Letter Sequence Response to RAI |
---|
|
|
|
Similar Documents at Cook |
---|
Category:Letter type:AEP
MONTHYEARAEP-NRC-2024-01, Emergency Plan Revision 482024-01-0808 January 2024 Emergency Plan Revision 48 AEP-NRC-2023-56, Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Unit 1 Post Accident Monitoring Reactor Coolant (Loop 3 Cold Leg) Wide Range Temperature Recorder Thermal Sensor2023-12-20020 December 2023 Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Unit 1 Post Accident Monitoring Reactor Coolant (Loop 3 Cold Leg) Wide Range Temperature Recorder Thermal Sensor AEP-NRC-2023-45, Unit 2 - Schedular Exemption for Enhanced Weapons, Firearms, Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation2023-11-16016 November 2023 Unit 2 - Schedular Exemption for Enhanced Weapons, Firearms, Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation AEP-NRC-2023-40, Annual Report of Loss-of-Coolant Accident Evaluation Model Changes2023-08-29029 August 2023 Annual Report of Loss-of-Coolant Accident Evaluation Model Changes AEP-NRC-2023-34, Supplement to Request for Approval of Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation2023-08-0202 August 2023 Supplement to Request for Approval of Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation AEP-NRC-2023-29, Core Operating Limits Report2023-06-19019 June 2023 Core Operating Limits Report AEP-NRC-2023-32, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-1 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2023-06-0606 June 2023 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-1 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations AEP-NRC-2023-33, Renewable Operating Permit2023-06-0505 June 2023 Renewable Operating Permit AEP-NRC-2023-30, Follow-Up Notification of Ph Non-Compliance for Turbine Room Sump2023-06-0101 June 2023 Follow-Up Notification of Ph Non-Compliance for Turbine Room Sump AEP-NRC-2023-27, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2023-05-15015 May 2023 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report AEP-NRC-2023-19, Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2023-04-30030 April 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report AEP-NRC-2023-23, Annual Report of Individual Monitoring for 20222023-04-24024 April 2023 Annual Report of Individual Monitoring for 2022 AEP-NRC-2023-24, Notification of Ph Non-Compliance for Turbine Room Sump2023-04-12012 April 2023 Notification of Ph Non-Compliance for Turbine Room Sump AEP-NRC-2023-20, Annual Report of Property Insurance2023-04-0303 April 2023 Annual Report of Property Insurance AEP-NRC-2023-15, Decommissioning Funding Status Report2023-03-28028 March 2023 Decommissioning Funding Status Report AEP-NRC-2023-11, Form OAR-1, Owner'S Activity Report2023-01-31031 January 2023 Form OAR-1, Owner'S Activity Report AEP-NRC-2023-02, Request for Approval of Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation2023-01-26026 January 2023 Request for Approval of Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation AEP-NRC-2022-66, Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Unit 2 Post Accident Monitoring Neutron Flux Monitoring2022-12-15015 December 2022 Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Unit 2 Post Accident Monitoring Neutron Flux Monitoring AEP-NRC-2022-46, Notification of Deviation from Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Materials Reliability Program 2019-008, Interim Guidance for NEI 03-08 Needed Requirements for Us PWR Plants for Management of Thermal Fatigue in2022-12-12012 December 2022 Notification of Deviation from Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Materials Reliability Program 2019-008, Interim Guidance for NEI 03-08 Needed Requirements for Us PWR Plants for Management of Thermal Fatigue in AEP-NRC-2022-61, Request for Relief Related to American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case N-729-6 Supplemental Examination Requirements, ISIR-5-062022-10-24024 October 2022 Request for Relief Related to American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case N-729-6 Supplemental Examination Requirements, ISIR-5-06 AEP-NRC-2022-58, U1C31 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report2022-10-24024 October 2022 U1C31 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report AEP-NRC-2022-56, Unit 2 - Transmittal of Report of Changes to the Emergency Plan2022-10-12012 October 2022 Unit 2 - Transmittal of Report of Changes to the Emergency Plan AEP-NRC-2022-30, Core Operating Limits Report2022-10-0606 October 2022 Core Operating Limits Report AEP-NRC-2022-51, Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis2022-08-31031 August 2022 Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis AEP-NRC-2022-50, Form OAR-1, Owner'S Activity Report2022-08-25025 August 2022 Form OAR-1, Owner'S Activity Report AEP-NRC-2022-35, Annual Report of Loss-of-Coolant Accident Evaluation Model Changes2022-08-18018 August 2022 Annual Report of Loss-of-Coolant Accident Evaluation Model Changes AEP-NRC-2022-47, Transmittal of Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Emergency Plan, Revision 472022-08-0202 August 2022 Transmittal of Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Emergency Plan, Revision 47 AEP-NRC-2022-42, Unit 2 Updated Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report to Reflect TSTF-577 Reporting Requirements2022-07-18018 July 2022 Unit 2 Updated Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report to Reflect TSTF-577 Reporting Requirements AEP-NRC-2022-29, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 20212022-05-13013 May 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2021 AEP-NRC-2022-15, CFR 72.48(d)(2) Summary Report of 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluations2022-05-0404 May 2022 CFR 72.48(d)(2) Summary Report of 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluations AEP-NRC-2022-28, 2021 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2022-04-29029 April 2022 2021 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report AEP-NRC-2022-27, Annual Report of Individual Monitoring2022-04-27027 April 2022 Annual Report of Individual Monitoring AEP-NRC-2022-05, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-554, Revision 1, Revise Reactor Coolant Leakage Requirements2022-04-0707 April 2022 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-554, Revision 1, Revise Reactor Coolant Leakage Requirements AEP-NRC-2022-18, Annual Report of Property Insurance2022-03-28028 March 2022 Annual Report of Property Insurance AEP-NRC-2022-20, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2022-03-14014 March 2022 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations AEP-NRC-2022-12, Commitment Schedule Change Related to Seismic PRA Distributed Ignition Backup Power Source2022-03-0202 March 2022 Commitment Schedule Change Related to Seismic PRA Distributed Ignition Backup Power Source AEP-NRC-2022-02, Unit 2 - Supplement to Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-5, Revision 1, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections2022-02-0101 February 2022 Unit 2 - Supplement to Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-5, Revision 1, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections AEP-NRC-2022-01, Quality Assurance Program Change Request for Internal Audit Frequency2022-02-0101 February 2022 Quality Assurance Program Change Request for Internal Audit Frequency AEP-NRC-2022-03, Final Supplemental Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-022022-01-20020 January 2022 Final Supplemental Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-02 AEP-NRC-2021-68, Response to Request for Additional Information on Requested Change Regarding Containment Water Level Instrumentation2021-12-16016 December 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information on Requested Change Regarding Containment Water Level Instrumentation AEP-NRC-2021-67, Unit 2 - Decommissioning Funding Plan for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation2021-12-0909 December 2021 Unit 2 - Decommissioning Funding Plan for Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation AEP-NRC-2021-66, 2020 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Correction2021-11-17017 November 2021 2020 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Correction AEP-NRC-2021-65, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask2021-11-0808 November 2021 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask AEP-NRC-2021-47, Unit 2 - Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-577, Revision 1, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections2021-11-0808 November 2021 Unit 2 - Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-577, Revision 1, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections AEP-NRC-2021-60, Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask2021-10-12012 October 2021 Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask AEP-NRC-2021-55, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask2021-09-20020 September 2021 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask AEP-NRC-2021-48, Cycle 26 Core Operating Limits Report, Revision 02021-09-14014 September 2021 Cycle 26 Core Operating Limits Report, Revision 0 AEP-NRC-2021-53, Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask2021-08-26026 August 2021 Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask AEP-NRC-2021-50, Annual Report of Loss-of-Coolant Accident Evaluation Model Changes2021-08-25025 August 2021 Annual Report of Loss-of-Coolant Accident Evaluation Model Changes AEP-NRC-2021-44, Form OAR-1, Owner'S Activity Report2021-08-12012 August 2021 Form OAR-1, Owner'S Activity Report 2024-01-08
[Table view] |
Text
INDIANA Indiana Michigan Power MICHIGAN Cook Nuclear Plant POWER fOneCook Place Bridgman, MI 49106 A unit ofAmerican Electric Power India naMichigan Power.com January 29, 2014 AEP-NRC-2014-07 10 CFR 50.54(f)
Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1& 2 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3, FLOODING WALKDOWNS
References:
- 1. R. J. Pascarelli, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), to L. J. Weber, Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M); "Request for Additional Information Associated With Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3, Flooding Walkdowns;" dated December 23, 2013 (ML13325A891).
- 2. Letter from J. P. Gebbie, I&M, to NRC Document Control Desk; "180-Day Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f)
Regarding the Flooding Aspects of Recommendations 2.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident;" dated November 26, 2012 (ML12340A442).
Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M), the licensee for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant (CNP)
Units 1 and 2, is submitting the response to "Request For Additional Information [RAI] Associated With Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3, Flooding Walkdowns" (Reference 1). The RAI is based on the I&M letter, "180-Day Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Flooding Aspects of Recommendations 2.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident" (Reference 2). provides the I&M RAI response for CNP Units 1 and 2.
There are no new or revised commitments in this letter. Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Michael K. Scarpello, Regulatory Affairs Manager, at (269) 466-2649.
Sincerely, Joel P. Gebbie Site Vice President JJV/amp
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AEP-NRC-2014-07 Page 2
Enclosures:
- 1. Affirmation
- 2. Response to "Request for Additional Information Associated With Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3, Flooding Walkdowns;" dated December 23, 2013 c: J. T. King, MPSC S. M. Krawec, AEP Ft. Wayne, w/o enclosures MDEQ - RMD/RPS NRC Resident Inspector C. D. Pederson, NRC Region III T. J. Wengert, NRC Washington, DC
Enclosure 1 to AEP-NRC-2014-07 AFFIRMATION I, Joel P. Gebbie, being duly sworn, state that I am Site Vice President of Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M), that I am authorized to sign and file this request with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on behalf of I&M, and that the statements made and the matters set forth herein pertaining to I&M are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
Indiana Michigan Power Company Joel P. Gebbie Site Vice President SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS ___+'_DAY OF .L3Cnup ,2014 Notary Public My Commission Expires
Enclosure 2 TO AEP-NRC-2014-07 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Response to "Request for Additional Information Associated With Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3, Flooding Walkdowns;" dated December 23, 2013 Pleaseprovide the following:
- 1. Confirmation that the processfor evaluating APM was reviewed; Request for Additional Information (RAI) 1 Response:
Indiana Michigan Power has reviewed the process for evaluating available physical margin (APM). Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Flooding Walkdown Reports (MD-12-FLOOD-001-S and MD-12-FLOOD-002-S) contain the information described in this RAI regarding the evaluation, determination, and documentation of APM.
- 2. Confirmation that the APM process is now or was always consistent with the guidance in NEI 12-07 and discussed in this RAI; RAI 2 Response:
A flooding walkdown feature list was developed for the performance of the walkdown process.
Pre-established small-margin threshold values for the flooding protection features were not defined and/or documented in the Flooding Walkdown Reports. The APM for a portion of the flooding protection features were numerically determined by measurement similar to Approach A. For the flooding protection features where the APM was not numerically determined, the basis of the "not small" determination does not contain the level of detail described in Approach B. Flooding protection features that were judged to have a small APM were entered into the corrective action program (CAP) for evaluation.
The APM process was not consistent with the detailed steps described within the RAI.
Although the intent of the flooding walkdown process was met, the level of detail in the walkdown reports does not support an independent verification of the expected implementation of the process as described in the RAI. Additional evaluation and documentation of APM determinations will be performed as described in RAI 4 Response below.
- 3. If changes are necessary, a general description of any process changes to establish this consistency; RAI 3 Response:
Additional evaluation and documentation of APM determinations will be performed as described in RAI 4 Response below.
to AEP-NRC-2014-07 Page 2
- 4. As a result of the audits and subsequent interactionswith industry during public meetings, NRC staff recognizedthat evaluation of APM for seals (e.g., flood doors, penetrations,flood gates, etc.) was challengingfor some licensees. Generally, licensees were expected to use eitherApproach A orApproach B (describedbelow) to determine the APM for seals:
a) If seal pressure ratings were known, the seal ratings were used to determine APM (similarto example 2 in Section 3.13 of NEI 12-07). A numerical value for APM was documented. No further action was performed if the APM value was greaterthan the pre-established small-margin threshold value. If the APM value was small, an assessment of "significantconsequences" was performed and the guidance in NEI 12-07 Section 5.8 was followed.
b) If the seal pressure rating was not known, the APM for seals in a flood barrieris assumed to be greaterthan the pre-establishedsmall-margin threshold value if the following conditions were met: (1) the APM for the barrier in which the seal is located is greaterthan the small-margin threshold value and there is evidence that the seals were designed/procured, installed, and controlled as flooding seals in accordance with the flooding licensing basis. Note that in order to determine that the seal has been controlled as a flooding seal, it was only necessary to determine that the seal configuration has been governed by the plant's design control process since installation. In this case, the APM for the seal could have been documented as "notsmall".
As part of the RAI response, state if eitherApproach A or Approach B was used as part of the initial walkdowns or as part of actions taken in response to this RAI. No additionalactions are necessary if eitherApproach A or B was used.
If neitherApproach A or B was used to determine the APM values for seals (eitheras part of the walkdowns or as part of actions taken in response to this RAI), then perform the following two actions:
Enter the condition into the CAP (note: it is acceptable to utilize a single CAP entry to capture this issue for multiple seals). CAP disposition of "undetermined"APM values for seals should consider the guidance provided in NEI 12-07, Section 5.8. The CAP disposition should confirm all seals can perform their intended safety function against floods up to the current licensing basis flood height. Disposition may occur as part of the IntegratedAssessment. If an IntegratedAssessment is not performed, determine whether there are significant consequences associated with exceeding the capacity of the seals and take interim action(s), if necessary, via the CAP processes. These actions do not need to be complete priorto the RAI response.
Report the APM as "undetermined"and provide the CAP reference in the RAI response.
RAI 4 Response:
Neither Approach A nor Approach B as described in the RAI was fully implemented during the flooding walkdowns to determine APM for all flood protection features, including seals.
Portions of Approach A and Approach B were implemented for individual flood protection features during the flooding walkdown process. Additional actions to implement Approach A or Approach B were not performed during the preparation of this RAI response.
to AEP-NRC-2014-07 Page 3 CAP Action Request 2014-0120 has been generated to disposition and document the "undetermined" APM values using the clarifications provided in the RAI and direct documentation of the results in the Flood Hazard Reevaluation Integrated Assessment.