ML20202C196

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:33, 18 November 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That Proposed Rule 10CFR50.55a Have Been Placed on Hold W/Ofc of Admin Pending Approval of OMB Clearance Package & Incorporation of Listed Changes Into Rule
ML20202C196
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/08/1996
From: Shelton B
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
To: Serpan C
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES)
Shared Package
ML20202C086 List:
References
FRN-62FR63892, RULE-PR-50 AE26-1-009, AE26-1-9, NUDOCS 9802120192
Download: ML20202C196 (1)


Text

_ _ ._ _ _

l

,f* **% ff)1-l g k UN"ED STATES 4

s* ]

t NUCLEAR REEULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. aaaaa aW (2 b $

)

'%....+[ November 8, 1996 '

HEMORANDUM T0: Charles Z. Serpan, Chief Generic Safety Issues Branch Division of Engineering Technology ff e of Nucle ulatory Research

~10 FROM: n64 J . ton, hief Information and Records Management Branch Office of Information Resources Management

SUBJECT:

10 CFR PART 50.55A, ' CODES AND STANDARDS," PROPOSED RULE We have reviewed the subject oroposed rule and the OE clearance package for compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 !!.S.C. 3501 et-seq.)

and have placed the rule on hold with the Office of Administration pend.ng IRH's approval of the OMB clearance package and your incorporating the following changes into the rule:

Change the Paperwork Reduction Act Statement to Attachment 1.

Include the modified section 50.8, "Information collection requirements: OMB approval" (Attachment 2).

4 In addition, we offer the following suggestions for your consideration:

The spelling of " vessel" occurs as "vessl" on numerous pages.

On page 26, paragraph 2, "errer jf four places" should read " error in four places."

The text at section 50.55a(g)(6()b)(1) and (2) replaces recently codified test that has not been implemented. You may wish to check this reference and change the section numbering if these requirements are intended to be new ones, rather than replacements of newly codified text.

On ) age 53, the end of footnote 6 should read "$50.55a(a)(3)"

ratier than "$150.55a(a)(3)."

We have also reviewed and annotated the associated OMB clearance package (OCP) with numerous comments. These coments have been communicated to Wally Norris of your staff, and we are working with him to resolve any concerns. Should you have any questions or require further assistance, please contact Beth St.

Mary at 415 5878 or e mail BCS.

Attachments:

As stated cc: F. Cherny, RES W. Norris. RES M. Lesar, ADM .-

g21g192900206 104 / c u, , {R6 892 PDR 7-