ML20247Q430
| ML20247Q430 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/27/1987 |
| From: | Power E NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI) |
| To: | Sinclair J NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20247Q206 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-89-192 NUDOCS 8908070139 | |
| Download: ML20247Q430 (2) | |
Text
.
y
[*"*% ,
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$ f . orricE OF INVESTIGATIONS FIELD OFFICE, REolON V
% ....+ ! wALNui cn"EYN"A0r'oTNNos .
MAR 2 71987 MEMORANDUM FOR: John Sinclair, Operations Officer Office of Investigations FROM: Eugene J. Power, Investigator _ _ ._ ,
Office of investigations Field Office, Region V
SUBJECT:
REVIEW 0F THE INVESTIGATION OF TRANSAMERICA DELAVAL INC.
(TDI) - CASE NUMBER 5-84-008 l This memnrandum 'is being prepared at the direction of- R. Marsh for the purpose of confirming my understanding of the review of the TDI investigation.
On March 2,1987, I was directed by Mr. Marsh to review the TDI. case file, and prepare an analysis with the intended purpose of closing the case on the primary basis of a lack of resources. The rationale for such closure action was:
1 l
The priority for the TDI investigation is LOW.
- No 01 investigative efforts have been expended on 'this case for j approximately four years.
There are no available OI resources to complete this case of low priority within the next six months. ;
The continued detail of myself to assist 01:RII in investigatiores of TVA.
If any O! efforts were pursued in the TDI matter, they*could be expected i to be extensive and complex. 1 In our telephone conversation of March 24, 1987 between you, R. Fortuna and l
myself, it is my understanding- that 01:HQ desires a review of the case.be 1 expeditiously completed and that all documentary evidence of potential l wrongdoings be identified for subsequent referral to DOJ. 4
\
1 In a telephone conversation on March 24, 1987 with C. MULLINS, 0GC ,
(FTS 634-3224), he indicated.that he was-acting as the primary interface with i the legal staff of LILCO in their suit vs TDI. MULLINS related that his- '
purpose was to monitor the LILC0 civil litigation to identify any new technical issues, to coordinate any potential subpoenas of NRC personnel, and i to precluds any hindrance of LILC0 in the NRC 01 investigation. He related that the OGC file of TDI was approximately eight inches- thick- which w5s !'
available for review by 01. MULLINS further indicated that LILCO had: filed h807oj c ;
now&P'a992g9ggg, PDR' .?- , Q & M CC VO'] l .
t + .i .
p f, ,
en amended complaints vs. TDI about a north ago, and he would provide'a copy to you within the next couple of days.
In a subsequent telephere conversation withyou on March 24,'1987, it is my.
understanding that you will review the OGC file on TDI. Further, following a review of the OGC file and the amended conplaint, we will then ' coordinate any-further action (s) for the referral of the TDI natter to DOJ.
cc: R. Marsh i
l yf ff dff/Wh WY '
z aa,s rat /& "'~
b uiWZ W' W ( /necio -p ? .,
f/ lf/My W
,g a i n s y< .a sk 'ce
,p ( ryN77 A /A: . .'fC WWW f"-
2 1
l Distribution l s/f 5-8^-008 ',-
c/f REE- ;
i 01:RV e ,. ;
p.
E0Powar:1 67/03/r /
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -