ML20125D119
| ML20125D119 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/02/1982 |
| From: | Hoyle J NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| To: | Mattia M NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20125C863 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-734 NUDOCS 8506120253 | |
| Download: ML20125D119 (3) | |
Text
.
- ' [ .
- c. .
UNITED 5TATES J l '
I' l
" *p NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION s' i wasmeter. o c row.
t
\. .r. '
,,,g,,,,
August 2, 1952 stenttans MEMORANDUM FOR: ' MARY JO MATTIA. CHIEF, "i Adm i .ra ive Contracts Branch (A
, FROM: JOH YLE, eting Secretary I
t
SUBJECT:
USE OF DIRECT RECORDING IN COMMISSION MEETINGS /
j l
l i At a meeting on Friday, July 30, 1982 Mark Flynn suggested that i
SECY provide a statement concerning its views on the use of " direct j t recording." Our statement follows. 1 The Office of the Secretary does not use the " direct recording" method for preparing transcripts of Comission meetings principally because of the following reasons:
N 1. No interruption of speakers by the reporter is allowed.
Hence, the direct recorder would not be able to indicate to the speaker that his voice is not being properly monitored and recorded. .
- 2. There is often simultaneous conversation, which is very difficult to transcribe later if the direct recording method of reporting is used.
- r . , . .
- 3. We discourage extra use of,gmicrophones on the Comissioners'
- Conference table.
- 4. Individual speakers rise and speak from the back of the - '
- room often where no microphone is available and would not ,
be picked up on direct recording equipment. 1 e
RILEYB4-834 PDR l
Original / /4//f.y
. $CHEDULE A .
- .'ititive Procurement Milestene Schedule (: ate;
':**.*. *: ~~;; *;. . 4 3 r- -3u. 7. s Revistor. =
teate)
TITLE . Jr . , , . . a R ,., . ,b . .,,
+ ,--_./. c' , uA .. A. n ~ . X w :. r , "V g r ,, -j i
l Negotiator " h #,,
. 6,,.l 1
s .
MILESTONES PROJECTED DATE ACTUAL DATE
- 1. Initial Division of Contracts
- Contact with Program Office y}()g3 '
- 2. Receipt of RFPA in DC'
- 3. Milestone Cnart Completion i.2/iGl9 3 ll9bW _
t /st/H //>c/cN
- 4. Statement of Work Agreed upon 11.=3h4 .
- 5. RFP Drafted by teegotiator
//~~W/('4 -
- 6. Panel Meeting on RFP Draft CBD Synopsis Mailed i611r4 .-
7.
- 8. Special Approvals (specify) iMe4 ik/e v 5.L.O. $Cfes.~~. ---------------- ------------------
, c .e
?ts e.; 5th.~~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------
l
- 9. :MP 1ssued m ilyh u -
- 10. Preproposal Conference S // :. /W --_.
- 11. RFP Closing Date c2N?lN -.
- 12. Technical Evaluation of Individual Panel Members N/f
- 13. -Gert Evaluation n
5 ll !]
- 14. Panel Meeting on Cc ;:ti n .e
, 'M Lev 6roccc 3j'AfE4
! 15. Competitive Range Recommenda- ~
tion Report Issued .
/ //r
- 16. ;ictifica icn to Giferors of Ccmpetitive Pange ,?. /.'
_ _ , _ . . -.-r---,-=
D5iidiTRcPort(s) Requested l
/ !/ r _ _
E. Audit Information Received I. .
- s. Discussions initiated C. Discussions Completec Best and final Offers Requested U
'd.
I l.Q.BestandfinalOffersReceived
(
~
!!3. Tecnnical Evaluation of Individual Panel Members
~24. Panel Meeting to Evaluate i Best and Final Offers '
i
. i ,
Final Evaluation Report i i25. ;
3 Received - . I
.si/[ *
- 26. Preaward Approvais (specify)
~I 21.rlg y------------------ *
./qms ---------- - 1 Yk 'du*r&*
hf_Q________._____--... .
- 27. Contract railed for Contractor Signature -
- 28. Contract Execution / Distribution 3fl%)$t-f *
- 29. CBD Award Notification / Award .
Notification to Unsuccess'ful -
Offerors :
2 //' h /r u.
- 30. Post-Award Orientation eo r 1.t 3l/9li V Panel Chairman //2 e //Y SEP Members [ o '<.o /do -@v _ ,
fk
~
, 19 _ - -.- . - - - - . . . . --
1 Contract Negotiator ~4 M,,. / -d.,E //u/3y 1
/
e
< - - - . . - - - . .