(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Refers to Pierce Actions Re Util Failure to Provide Adequate Training or Guidance Concerning Applicability of Doa 300-12 While Expert Present Directing Control Rod Movements| ML20080A608 |
| Person / Time |
|---|
| Site: |
Dresden  |
|---|
| Issue date: |
10/24/1994 |
|---|
| From: |
Pierce K
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
|---|
| To: |
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
| CON-#494-15852 94-694-05-EA, 94-694-5-EA, EA, IA-94-007, IA-94-7, NUDOCS 9411010207 |
| Download: ML20080A608 (1) |
|
|
|---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20207E0051999-03-0202 March 1999
Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl
ML20236H9381998-06-30030 June 1998
Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl
ML20198P3001997-11-0404 November 1997
Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & Viewgraphs
ML20141K3801997-05-27027 May 1997
Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-licensed Activities (Effective Immediately) for Dr Baudino for Period of Five Years
ML20080A6081994-10-24024 October 1994
Refers to Pierce Actions Re Util Failure to Provide Adequate Training or Guidance Concerning Applicability of Doa 300-12 While Expert Present Directing Control Rod Movements
ML20070B0081994-06-20020 June 1994
Response to Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-licensed Activities.* Informs That Order Will Have Negative Impact on Health & Safety of Public
ML20059C2351993-12-17017 December 1993
Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication
ML20245J0191989-04-14014 April 1989
Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20235T9661989-03-0101 March 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Alternatives Provide No Enhancement of Reactor Safety & Will Reduce Experience Level of Senior Operators
ML20235T8701989-02-28028 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Rule Will Cause Career Stagnation & Animosity Among Operators
ML20235T8251989-02-28028 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rules Provide No Enhancement of Reactor Safety
ML20235T1551989-02-27027 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Education & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Alternative Provides No Enhancement of Reactor Safety & Will Reduce Experience Level of Senior Operators
ML20235T1231989-02-27027 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Alternatives Provide No Enhancement of Reactor Safety & Reduce Experience Level of Senior Operators
ML20235S9791989-02-27027 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Both Alternatives Would Eventually Reduce to Nothing Reactor Operators Advancing to Senior Operator
ML20235S8371989-02-27027 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants
ML20235S8241989-02-27027 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Proposed Rule Alternatives Would Reduce to Nothing Reactor Operators Advancing to Senior Operator
ML20235T1361989-02-22022 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Alternative Provides No Enhancement of Reactor Safety & Will Reduce Experience Level of Senior Operators
ML20235T0911989-02-22022 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Alternatives Provide No Enhancement of Reactor Safety & Reduce Experience Level of Senior Operators
ML20235T7041989-02-22022 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants
ML20235T7951989-02-22022 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Both Alternatives Do Not Provide Enhancement of Reactor Safety
ML20235T0461989-02-22022 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Both Alternatives Would Reduce Number of Reactor Operators Advancing to Senior Operator to Nothing
ML20235T8381989-02-22022 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants
ML20235S9541989-02-22022 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors.Alternatives Provide No Enhancement of Reactor Safety & Reduce Experience Level of Senior Operators
ML20205T0891988-10-28028 October 1988
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Proposed Rule Unnecessary as Utils Have Effective Fitness for Duty Program
ML20205N0941988-10-24024 October 1988
Comments on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-50 Re Authorization of Reactor Licensees to Depart from License Conditions & Tech Specs in Emergency Situations.Young Criticism of Inerting Practices at Plant W/O Credence
ML20155A6591988-09-0303 September 1988
Comment Supporting Petition to Rescind Paragraphs (X)(Y) of Section 10CFR50.54 Re Cases of Hazardous Practices Including Util Authorizing Senior Operator to Turn Off Safety Sys in Emergency Before Sys Has Finished Job
ML20247N7531988-07-28028 July 1988
Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-53 Requesting NRC Action to Review Undue Risk Posed by BWR Thermal Hydraulic Instability.Nrr Should Issue Order Requiring All GE BWRs to Be Placed in Cold Shutdown for Stated Reasons
ML20207T2351987-02-16016 February 1987
Endorsement 16 to Maelu Policy MF-114
ML20207T2281987-01-28028 January 1987
Endorsement 21 to Nelia Policy NF-277
ML20213D3421986-08-11011 August 1986
Endorsement 79 to Maelu Policy MF-54
ML20213D3461986-08-11011 August 1986
Endorsement 78 to Maelu Policy MF-54
ML20213D3491986-08-11011 August 1986
Endorsement 94 to Nelia Policy NF-187
ML20213D3501986-08-11011 August 1986
Endorsement 95 to Nelia Policy NF-187
ML20213D3791986-08-0808 August 1986
Endorsement 178 to Nelia Policy NF-43
ML20213D3761986-08-0808 August 1986
Endorsement 84 to Nelia Policy NF-201
ML20213D3691986-08-0808 August 1986
Endorsement 72 to Maelu Policy MF-64
ML20213D3681986-08-0808 August 1986
Endorsement 73 to Maelu Policy MF-64
ML20213D3591986-08-0808 August 1986
Endorsement 154 to Maelu Policy MF-22
ML20213D3521986-08-0808 August 1986
Endorsement 153 to Maelu Policy MF-22
ML20213D3511986-08-0808 August 1986
Endorsement 179 to Nelia Policy NF-43
ML20063M3061982-09-0101 September 1982
Response Opposing Reopening of Record Re Comm Ed Use of 9-ton Auxiliary Hook of Main Overhead Crane Sys During 1981 Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks.Incident Not Relevant to Proceeding.Svc List Encl.Related Correspondence
ML20063A2551982-08-18018 August 1982
Response to ASLB 820728 Order.Requests Leave to Withdraw Application W/O Prejudice.Need for Transshipment in near- Term Reduced Due to Approval of Installation of High Density Spent Fuel Racks.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20055B4521982-07-20020 July 1982
Transcript of 820720 Hearing in Bethesda,Md Re Spent Fuel Pool Mods.Pp 1,192-1,284
ML20055A6681982-07-14014 July 1982
Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20054L9371982-07-0808 July 1982
Memorandum in Response to Applicant Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of Notice of Hearing Re Issue of Whether Spent Fuel Pool Floor Can Withstand Loads Imposed by New High Density Fuel Racks During Seismic Event
ML20054L9591982-07-0101 July 1982
Testimony of Oo Rothberg & G Harstead.Spent Fuel Pool Expansion for Full 33 Rack Installation Is Acceptable.Spent Fuel Pool Floor Can Withstand Impact If All 33 Racks Tip During Seismic Event
ML20054K6511982-07-0101 July 1982
Response Supporting Applicant 820616 Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of Notice of Hearing.Aslb Should Render Final Decision on Basis of Supplemental SER & ASLB Former Findings.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20054G0051982-06-16016 June 1982
Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of Hearing Scheduled for 820713 by ASLB 820609 Notice of Hearing. Further Evidentiary Sessions Unnecessary & Improper.Final Decision Proper.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20054F5391982-06-0909 June 1982
Notice of 820713 Hearing in Bethesda,Md,To Continue to 0714 If Necessary.Evidence Relevant to Issue of Whether Spent Fuel Pool Floors Can Withstand Loads Which Could Be Imposed by New Fuel Racks During Seismic Event Will Be Taken
ML20054F7151982-06-0707 June 1982
Testimony of DB Davidoff & LB Czech on Commission Questions 3 & 4.NY State Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plan Discussed.Certificate of Svc Encl
1999-03-02
[Table view]
Category:OTHER LEGAL DOCUMENT
MONTHYEARML20080A6081994-10-24024 October 1994
Refers to Pierce Actions Re Util Failure to Provide Adequate Training or Guidance Concerning Applicability of Doa 300-12 While Expert Present Directing Control Rod Movements
ML20070B0081994-06-20020 June 1994
Response to Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-licensed Activities.* Informs That Order Will Have Negative Impact on Health & Safety of Public
ML20055A6681982-07-14014 July 1982
Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20054L9371982-07-0808 July 1982
Memorandum in Response to Applicant Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of Notice of Hearing Re Issue of Whether Spent Fuel Pool Floor Can Withstand Loads Imposed by New High Density Fuel Racks During Seismic Event
ML20054F5391982-06-0909 June 1982
Notice of 820713 Hearing in Bethesda,Md,To Continue to 0714 If Necessary.Evidence Relevant to Issue of Whether Spent Fuel Pool Floors Can Withstand Loads Which Could Be Imposed by New Fuel Racks During Seismic Event Will Be Taken
ML20051J8521982-05-11011 May 1982
Notice of Change of Address.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML17193B2461981-03-17017 March 1981
Forwards Re Hubbard 810317 Affidavit Outlining Unresolved Safety Issues Relevant to Spent Fuel Mod Proceeding. Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20064J0681978-12-11011 December 1978
Parties Agree That NRDC & Cbe Have Adequately Identified at Least One Member Whose Interest May Be Adversely Affected by the Proposed Action.Auth to Represent These Interested Members Has Not Been Agreed Upon
ML20064G7001978-11-21021 November 1978
Gives Notice That a Bielawski Enters an Appearance on Behalf of Applicant Ceil in Proceedings Re Subj Facils.Cert of Svc Encl
ML20126B1631973-07-20020 July 1973
Notifies That on 730712,Friends of Earth Filed Petition Seeking Emergency Derating,To Unspecified Extent,Of Nine Licensed NPPs as Listed
1994-06-20
[Table view] |
Text
/5 752 .
00CKETED
,6b October @$yR$994 Docket No.55-30662; IA-94-007; ASLBP No. 94-694-05-EA Proposed Exhibits for hearing:
94 0c125 P 4 39 NRC Inspection Report No. 50-237/92033;50-249/92033 NRC Investigation Report No. 3-92-055R(and exhibitsgg:g:,E .
f;pgy
,gCE DOCK U.VW p'f' Proposed Witnesses: bHd BarrynJaicomo, Coal City, IL Louis Ciuffini, Elwood, IL Tom Mosey, Morris, IL Dave Tang Wee -
IBEW Representative Statement of the Issues:
- 1. Were Mr. Pierce's actions caused by Commonwealth Edison Management's failure to provide adequate training or guidance regarding the applicability of DOA 300-12 while a QNE is present directing control rod' movements.
- 2. Did Mr. Pierce's error directly result from following the technical advice of an expert (the QNE)which was not clearly unreasonable and should not have been recognized as such.
After consideration of the evidence, the ultimate issue to be
- decided by the Board shall be whether the Order should be sustained. .
Sincerely, Kenneth G. Pierce, Jr.
21013 South Sarver Drive Shorewood, IL 60436 s
9411010207 941024 PDR ADOCK 05000237 C pyg gj v