IR 05000155/1988003

Partially Withheld Phyical Security Insp Rept 50-155/88-03 on 8870928-1002 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Noted.Major Major Areas Inspected:Allegations Re Security Requalification Tests & Deficiencies in Security Sys

ML20154B428
Person / Time
Site:	Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date:	05/05/1988
From:	Christoffer G, Creed J, Madeda T, Mallett B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20154B424	List: IR 05000155/1988003 ML20154B419
References
50-155-88-03, 50-155-88-3, NUDOCS 8805170195
Download: ML20154B428 (2)

Text

____ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.

' -

, . .

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i

{

REGION III

Report No. 50-155/88003(DRSS) License No. DPR-6 Docket No. 50-155 Licensee: Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, MI 49201-Facility Name: Big Rock Point Nuclear Power Plant Inspection At: Big Rock Point, Charlevoix, Michigan Inspection Conducted: March 1-4, 1988 Type of Inspection: Unannounced Reactive Physical Securit Date of Previous Security Related Inspection: September 28 through October 2, 1987 Inspectors: % he,/,A 6[[F'

T. J.fladeda Date Physital Security Inspector S.1 bM'1 tlol G. M. Christof fbr O

'

.5/4/88 Date Physical Security Inspector Reviewed By: kb kM /m J. R. Creed, Ch'ef&

5/5/87 Date Safeguards Section Approved By: 59 Y B. S. Mallett, Ph.D., Chief Date Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch Enclosure contains SAFEGUARDS INFCRi'ATION

,, Upon scparation this 8805170195 880511 H ESSO IS Decon; rolled PDR ADOCK 05000155 O DCD

_ -_ a

--

.

p ,

..

.

Inspection Summary Inspection on September 28 through October 2, 1987 (Report No. 50-155/88003(DRSS))

Areas Inspected: Included allegations pertaining to: security requalification-tests; deficiencies in the perimeter security system; and claimed penetration of I the plant's security system. Iri addition, a followup on Regulatory Effectiveness Review Findings was performe Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements in the areas inspected. Tlie allegations were not substantiated, and RER inspection results determined that for 19 findings nine were referred to NRC Headquarters for resolution as licensing issues; two were referred to NRC Headquarters for resolution under the Miscellaneous Amendment Rule; six of the implementation issues are closed; and two remain ope (DETAILS: UNCLASSIFIED )

.

F Enclosure contains SAFEGUARDS INFCRP.ATIO(

Upon separation this page 10 Decontrolled

. _ . .

. , . . , . , . . , - , - - . . . . . _ , - -. . _ _ - _ - - . . _ _ . . . . - . _ , - - , _ - . _ . , - , -