ML15294A540

From kanterella
Revision as of 09:38, 19 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acceptance for Technical Review: Exemption from Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 74.19(c)
ML15294A540
Person / Time
Site: Mcguire, McGuire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/28/2015
From: Ed Miller
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Capps S
Duke Energy Carolinas
Hood T, NRR/DORL, 415-1387
References
CAC MF6693, CAC MF6694
Download: ML15294A540 (3)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 28, 2015 Mr. Steven D. Capps Vice President McGuire Nuclear Station Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 12700 Hagers Ferry Road Huntersville, NC 28078-8985

SUBJECT:

MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1AND2 -ACCEPTANCE FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW: EXEMPTION FROM TITLE 10 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART 74.19(c) (CAC NOS. MF6693 AND MF6694)

Dear Mr. Capps:

By letter dated August 17, 2015, as supplemented by letter dated October 6, 2015, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke), submitted a letter requesting an exemption from Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 74.19(c). The exemption would allow an alternative to the physical inventory requirements for movable in-core detectors. The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this exemption request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application, as supplemented, and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

S. Capps .

  • If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2481 or by e-mail at Ed.Miller@nrc.gov.
  • Sincerely, . j VJ~' 1(( ,~-

ward Miller, Project Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv

ML15294A540 NRR-004 OFFICE NRR/LPL 1-2/PM NRR/LPL2-1 /PM NRR/LPL2-1 /LA NRR/DLR/RERB NMSS/FCSE/MCAB NRR/LPL2-1/BC NAME THood GE Miller SFigueroa DWrona DWillis RPascarelli DATE 10/22/15 10/21 /15 10/22/15 10/26/15 10/26/15 10/28/15