ML22153A468

ES-301-4

ML22153A468
Person / Time
Site:	Clinton
Issue date:	01/28/2022
From:	Bruce Bartlett NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	Exelon Generation Co
Bartlett B
Shared Package
ML20`36A321	List: ML22153A468
References
Download: ML22153A468 (1)

Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: CPS Data of Exam: 1/18/2022 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 /3 Operating Test No.:2022-301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c'

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, BLB but it does not cue the operators into expected events. M ~

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. ((J BLB M

3. Each event description consists of the following:

.* the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event /vi BLB

• the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew ~

• the expected operator actions (by shift position)

• the event termination point (if applicable)

BLB

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. Iv\ ~

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete BLB

~

fv,.

evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

BLB

~

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. M Cues are given.

BLB

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. M ~

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance BLB

~

deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional M fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

BLB

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. M ~

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the BLB M

form along with the simulator scenarios). ~

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable BLB rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303*1 and ES*303*3.) M ~

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum BLBnumber of transients and events specified BLB on Form ES*301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). M lf)

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when BLB M

possible. ~

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

~ k-i BLB Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.S.d) Actual Attributes .. .. ..

BLB 1, Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1/ 1 / 1 M ff)

BLB

2. Abnormal events (2--4) 5/ 4 /4 /VI, f'fJ BLB

3. Major transients (1-2) 1/ 1 /1 A'\ M

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1/ 2 /1 BLB M N2_

5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions ~ 1 per scenario 1/ 1 /0 BLB set) M f!f7 BLB

6. Preidentified critical tasks ~ 2) 3/ 2 /2 M ~

• The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NAC*developed tests.

1. An independent NAC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.