ML20128D053

Notice of Violation from Insp on 921214-18.Violation Noted: Plant Emergency Plan Not Followed & Maintained in Effect as Required

ML20128D053
Person / Time
Site:	Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date:	02/03/1993
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20128D044	List: IR 05000213/1992023 ML20128D040 ML20128D053
References
50-213-92-23, NUDOCS 9302100038
Download: ML20128D053 (1)

Text

.

EQIlG OF VlQLAHQN Connec:icut Yankee Atomic Power Company Docket No. 50 213 Haddam Weck Plant Licensec No. DPR 61 During NRC inspection from December 14-18,1992, an apparent violation of NRC requirements was identified, in accordance with the NRC " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR 2, Appendix C, that violation is listed below:

10 CFR 50.54(q) requires licensees to follow and maintain in effect emergency plans which meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50 Appendix E.

10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section F.a. requires initial and periodic retraining of directors and/or coordinators of the plant emergency organir2 tion.

The Haddam Neck Emergency Plan, Revision 22, July 27,1992, specifies in Figure 81 and Section 8.1.1 that Technical Support Managers receive annual (1 year i 3 months)

Emergency Action Level training (Training Module G007).

Contrary to the above, as of December 18,1992, the Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Plant Emergency Plan was not followed and ma ntained in effect as required.

8 Specifically, qualified Technical Support Center Managers, who direct and/or coordinate plant emergency organization functions, had not received Emergency Action Level training (Module G007) since June 1991, a period of about 18 months.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement Vlli).

Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201, the Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NITN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20535 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region I, and a copy to the NRC Resident inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation

• and should include: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the correc-tive steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Act,42 U.S.C. 2232, this reply shall be submitted under oath or affirmation. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be takem Dated at King of Prussia, Pennsylvania this 3d day of February 19^/3 vaoatoooaa saoaoa 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY PDR ADOCK 05000213 0 PDR

_ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ -