05000338/FIN-2013002-01
From kanterella
Revision as of 22:47, 27 September 2017 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
---|---|
Title | Failure to Ensure Opposite Units Service Water Pumps Were Free of Fire Damage for a Postulated Fire in Either Units ESWGR |
Description | An NRC-identified non-cited violation was identified for the licensees failure to meet the requirements of North Anna Power Station (NAPS) Renewed Operating License Conditions 2.D, and the approved Fire Protection Program for Units 1 and 2. Specifically, the licensee failed to ensure that fire damage to cables associated with the opposite units service water (SW) pumps, located in each units emergency switchgear (ESWGR) room, would not prevent operation of the unaffected units SW pumps as described in Section 4.4.3.5 of the NAPS Appendix R Report. Postulated fire scenarios were identified in which the SW pumps for both units could be compromised due to a single fire in either units ESWGR room. The licensee had previously entered this issue in the NAPS corrective action program as condition report 500152 to evaluate this SW pump control circuit vulnerability and had implemented hourly roving fire watches in each units ESWGR room. Failure to perform an adequate safe shutdown (SSD) analysis as required by the NAPS FPP is a performance deficiency. This finding was determined to be more than minor because it was associated with the reactor safety mitigating systems cornerstone attribute of protection against external events (i.e. fire), and it affected the cornerstone objective of ensuring the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences. The finding had the potential to affect the ability to achieve post-fire SSD in the event of a fire in either units ESWGR. The finding was screened in accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, Significance Determination Process (SDP), dated June 2, 2011, Attachment 4, Initial Characterization of Findings, dated June 19, 2012, which determined that an IMC 0609 Appendix F, Fire Protection Significance Determination Process, dated February 28, 2005, review was required as the finding affected fire protection safe shutdown. The inspectors evaluated this finding using the guidance in IMC 0609, Appendix F. The inspectors performed Phase 1 and Phase 2 SDP screening assessments using IMC 0609, Appendix F, Attachments 1 and 2, and were not able to screen out this issue in the SDP Phase 1 or Phase 2. A senior reactor analyst from the Region II office performed a Phase 3 SDP analysis to assess the significance of this finding. The analyst determined that this finding was of very low safety significance (i.e., Green) because the risk was mitigated by the availability of at least one SW pump and the fire growth scenarios were mitigated by the gaseous suppression system. The inspectors determined that there was no cross-cutting aspect associated with this finding because it was not reflective of current licensee performance. |
Site: | North Anna |
---|---|
Report | IR 05000338/2013002 Section 1R05 |
Date counted | Mar 31, 2013 (2013Q1) |
Type: | NCV: Green |
cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
Identified by: | NRC identified |
Inspection Procedure: | IP 71111.05 |
Inspectors (proximate) | M Thomas R Carrion G Mccoy G Macdonald R Clagg R Temps G Kolcum A Sengupta B Tripathi |
Violation of: | License Condition - Fire Protection License Condition |
INPO aspect | |
' | |
Finding - North Anna - IR 05000338/2013002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (North Anna) @ 2013Q1
Self-Identified List (North Anna)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||