IR 05000313/1980013
| ML19343A296 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 08/27/1980 |
| From: | Caldwell R, Joseph Kelly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19343A293 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-313-80-13, 50-368-80-13, NUDOCS 8009170176 | |
| Download: ML19343A296 (2) | |
Text
.,
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMiISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION IV
Report No. 50-313/80-13 LICENSE NO. DPR-51 50-368/80-13 NPF -6 Licensee: Arkansas Power and Light Company Russellville, Arkansas Facility Name: Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2 Inspection at: Russellville, Arkansas Inspection Conducted: July 21-25, 1980 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: December 18-20, 1979 Date of Last Inspection: July 14-18, 1980 Type of Inspection: Unannounced Physical Security Inspector:
-
-
EL OM i ~ S
'N'
R. A. Caldwell Date Physical Security / Investigation Specialist
.
_
$
u.SdC Approved By:
U.A/L)
e.
J A. F. Kelly, Chief b
Date Physical Security Branch Inspection Summary Areas Inspected:
Included a review of the Security Plan; Security Program Audit; Protected Area Physical Barriers; Vital Area Physical Barriers; Lighting; Alarm Stations; Detection Aids; Testing and Maintenance; Power Supply.
The inspection involved 64 inspector-hours by two (2) NRC inspectors including eight (8) inspection hours accomplished during off-shift periods.
The inspection began during the regular shift.
-Results: -The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements within the areas examined during the inspection except for tire following four items:
1.
Vital Area Physical Barrier - A vital area door was fastened shut with an inadequate fastener (Infraction).
e sooem syg m
._..
.
-
.....
?4-
-
.
_-
2.
Detection Aid - A' tamper resistance enclosure. housing sensitive electronic equipment had the tamper alarm triggering mechanism taped in a manner-that prevented an alarm (Infraction).
3.
Detection Aid.- The line supervision for.the alarm system circuitry was such that a compromise of the alarm system was possible in the ACCESS mode (Infraction).
4.
. Testing - A review of records revealed that a regulatory requirement to test intrusion alarms at least once every 7 days was not met on one occasion.
(Infraction).
.
R w