|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20195B6691998-11-10010 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 17 to License R-106 ML20199G0331998-01-28028 January 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 16 to License R-106 ML20246D1071989-08-15015 August 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 10 to License R-106 ML20149M7101988-02-11011 February 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 9 to License R-106 ML20125C5651979-12-18018 December 1979 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 4 to License R-106 1998-11-10
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20195B6691998-11-10010 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 17 to License R-106 ML20155E8121998-06-30030 June 1998 Annual Rept of Oregon State Univ Radiation Center & Triga Reactor for 970701-980630 ML20203K5281998-03-0202 March 1998 RO 33732:on 980217,OSTR Failed to Shut Down When Console Manual Scram Button Was Pushed.Caused by Spring Return Switch Failed to Return Completely to Operate Position. Console Key Switch Cleaned & Relubricated ML20236K7251998-02-20020 February 1998 RO 33732:on 980217,manual Scram Failure Occurred.Caused by Spring Return Key Switch Failing to Return Completely to Operate Position & Wiring Change Difference.Removed & Cleaned Switch & Performed Encl 10CFR50.59 Evaluation ML20236K7301998-02-20020 February 1998 Osu Triga Reactor (OSTR) Changes,Tests & Experiments Evaluated Under Provisions of 10CFR50.59 ML20199G0331998-01-28028 January 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 16 to License R-106 ML20217A7451997-09-0505 September 1997 Ro:On 970812,questioned Whether OSTR Matl Balance Rept Date of 970728 Was Date Completed or Date Not to Be Exceeded. Caused by Reactor Administrator'S Pressure of Work Load. Completed OSTR Matl Balance Rept ML20236F4761997-06-30030 June 1997 Corrected Table V.B.2 for 1996-1997: Monthly Summary of Gaseous Effluent Releases to Annual Rept of or State Univ Radiation Ctr & Triga Reactor for Period July 1996 - June 1997 ML20212D4531997-06-30030 June 1997 Annual Rept of Oregon State Univ Radiation Ctr & Triga Reactor,960701-970630 ML20138G7651996-12-23023 December 1996 Ro:On 961203,staff Performed Irradiations W/O Following Procedural Controls.On 961216,staff Prepared Shipment of Irradiated Fission Track Samples W/O Following Procedures. Caused by Staff Error.Staff Counseled ML20134E4181996-06-30030 June 1996 Annual Rept of Oregon State Univ Radiation Ctr & Triga Reactor for Period 950701-960630 ML20094B3621995-06-30030 June 1995 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments Performed Per 10CFR50.59 for Period Jul 1994 - June 1995 ML20093M9851995-06-30030 June 1995 Annual Rept of Oregon State Univ Radiation Ctr & Triga Reactor June 1994-June 1995 ML20078C1511994-06-30030 June 1994 Annual Rept of or State Univ Radiation Ctr & Triga Reactor, 930701-940630 ML20059H5841993-06-30030 June 1993 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments Performed Under 10CFR50.59 for 920701-930630 ML20059C4431993-06-30030 June 1993 Annual Rept of or State Univ Radiation Ctr & Triga Reactor,920701-930630 ML20128G9901993-02-0101 February 1993 Ro:Discovered That Reactor Not Pulsed Semiannually to Compare Fuel Temp Measurements & Peak Power Levels W/Levels of Previous Pulses of Same Reactivity Value.Chart Listing Semiannual Surveillance & Maint Items Encl ML20116J2381992-06-30030 June 1992 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments Performed Under Provisions of 10CFR50.59 for Oregon State University Triga Reactor (Ostr) ML20116D0111992-06-30030 June 1992 Annual Rept of Oregon State Univ Radiation Center & Triga Reactor for Jul 1991 - June 1992 ML20079P0261991-11-0404 November 1991 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments Performed Under Provisions of 10CFR50.59 for Oregon State Univ Triga Reactor for Jul 1990-June 1991 ML20085L0731991-06-30030 June 1991 Annual Rept of Oregon State Univ Radiation Ctr & Triga Reactor,Jul 1990-June 1991 ML20029A7541991-02-25025 February 1991 Followup RO Per 910215 Telcon:On 910215,water Level in Reactor Tank Lower than Normal.Caused by Water Running Out from Under Concrete Block Shield Surrounding Demineralizer Tank.Barrier Dam Constructed Across HX Room ML20062H7911990-11-27027 November 1990 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments for Jul 1989 - June 1990 Under 10CFR50.59 ML20058F2241990-06-30030 June 1990 Annual Rept of Oregon State Univ Radiation Ctr & Triga Reactor, for Jul 1989 - June 1990 ML19327C0421989-10-31031 October 1989 Amend 5 to, SAR for Oregon State Triga Reactor (Ostr). ML19325C7001989-10-0202 October 1989 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments Performed Under Provisions of 10CFR50.59 for Triga Reactor,For Jul 1988 - June 1989 ML20246D1071989-08-15015 August 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 10 to License R-106 ML20012A0901989-06-30030 June 1989 Annual Rept of Oregon State Univ Radiation Ctr & Triga Reactor Jul 1988 - June 1989. ML20005D6031989-06-30030 June 1989 Annual Rept of Oregon State Univ Radiation Ctr & Triga Reactor Jul 1988 - June 1989. ML20245B3461989-04-17017 April 1989 Ro:On 890406,during Routine Pulsing Operation,Blue Pen Which Records Linear & Peak Power Went off-scale.Caused by Omission of 100-ohm Resistor Normally Placed Across Console Terminals.Operators Reprimanded & Procedures Changed ML20204G1161988-09-30030 September 1988 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments for Oregon State Univ Triga Reactor for Jul 1987 - June 1988 ML20235D0601988-06-30030 June 1988 Annual Rept of Oregon State Univ Radiation Ctr & Triga Reactor Jul 1987 - June 1988 ML20154J2511988-05-17017 May 1988 RO Re Jan 1988 Event in Which Procedures Consistent W/New NRC Policy Used Rather than Exact Written Procedures.Reactor Operations Committee Meeting on 880513 Preceeded Info for Review.Staff Instructed to Use Exact Procedures ML20150C8761988-03-15015 March 1988 Requalification Program for Licensed Operators of Oregon State Univ Triga Reactor (Ostr) ML20149M7101988-02-11011 February 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 9 to License R-106 ML20235R1021987-09-28028 September 1987 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments Performed Under Provisions of 10CFR50.59 for Oregon State Univ Triga Reactor (Ostr), for Jul 1986 - June 1987 ML20235E7421987-06-30030 June 1987 Oregon State Univ Triga Reactor Annual Rept ML20197B2941986-10-0303 October 1986 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments for Jul 1985 - June 1986,per 10CFR50.59 ML20138J9471985-10-0404 October 1985 Changes to Facility,To Facility Procedures & to Reactor Experiments for Jul 1984 - June 1985 ML20133N3991985-06-30030 June 1985 Oregon State Univ Triga Reactor Annual Rept, for Reporting Period Jul 1984 - June 1985 ML20080L2971983-09-19019 September 1983 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments Made Under 10CFR50.59 for Triga Reactor,Jul 1982 - June 1983 ML20071N4021983-05-25025 May 1983 Ro:On 830523,discovered Insp of Transient Control Rod Not Conducted Since 810317.Caused by Misinterpretation of Tech Specs.Surveillance Time Intervals Will Be Modified Per Ansi/Ans 15.1-1982 Guidelines ML20003G2551981-04-17017 April 1981 Ro:On 810414,continuous Control Rod Withdrawal Occurred, Resulting in Net Insertion of 80 Cents Reactivity Worth. Caused by Failure of Safety Rod Up Switch.Operations Instructions Bulletin Written Re Possible Recurrence ML19340D3771980-12-19019 December 1980 Ro:On 801212,reactor Operated for Approx 1-h W/ Nonfuctioning Air Pump on Reactor Top Continuous Air Particulate Radiation Monitor.Caused by Loosely Fitting Power Plug &/Or Loose Fuse Holder Connection ML19337A7821980-08-31031 August 1980 or State Univ Triga Reactor Annual Rept for Jul 1979-June 1980 ML19310A3861980-06-0303 June 1980 Ro:On 800520,while Performing Routine Pulses,One of Five Pulses Produced Peak Power & Measured Fuel Temp Beyond Expectation for 2.55 Dollar Reactivity Insertion. Apparently Caused by 2.75 Dollar Reactivity Insertation ML20125C5651979-12-18018 December 1979 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 4 to License R-106 ML19290A0801979-06-30030 June 1979 Annual Operating Rept for Jul 1978-June 1979 1998-06-30
[Table view] |
Text
.. .
/ \o UNITED STATES
! n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g j WASHINGTON, D C. 20666 g.....j SAFETYEVALUATIONBYTHEOFFICEOFNUCLEARREACTORREGULATIOhl SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. R-106 OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY DOCKET NO. 50-243
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letters dated July 19, 1983 and October 12, 1987, Oregon State University (OSU) requested changes in the Technical Specifications of Facility Operating License No. R-106 for the Oregon State University TRIGA Reactor (OSTR). The first of the requested changes would modify the organization structure of the OSTR by changing two titles in the organization and eliminating one position. The other requested change would update the surveillance requirements time intervals to bring them into agreement with current practice. '
In addition, to make the license condition more complete, Paragraph 2.C.(1) was amended to add the maximum reactivity insertion allowed in the pulse mode. This limit has always existed but was not stated explicitly in Paragraph 2.C.(1). Also, changes to Technical Specification 3.1 and ,
3.5.3 were made to eliminate an inconsistency between the license condition for the maximum power level at which the reactor may operata and the Technical Specification for the maximum operating power level.
2.0 EVALUATION !
2.1 Changes in the OSTR Organization Structure ,
OSU has proposed changing the titles of Assistant Reactor Administrator to Reactor Administrator and Vice President for Administration to Vice President for Finance and Administration. These are changes in formal i title only, the duties and responsibilities with respect to licensed activities will not change. OSU also proposed eliminating the position of Assistant Director for Radiation Protection and Regulatory Affairs.
The functions of the Assistant Director for Radiation Protection and Regulatory Affairs will be assumed by the Radiation Center Director, the Senior Health Physicist and the Radiation Center Health Physics Staff.
This change will not imaact radiation safety at the Center and will .
improve efficiency of t1e radiation safety program by streamlining l management at the Center.
i D DO OO O p PDR
.. . t I
i 2.2 Changes in the Surveillance Requirements Time Intervals [
OSU has proposed changes in Section 4 of the Technical Specifications, "Surveillance Requirements", to bring the surveillance requirements maximum time intervals into conformance with American National Standard ,
ANSI /ANS-15.1-1982, "The Development of Technical Specificatior ; for Research Reactors" (ANS-15.1) which is used by the NRC in the evaluation of non-power reactor Technical Specifications. ANS-15.1 specifies both the frequency of surveillance and maximum interval (used to provide operational flexibility as long as required frequencies are maintained over the long term) that can pass between surveillances. The requested changes would only affect the maximum interval between surveillances, the required frequencies would remain the same as before. The largest increase in maximum surveillance would be one month (from 14 to 15),
for those items with a one year frequency requirement. Because in the long term, no changes to surveillance frequencies will occur, there is t no safety impact involved in the granting of this request. [
2.3 Addition of the Maximum Reactivity Insertion Limit to the Operating License The purpose of this change is to bring the Facility 0)erating License f into conformity with current practice by stating in tie body of the ,
license the maximum thermal power level and the maximum reactivity !
insertion permitted in pulse mode. The maximum reactivity insertion limit was previously stated only in the Technical Specifications. This ;
change is editorial in nature and does not modify any actual license ~
conditions. ;
2.4 Inconsistency in Maximum Thermal Power Level Between the Facility i Operating License and the Technical Specifications. Appendix A ,
Technical Specification 3.1 and 3.S.3 previously permitted steady-state l thermal power to reach a maximum of 1.2 megawatts for purposes of l
. testing the full pcwer scram safety circuits. This was inconsistent ;
- with the license condition that limited power to 1.0 megawatt. Testing ]
4 of these safety circuits can be accomplished by other methods. OSU will i test these safety circuits by the introduction of an electrical signal. j To achieve consistency, the maximum operating power level under any ,
j - ccnditions will be restated in the Technical Specifications to be 1.0 l megawatt. This does not constitute a change in the authorized licensed power limit.
1 3.0 ENVIRCNMENTAL CONSIDERATION 3.1 Chsnges in the OSTR Organizational Structure, Addition of the Maximum i
Reactivity Insertion Limit to the Operating License, and Inconsistency in Maximum Therraal Power Level Between the Facility Operating License and the Technical Specifications, Appendix A.
j i
3 We have determined that these changes are in the category of record-keeping, eeporting, and administrative procedures and requirements.
4 Accordingly, this portion of the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessrent need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this portion of the amendment, i
3.2 Changes in the Surveillance Requirements Time Intervals This portion of the amendment involves changes in the installation or use of facility components located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20 and changes in inspection and surveillance requirements.
The staff has determined that this portion of the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and there is no '
significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. Accordingly, this portion of the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). ,
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this portion of the amendment.
4.0 CONCLUSION
The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) because the amendment does not involve a significant increase - ,
in the probability or consequences of accidents previously evaiuated, or ,
create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated, and does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety, the amendment does not involve a significant hazards consideration (2) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the proposed activities, and (3)suchpublic will notwill activities bebeendangered by the conducted in '
compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the comon defense and security or the health and safety of the public. j 4
Principal Contributor: Alexander Adams, Jr. l l
Dated: February 11, 1988 1
l
--