IR 05000155/1977006

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-155/77-06 on 770527.No Noncompliance Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Observation of Util Response Organization During Scheduled Drill & Collection of Effluent Samples for Future Comparative Analyses
ML20002E433
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/09/1977
From: Januska A, Pagliaro J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20002E432 List:
References
50-155-77-06, 50-155-77-6, NUDOCS 8101270978
Download: ML20002E433 (3)


Text

..

,

'

O

...

-

,

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPEC'l ION AND ENFORCEMENT

,

.

.

'

REGION III

.

Report No.

50-155/77-06 Docket Fo.

50-155 License No.

DPR-6

-

Licensee: Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, MI 49201 Facility Name: Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant

.

Inspection at: Big Rock Point Site, Charlevoix, MI Inspection conducted: May 27,19 W

.

be v Inspector:

A. G. Januska date signed

&

1')

Approved by:

J. A. Pagliaro, Chief Environmental and Special

'date signed Projects Section t.

Inspection Summary Inspection on May 27. 1977 (Report No. 50-155/77-06)

Areas Inspected: Routine, observation of the response by the licensee's organization during a scheduled drill conducted by the licensee; collection

.~~

of effluent samples for future comparative analyses. The inspection involved 8 Inspector-hours on site by one NRC inspector.

Results: For the two areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or devi-ations were identified.

b l

$

q

.

A

9

.

<

'

s

DETAILS (

1.

Persons Contacted

  • .

Principal Licensee Employees

  • C.

Axtell, Plant Health Physicist C. Tca,. Senior Chemistry and Radiation Protection Technician a

  • denotes those present at the exit interview.

2.

Drill The inspector observed the response by the licensee organization and an offsite support agency during one of the scheduled drills conducted by the licensee on May 27, 1977.

Observations were g1ven

,

in detail to the licensee representative which generally fell into the categories of Radiation Protection, room preparation and area restoration. The inspector noted that the Plant Health Physicist, also an observer, verified the impleme tation of Appendix C Section III of the Big Rock Point Plant Site Emergency Plan.

a.

Radiation Protection The inspector noted that minor deficiencies noted during the drill were due to the f act that the Emergency Room of the hospital was very busy and also that the ambulance used was

-

the culy one available and could not be detained to simulate

a survey of the attendants, b.

Room Preparation The Plant Health Physicist noted that a receptacle for waste

'~~

was not provided in preparing the room.

c.

Area Restoration The inspector noted that blotting paper, removed from the route from the emergency patient entrance to the Treatment Room, was carried to the Treatment Room in a manner that would have allowed contamination to be deposited on the corridor flocr.

A critique was scheduled for licensee management during the week of May 30 - June 3, 1977.

/

i

!

(

-2-

.

,

-

_

_

._._._._. _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _____ _________ ___--

.-

o

.

.-

3.

._ Effluent Sampling

Samples of liquid and gaseous waste, and particulate and charcoal (

<tdsorber filters were obtained for futare comparative analysis.

l '

4.

E_xit Interview

.

The inspector summarized his findings with the licensee represen-

~ t a t e'a (paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the drill on May 27, 1977.

\\,.

.. -.

0

.

I

,

i i

(

3-

-

!

l e

_

_

_ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _