IR 05000312/1978016

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Summary of IE Inspec Rept 50-312/78-16 on 781016-19.Inspec Rept & Notice of Violation Withheld Per 10CFR2.790
ML20197C915
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 11/03/1978
From: Norderhaug L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Walbridge W
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
References
NUDOCS 7811210244
Download: ML20197C915 (2)


Text

.. _

_

_

--

_

- - - - - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ -

- - _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ - _

<

,. _ _,

......

-.

- -

-

U:'o -

T

' [ 3 fi? 00,;[AlNS

'

/;. AAi!0N cc.,L( ;), JC,.

i

.

'

,

      • %

UNITED STATES

=i

  • t NUCLEAR R EGU LATOR Y COMMisslON E

h

REGION V

' k,hd$i

SUITE 202, W ALNUT C AEEK PLAZ A

,

%,

,,#

isso w. C ALIFORNI A BOULEV ARD

!

    • ee*

W ALNUT CREEK. C ALIFOR NI A 94596 NOV 3 53

Docket No. 50-312

'

Sacramento Municipal Utility Distric.

P. O. Box 15830

Sacramento, California 95830

Attention:

W. C. Walbridge General Manager

Gentlemen:

Subject:

NRC Inspection - Rancho Seco

!

This letter refers to the inspection of your activities authorized under NRC License No. DPR-54 conducted by Messrs. W. P. Mortensen and E. J. Power

!

of this office on October 16-19, 1978.

It also refers to the discussion of our inspection findings held by the inspectors with Mr. R. Colombo

,

and other members of the Rancho Seco staff on October 19, 1978.

.

The inspection included an examination of activities related to physical protection against industrial sabotage and against theft of special

nuclear material in accordance with applicable requirements of Title 10,

Code of Federal Regulations, Part 73, " Physical Protection of Plants and

Materials," your Security Plan, and license conditions pertaining to

,

physical protection as described in the enclosed inspection report.

Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and records, interviews with facility personnel and

.

observations by the inspectors.

Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements, as set forth in the Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix A.

The items of noncompliance are categorized into the level as described in our correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.

This notic is sett to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201

'

of the NRC's " Ruler of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.

Secticn 2.201 requires you to submit to this office within 20 days of your receipt of this notice, a written statement of explanation in reply, including:

(1) steps which have been or will be taken by you

'

to correct the violation, and the results achieved; (2) steps which will

'

be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full com-pliance will be achieved.

Ngy 7m

~ "

CCHN

.

.

hl 2E MGRl/.,a. u 7811h0MY e-J

___

d

.

.

-

-

\\

.

0NfAldS

'

'

-

-

.. ~

,

o 2.h] LJU"' m it"i NOV 3 :. 3

'

Sacramento Municipal Utility District-2-J

4

\\

In accordance with Section 2.790(d) of the NRC's " Rules of Practice,"

j Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, documentation of findings of your control and accounting procedures for safeguarding special

nuclear materials and your facility security procedures are exempt from disclosure; therefore, Appendix A to this letter, the inspection report and your response to the items listed in Appendix A will not be placed

>

in the Public Document Room and will receive limited distribution.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to

discuss them with you.

i

Sincerely,

i

,I

./

(z

/

'

V V' M i

eRoy

. 'riurum uau3, su m

m.m.

Safeguards Branch

Enclosures:

i 1.

Appendix A - Notice of Violation l

2.

IE Inspection Report

~

No. 50-312/78-16 (IE-V-260)

cc w/o enclosures:

R. J. Rodriguez, SMUD L. G. Schwieger, SMUD i

4 J

.

~?.C li""UlIU C'DIEliG lO.El...lAI['l

..;j t

.