ML20238D641

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:52, 23 January 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Memorandum & Order (Applicability of 55.11(c)).* NRC 871013 Motion for Suspension of Case Denied.Precise Statement of Specific Reasons of Fact & Law Should Be Submitted by 871111,per 870819 Order.Served on 871105
ML20238D641
Person / Time
Site: 05560402
Issue date: 11/04/1987
From: Bloch P
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
References
CON-#188-5215 87-552-03-SP, 87-552-3-SP, SP, NUDOCS 8801040344
Download: ML20238D641 (2)


Text

- _ _ _ _

4 i er i

DXKETED UWRC

'87 NOV -5 P12 *21 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE uf 5hAtlAsY 00CKEiiNG A SEi4VlCI.

Before Administrative Judge: BRANCH Peter B. Bloch, Presiding Officer SERVED f40V r 51987 In the Matter of ] Docket No. 55-60402

]

DAVID W. HELD ]

] ASLBP No. 87-552-03-SP (Senior Operator License for Beaver ]

Valley Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1) ]

] November 4, 1987

]

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Applicability of 55.11(c))

On October 13, 1987, the Staff of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission filed a motion in the form of a letter. The Staff requested that the Board suspend this case, including the dead-line for the Staff's " precise statement of specific reasons of fact and law concerning any argument with which it disagrees and also stating with which arguments it agrees," until Duquesne Light should clarify the status of Mr. Held's application for a license for Unit 1.

The Staff's motion shall be denied. After having consid-ered both the Staff letter and Mr. Held's response, we see no reason to separate out the Staff'n unproven allegation and treat it any differently from any other argument it may make. The Staff should make the required filing, stating its position in a carefully organized and reasoned statement that will assist this Board in understanding precisely what is happening. For example, for examination questions the Staff believes were answered incorrectly by Mr. Held, Staff should state the number of points involved, the precise configuration of the simulator, over time, that was relevant to Mr. Held's response, what Mr. Held's re-sponse was, why the response was wrong, and what the correct response was. Staff also should state the total number of points for the simulator exam, the number of points Mr. Held attained, I and what the passing score is. Necessary documentation, includ-ing any documentation that may be obtained from Duquesne Light Co. and the sections of regulations or guidance necessary to understand the Staff's position, shall be attached.

Staff should make its filing by November 11, 1987, and should assure that the Board receive the filing on that date. l I

8801040344 071104 {

SECY LIC55 05560402 f PDR

')9

Staff to Respond: 2 1

ORDER Upon consideration of the filings of the parties and the entire record in this matter, it is this 4th day of November 1987 ORDERED That by November 11, 1987 the Staff of the Nuclear Regula-tory Commission should file its " precise statement of specific reasons.of fact and law" pursuant to the accompanying memorandum and to our Order of August 19, 1987. The presiding officer shall receive that statement,by the close of business on November 11, 1987.

/

fe'ter B. Bloch, Presiding Officer i Administrative Judge Bethesda, Maryland

- - . - _ _ _ _ - _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ -