Repts on Remaining Issues to Be Covered in Proceeding. Hearings on Economic Issues Will Begin on or About 780918. Site Certification Application Will Be Considered in May 1979 W/Decision Expected by Jul 1979| ML20148A464 |
| Person / Time |
|---|
| Site: |
05000514, 05000515 |
|---|
| Issue date: |
09/14/1978 |
|---|
| From: |
Rhodes J
OREGON, STATE OF |
|---|
| To: |
Strub R
OREGON, STATE OF |
|---|
| Shared Package |
|---|
| ML20148A457 |
List: |
|---|
| References |
|---|
| NUDOCS 7810300167 |
| Download: ML20148A464 (2) |
|
|
|---|
Category:INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL MEMORANDUM
MONTHYEARML19256E4001979-09-20020 September 1979
Advises of Marbet Preference for Preliminary Telephone Conference
ML19256E4081979-09-12012 September 1979
Forwards Vol 1 of Proposed Findings of Fact,Opinion, Conclusions & Order Re Whether Matl Received as Evidence Meets Energy Facility Siting Council Requirements.Exceptions Should Be Filed by 791005.Summary of Order Encl
ML20204B9841978-10-27027 October 1978
Defers Filing Date for Testimony Re Liquid Radwaste Sys to 781103.Argonne National Lab Review Is Delayed.Will Inform Bd & Parties When New Filing Date Is Confirmed
ML20147C1061978-09-29029 September 1978
Informs Bd of NRC Agenda for Filing Testimony on Open Items in the Matter of Pgec'S Subj Facils
ML20148A4591978-09-18018 September 1978
Submits Tentative Schedule on Economic Issues to Be Discussed at Facility Proceeding
ML20148A4641978-09-14014 September 1978
Repts on Remaining Issues to Be Covered in Proceeding. Hearings on Economic Issues Will Begin on or About 780918. Site Certification Application Will Be Considered in May 1979 W/Decision Expected by Jul 1979
ML20214G6701977-02-0808 February 1977
Forwards Recommended Seismic Review Actions Needed to Resolve Licensing Decisions on Nuclear Plants in Pacific Northwest Under Review for Cps,Per Meeting on 770202
ML20210S7551977-02-0808 February 1977
Discusses Seismology Review Plan for Pacific Northwest Plants Under CP Review.Recommended Actions Summarized.Usgs Will Review Rept of 1872 Earthquake
ML20198E9921974-12-0303 December 1974
Advises That Each Technical Review Branch Responsible for Review of Tech Specs in Psar.Schedule for Requesting Addl Info & Stating Staff Positions on Tech Specs Same as for Other Aspects of Review
1979-09-20
[Table view]
Category:MEMORANDUMS-CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML19256E4001979-09-20020 September 1979
Advises of Marbet Preference for Preliminary Telephone Conference
ML19256E4081979-09-12012 September 1979
Forwards Vol 1 of Proposed Findings of Fact,Opinion, Conclusions & Order Re Whether Matl Received as Evidence Meets Energy Facility Siting Council Requirements.Exceptions Should Be Filed by 791005.Summary of Order Encl
ML20204B9841978-10-27027 October 1978
Defers Filing Date for Testimony Re Liquid Radwaste Sys to 781103.Argonne National Lab Review Is Delayed.Will Inform Bd & Parties When New Filing Date Is Confirmed
ML20147C1061978-09-29029 September 1978
Informs Bd of NRC Agenda for Filing Testimony on Open Items in the Matter of Pgec'S Subj Facils
ML20148A4591978-09-18018 September 1978
Submits Tentative Schedule on Economic Issues to Be Discussed at Facility Proceeding
ML20148A4641978-09-14014 September 1978
Repts on Remaining Issues to Be Covered in Proceeding. Hearings on Economic Issues Will Begin on or About 780918. Site Certification Application Will Be Considered in May 1979 W/Decision Expected by Jul 1979
ML20214G6701977-02-0808 February 1977
Forwards Recommended Seismic Review Actions Needed to Resolve Licensing Decisions on Nuclear Plants in Pacific Northwest Under Review for Cps,Per Meeting on 770202
ML20210S7551977-02-0808 February 1977
Discusses Seismology Review Plan for Pacific Northwest Plants Under CP Review.Recommended Actions Summarized.Usgs Will Review Rept of 1872 Earthquake
ML20198E9921974-12-0303 December 1974
Advises That Each Technical Review Branch Responsible for Review of Tech Specs in Psar.Schedule for Requesting Addl Info & Stating Staff Positions on Tech Specs Same as for Other Aspects of Review
1979-09-20
[Table view] |
Text
-f
)
The Honorable Robert Straub September 14, 1978 Page Two I have no doubt that if the application is rejected, the applicants will appeal to the Oregon Supreme Court. If the site certificate is issued, the intervenors will appeal to the Oregon Supreme Court. This will add at least five or six months to the process and nothing will be " final" until the appeal prccess is finished.
I should state that I consider the above-described schedule an optimistic one and many of the participants in the proceeding also consider these dates quite optimistic.
Sincerely, Ja s C. Rhodes ty Attorney General JCR:cm cc: Janet McLennan Fred Miller EFSC Members
.