IR 05000321/2004026

Notice of Violation from Insp on 850321-0426

ML20126H966
Person / Time
Site:	Hatch, Yankee Rowe
Issue date:	06/04/1985
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20126H885	List: IR 05000029/1985007 IR 05000321/2004026 ML20126H883
References
50-029-85-07, 50-29-85-7, NUDOCS 8506100473
Download: ML20126H966 (1)

Text

~

. . .

.

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Yankee Atomic Electric Company Docket No. 50-29 Yankee Nuclear Power Station License No. DPR-3 As a result of the inspection conducted on March 21 - April 26, 1985, and in ac-cordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR 2, Appendix C) published in the Federal Register on March 8, 1984 (49 FR 8583), the following violation was iden-tified:

Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires that written procedures shall be es-tablished that meet or exceed the requirements and recommendations of Appendix

"A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33, November,197 Regulatory Guide 1.33 requires implemented procedures for Technical Specification surveillance tests. Tech-nical Specification 4.3.3.3 specifies a daily surveillance requirement con-sisting of a channel check to demonstrate operability of the meteorological monitoring instrumentation channels. This surveillance is to include a qualitative assessment of channel behavio Contrary.to the above, on April 24, 1985, it was determined that a written procedure was not established that prescribes the required qualitative as-sessment of channel behavior that would ascertain the daily operability of the meteorological monitoring instrumentation channel This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Yankee Atomic Electric Company is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, in-cluding: (1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, considera-tion will be given to extending this response tim $ ,