IR 05000322/1981011
| ML20010B161 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 07/20/1981 |
| From: | Higgins J, Kister H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010B158 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-322-81-11, NUDOCS 8108140162 | |
| Download: ML20010B161 (4) | |
Text
r
.
.
..
c.
U.S. NUCLEAR P.EGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I
'
Report No. 50-322/81-11 Docket No. 50-322 License No. CPPR-95 Priority
.Catagory B
--
Licensee:
Long Island Lighting Company 175 East Old Country Road Hicksville, New York 11801
.
Facility Name:
Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 Inspection at:
Shoreham, New York Inspection conducted: May'18-June 30, 1981 Inspectors:
A-O Sl J[C.HQns,SeniorResidentInspector date signec date signed
-
cate signed Approved by:
.
IdB
/
H.' B. Kistbr,Tnief, Reactor Projects Section IC '
6 ate signed Projects Branch #1, DRPI
.
Insoection Summary:
.
Insoections on_: May-18-June 30,1981 (Inspection Report No. 50-322/81-11)
Areas Inspected: Routine onsite regular and backshift inspections by the residant inspector (101 inspection hours) of work activities, preoperational testing, and plant staff activities including:
tours of the facility; test witnessing; review of utility management structure and technical resources; review of control room;
.
and, followup on previous inspection findings.
.
Results: No violations.were identified.
8108140162 810721 '
PDR ADOCK 05000322~
-
G PDR Region I Form 12
!
(Rev. April 77)
.
.
-
...
.
_ _..
.
.,
..
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted D. Binder, Manager, Nuclear Engineering (L)
T. Gerecke, Quality Assurance Manager (L)
J. Kelly, Field QA Manager (L)
R. Kubinak, Manager, Nuclear Operations Support (L)
W. Klein, Lead Startup Engineer (L)
W. Matejek, Lead Advisory Engineer (S&W)
B. McCaffrey, Assistant Project Manager (L)
J. Notaro, Operating Engineer (L)
J. Novarro, Project Manager (L)
A. Pederson, Operations Manager (GE)
M. Pollock, Vice President, Nuclear (L)
J. Riley, Lead Startup Engineer (GE)
J. Rivello, Plant Manager (L)
W. Steiger, Chief Operating Engineer (L)
E. Youngling, Startup Manager (L)
GE - General Electric L
- Long Island Lighting Company S&W - Stona and Webster The inspector also held discussions with other licensee and contractor personnel during the course of the inspection including management, clerical, maintenance, operations, engineering, testing, quality assurance and construction personnel.
2.
Previous Inspection Item Update (closed) Unresolved Item (322/80-14-10):
HPCI vacuum pump discharge:
In Revision 21 to the FSAR, the licensee corrected the description of the HPCI vacuum pump to indicate that its discharge goes to the Reactor Building Standby Ventilation System vice the Suppression Chamoer.
(closed) Unresolved Item (322/81-04-04):
Documentation of Manual Disconnect Testing: The licensee's Substation Maintenance group performed the initial checkout of the manual disconnects between the station transformers and the offsite power system.
Records of these checkouts, titled " Power Switch or Power Fuse Inspection Report", were obtained from files located offsite.
The inspector reviewed these records for manual disconnect switches number 1355 and 1339 and had no further'auestions. This item is close r-
-
._
.
..
.
..
..
'3'
-
3.
Plant Tour The inspector conducted periodic tours of accessible areas in the plant
~
during normal and backshift hours.
During these tours, the following.
specific items were evaluated:
-- Hot Work: Adequacy of fire prevention / protection measures used.
-- Fire Equipment: Operability and evidence of periodic inspection of fire suppression equipment, and review of fire protection insurance inspection.
,
-- Housekeeping: Minimal accumulations of debris and maintenance of required cleanness levels of systems under or following testing.
.
-- Equipment Preservation: Maintenance of special precautionary measures i
for installed equipment, as applicable.
-- Component Tagging:
Implementation and observance of equipment tagging.
,
for safety, equipment protection, and jurisdiction.
,
-- Logs: Completeness of logs maintained.
-- Security: Adequate site construction security.
.
,
-- Prohibited Items: Observations to determine no smoking in restricted j
areas and no alcoholic beverages on site.
-- Weld Rod Control: Observations to determine weld rod was being controlled in accordance with site procedures.
'
No violations were identified.
'
4.
Test Witnessing i
l During the inspection period, the inspector witnessed a portion of the below i
'est:
(
CF.109.001, Integrated Flush of Systems Utilizing the Reactor Pressure Vessel with TCN's 1,L2 and 3.-
During the test the inspector noted that:
,
- the test procedure was approved and released for performance as 4.
required;
'
- test procedure'was in use by personnel performing the test;
- test personnel were suitably qualified;
- test exceptions were appropriately documented;
'-
4
.
. E..
.... i
.. m
g_
_
....
m.-
..
-4-test instrumentation was properly calibrated;
-
-- data was properly logged; and
- test acceptance criteria were met' for portions observed.
The inspector observed portions of the cleaning and inspection of Safety Relief Valve (SRV) discharge lines and ' associated "T" quencher. spargers following the flush of-the SRV lines.
. 5.
Utility Management Structure and Technical Resources Studies ' performed in the aftermath of the Three Mile Island '(TMI) nuclear plant accident'have called for upgrading in certain areas of utility management oversight and tec;nical competence. Guidelines in this area were published in September,1980, in'a Draft Report, NUREG-0731, titled " Guide-lines for. Utility Management Structure and Technical Resources".
This area is also identifieo in the TMI Action' Plan as Item I.B.1.
The NRC conducted a review of the licensee's organization on May 18-21 and May 29.. Participating in the review were two members-of the Licensee Qualifications Branch, the Licensing Project Manager and the Resident Inspector. The results of the :
review will be' documented the Safety Evaluation Report Supplement.
6.
Control Rooms Human Factors Review During the week of March 30, 1980 the NRC performed a detailed review of
-
,the human factors aspects of the Shoreham' Control-Room. The NRC provided the licensee with the results of this review-in a letter from Tedesco to-Pollock and discussed the findings at a meeting on May 29,:1981. During.the-inspection period the inspector participated in the meeting and in subsequent-phone conversations to' discuss the: findings of'the review. The inspector also performed followup inspections of the Shoreham Control Room in the areas of
,
identified discrepancies, in order to determine the adequacy of proposed corrective acti Ms.
Final NRC determinations on the acceptability of proposed actions will be reported by separate correspondence.
7.
Management Meetings At periodic intervals during the course of this inspection, meetings were held with plant management to discuss the scope and findings of 'this inspection. The resident. inspector also attended the entrance meeting of a region-based inspector and the meeting to discuss the findings of the Utility Managem +t Structure Review Group with licensee management.
i
'
l
- <-
t
,
e v
-- - - - -
- -- - - -
- -
.
- - -
-
- - - - - -. - -.
- -... -. -
-. - -. - - - - -
- - - -.
- - -
.. - -
-.. - - - - - - -.
. -
. - -
.
- -
-
. - -
..
-
. -
- - -