IR 05000312/1978016

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Summary of IE Inspec Rept 50-312/78-16 on 781016-19.Inspec Rept & Notice of Violation Withheld Per 10CFR2.790
ML20197C915
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 11/03/1978
From: Norderhaug L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Walbridge W
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
References
NUDOCS 7811210244
Download: ML20197C915 (2)


Text

.. _ _ _ -- _ - - - - - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - - _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ - _

<

- - -

. . . . . . - .

, . _ _ ,

. U:'o - T ' [ 3 fi? 00,;[AlNS '

i

,

'

/; . AAi!0N cc .,L( ;), JC , .

      • % UNITED STATES

=i *t NUCLEAR R EGU LATOR Y COMMisslON E h REGION V

' k,hd$i #

SUITE 202, W ALNUT C AEEK PLAZ A

%, 9 ,,# isso w. C ALIFORNI A BOULEV ARD

    • ee*

,

! W ALNUT CREEK. C ALIFOR NI A 94596 NOV 3 53

Docket No. 50-312

Sacramento Municipal Utility Distri P. O. Box 15830

'

Sacramento, California 95830
Attention
W. C. Walbridge 4 General Manager Gentlemen:

Subject: NRC Inspection - Rancho Seco

! This letter refers to the inspection of your activities authorized under

! NRC License No. DPR-54 conducted by Messrs. W. P. Mortensen and E. J. Power of this office on October 16-19, 197 It also refers to the discussion

,

of our inspection findings held by the inspectors with Mr. R. Colombo and other members of the Rancho Seco staff on October 19, 1978.

.

The inspection included an examination of activities related to physical

protection against industrial sabotage and against theft of special 4 nuclear material in accordance with applicable requirements of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 73, " Physical Protection of Plants and Materials," your Security Plan, and license conditions pertaining to

,

physical protection as described in the enclosed inspection repor Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations

. of procedures and records, interviews with facility personnel and observations by the inspector Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements, as set forth in the Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix The items of noncompliance are categorized into the level as described in our correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.

'

This notic is sett to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Ruler of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations. Secticn 2.201 requires you to submit to this office within 20 days of your receipt of this notice, a written statement of explanation

'

in reply, including: (1) steps which have been or will be taken by you

'

to correct the violation, and the results achieved; (2) steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full com-pliance will be achieve ;Ngy 7m ~ " . CCHN hl

.

2E MGRl/.,a. u 7811h0MY J

___

d

- -

. .

\

. 1

'

-

. . ~ -

'

0NfAldS

,

1 o

'

2.h] LJU"' m it"i NOV 3 :. 3 Sacramento Municipal Utility District -2- J 1 l l

4 \

In accordance with Section 2.790(d) of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," j Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, documentation of findings i of your control and accounting procedures for safeguarding special

nuclear materials and your facility security procedures are exempt from disclosure; therefore, Appendix A to this letter, the inspection report

>

and your response to the items listed in Appendix A will not be placed in the Public Document Room and will receive limited distributio Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to

discuss them with you.

i

Sincerely,

i ,I

'

./

V V' M (z /

su m 4 . 'riurum uau3, i eRoy Safeguards Branch

Enclosures:

i Appendix A - Notice of Violation l IE Inspection Report No. 50-312/78-16 (IE-V-260)

~

cc w/o enclosures:

R. J. Rodriguez, SMUD L. G. Schwieger, SMUD i

4 J

.

~?.C li""UlIU C'DIEliG

..;j lO.Elt ...lAI['l

.