IR 05000267/1980009
| ML19318A808 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Saint Vrain  |
| Issue date: | 04/30/1980 |
| From: | Dean S, Westerman T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19318A804 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-267-80-09, 50-267-80-9, NUDOCS 8006240182 | |
| Download: ML19318A808 (4) | |
Text
...
,
O u s auctzia arcutiroar coastss1ox 0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION IV
IE Inspection Report No. 50-267/80-09 Docket No. 50-267 License No. DPR-34 Licensee: Public Service Company of Colorado P. O. Box 840 Denver, Colorado 80201 Facility Name: Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station Inspection At:
Fort St. Vrain Site, Platteville, Colorado Inspection Conducted: April 15-18, 1980 Inspector:
8 -70- fD
'
S. Dean, Reactor Inspector Date Approved by:
7 I, [6
//60 Td
_
T. F. Westerman, Chief, Reactor Projects Date Section Inspection Summary Inspection on April 15-18, 1980 (Report No. 50-267/80-09)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of procedures; surveillance of pipe support and restraint systems; maintenance program; and plant tour.
The inspection involved twenty-eight (28) inspection hours on site by one (1)
NRC inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
s
'
8006240
.
.
._
.
-
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- W. Hillyard, Mainistrative Services Manager
- L. McInroy, Superintendent.of Quality Assurance Services
- W. Crane, Maintenance Superintendent V. R. Wetzbarger, Scheduling, QC, Stores Supervisor R. Webb, Maintenance Foreman J. Liebelt, Maintenance Supervisor W. Franek, Results Supervisor V. Tumbleson, I&C Technican D. Brown, Results Technican
- Denotes those attending exit interview.
2.
Surveillance of Pipe Support and Restraint Systems The purpose of this inspection effort was to ascertain whether surveillance of pipe support and restraint systems pertaining to safety-related piping and components was conducted as required by Technical Specifications, licensee's commitments, and the licensee's approved program and. procedures.
The inspector reviewed the licensee's administrative program in this area by reviewing the following procedures for technical accuracy.
Maintenance Procedure 98.1, Revision 8, dated January 3, 1980 Surveillance Test Procedure 5.3.8d.R, Revision 4, dated January 24, 1980 Surveillance Test Procedure 5.3.8a-X, Revision 13, dated January 24, 1980.
The inspector selected at random a representative sampling of snubbers, fixed pipe supports, and component structures for visual inspection.
The inspector verified that deterioration and corrosion was not noticable; that bolts, nuts, and washers appeared tight and secure; and that there was no obvious physical damage present.
Snubbers were examined to ensure bleed holes were open and free, that.the seals did not appear deteriorated and that reservoirs were sufficiently filled.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
. - - -.
--
..
-
.
3.
Maintenance Program The purpose of this inspection effort was to ascertain whether the licensee is implementing a QA Program relating to maintenance activities that is in conformance with Technical Specification and Regulatory requirements.
The inspector reviewed the following procedures.
-
ADM-06 Administrative Procedure for:
Use of Plant Report and Work Request Forms, Revision 13, dated March 5, 1980
.
ADM-12 Administrative Procedure for:
-
Maintenance and Repair Procedures, Revision 16, dated December 20, 1979 ADM-36 Administrative Procedure for:
-
System Operations. Department Maintenance, Repair, and Testing Activities, Revision 4, dated December 20, 1979 As a result of this procedural review the inspector noted the following weaknesses. The Plant Trouble Report system does not identify post maintenance testing requirements. The licensee acknowledged this and committed to revise their administrative procedures.- Additionally, the licensee's procedures do not identify an individual or group responsible for the review of maintenance activities analyzing equipment trends which require further attention, engineering review or design change.
This concern was discussed with the licensee and the licensee committed to clarify this function in future procedure revisions. (0 pen Iten 8009-01)
No items of noncompliance or deviations were noted.
4.
Plant Tour On several occassions during the course of the inspection the facility was toured by the inspector. The following are observations based upon those tours.
,
General cleanliness was satisfactory
-
No excessive fluid leaks or piping vibrations were observed
-
-
Control Room manning was in accordance with Technical. Specifications No fire hazards were visible
-
Selected equipment status tags were verified correct.
-
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
--
-.
.,
-.
.
.
5.
Exit Interview
'An exit interview was held with those representatives of the licensee on April 18, 1980, following completion.of the inspection. At the interview, the inspector discussed the findings indicated in the previous paragraphs. The licensee acknowledged these findings.
.
.
-.
-
-.
-
~.
.
,... _.. _ -.
--
-.....
...-...