IR 05000317/1982021

IE Mgt Meeting Rept 50-317/82-21 on 820707.Major Items Discussed:Nrc Concerns Re Recent Insp Findings on Inoperability of Hydrogen Analyzer During Cycle 5 & Concerns About Containment Leakage Rate

ML20062K264
Person / Time
Site:	Calvert Cliffs
Issue date:	07/21/1982
From:	Architzel R, Mccabe E, Trimble D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20062K244	List: IR 05000317/1982021 ML20062K239
References
50-317-82-21, NUDOCS 8208170104
Download: ML20062K264 (3)

Text

.

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY CONIISSION Region I Report N /82-21 Docket N License No. DPR-53 Priority ---

Category C Licensee: Baltimore Gas and Electric Company P. O. Box 1475 Baltimore, Maryland 21203 Facility Name: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 Meeting At: USNRC, Region I, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania Meeting Conducted: July 7,1982 NRC Personnel: //

R. E. Architzel, Senior Resident Inspector 7/n/E date signed ll fr7 9/0hb D. C' Trimble, Resident Inspector date signed date signed Approved By: de k OA 7 I 48 # E. C. McCabe, Jr. , Chief, Reactor Projects date signed Section 2B Meeting Summary:

Enforcement Conference on July 7,1982 (Report No. 50-317/82-21)

Suninary: Special enforcement conference convened by NRC Region I management to discuss NRC concerns regarding recent inspection findings related to the inoperability of hydrogen analyzer during cycle 5 and concerns about the Unit 1 containment leakage rate being greater than required limit. Senior Baltimore Gas and Electric Company and NRC Region I management personnel attended the meeting which was held at the Region I office. The meeting was of two hours duration.

8208170104 820802 '

PDR ADOCK 05000317 O PDR

. .

DETAILS Attendees Baltimore Gas and Electric Company A. E. Lundvall, Jr., Vice President, Supply L. B. Russell, Plant Superintendent J. A. Tiernan, Manager, Nuclear Power U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission J. M. Allan, Deputy Regional Administrator R. W. Starostecki, Director, DPRP T. T. Martin, Director, DETP R. R. Keimig, Chief, RPB#2 R. T. Carlson, Director, E&I D. J. Holody, TIB R. E. Architzel, SRRI at Calvert Cliffs D. C. Trimble, RRI at Calvert Cliffs Discussion Mr. Starostecki opened the meeting with a synopsis of events and inspection findings concerning the failure to have an operable hydrogen analyzer during Cycle 5 operation of Calvert Cliffs Unit 1 and containment leak-age rate exceeding the required limit. The following general topics were discussed during the meeting: (1) Baltimore Gas and Electric Company's proposed corrective actions; (2) additional corrective actions considered necessary by the NRC staff; and (3) the need for a subsequent licensee letter describing its final planned corrective action The licensee comitted to, or already had commenced, undertaking the following actions:

tions on Unit 1; (2)(1) Replacement request of the to a modification faulty electrical Technical penetra-Specifications to express leakage rate limits in the engineering units measured by field instrumentation; (3) corrected the leakage rate limit specified in the surveillance test procedure; (4) provide appropriate training to surveillance test coordinators; (5) discuss the leakage rate violation with POSRC members; (6) started noting changes to procedures with marginal lines to assist POSRC members in their reviews; (7) will conduct POSRC training on the need to assume a more active role and on proper depth of review; (8) will complete an ongoing effort to walk down plant systems, properly label valves, and revise plant drawings to reflect "as-built" conditions; (9) will, through the use of a sampling program or other methodology, verify that similar problems do not exist in other procedures where Technical Specification limits have been translated into procedural limits or setpoints and where POSRC review may not have been conducted in sufficient depth to I

. .

-2-discover errors; (10) will establish procedures to ensure that only properly qualified personnel make modifications or review modifications '

to procedures; (11) will study and implement where appropriate improve-ments in POSRC review methodology by such means as the establishment of better guidelines for responsible engineers to follow in presenting procedural / plant changes to the POSRC or by the use of subcommittees; and (12) subnit a letter within 30 days describing the final list of corrective action l l

t T

<

i

,