ML20003H818

From kanterella
Revision as of 11:56, 23 December 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Reviews Guideline 12 Re Sabotage Incident Mgt.Available Licensee & LLEA Resources & Forces Must Be Used in Most Effective Manner to Counter Actual Threat Based on Circumstances
ML20003H818
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/10/1978
From: Clark R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17209B280 List:
References
RTR-REGGD-01.029, RTR-REGGD-1.029 NUDOCS 8105070492
Download: ML20003H818 (1)


Text

[.1 E.

/pa arog'o, UNIT 5 D ST ATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

". 'g s,

,f W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

~ '

,2

\\;..v ]

J M *,.

" ~.

~

MEMORANDUM FOR: Reactor Safeguard >. Licensing Branch FROM:

Robert A. Clark, Chief Reactor Safeguards Licensing Branch

SUBJECT:

SAB0TAGE INCIDENT MANAGEMENT - REVIEW GUIDELINE NUM5ER 12 The licensee is responsible for the safe operation of his nuclear power plant and therefore is obligated to employ effectively all resources within his control to protect the public health and safety under all circurstances, including a secotage incident.

The security plans and procedures implementing the security plans prescribe the means to provide protection with high assurance against successful industrial sabotage by two design level threats (g73.55 (a)(1),(2)). The protection thus afforded is not limited to the design level threats, but will also provide a lesser or greater degree of protection for threats that are larger or smaller, simpler or more sophisticated.

In the event of a sabotage at+ampt, the available licensee and LLEA resources and forces must be used in the most effective manner to counter the actual threat based on the circumstances of the situation.

It is recognized that the Security plan and the implementing security procedures may not equally or adequately address the complete range Therefore, it is necessary that the security of possible threats.

plan and procedures accommodate the necessary freedom of action needed by the individual in charge at the site at time of an actual threat to employ the available resources (e.g. physical protection systems, security organization, response forces, LLEA, etc) in a manner that he t

considers most effective to counter that threat.

j kE-Robert A. C' lark, Chief Reactor Safeguards Licensing Branc N 1

1 81050 %

-