ML20195H607

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:09, 13 November 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-5 & DPR-26,amending Tech Specs to Remove Figures 3.1 & 3.2 of Unit 1 Tech Specs & Figures 6.2.1 & 6.2.2 of Unit 2 Tech Specs Per Guidance in Generic Ltr 88-06.Fee Paid
ML20195H607
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/15/1988
From: Bram S
CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20195H600 List:
References
GL-88-06, GL-88-6, NUDOCS 8806280325
Download: ML20195H607 (1)


Text

, _ . _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ - _ - - _ _

a UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j I

i

. In the Matter of

) e p

)

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY- ) Docket.No. 50-03 '

OF NEW YORK, INC. ). and 50-247 i (Indian Point Station, )

Units No. 1 and 2 ) l APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT i TO OPERATING LICENSE ,

i f

Pursuant to Section 50.90 of the Regulations of the Nuclear Regulatory ,

Commission ("NRC"), Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. ;

("Consolidated Edison"), as holder of Facility Operating Licenses No. DPR-5  !

and DPR-26, hereby applies for amendment of the Technical Specifications [

of those licenses. Specifically, Consolidated Edison requests removal of j Figures 3.1 and 3.2 of the Indian Point 1 Technical Specifications and removal of Figures 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 of the Indian Point 2 Technical e

, Specifications as encouraged by the Nuclear Regulatory Cossnission in [

Generic Letter 88-06.

The specific proposed Technical Specification revisions are set forth in (

Attachment A to this Application. A Safety Assessment of the proposed  !

t changes'is set forth in Attachment B to this Application. This assessment t demonstrates that the proposed changes do not represent a significant hazards consideration as defined in 10 CFR 50.92(c),

i.

4 l

As required by 10 CFR 50. 91 (b) (1) , a copy of this application and our [

analysis concluding that the proposed changes do not constitute a significant hazards consideration have been provided to the appropriate New York State official designated to receive such amendments.

f L

f

_g -

). BY: <! '

/, M

. Stephen Bram

/ / Vice President

[

s l

t i

B8062 PDR

$ f L P l I,

---_ _ _ __-_---_-_ _ --____-_ - --._ - -______ -_-______-___ _ _-_ ______________________-_ _ - _ _ _ a