ENS 56910
ENS Event | |
|---|---|
16:29 Dec 28, 2023 | |
| Title | |
| Event Description | The following information was provided by the licensee via email:
Plant alignment caused an unanalyzed condition regarding unit 1 and unit 2 Appendix R procedures. [Watts Bar Nuclear] (WBN) unit 1 and unit 2 Appendix R procedures require manual operator action times including [volume control tank] (VCT) isolation. They are calculated with an assumed hydrogen cover gas constant at 20 psig. This is to preclude hydrogen ingestion into the charging pumps with an operator action time of 70 minutes. Due to recent lower hydrogen concentration in the [reactor coolant system] (RCS), [unit 2] VCT hydrogen regulator set point was increased to 28 psig. This increased pressure set point invalidated the initial assumptions made in the Appendix R calculations for manual operator action times. WBN unit 1 VCT hydrogen regulator was also verified high out of band at 22 psig. WBN has restored unit 1 and unit 2 VCT hydrogen regulators to the required specification. The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified of this condition.
The following information was provided by the licensee via email: In accordance with NUREG-1022, Section 2.8 and Section 4.2.3, WBN is retracting the previous report in EN 56910 pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B). An analysis of the postulated Appendix R Fires that could cause ingestion of cover gas into the charging pumps would be mitigated through current plant processes and procedures and therefore does not present a significant threat to fire safe shutdown. Based on sufficient margin and existing operator actions, the event does not represent a condition that significantly degrades plant safety under 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B). Therefore EN 56910 is being retracted. The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified of this retraction. Notified R2DO (Miller). |
| Where | |
|---|---|
Watts Bar  Tennessee (NRC Region 2) | |
| Reporting | |
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | |
| Time - Person (Reporting Time:+2.43 h0.101 days <br />0.0145 weeks <br />0.00333 months <br />) | |
| Opened: | Tony Pate 18:55 Dec 28, 2023 |
| NRC Officer: | Adam Koziol |
| Last Updated: | Jan 4, 2024 |
| 56910 - NRC Website
Loading map... | |
Unit 1 | |
|---|---|
| Reactor critical | Critical |
| Scram | No |
| Before | Power Operation (100 %) |
| After | Power Operation (100 %) |
Unit 2 | |
|---|---|
| Reactor critical | Critical |
| Scram | No |
| Before | Power Operation (100 %) |
| After | Power Operation (100 %) |
WEEKMONTHYEARENS 569102023-12-28T16:29:00028 December 2023 16:29:00
[Table view]10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition ENS 565412023-05-25T17:45:00025 May 2023 17:45:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition of Emergency Diesel Generator ENS 538012018-12-20T05:00:00020 December 2018 05:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Containment Air Return Fan System Inoperable ENS 533492018-04-19T23:44:00019 April 2018 23:44:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Related to Emergency Core Cooling Gas Accumulation Acceptance Criteria ENS 528502017-07-12T16:38:00012 July 2017 16:38:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Related to Gdc-5 (General Design Criterion-5) for Dual Unit Operation ENS 519952016-06-08T19:26:0008 June 2016 19:26:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition That Could Potentially Degrade Plant Safety ENS 509602015-04-06T21:00:0006 April 2015 21:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Due to Volume Control Tank Isolation Time Analysis Error ENS 508872015-03-13T15:00:00013 March 2015 15:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition ENS 505962014-11-05T18:10:0005 November 2014 18:10:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Regarding Appendix R Procedures ENS 505402014-10-15T21:00:00015 October 2014 21:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Appendix R Unanalyzed Condition Affecting the Turbine Driven Aux Feedwater Pump ENS 502452014-07-01T02:46:0001 July 2014 02:46:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition That Could Have Resulted in an Increased Maximum Flood Level ENS 498182014-02-11T23:00:00011 February 2014 23:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Nonconservative Operator Manual Actions Identified in Appendix R Analysis ENS 495412013-11-14T21:00:00014 November 2013 21:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(C), Loss of Safety Function - Release of Radioactive Material Postulated Fire Induced Failure of Centrifugal Charging Pumps ENS 493892013-09-27T16:45:00027 September 2013 16:45:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Calculation Error Resulted in Unanalyzed Condition for Appendix R Event ENS 480562012-06-29T14:28:00029 June 2012 14:28:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Due to Increase in Probable Maximum Flood Level ENS 487232009-07-28T05:00:00028 July 2009 05:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition That Could Have Resulted in an Increased Maximum Flood Level 2023-05-25T17:45:00 | |