ML20135B935
Text
. . - ... ..- . - . . . .. - - --. .-- .. ._- .._ .... .- - . . . _.--.
't i
I January 17, 1990 f
l- NOTE Fuk: Hugh L. Thompson, Jr.
FROM: Peter Crane i [ !' ...
SUBJECT:
POTASSIUM IODIDE DPO As you consider the DPO panel's report, you should be aware
- of.the attached letter from the American Thyroid
- ~ Association. Apparently they feel strongly enough about the
! significance of the. issue to have sent the letter to i Louisiana. New York. Baltimore, and D.C. for the four signatures.
I l
4" l
l 1
i
,4.*M *#
4 l 9703030275 970226 PDR ORG NIRCTN
. PDR
- t. j l
January 5, 1990 j Hugh --
Just a followup point to our KI discussion of ;
2 yesterday. NUREG-0654, the 1980 document establishing the l j
criteria for emergency plans, was based on NUREG-0396, l
" Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local 4
Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in Support
! of Light Water Nuclear-Power Plants" (November 1978). That )
' document considered and rejected a cost-benefit approach to emergency planning, by which the cost of emergency planning measures would be balanced against the health effects i prevented. (I didn't come across this fact until after we talked or I would have mentioned it.)
So what is the rationale for applying to this single 1 i aspect of emergency planning a decision-making approach that
, has been judged inappropriate for all other aspects of
} emergency planning 7 i
i
- i f ~
l I
1 l.
i d
A
^
l I
i a