ML15342A390
| ML15342A390 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | SHINE Medical Technologies |
| Issue date: | 12/08/2015 |
| From: | NRC/OGC |
| To: | NRC/OCM |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| Mandatory Hearing 2, RAS 28630, 50-608-CP | |
| Download: ML15342A390 (18) | |
Text
Construction Permit Application ReviewSHINE Medical TechnologiesEnvironmental PanelDecember 15, 2015 Panelists*Jane Marshall-Deputy Director, Division of License Renewal, NRR*David Wrona-Branch Chief, NRR*Michelle Moser-Project Manager, NRR2 Environmental Review *National Environmental Policy Act*Environmental review process-Title 10 of Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 51-Environmental Standard Review Plan (NUREG-1537)-Interim Staff Guidance3 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)*10 CFR 51.20*Project-specific decision-Potential significant impacts -First-of-a-kind facility with a unique application of technologies-Public involvement maximized4 Scoping*2 public meetings in Janesville, Wisconsin*5 oral comments*6 written comments5 Department of Energy (DOE)*National Environmental Policy Act-Lead agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission -Cooperating agency: DOE*American Medical Isotopes Production Act-Complementary environmental reviews6 Environmental Review Areas7Human HealthTerrestrialResourcesAir QualitySocioeconomics andEnvironmental JusticeLand UseHistoric and Cultural ResourcesWater ResourcesAquaticResourcesSoils Environmental ImpactsResource AreaImpactLand Use and Visual ResourcesSMALLAir Quality and NoiseSMALLGeologic EnvironmentSMALLEcological and Water ResourcesSMALLHistoric and Cultural ResourcesSMALLSocioeconomicsSMALL Human Health and WasteSMALLTransportationSMALL to MODERATE8 Reasonable Alternatives*No-action alternative*Alternative sites-Chippewa Falls-Stevens Point*Alternative technologies9 Alternative Technologies*Neutron capture *Aqueous homogenous reactor*Linear-accelerator-based-Analyzed in depth10 Costs and Benefits*Purpose-Inform recommendation to the Commission*Costs-Environmental and financial *Benefits-Societal, medical, and economic 11 Environmental CostsSMALL to MODERATEProposed Janesville SiteTrafficChippewaFalls AlternativeTraffic, NoiseStevens PointAlternativeTraffic, Noise, VisualAlternative TechnologyTrafficNo-action AlternativeNone12*SMALL impacts for all other resource areas Benefits*Support United States (U.S.) policy *Support U.S. public health needs*Economic benefits-Increased tax revenue -New employment opportunities13 ConsultationsRegulation or OrderDeterminationEndangered Species Act,Section 7No EffectNational Historic Preservation Act, Section 106No AdverseEffect14 Draft Environmental Impact Statement*2 public meetings in Janesville, Wisconsin*1 oral comment*8 written comments15 NRC Staff's RecommendationStaff recommends issuance of the construction permit.16 Future NEPA Analyses*10CFR51.95(b) requires the staff to supplement the Final EIS-Matters that differ from the Final EIS-New significant information17 Acronyms*NRR -Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation18 Construction Permit Application ReviewSHINE Medical TechnologiesEnvironmental PanelDecember 15, 2015 Panelists*Jane Marshall-Deputy Director, Division of License Renewal, NRR*David Wrona-Branch Chief, NRR*Michelle Moser-Project Manager, NRR2 Environmental Review *National Environmental Policy Act*Environmental review process-Title 10 of Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 51-Environmental Standard Review Plan (NUREG-1537)-Interim Staff Guidance3 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)*10 CFR 51.20*Project-specific decision-Potential significant impacts -First-of-a-kind facility with a unique application of technologies-Public involvement maximized4 Scoping*2 public meetings in Janesville, Wisconsin*5 oral comments*6 written comments5 Department of Energy (DOE)*National Environmental Policy Act-Lead agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission -Cooperating agency: DOE*American Medical Isotopes Production Act-Complementary environmental reviews6 Environmental Review Areas7Human HealthTerrestrialResourcesAir QualitySocioeconomics andEnvironmental JusticeLand UseHistoric and Cultural ResourcesWater ResourcesAquaticResourcesSoils Environmental ImpactsResource AreaImpactLand Use and Visual ResourcesSMALLAir Quality and NoiseSMALLGeologic EnvironmentSMALLEcological and Water ResourcesSMALLHistoric and Cultural ResourcesSMALLSocioeconomicsSMALL Human Health and WasteSMALLTransportationSMALL to MODERATE8 Reasonable Alternatives*No-action alternative*Alternative sites-Chippewa Falls-Stevens Point*Alternative technologies9 Alternative Technologies*Neutron capture *Aqueous homogenous reactor*Linear-accelerator-based-Analyzed in depth10 Costs and Benefits*Purpose-Inform recommendation to the Commission*Costs-Environmental and financial *Benefits-Societal, medical, and economic 11 Environmental CostsSMALL to MODERATEProposed Janesville SiteTrafficChippewaFalls AlternativeTraffic, NoiseStevens PointAlternativeTraffic, Noise, VisualAlternative TechnologyTrafficNo-action AlternativeNone12*SMALL impacts for all other resource areas Benefits*Support United States (U.S.) policy *Support U.S. public health needs*Economic benefits-Increased tax revenue -New employment opportunities13 ConsultationsRegulation or OrderDeterminationEndangered Species Act,Section 7No EffectNational Historic Preservation Act, Section 106No AdverseEffect14 Draft Environmental Impact Statement*2 public meetings in Janesville, Wisconsin*1 oral comment*8 written comments15 NRC Staff's RecommendationStaff recommends issuance of the construction permit.16 Future NEPA Analyses*10CFR51.95(b) requires the staff to supplement the Final EIS-Matters that differ from the Final EIS-New significant information17 Acronyms*NRR -Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation18