ML052760152

Annual Report for the Ohio State University Research Reactor

ML052760152
Person / Time
Site:	Ohio State University
Issue date:	09/22/2005
From:	Baeslack W Ohio State University
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML052760152 (9)

Text

T - H - E Office of the Dean 142A Hitchcock Hall College of Engineering 2070 Neil Avenue OH-T-IO Columbus, OH 43210 SEA,TE -FAX Phone 614-292-2836 614-292-3244 UNIVERSITY September 22, 2005 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738

SUBJECT:

Annual Report for The Ohio State University Research Reactor, License R-75, Docket 50-150 Please find enclosed the annual report for The Ohio State University Research Reactor, Docket No. 50-150. This report is being submitted as required by our Technical Specifications, Section 6.6.1. If you have questions on the content of this report, please contact Mr. Andrew Kauffman, Associate Director of the Nuclear Reactor Laboratory, at 614-688-8220.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on September 22, 2005.

Sincerely, S, I W. A. "Bud" Baeslack III Dean, College of Engineering c: A. Fentiman, OSUNE D. Hughes, USNRC A. Kauffman, OSURR HARMON NOTARY PUSUC SlATE OF OHIO My Commission txpirss 04.25-09 fN02-o

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH REACTOR ANNUAL REPORT FOR FY 2004/2005 SEPTEMBER 2005 OSURR Annual Report Page I of 8 9/05

Introduction As stated in The Ohio State University Research Reactor (OSURR) Technical Specifications, Section 6.6.1 Operating Reports, an annual report shall be made to the NRC by September 30 of each year. This report is to include the following seven sections.

1. A narrative summary of operating experience (including experiments performed) and of changes in facility design, performance characteristics, and operating procedures related to reactor safety occurring during the reporting period.

2. A tabulation showing the energy generated by the reactor (in kilowatt hours) and the number of hours the reactor was in use.

3. The results of safety-related maintenance and inspection. The reasons for corrective maintenance of safety-related items shall be included.

4. A table of unscheduled shutdowns and inadvertent scrams, including their reasons and the corrective actions taken.

5. A summary of changes to the facility or procedures, which affect reactor safety and performance of tests or experiments carried out under the conditions of sections 50.59 of IOCRF50.

6. A summary of the nature and amount of radioactive gaseous, liquids, and solid effluents released or discharged to the environs beyond the effective control of the licensee as measured or calculated at or prior to the point of such release or discharge.

7. A summary of radiation exposures received by facility personnel and visitors, including the dates and times of significant exposures.

These seven sections are discussed below. These are all for the period July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005, except as noted for exposure records.

1. Summary of Operating Experience and Changes I.A. Experiments Performed The staff of The OSU Research Reactor is generally involved in four types of experiments at the Nuclear Reactor Laboratory. Included are introductions to nuclear research, neutron activation analysis, material irradiations, and classes that measure various reactor parameters. Typically when we introduce students, faculty or other experimenters to nuclear research, we do the following:

a. Discuss nuclear reactions and radiological safety.

b. Operate the reactor at lOkW-IOOkW

c. Have the individuals observe control room operations.

d. Complete a tour and demonstrate irradiation techniques.

Neutron activation analysis experiments are routinely completed for students ranging from high school to graduate school. The facilities normally utilized are the "rabbit" (pneumatic tube) and the "CIF" (Central Irradiation Facility). Much of the NAA work is geological samples.

Material irradiations, other than for NAA, are in four basic areas: isotope production; detector, electronic component and fiber optic testing; boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT); and irradiation of biological samples. Isotope production has been done often for medical research. Detector and electronic component OSURR Annual Report Page 2 of 8 9105

testing is done routinely. This testing is usually completed in the thermal column, or one of the beam ports, while fission chamber testing is in the Central Irradiation Facility. The reactor thermal column is also utilized for other BNCT studies. Typically it is the location for cell samples to determine their boron content.

Various nuclear engineering or physics classes throughout Ohio utilize the reactor for the following basic experiments:

a. Approach to critical (using banked control rods rather than fuel loading).

b. Control rod calibration by rod drop, positive period, and subcritical multiplication.

c. Measurement of the reactor transfer function by noise analysis.

d. Temperature coefficient measurements.

e. Radiological surveys.

The reactor utilization for July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005 is summarized in the following reports.

Funding for colleges and universities that utilize the OSU Research Reactor is provided in part by the DOE-funded Reactor Sharing Program.

The Ohio State University Nuclear Reactor Lab Reactor Utilization Report:

July 1 - December 31, 2004 User / Activity Hours Irradiations for AFIT - semiconductor damage 23.0 Hf-181 production for Miami 1.0 NAA for OSU Students 3.0 UC / Tuskegee tour/lab 2.5 NAA for Scintiprox 5.0 NAA for OK State 4.5 Detectors for GE Reuter-Stokes 60.5 NE 505, 742, 744 labs 32.5 Misc. OSU tours 7.0 Misc. high school / middle school tours 2.5 Misc. Ohio college tours 10.5 NASA testing 30.5 Irradiation of Si disks for U.C; 5.0 Irradiation of rare-earth magnets for Electron Energy Corp. 5.5 NERI scintillator irradiations 30.0 BNCT irradiations 2.5 SiC detector irradiations 26.5 Isotope production for U.C. 1.0 Total Reactor Operation Time 253.0 OSURR Annual Report Page 3 of 8 9/05

The Ohio State University Nuclear Reactor Lab Reactor Utilization Report:

January 1 - June 30, 2005 User / Activity Hours AFIT - Electronics damage 19.7 Tours 51.9 Bucky ball irradiations 1.5 GE-RS FC testing 46.3 Luna Innovations - fiber optic testing 19.9 NASA - electronics damage 51.2 NE 505, NE 742, NE 744 28.5 OK State Geology- NAA 3.0 OSU Mat. Science - Resin composition NAA 25.7 OSU-NE / Blue - BNCT 12.1 OSU-NE / Blue - SiC detectors 26.1 OSU-NE / Miller - Scint. Detectors 10.2 OSU-NE / Miller - SSFM Detectors 1.5 Scintiprox - source production 1.4 U Cincinnati - neutron irrad. Of quartz disks 7.9 U Miami - source production 4.2 Westinghouse - dosimeter irradiation 6.2 317.3 1.B. Changes in Facility Design There were no facility design changes that required a change to the Technical Specifications. 10CFR50.59 changes are described in Section 5.A of this report.

I.C. Changes in Performance Characteristics There have been no changes in performance characteristics related to reactor safety in the last year.

1.D. Changes in Operating Procedures There were no changes in operating procedures related to reactor safety in the last year. IOCFR50.59 changes are described in Section 5.B of this report.

2. Energy Generated and Hours of Use Kilowatt-Hours of Operation: 40,414 Hours of Utilization: 570.3 OSURR Annual Report Page 4 of 8 9/05

3. Safety Related Maintenance None

4. Unscheduled Shutdowns From July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005 there were 15 unplanned shutdowns. These are summarized below.

Reason Corrective Action Noise on Period Safety Amplifier (10) Replaced Period Safety Amplifier Low source counts (2) Discussed with operators Linear Channel scale (2) Discussed with operators Loss of magnet current (1) ,Repaired circuit

5. Changes in Facility and Procedures Accordance with 10CFR50.59 5.A. Facility Modifications During the period July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005, three OSURR Modification Requests were completed by the reactor staff:

a. Replacement of Level Safety Amplifier B

b. Replacement of Magnet Current Amplifier (for Shim Safety I)

c. Replacement of Period SafetyAmplifier 5.B. Procedure changes The following is a list of procedure changes made under IOCFR50.59 from July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005 in accordance with Administrative Procedure AP-05, entitled Format for Writing, Revising, and Approving Procedures.

Procedure Procedure Revision Number Title Date OM-01 Reactor Power Changes 7/12/04 OM-03 Experimental Facilities 7/12/04 OM-15 Process System Checks 7/12/04 RS-06 Annual Radiation Monitor Calibrations 7/14/04 PRS-15 Radiation Safety Instruction 7/15/04 SP-01 Personnel Authorized Access to NRL 2/8/05 EP-02 Handling Precautions for Non-Radioactive Hazardous Materials 3/11/05

6. Radioactive Effluents 6.A. Gaseous Effluent The only effluent measured is the release of Ar-4 1. For the period July 1 - Dec. 31, 2004, Ar-4I releases measured 1.07 % of the annual average concentration limit. From Jan. 1 - June 30, 2005, releases measured 2.05 % of the annual average concentration limit.

In accordance with the requirements of 10CFR20.1 101(d), the COMPLY code was run using the total Ar-41 release for the period July 1, 2004 - June 30, 2005 of 197.38 mCi. Using level 2 in the code, the effective dose OSURR Annual Report Page 5 of 8 9/05

equivalent rate at the facility fence was computed to be 0.1 mrem/yr. This is wvell below the 10 mrem/yr constraint specified in the regulation.

6.B. Liquid Releases Hot sink releases are recorded and reported through the OSU Office ofRadiation Safety. No releases were made to the sanitary sewer system during the period July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005.

6.C. Solid Releases No releases of solid radioactive material were made to the uncontrolled environment.

7. Radiation Exposures Since the firm that maintains records for The Ohio State University keeps a year to date record, it is easier to report this by the nearest completed calendar year. Therefore film badge exposures in this report are for the period January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004. Nine individuals were monitored as radiation workers for the entire year or a major part of it. These are tabulated below. They are consistent with the ALARA policy for The Ohio State University and represent a fraction of allowed limits. All doses are in rem.

Individual DDE SDE, WB SDE, ME TEDE Visitors 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1 0.019 0.057 N/A 0.019 2 0.095 0.128 0.480 0.095 3 0.035 0.039 0.190 0.035 4 0.047 0.154 0.030 0.047 5 0.015 0.017 N/A 0.015 6 0.047 0.057 N/A 0.047 7 0.264 0.604 0.970 0.264 8 0.055 0.126 0.240 0.055 9 0.029 0.030 N/A 0.029 OSURR Annual Report Page 6 of 8 9/05

COMPLY: V1.5d. 9/15/ 5 12:32 40 CFR Part 61 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE CLEAN AIR ACT LIMITS FOR RADIONUCLIDE EMISSIONS FROM THE COMPLY CODE, VERSION 1.5d Prepared by:

The Ohio State University Nuclear Reactor Lab 1298 Kinnear Rd., Columbus, OH 43212 Andrew Kauffman 614-688-8220 Prepared for:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Radiation Programs Washington, D.C. 20460 OSURR Annual Report Page 7of8 9/05

COMPLY: V1.5d. 9/15/ 5 12:32 NRL 2004-2005 SCREENING LEVEL 2 DATA ENTERED:

Release Rate Nuclide (curies/YEAR)

AR-41 1.974E-01 Release height 10 meters.

Building height 11 meters.

The source and receptor are not on the same building.

Distance from the source to the receptor is 15 meters.

Building width 25 meters.

Default mean wind speed used (2.0 m/sec).

NOTES:

Input parameters outside the "normal" range:

None.

RESULTS:

Effective dose equivalent: 0.1 mrem/yr.

• • • Comply at level 2.

This facility is in COMPLIANCE.

It may or may not be EXEMPT from reporting to the EPA.

You may contact your regional EPA office for more information.

• • • • • • • • END OF COMPLIANCE REPORT **********

OSURR Annual Report Page8 of 8 9/05