ML20136A740

From kanterella
Revision as of 01:49, 14 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Memo Discussing Request for Review of Directors Decision 96-03 from Nirs Ltr Re thermo-lag Barrier Protection Issues
ML20136A740
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/23/1996
From: Brian Bonser
NRC
To: Shirley Ann Jackson, The Chairman
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20136A623 List:
References
FOIA-96-485 DD-96-03, DD-96-3, NUDOCS 9703100039
Download: ML20136A740 (1)


Text

- - . . - - - - - . - . - - - . - . - . - .. - - - - . - - - . - - - ... . -

i April 23, 1996 -

3.

l 1 Note To: Chairman Jackson d

l From: Brian Bonser N Coordinated With: Kath Annette l

Subject:

Request for Review Of Director's Decision (00-96-03) From

!. Nuclear Information and Resource Service (NIRS)

SUMMARY

The NIRS letter of April 19 requests a review of 00-96-03 and meeting with you to discuss Thermo-Lag fire barrier protection issues. The

! letter requests a meeting to discuss several items. The items include:

! . Concerns that the NRC has prematurely closed out the NIRS petition

! while many Thermo-Lag technical issues remain open. -

i l . Concern with the NRC's response to the " substantive" issues of the l

petition. The issues include: (1) the extent of progress made by

' the NRC on Thermo-Lag issues; (2) when the NRC became aware of j Thermo-Lag deficiencies; and (3) the acceptability of fire .

g watches. '

l

. Concern that none of the Thermo-Lag petitioners were granted an l informal public hearing in affected communities to review these i

j . fire protection issues.

! DISCUSSION: Anextensionofoneweekwasrequestedonthe(pmmissionaction j expiration date of 4/29/96. C6dnded in May 6 e etter questions and l

Isagrees with the director's decision. 03 respo he i s i

i ori na

~

issues raised the 3etitioners ud 4 eve M g conc te l tre pro ection wi be maintained unti scensees implement their permanent corrective actions. The identification of the plant specific and generic Thermo-Lag issues, the Thermo-Lag action plan, the plant specific .,

j actTony, and the combination of fire watches and defense-in-depth at specific i plants have been judged to provide a clear path to resolution of the issues j and an adequate present level of fire protection. .

WS

! The a ency has responded to the titioners concerns.

i 4

1 e

i l

j  %,r. Mien h 1B rcccrd was de!sted

.a a / .:.d m c w.

i k!.cxe Ma Freedom of idormatiorf b

j rm. Axtiens[ti: u - b 9703100039 970228 i PDR FOIA

! BINDER 96-485 PDR__ __ . __ _