IR 05000259/2002301
| ML032380125 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry  |
| Issue date: | 08/16/2003 |
| From: | Ernstes M Operator Licensing and Human Performance Branch |
| To: | Scalice J Tennessee Valley Authority |
| Shared Package | |
| ML032380265 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-259/02-301, 50-260/02-301, 50-296/02-301 50-259/02-301, 50-260/02-301, 50-296/02-301 | |
| Download: ML032380125 (24) | |
Text
-.
-.
/I Administrative
~
Documents
~
-
BROWNS FERRY EXAM 2002-301 50-259, 50-260, & 50-296 DECEMBER 13,16-19,2002 Exam Preparation Checklist.....................
ES-201-1 d
.................. ES-201-2 Exam Outline Quality Checklist J
Exam Security Agreement......................
.............. ES-301-1 Administrative Topics Outline (Final)
J Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-through Test Outline (Final)......................................
ES-301-2 W'
Operating Test Quality Check Sheet.............. ES-301-3 J Simulator Scenario Quality Check Sheet........... ES-301-4 J Transient and Event Checklist................... ES-301-5 v/
Competencies Checklist........................
ES-301-6 /'
Written Exam Quality Check Sheet............... ES-401-7 J Written Exam Review Worksheet................. ES-401-9 +/A
~ 1 2. Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist........... ES-403-1 J l3. Post-Exam Check Sheet.......................
ES-501-1 J
s-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 (R8,S-180-120 Facility:
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT Date of Examination: 12/13-20/02-Examinations Developed by:
Facility(0perating Test) I NRC(Written Test)
1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a & b)
2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)
Target Date"
-120 (-901 Task Description I Reference 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)
[5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c)]
Chief Examiner's Initials-70-45-30 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)
8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and reference materials due (C.l.e, f, g & h; C.3.d)
9. Preliminary license applications due (C.1.I; C.2.g; ES-202)
-120 1 3. Facility contact briefed on security &other requirements (C.2.c)
I-14-1 4 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)
12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f & h; C.3.g)
-75 I 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due (C.1.e & f; C.3.d)
-7-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee and authorization granted to give written exams (if applicable) (C.3.k)
16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
-14 I 10. Final license applications due and assignment sheet prepared (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202)
-7
'1 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
14. Final applications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver-7 I
letters sent (C.2.g, ES-204)
L ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 (R8,Sl)
- bR4fT-LJL/ r k @ OkWQuality Checklist
@
item - w R
I T
T E
N - S I
M
- w I T
- G E
N E
R A
L -
I Browns Ferry Nuclear Piant Date of Examination: December 13-20,2002 Task Description I
I I
s) to test the projected number and position and rotation schedule without tested using at least one new or ted from the applicants audit test(s).
a. Verify that (3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an a (4) one in-plant task tests the applicants response to an em or abnormal condition, and a. Author
/
I I
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Supervisor Edwin Leal Michael E. ErnstesI Note:
- Not applicable for NRC-developed examination # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence require 'j Item W
.
S C c * G O b S ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 (R8, Quality Checklist-acility Dateof Examination / 2 / / b / a 'L Initials a
b'
c#
Task Description I
a. Verify that the outline(s) fit@) the apprapriate mcdel per ES-10..
I T
! I1 I
a Assess wnelher the OLII ne was Systematically and ranaomly prepare0 In accoraance w th Seclion D.l of ES-101 and whelher al WA caregones are appropr.ately sampled i
E ber of conIroI room an0 in-p ant tasks, epeatea from !he last hRC exam'nalio c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions. or generic topic d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected WA Statements are apprapriat I I I I I I b. Verify that:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the safetyfunction groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a law-Dower or shutdown conditio. Author 3. Facility Reviewer r)
- . NRC Chief Examiner (#)
A. NRC SupeM'sor I
I
\\ole hor applicaole for NRCdevelopa examinalions
- lnaepenaent hRC rev ewer n tial tiems n ColLmn c, cnief examiner COnCLrrenCe reqLlle0
ES-201 Final Written Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 (R8,Sl)
Quality Checklist Facilil Item -
-
1. w R
I T
T E
N S i
M
-
- w
/
T
- G E
N E
R A
L -
I. Author Timothv Kolb/
~
Date (2-2-0 2 PIA I
). Facility Reviewer r)
- . NRC Chief Examiner (#)
I. NRC Supervisor Michael E. Ernstes/ a -
Edwin Leal #Ah-+,
dote
' Not app icaole for NRCdevelopea examination ff Independent NRC rev ewer inftial,terns in ColLmn t:"
chef exam ner concurrence reqL'red
r d a L ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 (R8,Sl)
Quality Checklist
-.. -...,..
(1 ) the lasns are 01511 c ~ l e o among the safely fLncl'on gradpings as speciflea.I\\
ES-301, (2) one task.s COMLCICO :n a low-power or sh.100wn conall on (3) 40?0 01 the tasks rcqc're the appl can1 10 mplement an allemale paln procco.r (4, one in-p an1 task :esls !he app cant's response 10 an emergency or abnormal Conail on ana (5) m e 8"-p an1 Walk-1hroLgh requres m e app.'canl to enlcr !he RCA acili tern -
- W R
i T
T E
N S I
M
-
- W I
T
- G E
N E
R A
L -
RL &;1 iclb I
I I
t NRC examination, 3, Author
>. Facility Reviewer r)
- . NRC Chief Examiner (#)
j. NRC Supervisor I
I ote:
- Not applicable for NRC-developed examination # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Calumn"~? chief examiner concurrence require PA
~
RUG-22-20@3 13:19 FROM BFN OPS TRFlINING TO 914045624854667279 P.03 I ri-a
& z TOTAL P. 03
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 (R8. Sl)
Facility:
BFN Date of Examination: 12/16/02 Examination Level (circle one): X O
Operating Test Number:
-
- Administrative Topic/Subject Description Fuel Handling SECURITY SURVEILLANCE TESTING RADIATION CONTROL EPlP Describe method of evaluation:
1. ONE Administrative JPM, OR 2. TWO Administrative Questions ADMINISTRATIVE QUESTION A I.I ADMNISTRATIVE QUESTION A JPM A42 - RESPOND TO A SECURITY EVENT JPM 12OF - 2-SR-3.4.2.1. JET PUMP MISMATCH AND OPERABILITY A3.10 - REVIEW GASEOUS RELEASE SI JPM A4.5 - CLASSIFY THE EVENT
~
_ _ ~
-
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 (R8, SI)
=acility: A N
Date of Examination: 12/16/02-Zxamination Level (circle one):
RO Operating Test Number:.3
- __
-
Administrative TopiclSubject Description FUEL HANDLING SECURITY SURVEILLANCE TESTING RADIATION CONTROL EPIP Describe method of evaluation:
1. ONE Administrative JPM, OR 2. TWO Administrative Questions ADMINISTRATIVE QUESTION A I.I
~~
~
~
ADMINISTRATIVE QUESTION A I S JPM A4.1 RESPOND TO A SECURITY EVENT JPM 120 2-SR-3.4.2.1 JET PUMP MISMATCH AND OPERABILITY JPM A3.12 REVIEW A RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP ADMINISTRATIVE QUESTION A ADMINISTRATIVE QUESTION A ES-301Control Room Systems Form ES-301-2 (R8, SlBnd Facility Walk-Through Test Ot Facility:
BFN Date of Examination: 12/16/02 Exam Level (circle one): RO Operating Test No.:
~~
~
B.l Control Room Systems System / JPM Title a. CONTAINMENT VENTILATION JPM 51F PRIMARY CONTAINMENT VENTING FROM THE PRESSURE SUPPRESSION CHAMBER THROUGH FCV-84-20 b. OFF GAS JPM 116F PLACING STANDBY STEAM JET AIR EJECTOR IN OPERATION
~~
c. RHR JPM 201 LOSS OF SHUTDOWN COOLING BOARD VIA A UNIT 3 DIESEL GENERATOR ELECTRICAL JPM 84 ENERGIZE A UNIT % 4 KV SD e. RClC JPM 18F EO1 APPENDIX 5C - INJECTION SYSTEM LINEUP - RClC f. MAIN STEAM JPM 35 2-01-APPENDIX 88 REOPENING THE MSIVs FOLLOWING A GROUP 1 ISOLATION
~
~~
g. CONTROL ROD DRIVE JPM 148F LOSS OF A CRD PUMP B.2 Facility Walk-Through Type Code'
N S Safety Function
9
2
1
I a. EOVRPS JPM 340 3-EO1 APPENDIX 16F AND 16G BYPASSING RHR INJECTION VALVE TIMERS b. SSI JPM 205 PERFORM 213-SSI-16, ATTACHMENT 2, SECTION 2
N I
I I
I D,R I
c. EOllSLC JPM 26 2-EO1 APPENDIX 78, ALTERNATE RPV INJECTION SYSTEM LINEUP - SLC TANK
- Type Codes: (D)irect from bank, (M)odified from bank, (N)ew, (A)lternate path, (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, (L)ow-Power, (R)CA ne
..~J System I JPM Title Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-Through Test Outline Form ES-301-2 (R8, SI)
Type Code*
Safety Function Facility:
Date of Examination: 12/16/02 Exam Level (circle one):-)
Operating Test No.: PRIMARY CONTAINMENT VENTING JPM-51F 2-EO1 APPENDIX 12 DAIS 5 RHR JPM-201 LOSS OF SHUTDOWN COOLING SSI JPM205 PERFORM 2/3-SSI-16, ATTACHMENT 2, SECTION 2 N
8 ELECTRICAL JPM 96 PERFORM CONTROL ROOM TRANSFER OF 4KV SHUTDOWN BOARD A POWER EOVALTERNATE INJECTION SOURCE JPM 24 2-EO1 APPENDIX 7A ALTERNATE INJECTION SYSTEM -,
CONDENSATE TRANSFER TO CORE SPRAY
~ I I
I I
~ I I
~~.2 Facility Walk-Through I
I * Type Codes: (D)irect from bank, (M)odified from bank, (N)ew, (A)lternate path, (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, (L)ow-Power, (R)CA
ES-301 ODeratina Tekf Qualitv CWcklist Form ES-301-3 (R8. SI)
u
- acility:
Date of Examination:
Operating 1. GENERAL CRITERIA ES-301 ODeratina Tekf Qualitv CWcklist Form ES-301-3 (R8. SI)
u Test Number:
initials a
b'
dl ii I
The operating lest conforms vnlh the prewo~sly approvea ouliinc, changes are conswen1 win sampling req-ircmenrs (e q, 10 CFR 55 45, operaIlona1 impmance, safcly Lncl on ois'rl on,
?? There is no day-today repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a).
during this examinatio m Overlap with the wn'tten examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable limit ?.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license leve. WaK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A 8 8) CRlTERiA Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
. initial conditions
. initiating cues
, references and twis, including associated procedures
. reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific
. specific performance criteria that include:
designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
- system response and other examiner cues
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task
. iaent fcalion of cnt cal steps and theor assccialca pertomanu? stanoaras
- restnclions on Ihc sequence of steps.I app icabie
>
Tne prescr plea qLesrions m Calegory A are preaomrnant y open relerence ana meet lne cnlena in Allachmenl 1 of ES-301 Repetition from operaling lesls Lsea dLring lhe prevloLs licensing examlnal on 5 Mlnln acceplablc I m Is (30., lor tne YualWhroLqh) ana 00 no. wmprom se IcsI Inlegnw At least 20 percent of ihe JPMs on each test are newor siqnificantiy modifie. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA
- -
__
&
m e associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is anache ~p Printed Name / Signature Date I. Author 30-fl M,i)od 3L.L x
,,I40 t I. Facility Reviewer(')
/!/'L162/
- . NRC Chief Examiner (#)
I<//
&4
1. NRC Supervisor
/ / / / V /*a 4OTE
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRCdeveloped test # independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c? chief examiner wncumence require ES-301 Ooeratina Test Qualitv Checklist Form ES-301-3 (R8. SI)
u
- acility:
Date of Examination:
Operatir 1. GENERAL CRlTERlA The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e&., 10 CFR 55.45, operational impottance, safety function distribution).
There is no day-today repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examinatio The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a).
Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable.
?.
it appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license leve. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & 6) CRITERIA Each JPM includes the following. as applicable:
. initial conditions
. initiating cues
. references and tools, including associated procedures
. reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific
. specific performance criteria that include:
designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
- system response and other examiner cues
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task
- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the criteria in Attachment 1 of ES-30 Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% far the walk-throuqh) and do not compromise test integrit At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modifie.
3. SIMUIATOR (CATEGORY C) CRlTERlA The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES301-4 and a copy is attache Printed Name I 3. Author
>. Facility Reviewer?)
- . NRC Chief Examiner (#)
1. NRC SupeMsor LOTE
' The faci ly slgnatde s not applicaole for hRCderelopeo IeSlS 11 inoepmaenl ARC rwewer n llal items in Column c cnlef cxam ner conc.nencP req-Ired
-
t-rd A L ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 (R8, S I 1 QUALITATIVE AllRIBUTES Initials a
b'
c#
I I
I
Tne in I al conad ons are realist c n Inat Some cq-ipmenl andlor nsrrmentation may be 0-1 nl semce bLt II oces not C L
~
tne operators into expectco events.
The scenarios consist mostly of related event Each event description consists of the point in the scenariowhen it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptomslcues that will be visible to the crew the expected operalor actions (by shin position)
the event termination point (if applicable)
Rl,
No more than one non-rnechanist'c fa lLre (e 9.. p pe break) is nwrporaled nto the Scenario w 1h a crcaiDle preceoinq inc oenl s.ch as a se sm'c even Tne events are val a w Ih reqara Io phys cs ana 1ntrmwvnam:cs SeqLencing ana t m ng of evenis s reasonable. ano a lows the examinalion team Io obta n complcte eva 4ai.on resuks CornmensLratc wth me scenar o otiecr vcs T(@. rs A i
?
f time compress on tcchniq-es are Lsea. !he Scenano sLmmaly clearly so nalales Operators have s~ffcicnt t me 'O cany u.t expectea act v.t cs wth0.l LnaLc time constraints Cues are
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist FordS-301-4 (R8, SI)
QUALITATIVE ATlRIBUTES Initials a
b'
c#
I I The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected event No more Inan one non-mechaninc fat ure (e.g, pipe Dreakl IS Incorporated.nto the Scenar 0 wi1h a creo ble precedng 'nciaent s x h as a se;smc even.
The events are vatia w fh reqaro 10 phys cs an0 thennoawam c Sequenc ng an0 1;m ng 01 events 's reasonable, and allow lne examination team to ootain complete eva Lation resLIIs commensurate with tne scenario ob.ect:ves The scenarios consist mastly of related event LA Each event description consists of the point in the scenariowhen it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptomslcues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shifl position)
the event termination point (iiapplicable)
Rlt-7rh RK RVI eJL i?+ cu 1 All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit
~ Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)
2_
I L I
?@ Abnormal events (2-4)
'3, 121 Pb Major transients (1-2)
2 / I I xlh EOPs enteredlrequiring substantive actions (1-2)
2 1 1 I Z& EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)
I I l l i?& Critical tasks (23)
3 121
,?.
Total malfunctions (5-8)
I
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Qualitv Checklist" Form ES-301-4 (R8, SI)
u QUALITATIVE AllRIBUTES Initials a
b'
c#
I l
or inStrLmenlalion may be obi 01 the malfuncl.on(s) lhal are entered lo in't.aie the event I
. ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Final Form ES-301-5 (R8, SI)
OPERATING TEST NO.:
ii Reactivity
NA
1 Normal
NA
1 SRO-U Instrument /
N A
5 Major
NA
1 Component
1
2 Instructions:
Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution typ Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence COUnt toward the minimum requiremen * Note: Scenar designate 3s #3 and # 4 are the primary scenarios for use, scenario designated #2 is the backup for the Browns Ferry Exam 12/0 Author:
NRC Reviewer:
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 (R8, SI)
D Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an R (2) Optional for an SRO- (3) Only applicable to SRO Instructions:
Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evalu Author:
NRC Reviewer:
ES-401 Written Examination DRAFT Form ES-401-7 (R8, S1)
Quality Checklist ii ii Date of Exam: December 13,2002 Exam Level: SRO Initial Facility: Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant its (no more than 75 nk at least 10 percent new, Date a. Author Timothv Kolbl b. Facility Reviewer (*)
NIA c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
Edwin Lea/
.
d. NRC Regional Supervisor Michael E. Ernsted /nz;r, '?
/
O M
Note:
- The facility reviewer's initialslsignature are not applicable for NRC-developed examination # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column '"c;)I chief examiner concurrence require ES-401 Written Examination DRAFT Form ES-401-7 (R8, SI)
Quality Checklist L/
Date of Exam: December 13,2002 Exam Level: RO Yacility: Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Initial d is appropriate for the Tier to which they are Date a. Author b. Facility Reviewer (*)
N/A c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
Edwin Led A &
d. NRC Regional Supervisor Michael E. Ernsted Note:
- The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examination ES-401 Final Written Examination Form ES-401-7 (R8, SI)
Quality Checklist C licensing exams
-
the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed: or x t h e examinations were developed independently: or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was stalted; or the licensee certifies that there is no duplication: or st 10 percent new, and the the actual question a. Author b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note:
- The facility reviewer's initialshignature are not applicable for NRC-developed examination # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column T;" chief examiner concurrence require Final Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-7 (R8, S1)
ES-401 indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
he audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or he audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or he examinations were developed independently; or Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the Date a. Author b. Facility Reviewer r)
N/A c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
Edwin Lea/ kd& 6
,
d. NRC Regional Supervisor Michael E. Emstes/
H
/a
.
<-'-
Note:
- The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examination # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column 'c;" chief examiner Concurrence require ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 (R8, SI)
Quality Checklist Facility: Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: 12/13/02 Exam Level: ROlSRO I
,Initials, Applicants' scores checked for addition errors I Grading for all borderline cases (80% +I-2%) reviewed in lmL 1 All other failina examinations checked to ensure that grades I, 4 Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of a. Grader Timothy C. Kolb -,/*
I LLr&--/-L343 b. Facility Reviewerr)
NA c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
d. NRC Supervisor (*)
Michael E. Ernstes /
/ / 7 / 0 3 Edwin Lea /
~~~
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are require ES-501 Post-Examination Check Sheet Form ES-501-1 (R8, SI)
ii Browns Ferry Exam December 13-25,200 I, I Facility written exam comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC grading completed, if necessary Task Description I
/
// 7/)3 I
I Date ComDlete NRC Chief examiner review of written exam and operating test grading completed II Facility written exam comments or graded exams received and II verified complete
//7/DJ I
Operating tests graded by NRC examiners Responsible supervisor review completed I License and denial letters mailed Facility notified of results
//23/6 3
//23/03
/
I 1) Management (licensing official) review completed I
II I Examination report issued (refer to NRC MC 0610)
I //23 j I
'
&A 1 Reference material returned after final resolution of any appeals