsla specific table of. contents and . -a cross-reference to NUREG-0654.
The Emergency Preparedness Coordinator will ensure that an independent review of theLemergency preparedness program.is conducted annually by , an organization not responsible for'the emergency preparedness program.
l The review will-include both'the DAEC-and Corporate plans and their respective' implementing. procedures, training,: readiness testing,' equip-
ment, and interfaces with State and local governments. The Emergency-Planning Coordinator will ensure the evaluation-and correction of review-
-findings. A report'will be submitted to responsible corporata and DAEC ~ management as well as cognizant local and State authorities.
, , The staff finds this element of emergency preparedness,-as described-l l in the Duane' Arnold Energy Center and Iowa Electric Light and Power Corporate emergency plans to be adequate.
i i Conclusion ) -Based on our review of the Duane Arnold Energy Center and-Iowa Electric.
Light and Power Corporate emergency plans for onsite emergency prepared-
l ness at the Duane Arnold Energy Center, we conclude that the licensee's
emergency plan meets the planning standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the ' requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix E.
The review of the permanent Emergency Response Facilities (ERFs) will be' discussed ~1n a separate report.
i . !
< f ._ _-,. _.._ -. _ -. - _,_ _ _ _. -, _ -___ . - .. . -. }}