ML120230012

From kanterella
Revision as of 05:38, 30 April 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Outlines (Folder 3)
ML120230012
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 12/20/2011
From: Fish T H
Operations Branch I
To:
Entergy Nuclear Operations
Jackson D E
Shared Package
ML112730061 List:
References
TAC-U01865, 50-293/11-302, ES-401, ES-401-1 50-293/11-302
Download: ML120230012 (8)


Text

BWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-1 Facility:

PNPS Date of Exam: TBD SRO-Only Points Tier Group K K Total A2 1 2 1. Emergency 0 0 0 4 3 & Plant 2 0 0 0 2 Evaluations Tier Totals 0 0 0 6 4 1 0 0 0 2 3 2. Plant 2 0 0 0 0 2 Systems Tier Totals 0 0 0 4 4 3. Generic Knowledge

& Abilities 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 Note Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable KIA category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the Tier Totals in each KIA category shall not be less than two). The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by 1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions.

The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to section D.1.b of ES-401 , for guidance regarding elimination of inappropriate KIA statements. Select topiCS from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution. Absent a plant specific priority, only those KAs having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected.

Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively. Select SRO topics for Tiers 1 and 2 from the shaded systems and KIA categories. The generic (G) KlAs in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the KIA Catalog. but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. Refer to Section D.1.b of ES-401 for the applicable KIA's On the following pages, enter the KIA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics' importance ratings OR) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category.

Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above. If fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2. Group 2 (Note #1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams. For Tier 3. select topiCS from Section 2 of the KIA Catalog, and enter the KIA numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals (#) on Form ES-401-3.

Limit SRO selections to KlAs that are linked to 10CFR55,43 Total 7 3 10 5 3 8 7 E8-401 BWR Examination Outline Form E8-401-1 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions

-Tier 1 Group 1 EAPE#/Name Safety Function 295016 Control Room Abandonment I 7 295005 Main Turbine Generator Trip 13 295038 High Off-site Release Rate / 9 295018 Partial or Total Loss of CCW / 8 295031 Reactor Low Water Level 12 295006 SCRAM I 1 295030 Low Suppression Pool Water Levell 5 KIA Category Totals KIA Topic(s) AA2.02 -Ability to determine and/or interpret following as they apply to CONTROL ROOM ABANDONMENT:

Reactor water level AA2.08 -Ability to determine and/or interpret the following as they apply to MAl N TURBINE GENERATOR TRIP: Electrical distribution status EA2.03 -Ability to determine and/or interpret the following as they apply to HIGH SITE RELEASE RATE: 2.4.4 -Emergency Procedures I Plan: Ability recognize abnormal indications for system operating parameters which are entry-level conditions for emergency and abnormal res, 2.4,2 -Emergency Procedures I Plan: Knowledge of system set pOints, interlocks and automatic actions associated with EOP E:mt conditions.

2.4.20 -Emergency Procedures I Plan: Knowledge of operational implications of EOP warnings, cautions, and notes. EA2.04 -Ability to determine and/or interpret the following as they apply to LOW SUPPRESSION POOL WATER LEVEL: Drywell/ suppression chamber differential pressure: 1&11 Group Point Total: 4.3 1 2 4.3 3 4.7 4 4.6 5 4.3 6 3.7 7 7 ES-401 BWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-1 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions

-Tier 1 Group 2 EAPE#/Name Safety Function 295008 High Reactor Water Level / 2 295010 High Drywell Pressure /5 295032 High Secondary Containment Area Temperature / 5 KIA Category Totals 000 KIA Topic(s) AA2.02 -Ability to determine and/or interpret the following as they apply to HIGH REACTOR WATER LEVEL: Steam flow/feedflow mismatch 2.2.12 -Equipment Control: Knowledge of surveillance ures. EA2.02 -Ability to determine and/or interpret the following as they apply to HIGH SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AREA TEMPERATURE:

3.4 8 4.1 9 3.5 10 3 ES-401 BWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-1 System #/Name 217000 RCIC 218000 ADS 300000 Instrument Air 215005 APRMs 239002 SRVs KIA Category Totals Plant Systems -Tier 2 Group 1 KIA Topic(s) A2.19 -Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following on the REACTOR CORE ISOLATION COOLING SYSTEM (RClC) ; and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of tl10se abnormal conditions or operations:

High suppression pool tem rature A2.02 -Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following on the AUTOMATIC DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM; and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those abnormal conditions or operations:

Large break LOCA 2.1.20 -Conduct of Operations:

Ability to interpret and execute ure 2.2.25, APRMs, Knowledge of the bases in Technical Specifications for limiting conditions for operations and saf limits. 2.1.23 -Conduct of Operations:

Ability to perform specific system and integrated plant procedures during all modes of plant ration. Group Point Total: 3.6 11 3.6 12 4.6 13 4.2 14 4.4 15 5 ES-401 Generic Knowledge and Abilities Outline (Tier 3) Form ES-401-3 Facility:

Date: Category KA# Topic RO SRO-Only IR Q# IR Q# 1. Conduct Ability to use plant computers to 3.8 19 i evaluate system or component status. Ability to explain and apply all system 4.0 25 limits and precautions.

., ....

',;, '< 2 2.

Ability to apply technical specifications 20for a system.

15. ;";;;,,*.,.. , .* ,:,...... 1 2.3.11 Ability to control radiation 4.3 21 3. Radiation Knowledge of radiation or Control contamination hazards that may arise 3.8 24 during normal, abnormal, or emergency conditions or activities.

I, ..;', .'.,.. ,.......;..

ES-401 Generic Knowledge and Abilities Outline (Tier

3) Form ES-401-3 I Ability to verify system alarm setpoints
4. Emergency

! 2.4.50 and operate controls identified in the 4.0 22 Procedures

/ alarm response manual. Plan Knowledge of "fire in the plant" 2.4027 3.9 23 I procedures.

: .......*..Subtotal 2 I" Tier 3 Point Total: 7 ES-401 Tier / Group Random Iy Selected KA 2950381 EA2.02 1 11 replaced by 295038 / EA2.03 261000/2.4.49 2.1 1 replaced by 215005/2.2.25 3 2.1.5 replaced by 2.1.19 Record of Rejected KIA's Form ES-401-4 Reason for Rejection

!SRO (#3): EA2.02 -Ability to determine and/or interpret the following as they apply to HIGH OFF-SITE RELEASE RATE: Total number of curies releases.

Pilgrim utilizes dose and dose rate as the parameters of concern, vice curies, in its procedures associated with high off-site releases.

It is not possible to develop an operationally valid question addressing number of curies released.

Randomly selected 295038 EA2.03 -Ability to determine and/or interpret the following as they apply to HIGH SITE RELEASE RATE: Radiation levels. SRO (#14): 2.4.49 -Emergency Procedures!

Plan: Ability to perform without reference to procedures those actions that require immediate operation of system components and controls.

Difficult to write an SRO level question for this KIA. Randomly replaced with 215005 ! 2.2.25, APRlVls, Knowledge of the bases in Technical Specifications for limiting conditions for operations and safety limits. SRO (#19): Ability to use procedures related to shift staffing, such as minimum crew complement, overtime limitations, etc. Chief Examiner determined that the originally proposed question did not satisfy the required attributes of an SRO level question.

Facility determined that this KIA is more appropriately used to test RO level of knowledge.

Randomly replaced with genenc KIA 1.19. Ability to use plant computers to evaluate system or component status. ! i i ES-401 Record of Rejected KIA's Form ES-401-4