|
---|
Category:License-Operator
MONTHYEARML17013A5482017-01-13013 January 2017 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2017 LIC-16-0056, Response to RIS 2016-09, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations.2016-07-0707 July 2016 Response to RIS 2016-09, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations. ML16089A0712016-03-29029 March 2016 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results for March 9, 2016 IR 05000285/20153012016-01-20020 January 2016 Er 05000285/2015301; 12/07/2015 - 01/13/2016; Fort Calhoun Station; Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report ML15351A0282015-12-17017 December 2015 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2016 ML16012A3272015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Draft Outline Comments ML16012A3242015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Draft Outlines ML16012A3372015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12-DRAFT Written Examination Comments ML16012A3392015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Draft Operating Test ML16012A3452015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Draft Operating Test Comments ML16012A3652015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Final Operating Test ML16012A3672015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Post-Examination Comments ML16012A3492015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12-FINAL Outlines ML16021A1072015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Public Forms ML15334A4862015-11-30030 November 2015 2015-12-Exam Approval Ltr_ LIC-15-0137, Revised Final Initial Licensed Operator Examination2015-11-24024 November 2015 Revised Final Initial Licensed Operator Examination LIC-15-0127, for Calhoun Station, Unit 1 - Provides the Final Reactor Operator (RO) and Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) License Applications2015-11-24024 November 2015 for Calhoun Station, Unit 1 - Provides the Final Reactor Operator (RO) and Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) License Applications ML14237A2332014-07-31031 July 2014 ANO2-2014-07 Draft Operating Test Comments ML14237A2292014-07-31031 July 2014 ANO2-2014-07 Draft Operating Test ML14237A2072014-07-31031 July 2014 ANO2-2014-07 Draft Outlines ML14181A3842014-06-30030 June 2014 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results June 2014 LIC-14-0076, 2014-05 Post Exam Analysis2014-06-0606 June 2014 2014-05 Post Exam Analysis ML14184B2982014-05-23023 May 2014 2014-04 Public Forms ML14181A0302014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-05 Final Operating Test ML14184B1482014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-05 Draft Operating Test ML14184B1472014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-04 Draft Written Exam ML14184B1492014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-05 Draft Written Exam Comments ML14184B3092014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-05 Draft Outline ML14184B3212014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-05-Draft Outline Comments ML14267A3282014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-05 Final Outlines ML14184B1632014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-05-Draft Operating Test Comments ML14128A1182014-05-0808 May 2014 2014-05-Examination Approval ML14063A6242014-03-0404 March 2014 IR 05000285-14-301, 02/16/2013, Fort Calhoun, Revision to Notification of NRC Initial Operator ML12291A7362012-09-21021 September 2012 09 Post Exam Analysis ML12291A7322012-09-21021 September 2012 2012-09 Final Written Exam ML12325A3882012-09-21021 September 2012 Fc 2012-09 Draft Outlines ML12325A3962012-09-21021 September 2012 FC-2012-09-DRAFT Outline Comments ML12325A3982012-09-21021 September 2012 2012-09 Draft Retake Written Exam ML12325A4082012-09-21021 September 2012 Fc 2012-09 Final Outlines ML12325A4142012-09-21021 September 2012 Fc 2012-09 Post Exam Analysis ML12325A4202012-09-21021 September 2012 09 Public Forms ML12325A4032012-09-21021 September 2012 FC-2012-09 Draft Written Exam Comments Steely ML1226300422012-09-19019 September 2012 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval ML12180A4522012-06-28028 June 2012 Notification of NRC Retake Operator Licensing Examination 05000285/2012302 LIC-12-0055, FCS 2012-04 Post Exam Comments and Analysis2012-04-26026 April 2012 FCS 2012-04 Post Exam Comments and Analysis ML12157A2832012-04-20020 April 2012 FCS 2012-04 Draft Operating Test Comments ML12153A2782012-04-20020 April 2012 FC-2012-04 Final Written and Op Test Outlines ML12156A0032012-04-20020 April 2012 FC-2012-04 Final Operating Test ML12156A0052012-04-20020 April 2012 2012-04 Final Written Exam ML12156A3292012-04-20020 April 2012 FC-2012-04 Draft Outlines 2017-01-13
[Table view] Category:Part 55 Examination Related Material
MONTHYEARLIC-16-0056, Response to RIS 2016-09, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations.2016-07-0707 July 2016 Response to RIS 2016-09, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations. ML16089A0712016-03-29029 March 2016 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results for March 9, 2016 IR 05000285/20153012016-01-20020 January 2016 Er 05000285/2015301; 12/07/2015 - 01/13/2016; Fort Calhoun Station; Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report ML15351A0282015-12-17017 December 2015 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2016 ML16012A3392015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Draft Operating Test ML16012A3242015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Draft Outlines ML16012A3272015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Draft Outline Comments ML16012A3372015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12-DRAFT Written Examination Comments ML16012A3452015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Draft Operating Test Comments ML16012A3492015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12-FINAL Outlines ML16012A3652015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Final Operating Test ML16012A3672015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Post-Examination Comments ML16021A1072015-12-14014 December 2015 2015-12 Public Forms ML15334A4862015-11-30030 November 2015 2015-12-Exam Approval Ltr_ ML14237A2332014-07-31031 July 2014 ANO2-2014-07 Draft Operating Test Comments ML14237A2292014-07-31031 July 2014 ANO2-2014-07 Draft Operating Test ML14237A2072014-07-31031 July 2014 ANO2-2014-07 Draft Outlines ML14181A3842014-06-30030 June 2014 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results June 2014 LIC-14-0076, 2014-05 Post Exam Analysis2014-06-0606 June 2014 2014-05 Post Exam Analysis ML14184B2982014-05-23023 May 2014 2014-04 Public Forms ML14184B3092014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-05 Draft Outline ML14184B1632014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-05-Draft Operating Test Comments ML14184B1492014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-05 Draft Written Exam Comments ML14184B1482014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-05 Draft Operating Test ML14184B1472014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-04 Draft Written Exam ML14267A3282014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-05 Final Outlines ML14181A0302014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-05 Final Operating Test ML14184B3212014-05-22022 May 2014 2014-05-Draft Outline Comments ML14128A1182014-05-0808 May 2014 2014-05-Examination Approval ML12291A7362012-09-21021 September 2012 09 Post Exam Analysis ML12291A7322012-09-21021 September 2012 2012-09 Final Written Exam ML12325A3882012-09-21021 September 2012 Fc 2012-09 Draft Outlines ML12325A3962012-09-21021 September 2012 FC-2012-09-DRAFT Outline Comments ML12325A3982012-09-21021 September 2012 2012-09 Draft Retake Written Exam ML12325A4082012-09-21021 September 2012 Fc 2012-09 Final Outlines ML12325A4142012-09-21021 September 2012 Fc 2012-09 Post Exam Analysis ML12325A4202012-09-21021 September 2012 09 Public Forms ML12325A4032012-09-21021 September 2012 FC-2012-09 Draft Written Exam Comments Steely ML1226300422012-09-19019 September 2012 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval ML12180A4522012-06-28028 June 2012 Notification of NRC Retake Operator Licensing Examination 05000285/2012302 LIC-12-0055, FCS 2012-04 Post Exam Comments and Analysis2012-04-26026 April 2012 FCS 2012-04 Post Exam Comments and Analysis ML12156A3392012-04-20020 April 2012 FCS 2012-04 Draft Outline Comments ML12153A2782012-04-20020 April 2012 FC-2012-04 Final Written and Op Test Outlines ML12156A0032012-04-20020 April 2012 FC-2012-04 Final Operating Test ML12156A0052012-04-20020 April 2012 2012-04 Final Written Exam ML12156A3292012-04-20020 April 2012 FC-2012-04 Draft Outlines ML12156A3432012-04-20020 April 2012 FC-2012-04 Draft Operating Test ML12157A2832012-04-20020 April 2012 FCS 2012-04 Draft Operating Test Comments ML12157A3912012-04-20020 April 2012 2012-04 Draft Written Exam ML12191A2402012-04-20020 April 2012 04 Public Forms 2016-07-07
[Table view] |
Text
JPM#
4.I; 1u;j;,s APPENDIX E - REGION IV IPERATING TEST JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE QUALITY REVIEW MATRIX 6.
Explanation (See below for instructions)
Job- Minutia RO-2004-1 I I s 1 RO-2004-2 S RO-2004-3 S RO-2004-4 1 I s SRO-2004-1 S SRO-2004-2 S SRO-2004-3 I I
II s 1 I SRO-2004-4 S SRO-2004-5 Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-I021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating tests. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item@)requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
- 1. Determine whether the task is dynamic (D) or static (S). A dynamic task is one that involves continuous monitoring and response to varying parameters. A static task is basically an system reconfiguration or realignment.
- 2. Determine level of difficulty (LOD) using established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent inappropriate (low or high) discriminatory level for the license being tested.
3.
Check the appropriate box when an attribute weakness is identified:
The initiating cue is not sufficiently clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin.
The JPM does not contain sufficient cues that are objective (not leading).
All critical steps (elements) have not been properly identified.
Scope of the task is either too narrow (N) or too broad (B).
Excessive overlap with other part of operating test or written examination.
4.
Check the appropriate box when a job content error is identified:
Topics not linked to job content (e.g., disguised task, not required in real job).
Task is trivial and without safety significance.
- 5. Based on the reviewers judgment, is the JPM as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
- 6. Provide a brief description of problem in the explanation column. Provide conclusion on whether JPM SET criteria satisfied (Le., number/distribution of safety functions, A.3 and A.4 integrated with parts BIC, Admin topics per section meet ES).
- Page 1 -
APPENDIX E - REGION IV OPERATING TEST JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE QUALITY REVIEW MATRIX
- 3. Attributes 4. Job 5. 6.
JPM# lDyn Content UIE Explanation Errors IS (See below for instructions)
Cue Critic SCOF Ove Jo Minuti s a1 e r- b- a Step (NIB lap Link S
S OOIORW D X E this is written as if it will really be performed (vice simulated) in the plant -
is this really the intent (to change valve positions in the plant during the exam)? Response: No, the cues will be edited.
X E steps 2 and 3 have, as a critical task, to ensure... which is just like verify... - it is difficult to evaluate whether someone has ensured or verified something that is already in the correct position, so it really shouldnt be a critical task unless it requires the applicant to take observable actions that, if not taken, would jeopardize the success of the task. Response: Agree, they are not critical tasks.
S E initiating cue should tell the applicant that this is a time-critical JPM.
Response: Agree, it will be added.
S 0613M I D S 0621M I I
D S S
S I
S
- Page 1 -
Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating tests. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
- 1. Determine whether the task is dynamic (D) or static (S). A dynamic task is one that involves continuous monitoring and response to varying parameters. A static task is basically an system reconfiguration or realignment.
- 2. Determine level of difficulty (LOD) using established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent inappropriate (low or high) discriminatory level for the license being tested.
- 3. Check the appropriate box when an attribute weakness is identified:
The initiating cue is not sufficiently clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin.
The JPM does not contain sufficient cues that are objective (not leading).
All critical steps (elements) have not been properly identified.
Scope of the task is either too narrow (N) or too broad (B).
Excessive overlap with other part of operating test or written examination.
- 4. Check the appropriate box when a job content error is identified:
Topics not linked to job content (e.g., disguised task, not required in real job).
Task is trivial and without safety significance.
- 5. Based on the reviewers judgment, is the JPM as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
- 6. Provide a brief description of problem in the explanation column. Provide conclusion on whether JPM SET criteria satisfied (i.e., number/distribution of safety functions, A.3 and A.4 integrated with parts B/C, Admin topics per section meet ES).
- Page 2 -
S \DRS\OB\EXAMS\fcs\March2004exam\FCS-03-2004-Scenario-QualityRvw.wpd Scen 1 2 10 Explanation (See below for instructions)
Set ES TS 1
2 eliminated to conform with the attributes list (2-3 critical tasks).
3 X guidance from HQ confirms that ISRO-2 must face a scenario in the RO 4
nstructions for Completing Matrix rhis form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional
- onsistency in reviewing operating test scenario sets. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check
)r mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
I. ES: ES-301 checklists 4, 5, & 6 satisfied.
!. TS: Set includes SRO TS actions for each SRO, with required actions explicitly detailed.
- 1. Crit: Each manipulation or evolution has explicit success criteria documented in Form ES-D-2.
- 1. IC: Out of service equipment and other initial conditions reasonably consistent between scenarios and not predictive of scenario events and actions.
). Pred: Scenario sequence and other factors avoid predictability issues.
). TL: Time line constructed, including event and process triggered conditions, such that scenario can run without routine examiner cuing.
I L/C: Length and complexity for each scenario in the set is reasonable for the crew mix being examined, such that all applicants have reasonably similar exposure and events are needed for evaluation purposes.
I. Eff: Sequence of events is reasonably efficient for examination purposes, especially with respect to long delays or interactions.
- 1. Based on the reviewers judgment, is the scenario set as written (tJ)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, 01 (S)atisfactory?
- 0. Provide a brief description of problem in the explanation column
II APPENDIX N - REGION IV OPERATING TEST SCENARIO REVIEW MATRIX I RESPONSE: THE CRITICAL TASKS WILL BE REVIEWED AND ELIMINATED IF THEY DO NO MEET THE CRITERIA. FOR NUMBER 3, THE SCHEDULE WILL BE REVISED TO GIVE THE INSTANT A POSITION AS RO. FOR NUMBER 4, THE TASK NUMBERS MEET THE CRITERIA.
- Page 2 -