05000482/LER-2010-007

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER-2010-007, WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION
Wolf Creek Generating Station
Event date:
Report date:
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition
4822010007R01 - NRC Website

While performing a post-fire safe shutdown (PFSSD) review per Enforcement Guidance Memorandum (EGM) 09-002, "Enforcement Discretion for Fire Induced Circuit Faults," and Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.189, Revision 2, "Fire Protection for Nuclear Power Plants," five fire-induced multiple spurious operations (MSOs) issues were determined to be reportable. EGM 09-002 provides enforcement discretion for non-compliances related to multiple fire-induced circuit faults. The enforcement discretion period allows 6 months from the date of issuance of RG 1.189, Revision 2 to perform the following:

- Identify noncompliances related to multiple fire induced circuit faults - Implement compensatory measures for the noncompliances, and - Place the noncompliances in the licensees' corrective action program Regulatory Guide 1.189, Revision 2, was issued on November 2, 2009. Therefore, the 6-month identification period ended on May 2, 2010. For noncompliances identified during the 6-month identification period, enforcement discretion continues for an additional 30 months to resolve identified noncompliances.

Wolf Creek Generating Station's (WCGS) licensing basis associated with PFSSD analysis is silent regarding the applicability and respective methodology for addressing multiple fire-induced circuit failures and MSOs for a fire outside the Control Room. Because of this, a conservative approach was applied during the PFSSD fire area reanalysis project to review each fire area outside the Control Room for MSO vulnerabilities utilizing a deterministic approach in an attempt to identify single and multiple equipment maloperation conditions that could potentially affect the ability to achieve and maintain PFSSD. This review approach, which was based on Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 00-01, "Guidance for Post Fire Safe Shutdown Circuit Analysis," Revision 2, identified single spurious and MSO issues, which required resolution.

NEI 00-01 provides a consistent process for performing a PFSSD circuit analysis including deterministic methods for addressing potential fire-induced circuit failure issues. NEI 00-01 describes the process in which the generic MSO list was developed utilizing industry input through the Pressurized Water Reactors (PWR) and Boiling Water Reactors (BWR) Owner's Groups. The NEI guidance further identifies that both the Generic MSO List and plant specific MSO items identified via an expert panel process are required to be assessed for applicability. WCGS completed a MSO expert panel review and developed a Plant Specific MSO List comprised of the applicable generic MSOs identified in Appendix G of NEI 00-01 as well as the MSO items identified during the expert panel review.

PFSSD analysis review of the Plant Specific MSO List resulted in the identification of the following five reportable PFSSD issues:

1. In fire areas A-27 (Control Rod Drive/MG Set Room) and C-21 (Lower Cable Spreading Room), a fire-induced spurious safety injection signal (SIS) coincident with a loss of Residual Heat Removal (RHR) pump [EllS Code: BP-P] suction could prevent operation of both RHR pumps.

The loss of RHR pump suction is postulated to occur due to a fire-induced spurious low level in the Refueling Water Storage Tank (RWST) which opens the containment sump to RHR pump suction valves and closes the RWST to RHR suction valves. In this case, the sump would be dry and the operating RHR pumps would have no suction source.

2. In fire area A-8 (Aux Bldg 2000 Elevation Hallway), a fire-induced spurious SIS coincident with a loss of RHR pump suction could prevent operation of both RHR pumps. The loss of RHR pump suction is postulated to occur due to fire induced damage to control circuits for the RWST to RHR suction valves that causes them to close.

3. In fire area A-8, a fire-induced spurious SIS coincident with RHR miniflow valves going closed could prevent operation of both RHR pumps. The RHR miniflow valves are postulated to spuriously close due to damage to the flow indicating switch or the associated cable, causing a spurious high flow signal.

4. In fire areas A-1, A-11, A-18, C-7, C-12, C-18, C-21, C-24 and RB, pressurizer spray valves [EllS Code: PZR-V] could spuriously open and all four reactor coolant pumps (RCP) [EllS Code: AB-P] may not stop from the Control Room. Pressurizer spray flow can be stopped by tripping the RCPs either from the Control Room or locally.

5. In fire areas C-18, C-21, C-22, C-24, C-30 and C-33, the Boron Injection Tank flow path could spuriously open and a charging pump could spuriously start. This would fill the pressurizer [EllS Code: PZR] solid if not mitigated in a timely manner.

BASIS FOR REPORTABILITY

When a PFSSD issue is identified in which insufficient guidance is available to Operations personnel to readily mitigate the postulated fire-induced equipment maloperation, the issue is considered reportable under 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) and 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B) as an unanalyzed condition that significantly degrades plant safety. This is based on NUREG-1022, "Event Reporting Guidelines 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73," Revision 2, Section 3.2.4. This section provides the following example:

...if fire barriers are found to be missing, such that the required degree of separation for redundant safe shutdown trains is lacking, the event would be reportable as an unanalyzed condition that significantly degraded plant safety.

maloperation with a resulting adverse affect on PFSSD capability, is considered by WCNOC to be equivalent to a condition where fire barrier protection is deficient.

As such, WCNOC is reporting this condition pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B) for any event or condition that resulted in the nuclear power plant being in an unanalyzed condition that significantly degraded plant safety.

Additionally, this event is being reported pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A) and (B) as an event or condition that could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of structures or systems that are need to shut down the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown condition and remove residual heat. NUREG-1022 indicates that a design or analysis defect or deviation is reportable under this criterion if it could have prevented fulfillment of the safety function of structures or systems defined in the rules. The PFSSD analysis review determined that a fire-induced spurious SIS coincident with a loss of RHR pump suction could prevent operation of both RHR trains.

CAUSE

The apparent cause is latent design issues related to PFSSD that have existed since original plant design.

The original PFSSD analysis did not address MSO issues to the level of rigor that is now being applied in response to the NRC endorsement of the NEI 00-01 MSOs review methodology. This position is substantiated by the fact that WCGS's licensing basis associated with PFSSD analysis is silent regarding the applicability, scope and respective methodology for addressing multiple fire-induced circuit failures and MSOs for a fire outside the Control Room.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

Hourly fire watches were established for the affected areas. Procedure OFN KC-016, "Fire Response," was revised to identify interim mitigating actions in the event that a fire-induced MSO event occurred.

These interim actions will remain in effect until the respective MSO issue is resolved.

A design modification will be completed by November 2, 2012 to address issue 3.

Additional PFSSD analysis is required for issue 4. The analysis and actions to correct issue 4 will be completed by November 2, 2012.

For issues 1, 2 and 5, a portion of the field work associated with resolving the issues require a refueling outage to complete design modifications. Refueling Outage 19 was scheduled to start on September 22, 2012, which would have allowed WCNOC to complete the actions associated with noncompliant multiple fire induced circuit faults by November 2, 2012. The expiration of the enforcement discretion provided in Enforcement Guidance Memorandum 09-002, "Enforcement Discretion for Fire Induced Circuit Faults," is November 2, 2012. On January 13, 2012, the unit experienced a reactor trip and coincident loss of off-site power. An extended forced outage to affect the necessary repairs in conjunction with a longer than expected Refueling Outage 18 has resulted in a decision to move the start of Refueling Outage 19 to February 4, 2013. WCNOC will complete the actions associated with these 3 multiple fire induced circuit failures prior to startup from Refueling Outage 19.

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

There were no adverse consequences that resulted from the identified conditions, as there was no actual plant fire. Due to fire protection administrative controls, availability of fire detection and suppression systems, the trained on-site fire brigade, and the minimal potential for rapid-fire growth in the fire areas, it is highly unlikely that a credible fire would result in the circuit failure combinations required for the MSO maloperation scenarios. The compensatory measure hourly fire watch and the establishment of procedure OFN KC-016 mitigating actions provide reasonable assurance that the identified MSO issues will not jeopardize PFSSD capability during the interim time frame prior to implementation of actions required for permanent issue resolution.

OPERATING EXPERIENCE/PREVIOUS EVENTS

Charging Pump's capability to successfully inject borated water into the reactor. This condition was caused by the original Electrical Fire Hazards Analysis (EFHA) having non-validated assumptions and being insufficiently documented.

Train B Diesel Generator. This condition was caused by the original EFHA completed for the WCGS not identifying that field flashing may not be available if a fire occurs in the Control Room.

operation of the Train B Diesel Generator if a fire occurred in the Control Room. This condition was due to an inadequate review of Control Room circuitry for impact on PFSSD following a Control Room fire.