IR 05000322/1979011

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-322/79-11 on 790723-27.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Overall Preoperational Test Program,Cooling Water Sys,Mgt Meeting & Previous Insp Items
ML19254E385
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 09/06/1979
From: Briggs L, Caphton D, Nicholas H
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML19254E384 List:
References
50-322-79-11, NUDOCS 7911010018
Download: ML19254E385 (9)


Text

.

.

,

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I Report No.

50-322/79-11 Docket No.

50-322 License No.

CPPR-95 Priority Category R

--

Licensee:

Lona Island Liattino comoany 175 East Old Country Road Hicksville, New York 11801

-

Facility Name: _ %oreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 Inspection at:

Shoreham, New York Inspection conducted:

July 3-

, 1979

Nf

'

Inspectors:

.

-

H. H. Nicholas, Reactor Inspector

/datd signed Y

?D f

hf L. E. BriggsF Reactor Inspector date signed CPK-~

ekhs

. C. H Ry or Inspector date signec Approved by:

&

4'

7 /77

,,,

D. L! Caphton, Chief, Nuclear Support

'date s'igned Section No.1, RO&NS Branch I

Inspection Summary:

Inspection on July 23-27, 1979 (Recort No. 50-322/79-11)

Areas inspected:

Routine, unannounced inspection by regional based inspectors of the overall preoperational test program including preoperational test program requirements, test procedures and test sequencing, test procedure verification, and test procedure review; cooling water systems; management meeting; tours of the facility; and, followup on previous inspection items.

The inspection involved 74.5 inspector-hours onsite by three regional based inspectors.

Results:

No items of noncompliance were identified.

1281.T Region I Form 12

-

7 911010 O ( 'Do (Rev. April 77)

.

.

,

DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Long Island Lighting Company

+Mr. L. Calone, Chief Technical Engineer Mr. R. Cavalieri, Test Engineer Mr. R. Corona, Test Engineer

  • +Mr. D. Durand, 0QA Er gineer Mr. J. Emr, Safety Et aineer

+Mr. T. Gerecke, QA Manager Mr. J. Higgins, QA Engineer

+Mr. J. Kelly, Field QA Manager

  • +Mr. L. Lewin, Asst. Startup Manager Mr. A. Muller, QC Engineer
  • +Mr. J. Novarro, Project Manager
  • Mr. J. Rivello, Plant Manager

+Mr. J. Smith, Regulatory Supervisor

+Mr. J. Taylor, Startup Manager Mr. D. Terry, Lead Startup Engineer Stone and Webster Corporation

  • +Mr. J. Baker, Lead Advisory Engineer Mr. C. Fonseca, Asst. Project Engineer Mr. B. Perkins, Test Engineer Mr. R. Sherwin, Test Engineer Mr. D. Yasi, Test Engineer General Electric Corporation Mr. A. Pederson, Operations Manager The inspectors also interviewed other licensee personnel during the course of the insoection.

+ denotes those present at the management meeting.

  • denotes those present at the exit interview.

2.

Status of Prtvious Inspection Findings (0 pen) UnresoIved item (322/79-05-01): Verify that the time frame within which the sta tup manual will be periodically reviewed and updated is-specifically designated.

This resolution is in progress and will be examined on a subsequent inspection.

1281 M~

.

.

(0 pen) Deficiency item (322/79-05-02): Failure to review and update EQAP's annually as required by EQAP 5.1.

Action is being taken to prevent a reoccurrence and will be reviewed on a subsequent inspection.

(0 pen) Unresolved item (322/79-05-03): Verify that the startup manual was revised to be consistent with the QA organization and May 1979 FSAR revision.

This revision is in progress and will be examined and verified during a subsequent inspection.

3.

Overall Preoperational Test Program a.

Preoperational Test Program Requirements Discussion:

The inspector met with ti e startup manager and his staff and discussed various phases of the pecaperational test program requirements including:

Test Program,

--

Test Organization,

--

Test Program Administration,

--

--

Document Control, and, Design Changes and Modifications.

--

The following areas were also discussed and expanded upon:

Pipe support and restraint systems,

--

Component and pipe expansion,

--

Inservice inspection,

--

Loose parts monitoring system, and,

--

Vibration.

--

A The concerns in these areas are procedures, testing, and documentation.

References:

The following references were used for reviews and discussions:

--

Startup Manual,

--

Final Safety Analysis Report, Station Operations Manual,

--

--

Quality Assurance Manual, Quality Assurance Procedures,

--

System Description Manual, and,

--

--

Regulatory Guide 168, Initial Test Programs for Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants.

1281

~

'

.

.

Findings:

As a result of reviews of references and discussions with the startup manager and his staff, no discrepancies were noted with the test program requirements, and the inspector had no further questions in this area at this time.

The inspector identified a concern, the Loose Parts Monitoring system was not found to be listed in the preoperational test program startup procedure status listing nor was a procedure available.

The startup manager acknowledged tne inspector's concern and agreed that the Loose Parts Monitoring System will be included in the test program and a procedure will be forthcoming.

The inspector had no further questions on this item at this time.

This will be a7 inspector followup item (IFI) (322/79-11-01).

b.

Test Procedures and Test Sequencing Discussion:

The inspector met with the licensee's representatives and discussed the status of procedures, their review and approval, and test sequenc.ing.

Findings:

'

Based upon discussions with the licensee's representatives, a review of the procedure status, the review cycle, and the test sequencing; procedures are being received by NRC for review in adequate time.

The inspector had no further questions at this time.

c.

Test Procedure Verification The following procedure were reviewed to verify that adequate testing is planned to satisfy regulatory guidance and licensee commitments:

PT 136.001 Revision 0, Approved February 21, 1979, Nuclear

--

Boiler Process Instrumentation PT 311.001 A Revision 0, Approved November 14, 1978, 480 V Emergency

--

Bus Distribution: BUS 111 PT 311.001B Rev Mion 0, Approved November 14, 1978, 480 V Emergency

--

Bus Distribution: BUS 112 1281 T

'

.

PT 311.001C Revision 0, Approved November 14, 1978, 480 V Emergency

--

Bos Distribution: BUS 113 PT 707.000 Revision 0. ' Approved December'21,1977, Fuel Pool

~~

--

Cooling System PT 709.001 Revision 0, Approved March 15, 1978, Reactor Water

--

Cleanup PT 117.001-3 Revision 3, Approved August 10, 1978, Instrument

--

and Service Air PT 504.001 Revision 0, Approved March 21, 1979, Smoke, Flame

--

and Temperature Detection

.

PT 102.001 Revision 0, Approved August 23, 1978, Circulating

--

Water System PT 107.001-3 Revision 3, Approved March 16, 1977, Makeup

--

Demineralizer and Transfer System PT 117.002 Revision 0, Approved May 23, 1979, Loss of Instrument

--

Air PT 118.001 Revision 0, Approved May 16,'1978, Reactor Building

--

Closed Loop Cooling Water PT 122.001 Revision 0, Approved August 23, 1978, Service Water

--

System PT 312.001A Revision 0, Approved May 2, 1979, 120 VAC - RPS - MG -

--

Sets PT 312.001B Revision 0, Approved May 2, 1979, 120 VAC - RPS - MG -

--

Sets PT 319.001 Revision 0, Approved April 25, 1979, Plant Coninunications

--

PT 415.001 A-1 Revision 0, Approved March 16, 1977, Screenwell

--

Pump House Ventilation System PT 415.001 B-1 Revision 0, Approved March 16, 1977, Screenwell

--

Pump House Ventilation System PT 651.001 Revision 0, Approved December 20, 1978, Process Computer

--

1281 Z!

'.

PT 654.005 Revision 0, Approved July 19, 1978, Drywell Floor

--

Seal Pressure Monitoring System PT 655.001 Revision 0, Approved June 20, 1979, Seismic Monitoring

--

System PT 703.001 Revision 0, Approved May 23, 1979 Fuel viandling

--

and Vessel Servicing Equipment PT 402.001 Revision 0, Approved July 25, 1979, Primary Containment

--

Atmospheric Control System PT 315.001 A Revision 0, Approved July 25, 1979, 125 VDC Power

--

Distributien PT 315.001B Revision 0, Approved July 25, 1979, 125 VDC Power

--

Distribution

.

--

PT 315.001C Revision 0, Approved July 25, 1979, 125 VDC Power Distribution This inspection verified that tha licensee had a procedure written, reviewed and approved.

Licensee management approval was in accordance with established procedures and test objectives were consistent with test titles.

Fi' dings:

No distracancies were noted in the review of these procedures and the inspector nad no further questions at this time.

d.

Test Procedure Review Procedures Reviewed:

PT 120.002 Revision 0, Approved November 14, 1978, Reactor

--

Pressure Vessel Internals Vibration Test PT 123.001 Revision 0, Approved June 15, 1977, Standby Liquid

--

Control System PT 121.001 Revision 0, Approved January 26, 1979, Residual

--

Beat Removal System PT 119.001 Revision 0, Approved November 14, 1978, Reactor Core

--

Isolation Cooling System 1281

~L'

.

PT 413.001 Revision 0, Approved November 14, 1978. Primary

--

Containment Cooling PT 133.001 Revision 0, Approved November 14, 1978, Remote

--

Shutdown Panel PT 656.001 Revision 0, Approved May 10, 1979, Feed Water Control

--

The procedures were reviewed for technical and administrative adequacy and included the following:

Management review and approval,

--

Procedure format,

--

Test objectives clearly stated,

--

--

Prerequisites, Environmental conditions,

--

Acceptance criteria,

--

References,

--

Initial conditions,

-

--

--

Test objectives are met, Performance verification,

--

--

Recording conduct of test,

--

Restoration of system to normal after test, Identification of personnel conducting and evaluating test data, and

--

Independent verification of critical steps or parameters.

--

The inspector ascertained by review of the above procedures that they are consistent with regulatory requirements, guidance and licensee commitments.

Findings:

No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedures and the inspector had no further questions at this time.

4.

Cooling Water Systems Discussion:

The inspector interviewed licensee's representatives in the startup testing group and held discussions on the following:

--

Intake Canal and Screenwell Pump House, Circulating Water System,

--

Service Water System,

--

Reactor Building Closed Loop Cooling Water System,

--

Turbine Building Closed Loop Cooling Water System,

--

1281

~

'

Demineralized Mater Makeup System,

--

Well Water Supply System,

--

Potable Water Supply and Domestic Water Systen, and,

--

Fire Main Distribution.

--

References :

Final Safety Analysis Report,

--

Startup Manual,

--

System Description Manual, and

--

Prints, Drawings and Diagrams.

--

Findings:

As a result of inspections of systems, components, areas, structures, review of referenced documents, and discussions with personnel, no dis-crepancies were noted and the inspector had no further questions at this time.

A review of these systems, their procedures, completions and turnovers, will continue during subsequent inspections.

5.

Management Meeting During the course of the inspection the inspectors met with on site management (see Paragraph 1 for attendees) to discuss various aspects of the NRC resident inspection program.

Items '. hat were discussed included plans for a future meeting to cover the resident inspection program in greater depth, the resident inspectors office facilities, NRC phone lines to the site, NRC and LILCo organization, and, an overview of the NRC inspection program througnout the preoperational testing and startup testing phases.

6.

Plant Tours Several plant tours were conducted during the course of the inspection including containment drywell and wetwell, reactor building, turbine building, radwaste building, control building, control room, diesel generator rooms, auxiliary boiler room, battery rooms, Intake Canal and screenwell pump house, and, fire pumphouse.

The inspectors observed the status of construction, cleanliness and preser-vation of equipment, fire protection equipment, work in progress, existing pipe and component supports and tagging of equipment. With the exception of the below item, the inspectors had no questions at this time as a result of these tours.

1281 M'

...

,

.

The inspector noted that several fire extinguishers in the reactor building were either not sealed or below full charge. The inspectors discussed with the licensee's representatives their program for checkirg and maintaining fire extinguishers and fire hose stations.

The inspectors also reviewed the logs maintained in the fire protection area and noted that significant effort was being expended to maintain all fire protection equipment operable.

This area will receive further inspector review diring subsequent inspection. This will be an inspector followup item.

(IFI) (322/79-11-02)

7.

Exit Interview At the conclusion of the site inspection on July 27, 1979, an exit meeting was conducted with the licensee's senior site representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1).

The findings were identified and previous unresolved and open items were discussed.

1281 1