ENS 50740
From kanterella
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ENS Event | |
|---|---|
23:04 Jan 15, 2015 | |
| Title | Inadequately Sealed Piping Penetrations and Postulated Flooding Event |
| Event Description | On November 19, 2014, inadequately sealed piping penetrations were discovered in the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) piping and valve gallery walls that could have allowed a postulated flooding event to potentially impact both RHR pumps. The same configuration was identified on both Units. Following analysis of the postulated flooding leakage sources and flow paths, it was discovered that there was a time when an unacceptable volume of flood water could have entered the pipe and valve gallery areas. This condition was found to have been previously corrected on 12/16/14, following changes to Operations flood mitigation strategies and installation of seals in upstream pipeway trenches. Therefore, this issue is reported as an unanalyzed past condition that had the potential to adversely impact the RHR pumps.
This condition was determined to be reportable per 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) and 50.72(b)(3)(v)(B). The licensee has informed the NRC Resident Inspector. |
| Where | |
|---|---|
Point Beach  Wisconsin (NRC Region 3) | |
| Reporting | |
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat | |
| Time - Person (Reporting Time:+-3.87 h-0.161 days <br />-0.023 weeks <br />-0.0053 months <br />) | |
| Opened: | Michael Heim 19:12 Jan 15, 2015 |
| NRC Officer: | John Shoemaker |
| Last Updated: | Jan 15, 2015 |
| 50740 - NRC Website
Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"mappingservice":"leaflet","width":"350px","height":"250px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":6,"defzoom":14,"layers":["OpenStreetMap"],"image layers":[],"overlays":[],"resizable":false,"fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":true,"cluster":false,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clustermaxradius":80,"clusterspiderfy":true,"geojson":"","clicktarget":"","imageLayers":[],"locations":[{"text":"\u003Cb\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\"mw-parser-output\"\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Ca class=\"mw-selflink selflink\"\u003EENS 50740\u003C/a\u003E - \u003Ca href=\"/Point_Beach\" title=\"Point Beach\"\u003EPoint Beach\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003C/div\u003E\u003C/b\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\"mw-parser-output\"\u003E\u003Cp\u003EInadequately Sealed Piping Penetrations and Postulated Flooding Event\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003C/div\u003E","title":"ENS 50740 - Point Beach\n","link":"","lat":44.280972222222225,"lon":-87.53674444444445,"icon":"/w/images/9/9b/NextEra_Energy_icon.png"}],"imageoverlays":null} | |
Unit 1 | |
|---|---|
| Reactor critical | Critical |
| Scram | No |
| Before | Power Operation (100 %) |
| After | Power Operation (100 %) |
Unit 2 | |
|---|---|
| Reactor critical | Critical |
| Scram | No |
| Before | Power Operation (100 %) |
| After | Power Operation (100 %) |
Point Beach with 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | |
WEEKMONTHYEARENS 532392018-03-01T22:43:0001 March 2018 22:43:00
[Table view]10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Potential Tornado Missile Vulnerabilities ENS 529762017-09-18T22:24:00018 September 2017 22:24:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Control Room Envelope Not Maintained ENS 507402015-01-15T23:04:00015 January 2015 23:04:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Inadequately Sealed Piping Penetrations and Postulated Flooding Event ENS 484022012-10-12T09:20:00012 October 2012 09:20:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Reactor Power Exceeded Fsar Analyzed Value ENS 443512008-07-16T20:16:00016 July 2008 20:16:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Potential Fire Propagation Between Rooms Could Affect Appendix R Safe Shutdown ENS 434872007-07-12T15:15:00012 July 2007 15:15:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Fire Inspection Analysis of Pressurizer Porvs and Block Valves ENS 433532007-05-09T21:23:0009 May 2007 21:23:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Due to Identified Non Compliant Fire Protection Manual Operator Actions ENS 421292005-11-08T14:44:0008 November 2005 14:44:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Design Basis for Long Term Cooling Not Correctly Modeled ENS 421092005-11-02T05:00:0002 November 2005 05:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(i), Tech Spec Required Shutdown Tech Spec Required Shutdown Due to Degradation of Containment Coatings ENS 420202005-09-27T15:00:00027 September 2005 15:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Postulated Faults Have Electrical Current in Excess of the Maximum Listed Interrupting Ratings. ENS 418562005-07-20T09:51:00020 July 2005 09:51:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Minimum Recirculation Valves Will Not Automatically Open in Local Operating Mode ENS 417582005-06-08T22:24:0008 June 2005 22:24:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition - Fire Organizational Plan No Longer Aligned with Safe Shutdown Analysis ENS 417542005-06-07T23:00:0007 June 2005 23:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Appendix R Safe Shutdown Strategy Deficiency 2018-03-01T22:43:00 | |
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ENS_50740&oldid=421823"