IR 05000313/1984037
| ML20114A150 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 01/14/1985 |
| From: | Hunter D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Jeffery Griffin ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20114A152 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8501250557 | |
| Download: ML20114A150 (2) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:4 . In. Reply Refer To: Dockets: 50-313/84-37 50-368/84-37 . jay 141985 ' ', < - , . Arkansas Power & Light Company ATTN: John M. Griffin, Senior Vice President - Energy Supply
.. P. O. Box 551 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 ,.. Y ' - Gentleinen: This refers to the in:,pection conducted by Messrs. W. D. Johnson and P. H.
, Harrell of this office during the period December 10-31, 1934, of activities authorized by NRC Operating Licenses DMi-51 and NPF-6 for Arkansas Nuclear, One, , Units 1 and 2, and to the discussion of our findings with Mr. J. M. Levine, and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
Areas examined during the inspection included operational safety verification, maintenance, surveillance, and Unit 1 facility modifications. Within.these' areas, the inspection consisted of selective examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspectors. The findings are documented in the enclosed inspection report.
Within the' scope ~of-the inspection, no violations or deviations were identified.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely, Origirial Slgned By: 0 '?. HUNTER" ' D. R. Hunter, Chief Reactor Project Branch 2 Enclosure: Appendix - NRC Inspection Report 50-313/84-37 50-368/84-37 RPB2Cf{- cc: See next page RPB2/ RPB2/ RPB2/ , WDJoh PHHarre LEMar DRHunter 1/W/85 1/@/85 1/gy85 1/gy85 -- N 8501250557 850114 t O.
PDR ADOCK 05000313-L ' - G PDR ' ,,_ ' ...
, . '* & . ., . _ >J
- . .. V ,
% .cc w/ enclosure: ' J. M. Levine, General Manager - _ Arkansas Nuclear-0ne - P. O. Box 608 Russellville, Arkansas 72801 . . L.bcc to DMB (IE01) - 'bcc distrib. by RIV':
- RPB2
- EP&RPB
- *RIV File -* MIS System . RSTS Operator
' . < , c *RRI.
~ ~
- Section Chief (RPB2/A)
R. Denise, D/DRSP ' R. D. i4artin, RA > '
G. Vissing, NRR R. Lee, NRR
- Arkansas State Dept. Health - ' .
- w/766 e
.
e
m . I y b 't b t' f > .. t g e < _ > - . . . -1S.
', ' t . . .. .
_ - . _ -2- __ Inspection Sumary Inspection Conducted December 10-31, 1984 (Report 50-368/84-37) _
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of operational safety ^3 - verification, maintenance, and surveillance.
' g ' The inspection involved 37 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC inspectors.
Results: Within the three areas inspected, no violations were identified.
N N , 'N s s % T p- / g-8 . . ." - _- $ i < . $ . Q /
/ - , , _
/ s / y.
b , _ ' e5 , W s. - ' - m r _ $ . g ' i
j.
_ _ _... _ _ _
' - . ,
. .
' ,. . . ". t .3- . . ' DETAILS- ' , 1.
Persons Contacted
- J. Levine,' ANO General Manager
,
- E. Ewing, Engineering & Technical Support Manager
- B. Baker, Operations Manager L. Sanders, Maintenance Manager J. McWilliams,-Unit 1 Operations Superintendent M. Bolanis, Health Physics Superintendent R. Tucker, Electrical. Maintenance Superiatendent D. Wagner, Health Physics Supervisor
- T. Cogburn, Special Projects Manager
- L. Humphrey, Administrative Marager H. Hollis, Security Coordinator V. Pettus, Mechanical Maintenance' Superintendent L. Schempp, Nuclear Quality Control Manager
- P. Campbell, Plant Licensing Engineer-L. Dugger, Acting I&C Maintenance Supervisor L. Gulick, Unit 2 Operations Superintendent
- D. Lomax, Licensing Supervisor B. McCord, Quality Control Inspector L. Taylor, Operations Technical Engineer R. Blankenship, Nuclear Engineer G. Storey, Safety and Fire Protection Coordinator J. Lamb, Safety and Fire Protection Coordinator J. Montgomery, Human Resources Supervisor
- D. Provencher, Quality Engineering Supervisor B. Terwilliger, Operations Assessment Supervisor D. Crabtree, Mechanical Engineer M. Stroud, Electrical Engineer B. Wilkinson, Electrical Engineer S. Strasner, Quality Control Supervisor J. Beatty, Plant Storekeeper
'
- R. Wewers, Work Control Center Manager
- Present at exit interview.
The inspectors also contacted other plant personnel, including operators, technicians, and administrative personnel.
72.
Operational Safety Verification (Units 1 and 2) The NRC inspectors observed control room operations,' reviewed applicable logs, and conducted discussions with control room operators. The " inspectors verified the operability ~of selected emergency systems,
r - = . . , e
TlWl y g , _ ,~ ' - v ,
- .
,, _ u .c., . r- , , w ,i-,~ j %% QQ: - - + ~1 - . L;W@ - ^ ' c ' . , . , ' ' L';
, 'e $: l ,
' . %. * \\ , !.* 4 f '
- .
p j ; s-4- ~ ' ' '"
- -
t p y, , y . , . - , , < yn
' " -'
w.
. . . ,, i . ' 'f ' reviewed tagout records, and verified proper return-to-serv ce of '. ' . , - affected. components. Tours of. accessible areas of the units were con, ' ~ d;.cted to observe: plant equipment conditions, including potential fire - - .i , ' ', hazards, fluid leaks, and excessive'. vibration.
_In' addition, the , - -inspectors ensured that maintenance requests had been' initiated for < , -equipment in need of maintenance. - The inspectors, by ' observation and ' direct. interview, verified =that the physical security plan was being > , , implemented in accordance with the station security plan.- n , , c ?, }The'NRCinspectorsobservedplanthousekeeping/cleanlinessconditionsa'nd' ' verified implementation of radiation protection controls. The NRC . ' inspectors' walked down the Unit 1 emergency feedwater (EFW) syster: and- , portions of the Unit-2 high pressure safety injection (HPSI) system to
' verify operability.
. . These reviews and_ observations'were conc'ucted to verify that facility , operations were in conformance with the requirements established under-Technical Specifications, 10 CFR, and administrative procedures.
The walkdown of the Unit 1 EFW system was-performed using Procedure _ 1106.06 -and_ Drawing M-204, Sheet. 3.. During preparation and performance of the walkdown,.the NRC inspectors identified discrepancies between- , '
- Attachment 1.of' Procedure 1106.06, Drawing M-204, and the as-built
' . configuration.of the system in the plant. The discrepancies were identified _to appropriate licensee personnel. During the next inspection period, the_ NRC inspectors will review these discrepancies:in more detail - 'to determine whether they are symptomatic of; incomplete implementation,of . station procedures.
,.
The walkdown of the Unit 2.HPSI system was performed to verify.
that the "C" HPSI pump was properly aligned to the green train.
, -No_ problems were noted.
' No violations or deviations were identified.
? I 3.~ Monthly Surveillance Observation (Units 1'and 2)~ L lt - The.NRC inspectors observed the 'lechnical Specification required . surveillance testin h Unit 1 emergency diesel generator.
- ' L l(Procedure 1104.36)g on t eand verified that testing was. performed >in accordance with adequate procedures, that-test instrumentation was v ~ [= - ' calibrated, thatilimiting conditions forfoperation:were met, that removal.
U s . L
- and" restoration of,the affected components were accomplished,cthat test.
, E ,~ 'n results conformed with Technical Specifications and procedure - , ,
-
requirements, that test results were reviewed by personnel-other.than' ,: - . - ' <c
- r
- ,
- > .w. . - y;, ,
- -
.s . > , g' yp x - - '
, . - - -- , , ,, . . , F ' ,g , F]i, J [y 7 ~ _ ng %- , ,
p , - - . ,g, , -- l. ;
'. :- < , % + O ~ ~ kn 3 N , ,' fY} ' * [; ;p.3,9 . y .
,
,. . , . s: _'. s j T , , ,. Q.4 '
,
g; ' ' '
- ~
' -. -{* y O.
.*, , ,s + ., .w c
.#,, u,;.w __, , . . _ .. 1 . ,,_ _, -
. . -5-the individual directing the test, and that any deficiencies identified during.the testing were properly reviewed and resolved by appropriate management personnel.
The inspectors also witnessed portions of the following test activities: Steam generator hydrotest, Unit 1, Work Plan 1409.61 . ~ Plant protection system channel 'D' test, Unit 2 . Procedure 2304.40 In addition, the NRC inspectors reviewed the results of the most recent performance of the following tests: , 18-month test of emergency DC-lighting, Unit 1, . Procedure 1307.25 18-month capacity test of diesel fuel oil pumps, Unit 1, . Procedure 1104.26 Quarterly inspection of station batteries, Unit 1 . , Procedure 1307.05 Quarterly inspection of switchyard batteries, Unit 1, . Procedure 1405.11 - No violations or deviations were identified.
i i 4.
Monthly Maintenance Observation (Units 1 and 2) Station maintenance activities of safety-related systems and componerits'. listed below were observed / reviewed to ascertain that they were conducted in accordance with approved procedures, Regulatory, Guides, and industry codes or standards; and in conformance with Technical: Specifications.
The following items were considered during this review:,the limiting conditions for operation were met while components or. systems were removed ~ from service; approvals were obtained prior to initiating the work; activities were accomplished using. approved procedures and were. inspected as applicable; functional testing and/or calibrations.were performed prior to returning components or systems to. service;' quality control records were maintained; activities were accomplished by qualified personnel; parts and materials used were properly certified; radiological controls were implemented; and fire prevention controls were implemented.
, w
- - - - - ,, = , , _ _ > - n - - * ru44' , , + , ..i s (. ~ %.. ' ..' .yp? m - - - .
.
. _ ,, , , . m y, r , ' t : w-6- " ' 1,
Work requests were reviewed to determine status-of outstanding' jobs and.to L + ensure that priority is' assigned to safety-related equipment maintenarce 1'. ' which may affect. system performance.. '
. > I 'The following maintenance activities were.obse,rved/ reviewed: ' . ; . Unit 1l emergency. fee'dwater modification (DCP 80-1083) E , , , . !' Unit:1' emergency diesel generator turbocharger repair .
(Procedure 1402.128); Unit 1 main steam-safety valve installation .
(Procedure 1409.61', Appendix-M)"
' ' . . + .. . - - No violations.or deviations were' identified.
I ( 5.
Facility Modifications (Unit 1)
. i During the current refueling outage (IR6), the licensee modified the I - emergency feedwater (EFW) system for installation of a new emergency ' feedwater initiation and control (EFIC); system. The EFW system
, modification and EFIC system installation are a result of the requirements
- of the TMI Action Plan, NUREG-0737..The NRC inspectors reviewed-portions
. of..the EFW system modifications -to verify that the new piping was i , , installed in accordance with the applicable design documents.and ! procedures.
, The NRC inspectors selected a sample of the weld. joints performed in the l' field and verified that the welding was performed-in accordance with applicable codes and standards. 'The' review-included'the areas of welder , . . quali_fication, weld filler material control, nondestructive examination ' records, weld procedure qualification, weld joint records, and procure-
ment records for-the piping-and the weld filler material. The review- . ' concluded that all records associated with the weld _ joints ' selected were. ~ .. complete and accurate.
- - - 4' .. . . . _ = The NRC inspectors also walked down portions of the EFW system piping to s - _
' verify that the pipe supports and/or hangers'were installed-as-shown on
.. , the hanger / support installation drawings.- No instances were identified.
. ' ' ,!) where the support or. hanger had not been properly. installed. - ' ' - , _ . . 3: s , , - .
- The inspectors reviewed the licensee's safety evaluations for th'e'EFIC-
'" !' - Linstallation, the licensee's proposed Technical-Specification changes, and-0m~.
- therev.isedTechnical. Specifications-andthesupporting,SafetjEvaluation.-; ' , , , - -
c ' - , ' '
.L < -.. , .
+
' , - - 3 .
' 1 4 y _-
1 - . m.. _ Y
, a p. . f' ," x > , > u b , s e '
L _
> .
.. .: ., - . -..c: . ., "' -_ , . . . -
. .. _ - . _.
._.
. l.
n '
.. , - ' ., + , .. . _ > , . -7- - , .
. The NRC inspectors also reviewed the revised EFW Operating Report.
_ ,. . . Procedure (1106.06) and the EFIC Functional Test. Procedure (1409.44) and ~ observed portions of the tests performed under these procedures.
l
No violations or deviations were identified.
- ~ 6. - Exit Interview -
, s , The NRC inspectors met with Mr. J. M.- Levine (ANO General Manager):and other members of the AP&L. staff at~the..end of this inspection. At this meeting,theinspectorssummarized.thelscopeoftheinspecti6n'andthe findings.
, a-s l " 2-
+
I P t i I
e ? ll m ' _.
-= q ? f.
> - ' w - ,v .. , % % ~ , -, ~
Y w >,-a w w .- .&. ..o.
,.., ' ~,f ' ~ }}