IR 05000265/1985015
| ML20126C681 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 06/11/1985 |
| From: | Guldemond W, Milbrot W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20126C671 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-265-85-15, NUDOCS 8506140496 | |
| Download: ML20126C681 (3) | |
Text
y-
c s
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'
REGION III
Report No. 50-265/85015(DRS)
Docket No. 50-265 License No. DPR-30 Licensee: Conmonwealth Edison Company P. O. Box 767 Chicago, IL 60690 Facility Name:
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2 Inspection At: Cordova, Illinois Inspection Conducted: Ma
,2985
Inspector:
. E. Milb
.
Date
/
,
Approved By:
. G. Gulde h
Operational Prografn Section Date Inspection unenary Inspection on May 14-16, 1985 (Report No. 50-265/85015(DRS))
Areas Inspected: Routine anrounced inspection of refueling preparations and refueling activities. The inspection involved a total of 21 inspector-hours onsite by 1 NRC inspector including 1 inspector-hour onsite during off-shifts.
Results: No violations or deviations were identified.
l l
N. Nk e5 m
-
-
_.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
,-
,,
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Commonwealth Edison Company
- N. Kalivianakis, Superintendent
- T. Tamlyn, Assistant Superintendent for Operations
- P. Knoespel, Head Nuclear Engineer
- B. Strub, Compliance Coordinator
- D. Gibson, Quality Assurance Supervisor K. Donovan, Nuclear Engineer USNRL A. Morrongiello, Resident Inspector The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee personnel during this inspection.
- Denotes personnel attending the May 16, 1985 exit.
2.
Refueling Preparations The inspector reviewed the results of new fuel receipt inspection, fuel handling procedures, periodic check and test procedures covering the maintenance, testing and operational checkout of fuel handling equipment, and surveillances procedures that covered the applicable Technical Specifications required to support fuel loading. The fuel handling procedures included the implementing of good housekeeping practices and captivation of loose items used over the open reactor vessel or spent fuel storage pool.
The results of new fuel inspection were recorded in Quad Fuel Procedure.
(QFP) 200-2, Revision 14 Nuclear Fuel Receiving Inspection and Core Preparation of Fuel Bundles. No discrepancies were noted.
Personnel performing fuel inspections were qualified in accordance with a General Electric Procedure.
Training of fuel handling personnel consisted of several days of class room study followed by several hours of on-the-job fuel handling experience. No records were maintained to document the training activities. The licensee reported that there were plans to revise the fuel handlers' training requirements which would include developing training records.
The licensee conducted a 10 CFR 50.59 Unit 2, Cycle 8 core reload safety evaluation and verified that the core reload did not involve a change to Technical Specifications or an unresolved safety question.
No violations or deviations were identified.
,
..
.
__
..
. :. ; :,.
l l-3.
LRefueling Activities The. inspection of refueling activities consisted of reviewing the following documentation of fuel handling operations as no fuel load was conducted during the 1.nspection period. No discrepancies were noted.
. QFP 100-3, Revision 5, Refueling Bridge Interlock Transferring of Fuel Between or Within the Confines of the Spent Fuel Pool / Pools.
005 700-8, Revision 3, SRM Instrument Checks
-QOS 7500-5, Revision 4, SBGT System Monthly Operable Test.
.QFP 100-6, Revision 2, Refueling Shifts Checks. -
QFP 150-7, Revision-1, Monthly Inspection for Refueling Bridge,
Monorail and Frame Hoist.
Periodic testing during fuel handling was documented using Q0S,
-005-1, Revision 10, Operation Department Weekly Summary of Daily Surveillances. Checks required to support refueling included fuel storage pool water level, refueling floor vent radiation monitor, SRM operable and SBGT system operable.
'
A Nuclear Component Transfer List'(NCTL) was used to control the
'
transfer of fuel between the Spent Fuel Storage Pool and the reactor vessel. All changes made to the NCTL received the required approvals prior to issuance. The inspector checked the fuel core locations specified in the NCTL to that required by the General Electric Company prepared plan for the loaded core. No discrepancies were noted.
No violations or deviations were identified.
3. -
Exit Interview-The inspector met with the licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph
,1) on May 16, 1985 to discuss the scope and findings of the inspection.
The licensee acknowledged the statements made by the inspector with respect to items discussed'in this report. The inspector also discussed the likely information content of the inspection report with regard to-documents or processes reviewed by the inspector during the inspection.
The licensee did not identify any such documents / procedures as proprietary.
.-
.
.-
.-
-
________________ __ _ ______