IR 05000324/1974012
| ML20044C500 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick |
| Issue date: | 08/01/1974 |
| From: | Bryant J, Mcfarland C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20044C467 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-92-569 50-324-74-12, 50-325-74-06, 50-325-74-6, NUDOCS 9303230147 | |
| Download: ML20044C500 (8) | |
Text
..
.
.
. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
'
o :-~
u.s.n D E,% E
'
-}/
t(',, s,._;_..
.
,..OM:C EN2RGY COMM!E SiON
._
- t
-
-
- 2.. e
' F E : UJ.TT"~i G"IC -
.
,
m
\\' '.. V -
^ =,I
%,o o
woe e%
,
m ~.u -'
- .., s.
..
,a t 8,nrr.. w r-<*c'
,...-e..
+n'a
.
,... > c.a... > na W*
M G 1 13 %
RO Inspection Report Nos. 50-324/74-12 and 50-325/74-6 Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company 336 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
~
Facility Names: Brunswick 2 and I Docket Nos.:
50-324 and 50-325 License Nos.:
CPPR-67 and CPPR-68 Category:
A3 and A2
.
Location: Southport, North Carolina Type of License: 821 Mwe, BWR, G-E Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced, Construction Dates of Inspection: June 25-28, 1974 Dates of Previous Inspection: June 6, 7,11-13,1974 (Unit 1)
June 10-14,1974 (Unit 2)
Inspector-in-Charge:
F. U. Bower, Reactor Inspector Engineering Section
'
Facilities Construction Branch Accompanying Inspectors: None
'
Other Accompanying Personnel: None
-
Principal Inspector:
/
/-2 9' 7Y '
C. R. McFarland, Reactor Inspector Date Facilities Section Facilities Construction Branch Reviewed By:
c/
rue 4r s
7-29-M f,C. Bryant, Senior Inspector Date O nilities Section Facilities Construction Branch
_
_
9303230147 930202
~
-
" ~ ' ' ~
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ -
.
-
.
.
.=.
.
.
,
,
.
.
RO Rpt. Nos. 50-324/74-12 and-2-
'
50-325/74-6
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS t
.
!
I.
Enforcement Action r
>
A.
Violations I
None B.
Safety Items
!
None l
II.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters l
A.
Violations
!
!
74-9-Al(II)
Radiography of Field Welds
!
L Radiography performed on field welds was not in i
accordance with the radiographic procedures
!
specified in the FSAR, Appendix A, Section A.4.
This is contrary to Criterion.V of 10 CFR 50,-
j Appendix B.
This item remains open.
74-3-A2(II)
Valve Wall Vendor Documentation-l Contrary to Criterion VII, the vendor documenta-
tion did not provide evidence that the valve
'
wall thickness met the procurement requirements.
'
This item remains open.
73-ll-Al(II)
Redundant Channel Cable Separation
.
.
!
The objectionable language of the applicable i
specification has been altered and revision 4
!
to specification 9527-01-48-4 has been released
{
This item is closed.
(Details I, paragraph 3)
'
,
73-11-A2(II)
Redundant Channel Conflicts
!
Corrective action has been initiated. Onsite j
discussions indicate that the corrective action
!
-
!
-
}
i-I i
i
'
-
1
..
- '
-1 I
.
-
.
-
-
-
..
-
- - - -
.
_
._
=_.
.
-
- *
i
.
RO kpt. Nos. 50-324/74-12 and-3-
-
-
50-325/74-6
i
,
will provide a qualified installation.
This item remains open pending completion of the
anticipated action.
(Details I, paragraph 4)
,
i B.
Safety Items
'
\\
None III.
New Unresolved Items
!
None i
t IV.
Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items 74-10/1 Carolina Power and Light Company (CP&L) Report of Audit of General Electric Company Nuclear Enerev Products Division
(GE-NEPD) June 11-13, 1974
!
t The CP&L report of this audit will be reviewed by-Region II i
during a subsequent inspection..
.i 74-9/2 Preoperational. Baseline Examination Plan
!
The preoperational baseline examination plan does not
-
include several items specified as a part of baseline j
inspection in the FSAR.
'
.. ;
74-5/1 Unit 1 Suppression Chamber Liner Concrete Repair Deficiencies i
On June 3, 1974, CP&L notified Region II by telecon of l
deficiencies in the epoxy grouting used to repair-voids
in the Unit 1 suppression chamber concrete.- Additional
~
testing is being performed.
CP&L will report their:
!
evaluation and corrective action within 30 days.per the l
requirements of 10 CFR 50.55(e)'.
This item remains open.
74-4/1 Interrelation of Primary Containment Isolation Valves
'I F008 (ESSII) and F009 (ESSI)
)
.
Documentation is now in order.- This item is closed.
l L
(Details I, paragraph 5)
,
l 74-4/2 Cable Support System - Design Concept and Installation Workmanship Standards
-
.
Corrective actions have been completedRin several arcas, however,, deficiency reports are open in other areas.
This item remains open.
(Details 1, paragraph 6)
}
l l
!
!
-
'
!
!'
,
.
.
- -
-
-
_
_
.
.
_
. _
'
.
~
'
~
..-.
RO Rpt. Nos. 50-324/74-12 and-4-
50-325/74-6
-
q
,
74-2/1 Unit 1 Drywell Head
BER repairs of the Unit 1 drywell head need to be documented.
This item remains open.
r 73-13/2 QA/QC of Hangers, Snubbers and Restraints l
CP&L and B6R have satisfactorily revised the crection,
!
inspection and QA/QC programs related to hangers, snubbers and restraints.
This.igen will remain open until additional i
work can be inspected.
^
!
73-3/2 Piping Documentation
!
The licensee and B&R are auditing all completed weld r
joints to insure that complete documentation exists for each weld joint.
This item remains open.
73-1/1 Verification of Nuclear Valves to Design Specifications
.
(RO:II letters dated June 30, 1972, and February 16, 1973).
I The following additional items were previously identified j
which require solution:
,
a.
Valve Bonnet and Cover Plate Thickness Measurements
'I
Thickness measurements were not made of valve bonnets
'
.
and some valve covers.
t b.
Valve Wall QA Records
,
The quality assurance records of measurements were recorded in a manner that were not interpretable by the inspector.
.>
The valve wall thickness verification program remains
, open pending review of the documentation that CP&L
'
will submit as a result of their meeting at Region
+
11 on May 22, 1974.
j V.
Design Changes
,
,
None
.
f V1.
Unusual Occurrences i
Nonc
_
>
.
.
-
.
u e
-
-
,
n,
-,.,,
.
.
_
_
-.. - _. -.
.
.
-
.
R0 Rpt. Kos. 50-324/74-12 and-5-
,
50-325/74-6
.c f
-
VII. Other Significant Findings I
.
None r
't VIII.
Manacement Interview i
t i
The inspector tiet with F. R. Coburn, CPLL Project QA Specialist, l
and others of the site ctsff to apprise them of the ganeral crece i
of inspection and the findings as noted in this report.
.
)
l t
i
.
'
t
i i
i i
,
.
,
i
i
!
!
!
!
!
I i
i
r
i
!
.
i
.I t
.
.
i i
.. -.
!
!
+
'
.
,
.
.
..
^
.
.
-
!
!
. -
-
RO Rpt. Nos. 50-324/74-12 and I-l
-
-
.
50-325/74-6 DEIAILS I Prepared By:
I
- OL" Y-
-
F. U.. Bower, Reactor Inspector Date
'l Engineering Section
!
'
f Facilities Construction Branch
<
'
,,
Dates of Inspection: Jun 38, 974
'
/
/
<
i
,
Reviewed By:
.
. O 74 7A Y
' D6te B.J'Cochp'n,ActingSeniorInspector
~
,
Facilitids Section Facilities Construction Branch
!
i The discussion contained in this sec, tion of this report applies to Units 1 and 2 equally unless noted otherwise.
s I
1.
Persons Contacted e
a.
Carolina Power and Light Company (CP&L)
r R. Coburn - QC Specialist i
G. Maxwell - QC Technician l
R. Coats - Engineering Site Representative
W. Price - Project Electrical Engineer (Raleigh)
i b.
Brown and Root (B&R)
.
.
W. Rowley - Electrical Turnover Supervisor
W. Fehling - Internal Audit-Supervisor
!
2.
Unit No.1. - Electrical / Instrumentation (E/I) Construction' Progress i
!
>
E/I construction in Unit No. 1 is still in the very early stages.
- Most of the activity has been related to the installation of cable support systems (trays) and balance-of-plant (DOP) equipment and
,
related cabling. Very little of the safety related systems materials
'
,
have been installed.
!
!
'
Unit No. 2 vork is. progressing on a priority basis which is expected to continue until the unit is ready for service.
I
-
!
!
>
l
.
I-i o
f
'
.
-
' '
R0 Rpt. Nos. 50-324/74-12 and I-2
,
,,
50-325/74-6
,
,
3.
Redundant Channel Cable Separation (73-11-A1)
The effective specification for control of cable installat' ion (UE&C 9527-01-45-4) has been altered and reissued as Revision 4
,
l (R-4).
This revision incorporates wording that is intended to assure that the single failure criteria is met.
l During review of this specification revision, it was found necessary i
to discuss and reach an understanding with the responsible CP&L l
staff personnel regarding the particular meaning of the term " instrument J
viring" as used therein.
As agreed, this term describes only those
{
lov energy systems that are isolated from the safety related systems l
power and/or control wiring by means that assure their individuality
!
and forestalls propagation of failures to other systems; i.e.,
l transformers, relay contacts, etc.
Furthermore, the systems in
!
discussion are termed "related circuits" and do not supply signals i
and/or other intelligence necessary to the operation or performance
!
of safety related systems.
There are no further questions and this
.I item is closed.
!
l 4.
Redundant Channel Conflict (73-11-A2)
!
l Discussions with the responsible CP&L engineering representatives and an examination of their preliminary internal documents related l
to this subject tended to assure that a broad based corrective
!
action program was in the early stages of development.
It was the inspector's urderstanding, reached through the above described
!
activities, that the developing program would emerge as a prepared j
docu=ent that would serve as a baseline criteria to regulate and l
'
coordinate the activities of the several consultants expected to j
participate.
This document is expected to describe the program
'
scope and the detailed procedure needed to accomplish the work in a
,
qualified manner.
l r
As a part of this ongoing program, it is anticipated'that interin l
inspections vill be performed by Region II, the first of which is t
expected to occur when the licensee feels that a representative portion of the effort can be made available for an evaluation.
This early examination can not be conclusive; however, it vill afford an opportunity to review and correct any potential defi-ciencies prior to the expenditure of time and effort in unacceptable l
,
'
activity.
,!
i
'
-
j
,
!
}
!
<
+
i
!
i
!
f
r h
-
l l
-.
.
!
---
- -.
..
.
r Ar :
.
.
,
' ~
RO Rpt. Nos. 50-324/74-12 and I-3
.,,,
50-325/74-6 5.
Interrelation of Primary Containment Isolation Valves F008 (ESSII)
F009 (ESSI) (74-4/1)
Revision 5 of construction drawing 9527-F-9555, Sheet 7 has been
,
approved and released.
This revision contains the details of the subject installation and answers those questions originally posed by the inspector.
There are no further questions and this item is closed.
6.
Cable Support System - Desien Concept and Installation Workmanship Standards inspection of those regions previously questioned revealed that the licensee has caused some corrective work to be initiated as a start towards executing their commitment to this problem area.
The.
portions of the effort that the inspector was capable of examining indicates that the work is an improvement and is being undertaken to meet specification requirements.(Ref. UE&C 9527-01-48-01) CP&L site QC personnel in their surveillance activity have found reasons to accept much of the work in progress, however, examination of the surveillance memo file, DDR file and the inspection report file indicate an appreciable number of areas where work is still to be accomplished. Discussions with the staff on this subject also indicates that there may be some disagreement between the construction group and the QC groups in their subjective opinions on what is acceptabic.
'
This item vill remain open until a consensus is reached and implemented for the corrective action.
>
>
i
'
i r
!
!
?
-
F
>
'
!.
!
i l
>
k
!
-