ENS 52976
From kanterella
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ENS Event | |
---|---|
22:24 Sep 18, 2017 | |
Title | Control Room Envelope Not Maintained |
Event Description | At 1724 [CDT] on 9/18/17 during Control Room Ventilation testing Door-61, South Control Room Door, became wedged against its door stop and stuck open. Door-61 is a credited High Energy Line Break (HELB) / Fire / Flood Barrier in addition to its function to maintain the Control Room envelope. The door stop was subsequently unbolted from the floor and the door was free to close. Door-61, South Control Room Door, has since been inspected, and at 1750 [CDT], was declared functional as a HELB / Fire / Flood Barrier and Operational for purposes of maintaining the Control Room Envelope. During the 26 minutes the door was stuck open, the Control Room was in an unanalyzed condition with regards to protection from a High Energy Line Break.
The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector. |
Where | |
---|---|
Point Beach Wisconsin (NRC Region 3) | |
Reporting | |
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident | |
Time - Person (Reporting Time:+1.62 h0.0675 days <br />0.00964 weeks <br />0.00222 months <br />) | |
Opened: | Thad Edmonds 00:01 Sep 19, 2017 |
NRC Officer: | Dong Park |
Last Updated: | Sep 19, 2017 |
52976 - NRC Website
Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"mappingservice":"leaflet","width":"350px","height":"250px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":6,"defzoom":14,"layers":["OpenStreetMap"],"image layers":[],"overlays":[],"resizable":false,"fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":true,"cluster":false,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clustermaxradius":80,"clusterspiderfy":true,"geojson":"","clicktarget":"","imageLayers":[],"locations":[{"text":"\u003Cb\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\"mw-parser-output\"\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Ca class=\"mw-selflink selflink\"\u003EENS 52976\u003C/a\u003E - \u003Ca href=\"/Point_Beach\" title=\"Point Beach\"\u003EPoint Beach\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003C/div\u003E\u003C/b\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\"mw-parser-output\"\u003E\u003Cp\u003EControl Room Envelope Not Maintained\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003C/div\u003E","title":"ENS 52976 - Point Beach\n","link":"","lat":44.280972222222225,"lon":-87.53674444444445,"icon":"/w/images/9/9b/NextEra_Energy_icon.png"}],"imageoverlays":null} | |
Unit 1 | |
---|---|
Reactor critical | Critical |
Scram | No |
Before | Power Operation (98 %) |
After | Power Operation (98 %) |
Unit 2 | |
---|---|
Reactor critical | Critical |
Scram | No |
Before | Power Operation (100 %) |
After | Power Operation (100 %) |
Point Beach with 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | |
WEEKMONTHYEARENS 532392018-03-01T22:43:0001 March 2018 22:43:00
[Table view]10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Potential Tornado Missile Vulnerabilities ENS 529762017-09-18T22:24:00018 September 2017 22:24:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Control Room Envelope Not Maintained ENS 507402015-01-15T23:04:00015 January 2015 23:04:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Inadequately Sealed Piping Penetrations and Postulated Flooding Event ENS 502622014-07-08T05:24:0008 July 2014 05:24:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident Unit 2 Spray Addition Declared Inoperable Due to Tank Indication Greater than 67% ENS 489212013-04-14T11:20:00014 April 2013 11:20:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident Containment Spray Chemical Addition Flow Path Isolated ENS 484022012-10-12T09:20:00012 October 2012 09:20:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Reactor Power Exceeded Fsar Analyzed Value ENS 466462011-02-28T03:59:00028 February 2011 03:59:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident Degraded Accident Mitigation Due to Safety Injection Out of Service ENS 443512008-07-16T20:16:00016 July 2008 20:16:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Potential Fire Propagation Between Rooms Could Affect Appendix R Safe Shutdown ENS 437502007-10-26T00:30:00026 October 2007 00:30:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident Both Low Temperature Overpressure Protection Systems Out of Service ENS 434872007-07-12T15:15:00012 July 2007 15:15:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Fire Inspection Analysis of Pressurizer Porvs and Block Valves ENS 433532007-05-09T21:23:0009 May 2007 21:23:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Due to Identified Non Compliant Fire Protection Manual Operator Actions ENS 431492007-02-06T20:15:0006 February 2007 20:15:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded Control Room Emergency Filtration System Declared Inoperable ENS 430402006-12-09T00:12:0009 December 2006 00:12:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident Crefs System Inoperable ENS 426112006-05-30T14:23:00030 May 2006 14:23:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident Control Room Emergency Filtration System Inoperable ENS 421292005-11-08T14:44:0008 November 2005 14:44:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Design Basis for Long Term Cooling Not Correctly Modeled ENS 421092005-11-02T05:00:0002 November 2005 05:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(i), Tech Spec Required Shutdown Tech Spec Required Shutdown Due to Degradation of Containment Coatings ENS 420202005-09-27T15:00:00027 September 2005 15:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Postulated Faults Have Electrical Current in Excess of the Maximum Listed Interrupting Ratings. ENS 418852005-08-02T01:00:0002 August 2005 01:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident Potentially Inoperable Safety Injection Pumps ENS 418562005-07-20T09:51:00020 July 2005 09:51:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Minimum Recirculation Valves Will Not Automatically Open in Local Operating Mode ENS 417582005-06-08T22:24:0008 June 2005 22:24:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition - Fire Organizational Plan No Longer Aligned with Safe Shutdown Analysis ENS 417542005-06-07T23:00:0007 June 2005 23:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Appendix R Safe Shutdown Strategy Deficiency 2018-03-01T22:43:00 | |
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ENS_52976&oldid=81745"