05000313/FIN-2010004-08
From kanterella
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Finding | |
---|---|
Title | Failure to Follow Procedures and Generate Adequate Work Orders for Maintenance on Safety Related Equipment |
Description | The inspectors identified a noncited violation of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings, for station planning personnel\'s failure to adequately implement station Procedure EN-FAP-WM-011, Work Planning Standard, Revision 0, and EN WM-105, Planning, Revision 6. Specifically, from August 3-19, 2010, multiple examples were identified where work orders used to perform maintenance activities on safety related equipment were incorrectly classified as reference work orders, referenced technical material that did not contain guidance for the prescribed task, or did not contain sufficient detail or direction to accomplish the maintenance activity as written. This issue was entered into the licensee\'s corrective action program as Condition Reports CR-ANO-C-2010- 1962, CR-ANO-C-2010-1964, CR-ANO-2-2010-1736, CR-ANO-C-2010-2114, CR-ANO-C-2010-2119, and CR-ANO-C-2010-2140. The performance deficiency was determined to be more than minor because if left uncorrected, the continued practice of generating inadequate work orders for maintenance activities on safety-related equipment would have the potential to leave risk significant equipment in a degraded condition without the knowledge and approval of site management and operations personnel, and is therefore a finding. The performance deficiency was associated with the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone. Using Manual Chapter 0609.04, Phase 1 - Initial Screening and Characterization of Findings, the finding was determined to have very low safety significance because the finding: (1) was not a design or qualification issue confirmed not to result in a loss of operability or functionality; (2) did not represent an actual loss of safety function of the system or train; (3) did not result in the loss of one or more trains of nontechnical specification equipment; and (4) did not screen as potentially risk significant due to a seismic, flooding, or severe weather initiating event. The finding was determined to have a crosscutting aspect in the area of human performance, associated with work practices H.4(b) in that the licensee defines and effectively communicates expectations regarding procedural compliance and personnel follow procedures. |
Site: | Arkansas Nuclear |
---|---|
Report | IR 05000313/2010004 Section 4OA2 |
Date counted | Sep 30, 2010 (2010Q3) |
Type: | NCV: Green |
cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
Identified by: | NRC identified |
Inspection Procedure: | IP 71152 |
Inspectors (proximate) | A Sanchez C Graves C Osterholtz D Stearns D Strickland J Clark J Josey J Rotton K Clayton L Ricketson T Pate |
CCA | H.8, Procedure Adherence |
INPO aspect | WP.4 |
' | |
Finding - Arkansas Nuclear - IR 05000313/2010004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Arkansas Nuclear) @ 2010Q3
Self-Identified List (Arkansas Nuclear)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||